India: Anti-Arbitration Injunction in India

Last Updated: 12 April 2005
Article by Dharmendra Rautray

A growing concern in the arbitration circle is the issue of anti arbitration injunction in foreign arbitrations, especially in jurisdictions like India.

Statutory Provisions:

Courts in India are empowered vide Section 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the Act") to refer parties to arbitration unless it found that, "the arbitration agreement was null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed". There is nothing unusual about this Section indeed it corresponds to Article 2 (iii) of the New York Convention 1958.

By virtue of Section 45 of the Act, the power of judicial authority to decide on the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal is not ousted rather it imposes a duty on the judicial authority to prima facie determine as to whether the arbitration agreement is valid or not.

The object to confer a specific power on the Civil Court to decide whether the agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed is based on public policy that a party ought not to be forced to participate in arbitral proceedings in a foreign country incurring considerable expenses and losing valuable time in the event the finding of the Court is that the arbitral agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed. Once such a finding is made, it would avoid a situation where the arbitral tribunal records the same findings after the parties have already incurred great cost in initiating the arbitral proceedings1. The Bombay High Court GTC Ltd. case, held that since the arbitral clause had been invoked and the English Arbitration Act of 1996 contained provisions for raising jurisdictional challenges before the arbitral tribunal itself and the arbitrator having been appointed it was not appropriate to grant the relief of interim injunction against continuance of arbitral proceedings in London.

Judicial pronouncements:

Indian Courts have granted injunctions usually in cases where a suit for declaration along with an application for interim injunction is filed on the ground that the arbitration agreement is either null and void, inoperative of being incapable of being performed. On most occasions, injunctions have been obtained by a party from District Courts of the place, where the cause of action arises and have been granted in favour of them ex parte. However, the Courts on hearing both the parties have in majority of cases vacated such injunctions.

In Bharti Televentures Ltd. Vs. DSS Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.2, the Delhi High Court while considering an application seeking injunction of reference of the dispute of foreign arbitral forum held that in absence of provisions of Section 5, 9 and 16 in Part-II of the Act, the legislature did not intend to provide jurisdiction of the Court for deciding the issue whether to grant interim injunction or not either before or during the arbitral proceedings. The Court stated that,

"the intention of the legislature was clear and unambiguous. It was to oust the jurisdiction of any judicial authority to intervene either before or during the arbitral proceedings and make it mandatory to refer the parties to arbitration as and when it is ceased off an action arising from the agreement on the request of one of the parties or any person claiming through or under him".

In Cultor Ford Science Inc. Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.3 the High Court of Andhra Pradesh refused to grant an interim injunction against arbitral proceedings under the LCIA Rules (Rules) mainly in view of the provisions under Article 23 of the Rules which confers power on the arbitral tribunal itself to determine the plea of its jurisdiction or authority. It further observed that,

"Therefore, merely because arbitration has to take place in a foreign country, to which forum parties, with their eyes wide open, willingly submitted themselves and that considerable money has to be spent to participate in those proceedings, would not be a ground to grant an injunction restraining the appellant and 3rd respondent from proceeding with the arbitration".

In a recent case, the Delhi High Court in Union of India Vs. Dabhol Power Co.4, granted injunction against arbitral proceedings continuing in England on the ground that neither Section 5 nor Section 45 of the Act ousted the jurisdiction of the Court from issuing an injunction if it finds that the arbitral proceedings against the Plaintiff in a foreign country are oppressive and call for interference. The High Court emphasized on the fact that the Plaintiff Union of India was not asking for an indefinite injunction but was merely praying that the Defendant be restrained from oppressing with the arbitral proceedings till the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the jurisdiction of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC). Further, there was an undertaking given by the Union of India to the Delhi High Court that in the event, the Supreme Court dismisses the appeal pending before it, it would submit to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.

Duty of the arbitrators:

The most frequently asked question is as to what should the arbitrators do when Courts have granted an anti-arbitration injunction against foreign arbitration proceedings. The answer is not very simple and the onus is on the arbitrators to act in a manner as would be in the interest of either both the parties or the party which is affected the most by such injunction. It is possible to contemplate a situation when neither of the parties have sought for stay of arbitration proceedings, but an application seeking stay has been moved by a third party who is not privy to the arbitration proceedings. An example would be where one of the share holders, of the company party to the proceedings before foreign arbitral tribunal, moves an injunction application praying that he or she is likely to be seriously affected by the award. However, in most cases it is one of the parties to arbitration which wants a stay of the proceedings. The arbitrators would have to weigh the pros and cons of continuing with the proceeding. The negatives are many, and are something that the arbitrators ought not to ignore. Firstly, if there is an injunction order passed, the party on whose request it was passed will not continue to participate in the proceedings and if the arbitrators decide to continue, any award rendered by them can be challenged as being contrary to the principles of natural justice and thus, giving that party the right to challenge the award invoking the ground of public policy. Whether or not the arbitrator/s are made a party to the injunction application filed in the Court, continuance of the arbitral proceedings despite the Court’s order would render the arbitrator/s liable for contempt of court proceedings having violated the order of the Court. If the arbitrators are willing to ignore such order of the Court and are ready to take the risk of being hauled for contempt proceedings (even though this may not be an eventuality), an award made by them would still not be immune to challenge of breach of public policy of the country (assuming the award is sought to be enforced in the country of the courts which passed the injunction order). If it were an Indian Court, it would take such a breach of its order seriously and may not uphold the award. However, this is yet to be established. But if the award is sought to be enforced in a different country, other than the one that passed the injunction order, then the party seeking to enforce such an award may not face such difficulty. Thus, a lot would depend on the jurisdiction in which enforcement of the award is applied for. It would thus, not be appropriate for arbitrators to ignore such factors and proceed with the arbitration proceedings and make an award that would not withstand in the court where it is sought to be enforced.

It would be reasonable for the arbitrators to not to proceed and direct the other party to have the injunction order vacated first. Although, this may involve time loss or delay but would be prudent step to take, lest the party wants to take the risk in having a mere paper award after having incurred huge expenses as costs of arbitration.


Thus, it is rather a myth that the Indian Courts liberally grant injunctions against foreign arbitration proceedings and that it allows a party to subvert or stultify such proceedings. The approach of the Indian Courts countenanced by the Supreme Court has been rather to draw a balance between protecting of interest of a party from being forced to participate in arbitral proceedings incurring considerable expense and losing valuable time and on the other hand to ensure that the parties by frivolous plea, do not misuse the jurisdiction of the Court to interfere in arbitral proceedings by obtaining injunctions. What seem to have been brought more into limelight is the fact that the Courts in India have granted injunctions against foreign arbitral proceedings (although temporarily), but not the fact that in a greater number of cases the Courts have refused to grant such injunctions.


1. GTC Ltd. Vs. Royal Consulting R.V

2. Decided On: 14.05.2001(Delhi High Court)

3. 2002 (2) ALD 149

4. Decided On: 05.05.2004 (Delhi High Court)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.