India: Anti-Arbitration Injunction in India

Last Updated: 12 April 2005
Article by Dharmendra Rautray

A growing concern in the arbitration circle is the issue of anti arbitration injunction in foreign arbitrations, especially in jurisdictions like India.

Statutory Provisions:

Courts in India are empowered vide Section 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the Act") to refer parties to arbitration unless it found that, "the arbitration agreement was null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed". There is nothing unusual about this Section indeed it corresponds to Article 2 (iii) of the New York Convention 1958.

By virtue of Section 45 of the Act, the power of judicial authority to decide on the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal is not ousted rather it imposes a duty on the judicial authority to prima facie determine as to whether the arbitration agreement is valid or not.

The object to confer a specific power on the Civil Court to decide whether the agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed is based on public policy that a party ought not to be forced to participate in arbitral proceedings in a foreign country incurring considerable expenses and losing valuable time in the event the finding of the Court is that the arbitral agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed. Once such a finding is made, it would avoid a situation where the arbitral tribunal records the same findings after the parties have already incurred great cost in initiating the arbitral proceedings1. The Bombay High Court GTC Ltd. case, held that since the arbitral clause had been invoked and the English Arbitration Act of 1996 contained provisions for raising jurisdictional challenges before the arbitral tribunal itself and the arbitrator having been appointed it was not appropriate to grant the relief of interim injunction against continuance of arbitral proceedings in London.

Judicial pronouncements:

Indian Courts have granted injunctions usually in cases where a suit for declaration along with an application for interim injunction is filed on the ground that the arbitration agreement is either null and void, inoperative of being incapable of being performed. On most occasions, injunctions have been obtained by a party from District Courts of the place, where the cause of action arises and have been granted in favour of them ex parte. However, the Courts on hearing both the parties have in majority of cases vacated such injunctions.

In Bharti Televentures Ltd. Vs. DSS Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.2, the Delhi High Court while considering an application seeking injunction of reference of the dispute of foreign arbitral forum held that in absence of provisions of Section 5, 9 and 16 in Part-II of the Act, the legislature did not intend to provide jurisdiction of the Court for deciding the issue whether to grant interim injunction or not either before or during the arbitral proceedings. The Court stated that,

"the intention of the legislature was clear and unambiguous. It was to oust the jurisdiction of any judicial authority to intervene either before or during the arbitral proceedings and make it mandatory to refer the parties to arbitration as and when it is ceased off an action arising from the agreement on the request of one of the parties or any person claiming through or under him".

In Cultor Ford Science Inc. Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.3 the High Court of Andhra Pradesh refused to grant an interim injunction against arbitral proceedings under the LCIA Rules (Rules) mainly in view of the provisions under Article 23 of the Rules which confers power on the arbitral tribunal itself to determine the plea of its jurisdiction or authority. It further observed that,

"Therefore, merely because arbitration has to take place in a foreign country, to which forum parties, with their eyes wide open, willingly submitted themselves and that considerable money has to be spent to participate in those proceedings, would not be a ground to grant an injunction restraining the appellant and 3rd respondent from proceeding with the arbitration".

In a recent case, the Delhi High Court in Union of India Vs. Dabhol Power Co.4, granted injunction against arbitral proceedings continuing in England on the ground that neither Section 5 nor Section 45 of the Act ousted the jurisdiction of the Court from issuing an injunction if it finds that the arbitral proceedings against the Plaintiff in a foreign country are oppressive and call for interference. The High Court emphasized on the fact that the Plaintiff Union of India was not asking for an indefinite injunction but was merely praying that the Defendant be restrained from oppressing with the arbitral proceedings till the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the jurisdiction of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC). Further, there was an undertaking given by the Union of India to the Delhi High Court that in the event, the Supreme Court dismisses the appeal pending before it, it would submit to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.

Duty of the arbitrators:

The most frequently asked question is as to what should the arbitrators do when Courts have granted an anti-arbitration injunction against foreign arbitration proceedings. The answer is not very simple and the onus is on the arbitrators to act in a manner as would be in the interest of either both the parties or the party which is affected the most by such injunction. It is possible to contemplate a situation when neither of the parties have sought for stay of arbitration proceedings, but an application seeking stay has been moved by a third party who is not privy to the arbitration proceedings. An example would be where one of the share holders, of the company party to the proceedings before foreign arbitral tribunal, moves an injunction application praying that he or she is likely to be seriously affected by the award. However, in most cases it is one of the parties to arbitration which wants a stay of the proceedings. The arbitrators would have to weigh the pros and cons of continuing with the proceeding. The negatives are many, and are something that the arbitrators ought not to ignore. Firstly, if there is an injunction order passed, the party on whose request it was passed will not continue to participate in the proceedings and if the arbitrators decide to continue, any award rendered by them can be challenged as being contrary to the principles of natural justice and thus, giving that party the right to challenge the award invoking the ground of public policy. Whether or not the arbitrator/s are made a party to the injunction application filed in the Court, continuance of the arbitral proceedings despite the Court’s order would render the arbitrator/s liable for contempt of court proceedings having violated the order of the Court. If the arbitrators are willing to ignore such order of the Court and are ready to take the risk of being hauled for contempt proceedings (even though this may not be an eventuality), an award made by them would still not be immune to challenge of breach of public policy of the country (assuming the award is sought to be enforced in the country of the courts which passed the injunction order). If it were an Indian Court, it would take such a breach of its order seriously and may not uphold the award. However, this is yet to be established. But if the award is sought to be enforced in a different country, other than the one that passed the injunction order, then the party seeking to enforce such an award may not face such difficulty. Thus, a lot would depend on the jurisdiction in which enforcement of the award is applied for. It would thus, not be appropriate for arbitrators to ignore such factors and proceed with the arbitration proceedings and make an award that would not withstand in the court where it is sought to be enforced.

It would be reasonable for the arbitrators to not to proceed and direct the other party to have the injunction order vacated first. Although, this may involve time loss or delay but would be prudent step to take, lest the party wants to take the risk in having a mere paper award after having incurred huge expenses as costs of arbitration.


Thus, it is rather a myth that the Indian Courts liberally grant injunctions against foreign arbitration proceedings and that it allows a party to subvert or stultify such proceedings. The approach of the Indian Courts countenanced by the Supreme Court has been rather to draw a balance between protecting of interest of a party from being forced to participate in arbitral proceedings incurring considerable expense and losing valuable time and on the other hand to ensure that the parties by frivolous plea, do not misuse the jurisdiction of the Court to interfere in arbitral proceedings by obtaining injunctions. What seem to have been brought more into limelight is the fact that the Courts in India have granted injunctions against foreign arbitral proceedings (although temporarily), but not the fact that in a greater number of cases the Courts have refused to grant such injunctions.


1. GTC Ltd. Vs. Royal Consulting R.V

2. Decided On: 14.05.2001(Delhi High Court)

3. 2002 (2) ALD 149

4. Decided On: 05.05.2004 (Delhi High Court)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions