India: The Relevance Of Doctrine Of Scène À Faire In Copyright Law

Introduction

Scène à faire is a French term which means "scene to be made" or "scene that must be done". It is a concept in Copyright Law which holds that certain works of a creative work are held to be not protectable because they are mandated by or are customary to a particular genre2. There are sometimes specific conditions when there is no other way to present an idea but only by using certain fixed elements then those elements are identified by the term "scenes à faire".

In the treatise "Nimmer on Copyright", while dealing with the topic - Action - Substantive aspects, the doctrine of "Scenes a Faire" has been elucidated in the following words:

"Bearing in mind the hoary wisdom of Ecclesiastes that there is nothing new under the sun, certain patterns and situations are bond to recur. The claim ( and variations thereon) is often advanced that "the entire dramatic literature of the world can be reduced to some three dozen situations" Schwartz v. Universal Pictures Co. 85 F. Supp. 270(S.D. Cal. 1949) So, for example, if two scenarios wish to treat the unprotected idea of police life in the South Bronx, for each it will be only natural to depict" drinks, prostitutes, vermin and derelict cars", juxtaposed against hard drinking Irish cops chasing fleeing criminals Judge Leon Yankwich has called such incidents" scenes a faire" i.e., "scenes which 'must' be done." That language is often invoked to immunize from liability similarity of incidents or plot which necessarily follow from a common theme or setting."3 The doctrine essentially tries to encourage continuous creative endeavors and discourage the monopoly contended by copyright owners over common subject matters.

Evolution of the doctrine

This doctrine first evolved in the famous US case of Cain v. Universal Pictures Co.4 , wherein Judge Leon Yankwich while passing the order in the favour of the defendants admitted that the scene from the plaintiff's book and the defendant's movie were somewhat similar but it cannot be said to constitute a copyright infringement.

The judge likewise stated that the idea of a couple taking shelter from a storm in a church was regular and as old as going back to the time when the first churches came and thus couldn't be made a subject matter of copyright. He noted that there was some homogeneity between the book and film adaptations, for example, playing piano in the church, praying and suffering from hunger. He brought out the French term "scènes à faire" for these similarities, holding "it was inevitable that incidents like these and others which are, necessarily, associated with such a situation should force themselves upon the writer in developing the theme." The doctrine is an indispensable part of the American jurisprudence furthering and fostering the growth and development of individual creativity on the one hand and protecting the rights of a copyright owner on the other hand. The doctrine mandates a copyright owner to prove that the alleged work is largely similar to his work and is not merely based on the common theme employed by both the plaintiff and defendant.

Other important judgments of the US courts on the subject matter are Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc5. and Joshua Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc6. In Walker v Time Life Films, Inc., writer Thomas Walker documented a claim against one of the production companies, Time- Life Television Films (lawful holder of the script), after the release of the film Fort Apache, The Bronx, asserting that the makers infringed on his book Fort Apache. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that the alleged infringement are only conventional thoughts, and that the United States copyright law does not protect ideas or thoughts.

Another noteworthy case in United States was Ets- Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, in which scenes à faire was maintained as a certifiable barrier by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case included a business photographic artist, Joshua Ets-Hokin, who sued Skyy vodka when another photographer made commercials with a considerably comparable appearance to the work he had done for them previously. It was held that the closeness between his work and the later works of the photographer was mainly because of the constrained scope of articulation conceivable of the subject matter. Inside the limitations of a photograph shoot for a saleable business item there are only so many ways one may photograph a vodka bottle. In light of this, to constitute copyright infringement, the two photographs would have to be essentially compulsorily indistinguishable.

Position in India

The doctrine of Scène à faire has not been expressly stated in the Copyright Act in India. The courts have discussed this issue following what has already been stated in their US and UK counterparts. The doctrine is basically American in origin and the Indian courts have not deviated much from what is the settled law in the US.

In NRI Film Production Associates v. Twentieth Century Fox Films7 , this doctrine was discussed in reference to the famous Supreme Court case of R G Anand v. M/s Delux Films And ors. wherein it was held that "there can be no copyright in an idea, subject-matter, themes, plots or historical or legendry facts and violation of the copyright in such cases is confined to the form, manner and arrangement and expression of the idea by the author of the copyrighted work.8"

"Also it was stated that where the same idea is being developed in a different manner, it is manifest that the source being common, similarities are bound to occur. In such a case the courts should determine whether or not the similarities are on fundamental or substantial aspects of the mode of expression adopted in the copyrighted work. If the defendant's work is nothing but a literal limitation of the copyrighted work with some variations here and there then it would amount to violation of the copyright. In other words, in order to be actionable the copy must be a substantial and material one." 9

"Further it was held by the Court that where the theme is the same but is presented and treated differently so that the subsequent work becomes a completely new work, no question of violation of copyright arises."10 The doctrine of Scenes a Faire has come into light recently in India when Rajinikanth-starrer 'Lingaa' ran into trouble ahead of its release. K.R. Ravi Rathinam, an aspiring film maker, filed a case in the Madras High Court alleging that the director of 'Lingaa' has lifted his script.

The petitioner has alleged that the script of Lingaa is copied from his yet-to-be-released Tamil film titled 'Mulai Vanam 999' which is based on the life of a British engineer who conceived the idea behind the Mullaperiyar dam and that the petitioner had uploaded the entire story on YouTube on Feb 24, 2013. The respondents have denied his claims stating that a work which has not been published cannot claim copyright infringement.

In a counter-affidavit, Rajinikanth said that there were numerous stories focused around the nationalization of rivers and it would not be right for the applicant to claim copyright over such an issue. For now, Justice M. Venugopal has reserved his order on the petitioner's plea to stay the release of the film.

The case raises important questions relating to the doctrine of scene a fair. It must be thought upon whether a copyright protection can be granted to the aspiring director on the premise that he had made a Youtube video on the story. Also, it has to be noted that a copyright cannot be granted on a theme. To establish that there was copyright infringement it must be shown that it is not merely a theme which has been copied but the whole storyline has been copied. Venugopal has reserved his order on the petitioner's plea to stay the release of the film.

The case raises important questions relating to the doctrine of scene a fair. It must be thought upon whether a copyright protection can be granted to the aspiring director on the premise that he had made a Youtube video on the story. Also, it has to be noted that a copyright cannot be granted on a theme. To establish that there was copyright infringement it must be shown that it is not merely a theme which has been copied but the whole storyline has been copied.

Conclusion

The doctrine of Scène à faire creates a balance between freedom of expression and copyright law. On the one hand it protects the rights of the artist whereas on the other hand it gives another individual a freedom to create on a particular theme which has been used earlier by another artist. This doctrine has been created considering both law and equity in mind.

As popularly described by Prof. Nimmer in his book, "this doctrine does not limit the subject matter of copyright; instead, it defines the contours of infringing conduct."11 In order to best serve the interests of copyright law, in light of the ever increasing statutory protection afforded to copyright owners and the plain language of the copyright statute itself, courts should require plaintiffs to show that their work is protectable despite the doctrine of scenes a faire.

The doctrine of scenes a faire is used by the courts to distinguish copyrightable material from those which cannot be copyrighted. Its purpose is to ensure that what belongs in the public domain stays there, and what deserves protection gets it12.

Thus, scenes a faire is a concept invoked to promote the very same public policy that copyright law itself promotes, namely, the progress and public dissemination of knowledge13.

Footnotes

1.3rd Year Student, National Law School, Orissa

2.Scène à faire under Copyright Law, Ivan Hoffman, BA JD.

3.Nimmer on Copyright, Vol. III, 1993

4.Cain v. Universal Pictures Co., 47 F.Supp. 1013 (1942).

5.Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc.,784 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1986)

6. Joshua Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc., 225 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2000)

7. NRI Film Production Associates v. Twentieth Century Fox Films, ILR 2004 KAR 4530

8. R G Anand v. M/s Delux Films And ors., 1978 AIR 1613

9. Ibid

10. Ibid

11. Nimmer on Copyright, Vol. III, 1993.

12. Feist Publications v. Rural Tel. Service, 499 U.S. 340, 348 (1991)

13. Fin. Control Assocs. v. Equity Builders, Inc., 799 F. Supp. 1103, 1118 (D. Kan. 1992)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions