India: Cheque Dishonor – SC Redefined Jurisdiction Of Courts

Last Updated: 2 March 2015
Article by PSA


The perplexity over jurisdiction of courts in cheque bouncing cases has finally been resolved by the three judge bench of the apex court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v State of Maharashtra & Anr ("Dashrath").1 The Supreme Court held that the complaints relating to dishonor of cheques must be filed only in the courts within whose territorial jurisdiction the drawee bank is situated. The judgment has taken a contrary view from the principle of territorial jurisdiction laid in Bhaskaran v Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan ("Bhaskaran")2, wherein the ruling was that complaints under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("NI"), can be filed at any place other than the place of drawee bank. But, still confusion persists about the jurisdiction of courts on multi city cheques as the SC did not discuss or clarify its stance on such cheques payable at par at all branches of the bank.

This newsletter analyses the SC's interpretation under section 138 NI in determining the jurisdiction of courts in cheque dishonor complaints, the alternate remedies available for the drawee of dishonored cheques and the contrary view of the Bombay High Court ("BHC") on dishonor of multi city cheques.

1. Jurisprudential Position

As stated, the courts so far were following the principles of territorial jurisdiction laid in Bhaskaran's case for section 138 complaints. In that case, a two-judge bench of the SC interpreted section 138 NI along with sections 177 to 179 of Criminal Procedure Code ("CrPC") and indicated that the offence under section 138 can be completed only with the concatenation of the following acts: (i) Drawing a cheque; (ii) Presentation of the cheque to the bank; (iii) Return of the cheque unpaid by the drawee bank; (iv) Written notice to the drawer of the cheque demanding payment of the cheque amount; and (v) Failure of the drawer to make payment within 15 days of the receipt of notice. The SC held that the court, within whose jurisdiction any one of the aforesaid five acts takes place, will have the territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate the case.

The question is whether the liberal approach adopted by considering location of issue of notice of cheque bouncing tantamounts to commission of offence is legally correct? As per section 179 of CrPC,3 the offence must be tried only by the courts within whose jurisdiction the offence has been committed. So, will a mere issuance of notice to the drawer demanding payment for dishonored cheque be considered as an offence?

In Harman Electronics (P) Ltd ("Appellant") v National Panasonic India Ltd ("Respondent")4, the apex court analyzed the question whether the cause of action for section 138 cases arises by issuing demand notice or when the drawer receives notice. In this case, the Appellant and Respondent entered into a business transaction in Chandigarh. Appellant resided and carried on business in Chandigarh and issued a cheque to the Respondent in Chandigarh which was presented for encashment in that city. It was dishonored by the Appellant's bank in Chandigarh. The Respondent issued a legal notice under section 138 from Delhi. The question arose if a mere issue of notice from Delhi will constitute as cause of action? The case went all the way to the SC who took the view that if mere presentation of cheque or issue of notice bestows territorial jurisdiction upon the courts to try section 138 matters, then it would inevitably lead to harassment for a drawer. The SC held that only receipt of notice will give rise to cause of action for section 138 matters. A distinction must be made between the ingredients and commission of an offence. Issuance of notice under section 138 NI is an ingredient for maintaining the complaint and failure by the drawer to make payment within 15 days only give rise to cause of action.

The ratio held in Harman case sounds a discordant note to Bhaskaran's view as in the former case the SC categorically held that mere issue of notice will not be considered as commission of offence and, thus section 138 complaints cannot be filed in courts by claiming that notice issued to the drawer demanding defaulted payments was within jurisdiction of a court. The Harman case has adopted a strict approach towards territorial jurisdictions of courts with a view to uphold the law enshrined under section 179 CrPC and to restrain the drawee from harassing the drawer.

2. Dashrath Ruling and its Impact

In Dashrath's case, the SC analyzed the varied connotations laid in the above cases and the concept of cause of action to determine the place of cause of action and the principle for territorial jurisdictions. It held as follows:

2.1 Applicability of civil law: The SC took the view that unlike civil law, the phrase cause of action under section 138 NI must be construed in accordance with section 178 of CrPC. Under civil law, suits can be filed in courts within whose jurisdiction whole or part of cause of action arises i.e. a civil suit can be filed at the place where the drawer resides or where the transaction took place or where the drawer has its place of business. But, to initiate section 138 NI proceedings, the complaint must be filed only in the courts within whose jurisdiction the offence has been committed i.e. place where the drawer bank is situated.

2.2 Cognizance of offence: The SC held that there is a discernibly demarcated difference between the commission of an offence and cognizance of offence. Cognizance leads to cause of action. For section 138 complaints, the cause of action arises only when the drawer fails to pay the defaulted payment. The complaints can be filed only in the courts within whose jurisdiction the cheque is presented for encashment. But, the courts can take cognizance of the offence only when: (i) the cheque is presented to the bank within 6 months from the date on which it is drawn; (ii) notice has been issued to the drawer demanding the defaulted payment within 30 days from the date of dishonor by the bank; and (iii) the drawer fails to pay the defaulted payment within 15 days from the receipt of the notice.

2.3 Jurisdiction under section 138 NI: The SC held that the return of the cheque by the drawer bank only constitutes commission of offence under section 138. Hence, the courts within which drawer bank is located will only have the jurisdiction to try the case. Adopting a strict approach, the SC wanted to rule out the unintended ramifications caused to the drawer by the principles laid in Bhaskaran's case. The flexibility given to the drawee so far with respect to choosing the place for initiating action under section 138 NI had caused severe hardships to the drawer as the places sometimes had no connection with the drawer or with any facet of the transaction. With the Dashrath ruling, the judicial inquiry or trial has been restricted to place of the commission of offence so as to restrain abuse of section 138.

2.4 Alternate remedies: In terms of alternate remedies, the SC also observed that the relief sought under section 138 is in addition to the reliefs available under Indian Penal Code ("IPC") and common law. The drawee of a dishonored cheque can lodge a First Information Report with the Police or file a complaint directly before the concerned Magistrate or a civil suit. If the drawee succeeds in establishing that the inducement for accepting a cheque which subsequently was dishonored, had occurred where he/she resides or ordinarily transacts business, he/she will not have to travel to the place where the cheque was dishonored. All remedies under the IPC, CrPC will be available to a drawee, if he/she chooses to pursue this course of action, rather than a complaint under section 138.

The SC decision will have a massive impact on the cases already pending before various courts because numerous cases will have to be transferred to the courts within whose jurisdiction the cheque was dishonored. However, keeping in perspective the (a) hardship caused to the accused who may have to travel long distances to conduct their defense, and (b) mindful of the legal implications of proceedings permitted to continue in a court devoid of jurisdiction, the SC held that the cases, in which evidence has commenced (as envisaged under section 145(2) of NI) will continue in the same court. To obviate and eradicate any legal complications, the category of cases where proceedings have gone to the stage of section 145(2) or beyond will be deemed to have been transferred from the courts, which possess the territorial jurisdiction to the court where it is presently pending. All other complaints, including the ones where the accused has not been properly served will be returned to the complainant for filing in the proper court. If such complaints are re-filed within thirty days of their return, they shall be deemed to have been filed within the time prescribed by law, unless the initial or prior filing was itself time barred

3. At Par Cheques

The BHC in Ramanbhai Mathurbhai Patel ("Petitioner") v State of Maharashtra & Anr ("Respondent")5, dealt with territorial jurisdiction of the courts on "At Par cheques". In this case, two cheques were drawn on State Bank of India and Bank of Maharashtra located at Gandhinagar in Gujarat. Both these cheques were multi-city cheques payable at par in any of the branches of the respective banks. The drawee presented them in his bank at Mumbai, and they were sent for clearing to the respective branches of the two banks located in Kurla, Mumbai. Both the cheques were dishonored and section 138 proceedings were launched at Metropolitan Magistrate, Kurla. The Petitioner challenged the jurisdiction of Kurla court by filing criminal writ petition before BHC. However, BHC held that in the case of at par cheques, the drawer has given an option to the banker of the drawee to get the cheques cleared from the nearest branch of the drawee bank. In the case of multi-city cheque section 138 complaints can be filed in Mumbai i.e. place of drawee bank. Thus, BHC ruling implies that the drawee can choose the court where section 138 proceedings may be initiated which is contrary to the ratio held in Dashrath case. Since SC, in Dashrath's case did not held specifically on the territorial jurisdictions of courts in multi-city cheques, it becomes necessary that another case will need to clarify the confusion emanating from the BHC judgment.


The SC has finally ruled on and clarified a very complicated issue by categorically holding that the place where the drawee bank is situated will only be the place for judicial inquiry and trial for section 138 NI complaints. On the flipside, the present decision will burden the courts as the pending matters will have to be transferred to the appropriate courts and potentially will cause unnecessary procedural delays. The recent BHC decision has raised the issue of territorial jurisdiction of courts in multi- city cheques. However, the SC has stayed the BHC decision6 as it runs contrary to the essence of Dashrath. Thus, the jurisdiction of courts on multi-city cheques is yet to be determined by the SC.


1 AIR 2014 SC 3519

2 (1999) 7 SCC 510

3 Section 179 of CrPc states - When an act is an offence by reason of anything which has been done and of a consequence which has ensued, the offence may be inquired into or tried by a Court within whose local jurisdiction such thing has been done or such consequence has ensued

4 (2009) 1 SCC 720

5 2014(4)Bom CR(Cri)126

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions