India: Jurisdiction Of The CCI: Navigating Through Muddy Waters

The jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has been widely debated in the recent past. The scope of the CCI's powers is under challenge for varying reasons in several matters. A few matters that have regularly made headlines are DLF1, Micromax/Ericsson2, IOCL3, ICAI4, DDA5 and JCB/Bull Machines6. Most of these cases have been either been completely or partially stayed by high courts as the verdict on the CCI's jurisdiction is yet to be finally decided.

The foundation of most jurisdictional challenges seems to fundamentally be based on the CCI usurping the jurisdiction of another regulator or court. The Micromax/Ericsson case (which appears to be the closest to reaching closure before the Delhi High Court) relates to Ericsson allegedly demanding unfair, discriminatory and exorbitant royalty for licensing its standard essential patents (of which it is the sole licensor) regarding GSM technology. The main argument adopted by Ericsson is the encroachment by the CCI upon the jurisdiction of the Intellectual Property Authority Board as well as the Delhi High Court. Ericsson has argued that the Delhi High Court was already hearing an infringement suit against Micromax in relation to the same standard essential patents and the CCI's exercise of jurisdiction could lead to conflicting decisions on the same issue.

Similar to this is the case of JCB/Bull Machines where the issue is based on a certain civil suit which was filed by JCB, a construction equipment manufacturer, against Bull Machines for infringement of its intellectual property as a premise used by JCB to foreclose the market for Bull Machines. Despite the pendency of these proceedings before the High Court, Bull proceeded against JCB before the CCI on the ground that JCB denied market access to Bull Machines by way of obtaining an injunction from the High Court; and the CCI took cognizance of this matter. JCB moved the High Court against the CCI as the institution of this investigation would have inter-alia translated into the CCI pre-deciding the outcome of the civil suit even though the same is pending disposal before the High Court.

Another closely watched case has been the dispute between DLF, a player in the realty sector and allottees of apartments in a few projects in Gurgaon. The main grievance of the allottees has been the increase in number of floors which has led to an increase in the super area and the consequent decrease in the common area.7 Basis this and amongst others, the one-sidedness of the clause permitting the developer to increase the super area has been agitated before the CCI and later the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT). The matter is now pending before the Supreme Court of India. DLF has strongly argued that the CCI has closed a multitude of matters that have been filed before it on the ground that such disputes are contractual disputes and the CCI is not the correct forum to bring these disputes before.8 It has gone on to state that the appropriate forum for disputes of such nature is the State and the National Consumer Redressal Forums as there are no competition issues involved. However, when similar grievances were raised by the allottees against DLF, the CCI took action. There appears to be some inconsistency in the approach adopted by the CCI in respect of its jurisdiction as different yardsticks are being used for different players in the same sector.9 It is seen that the scope of CCI's jurisdiction overlaps with that of the consumer dispute forum as there are numerous cases that have been decided by the NCDRC on the same issues.10 More so, the CCI in a recent order relating to the real estate sector11 has itself held that consumers have adequate curative remedy available to them in the form of consumer forums and in addition, it is the potential real estate regulatory authority that would look into the broader issues and concerns in this market.

Similarly, the CCI directed its investigative arm, the Director General (DG) to look into the practices of the Delhi Development Authority. Meanwhile, the allottee who had approached the CCI, filed a writ before the Delhi High Court seeking possession of the flat and interest on the amounts paid by him.12 The DDA approached the Delhi High Court praying that the CCI ought to first decide the question of jurisdiction prior to proceeding with the merits of the case, which was acceded to by the High Court.13 This comes as a pleasant and welcome surprise as the High Court has previously shown resistance in passing such an order.

Last year, the CCI also instituted a case into certain practices of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), a statutory body established under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which regulates the profession of chartered accountants in India. The ICAI filed a writ against the order of the CCI stating that it cannot be subject to the jurisdiction of the CCI when it is discharging its functions under the Act as it does not carry on any trade, business or commerce. The Court observed that since a question of the CCI's jurisdiction is involved, the investigation ought to be stayed.

To add to this list, the CCI is before the Delhi High Court in respect of the proceedings initiated by it (filed by Reliance Industries14) against IOCL, BPCL and HPCL for violations of both Sections 3 and 4 of the Act15 in respect of supply of aviation turbine fuel to Air India. The issue primarily raised by the parties relates to the CCI not having jurisdiction in the matter as the jurisdiction clearly and unequivocally rests with the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board – and the stay on the proceedings before the CCI is still in operation.

The common thread that runs through the above cases is the CCI exercising its power in respect of matters which may not be subject to its jurisdiction at the very outset. The list above demonstrates very patently that the CCI itself is grappling with the overlap between its jurisdiction and that of other regulators.

For instance, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 (PNGRB Act) states that one of the functions of the Board is to "protect the interest of the consumers by fostering fair trade and competition amongst the entities"16 Moreover, even the preamble states the PNGRB Act is to inter-alia promote competitive markets and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Similarly, the Controller of Patents is required to look into the market effects while setting the terms and conditions of compulsory license which translates to determining the effect on competition.17

This critical issue which is a starting point in most cases is creating a vacuum as investigations are being stayed for several months (and sometimes years). The parties have to face the rigor of multiple litigations before the CCI is directed to decide the jurisdictional issue at the first instance prior to proceeding into the merits of a matter. For instance, even though the case was filed against the DDA in the beginning of 2013, it is only now that the CCI is proceeding to decide whether it has jurisdiction. In the DLF case, jurisdiction has become a focal point as the decisions of the CCI and the COMPAT would have no value if the Apex Court decides that the consumer forum was the appropriate authority for the nature of the grievance raised by the consumers.

There is no thumb rule as there are no clear exceptions specifying the nature of cases that can be taken cognizance of by the CCI. However, this overlap and exercise of authority by two regulators in respect of the same issue, would not only delay justice but act as a barrier to justice. A way to mitigate this to a certain extent may be to call upon the parties prior to passing a prima facie order and deciding the question jurisdiction at the very threshold. All eyes are on the Ericsson case to shed some light on this issue and provide the much needed guidance.

Kanika Chaudhary Nayar, Managing Associate

Kanika Chaudhary Nayar is a Managing Associate in the Competition Law Practice Group at the Firm. She received her master's degree in 2009 from the prestigious Kings College London with merit in International Commercial Laws along with EC Competition Law.

She deals with intricate and complicated competition issues and assists in rendering strategic solutions in terms of the Indian Competition Law including the use of economic theory to put forth arguments before the Competition Commission of India and the Competition Appellate Tribunal, in addition to making merger filings before the Competition Commission of India. Kanika has acted for clients engaged in various fields, including, fast moving consumer goods, steel, cement, glass, tyre, broadcasting, real estate and film production and distribution.

Kanika has also been actively involved in developing competition compliance/training programmes for various multinational and Indian corporations and has specific experience in preparing clients for 'dawn raids'.

She is also an Associate Editor for the Manupatra Competition Law Reports, a bi-monthly journal featuring articles, new developments worldwide, national and international news and notes on international competition law/antitrust cases and has various publications to her credit. She contributes a section on 'International Developments' in the Manupatra Competition Law Reports in each issue. She also contributes significant developments on Competition Law to India Law Journal.


1. DLF Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 6328 of 2014 and other connected appeals (arising from Case No. 19 of 2010 before the CCI and attendant Appeal No. 20 of 2011 before the COMPAT).

2. Ericsson v. Competition Commission of India, W.P.(C) 464/2014 and other connected matters (arising from Case No. 50 of 2013 and 76 of 2013).

3. WP (C) No. 8211 of 2011 (arising out of Case No. 26 of 2010).

4. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Competition Commission of India, W.P.(C) 2815/2014 (arising from Case No. 93 of 2013).

5. Delhi Development Authority v. Competition Commission of India, W.P.(C) 6892/2014 (arising from Case No. 06 of 2013).

6. JCB v. Competition Commission of India & Ors., W.P.(C) 2244/2014 (arising from Case No. 105 of 2013).

7. Super area commonly means the apartment built up area along with the proportionate share in common area. Also, Common area commonly means the area which is available for use by more than one person for eg. park, swimming pool.

8. For instance, Subhash Yadav v. Force Motor Ltd. & Ors, Order dated October 05, 2012, Case No. 32 of 2012.

9. Please see Mr. George Kuruvilla v. Hiranandani Palace Gardens Pvt. Ltd., Order dated February 09, 2012, Case No. 67 of 2011; M/s Abir Infrastructure Private Limited v. M/s Emaar MGF Land Limited, Order dated November 02, 2011, Case No. 61 of 2011; Eastman Cast & Forge Ltd. v. Exact Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and Vipul Ltd., Order dated January 12, 2012, Case No. 77 of 2011; Ravi Suri v. M/s Today Homes and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Order dated January 12, 2012, Case No. 80 of 2011; Shri Kaushal K. Rana v. DLF Commercial Complexes Ltd., Order dated December 13, 2012, Case No. 50 of 2012; Praveen Kumar Sodhi v. Omaxe Limited and Others, Order dated February 21, 2012, Case No. 83 of 2011.

10. Please see DLF v. Kamal Sood, (First  Appeal  No. 557 of 2003); Lalit Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. DLF Universal Ltd. (First Appeal No. 88 of 1999 and 345 of 2001); Emaar MGF Land Ltd. v. Karnail Singh, I.A. No. 3876 of 2014; Sanjay Goyal v. Unitech Ltd. (Consumer Complaint No. 344 of 2012).

11. Jyoti Swaroop Arora v. M/s Tulip Infratech Limited & Ors., Order dated February 03, 2015, Case No. 59 of 2011 at para 357.

12. (last accessed on 29.03.2015)

13. Delhi Development Authority & Ors. v. Competition Commission of India & Anr., LPA No. 154/2015, dated March 17, 2015.

14. (last accessed on 06.04.2015) – WP (C.) No. 8211 of 2010.

15. Section 3 of the Act deals with anti-competitive agreements and Section 4 deals with abuse of dominant position.

16. Section 11(a) of The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006.

17. Please see Section 90 (1) (ix) of the Patents Act, 1970.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.