India: Litigation And Dispute Resolution


Perin Hoshang Davierwalla & Anr. ("Appellants") v. Mr. Kobad Dorabji Davierwalla & Ors ("Respondents")

The main issue which arose for consideration in the present appeal before the Bombay High Court ("BHC") was whether an ad-interim order passed by a court under  Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act") would be appealable under  Section 37 of the Act.

Certain important and recent case laws in this area are set out below.


Perin Hoshang Davierwalla & Anr. ("Appellants") v. Mr. Kobad Dorabji Davierwalla & Ors ("Respondents")

The main issue which arose for consideration in the present appeal before the Bombay High Court ("BHC") was whether an ad-interim order passed by a court under  Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act") would be appealable under  Section 37 of the Act.

The Appellants and Respondents were partners in a partnership firm which carried on the business of running of a boarding and lodging house known as IL Palazzo Hotel. The two Appellants were the widow of two partners and Respondents were the sons of the third partner. Appellants alleged that the Respondent was attempting to utilise the partnership assets for his personal benefit at the cost of the partnership business. The firm was dissolved vide dissolution notice and the Appellants invoked the arbitration clause forming part of the Deed of Partnership and suggested appointment of a sole arbitrator. 

The Appellants, thereafter, filed an application under Section 9 of the Act before the District Court at Satara thereby claiming and praying for the following reliefs to be granted in their favour:

  • Restrain the Respondents from creating any third party rights in the business or assets of the partnership firm;
  • Restrain the Respondents from withdrawing any amount from the partnership account except under joint signatures of the Appellants during the pendency of the application;
  • Appoint a Court receiver to manage the business of the partnership firm during the pendency of the application.

The District Judge, Satara vide order dated April 6, 2013, granted ad-interim injunction allowing the first two ad interim reliefs against the Respondents, but rejected the ad-interim application for appointment of Court Receiver for managing the business of the partnership firm. Aggrieved by the said order the Appellants filed this appeal before the BHC.

The Respondents raised the preliminary objections as to maintainability of the appeal on the ground that  that the order was passed by the District Judge in the exercise of its powers under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC") and not under Section 9 of the Act and therefore such an order is not appealable under Section 37 of the Act.

Respondent further averred that an ad-interim order under  Section 9 of the Act was not appealable as only a final order under  Section 9 of the Act is appealable under Section 37 of the Act.

Dismissing the objections raised by the Respondents, the BHC held that while entertaining an application under Section 9 of the Act, a court has the same powers to pass an order as it would have while passing an order under  Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC. The BHC relied on the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Kalinga Mining Corporation[1] to provide the rationale for the same stating that when a power is conferred on a court by way of a special statute then the general rules of procedure of that court would apply. In light of this, it was further held that grant or refusal of an interim measure of protection by way of an ad-interim order under  Section 9 of the Act is an appealable order under  Section 37 of the Act.

Swiss Timing Limited v. Organising Committee, Commonwealth Games 2010, Delhi

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court"), setting a pro-arbitration tone to the issue of arbitrability of allegations of fraud, in the case of Swiss Timing Limited ("Petitioner") v. Organising Committee, Commonwealth Games 2010, Delhi ("Respondent") held that the allegations of fraud can be determined by the arbitral tribunal in an arbitration where an arbitration agreement exists between the parties. Vide the present judgment, the Supreme Court has held the much criticised decision of the Supreme Court in N. Radhakrishnan v Maestro Engineers ("N. Radhakrishnan Case") as per incuriam, wherein it had been held that a dispute involving serious allegations of fraud should normally not be referred to arbitration and should be decided by the courts even if there is a valid arbitration clause.

In the present case, the Petitioner entered into an agreement dated 11th March, 2010 ("Contract") with the Respondent for providing timing, score and result systems as well as supporting services required to conduct the Commonwealth Games. After the conclusion of the games, Respondent refused to make the final payment of about CHF (Swiss Franc) 1.3 million which was due to the Petitioner under the Contract. Consequently, disputes arose between the parties with respect to the payment of the dues and the Petitioner invoked the arbitration clause by serving a notice invoking arbitration and nominating their arbitrator in terms of Article 38 of the Contract.

Since the Respondent failed to nominate their arbitrator, the Petitioner filed an Arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Act, thereby seeking the court to appoint the arbitral tribunal for adjudicating the disputes which had arisen between the parties.

The Respondent raised two preliminary objections to the Arbitration Application filed by the Petitioner. Firstly, it contended that Petitioner had not followed the dispute resolution mechanism as set out in the Contract, which required all disputes to be resolved amicably in the first instance, failing which dispute was to be resolved by the Chairman of the Respondent within five days of such reference and that the parties could invoke arbitration only if the Chairman failed to resolve the dispute within five days. Secondly, the Respondent contended that the Contract stood vitiated on grounds of being void-ab-initio as the Petitioners had engaged in corrupt practices and had obtained the Contract by fraud.

Highlighting the fact that the courts should adopt a least interference policy in view of the general principle laid under Section 5 of the Act, the Supreme Court held that all matters including the issue as to whether the main contract was void /voidable can be referred to arbitration. The Supreme Court, after taking into account all the facts of this case, allowed the petition and held the judgment passed in the case of N. Radhakrishnan Case does not lay down the correct law and cannot be relied upon.

The Supreme Court held that the judgment passed in N. Radhakrishnan Case is per incuriam on two grounds. Firstly, the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corp v. Pink City Midway Petroleum[2] Ltd. and P. Anand Gajapathi Raju & Ors. V. P.V.G. Raju (Dead) & Ors.[3] (wherein it was held that the civil courts are obligated to refer the disputes to arbitration in cases where there exists an arbitration agreement between such parties) were not considered by the Supreme Court and secondly, the provision contained under Section 16[4] of the Arbitration Act were also not brought to the notice of this Court.

Providing clarity on how objections regarding invalidity of the contract as a bar to the matter being referred to arbitration have to be dealt with, the Supreme Court observed that;

"...Undoubtedly, in cases, where the Court can come to a conclusion that the contract is void without receiving any evidence, it would be justified in declining reference to arbitration but such cases would be few and isolated. These would be cases where the Court can readily conclude that the contract is void upon a meaningful reading of the contract document itself.

However, it would not be possible to shut out arbitration even in cases where the defence taken is that the contract is voidable. These would be cases which are covered under the circumstances narrated in Section 12 - unsoundness of mind; Section 14 - absence of free consent, i.e. where the consent is said to be vitiated as it was obtained by Coercion (Section 15), Undue Influence (Section 16), Fraud (Section 17) or Misrepresentation (Section 18). Such a contract will only become void when the party claiming lack of free consent is able to prove the same and thus rendering contract void. This indeed is the provision contained in Section 2(j) of the Indian Contract Act. In exercising powers under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court has to keep in view the provisions contained in Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, which provides that a reference to arbitration shall be made if a party applies not later than when submitting his first statement on the substance of the dispute..."

As the judgment has been passed by a single judge of the Supreme Court, Swiss Timing Case only critiques and distinguishes as per incuriam the Radhakrishnan Case but does not overrule the same.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Vaish Associates Advocates
Vaish Associates Advocates
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Vaish Associates Advocates
Vaish Associates Advocates
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions