India: General Principles of Law Holding the Field ... in the Matters of Termination of Contract of Agency (Agreements)

Last Updated: 26 August 2004

By Shivaji Rao, Manager - Legal, Wockhardt Ltd.,

Prelude: Sec.201 of the Indian Contract Act denotes termination of agency that an 'agency is terminated by the principal revoking his authority, or by the agent renouncing the business of the agency....'

However, if a term/duration of the agency is fixed in the agreement, it is determined on the expiration of the term. The agency may be terminated before the expiry of the term in accordance with an express reservation in the contract or for a reasonable cause. The right to cancel an agency may also depend upon some stipulation in the contract. If the right to cancel an agency is reserved, in case an agent fails to do a specified amount of business within a specified period, the contract may be cancelled if that condition is violated. Under the contracts of such kind, cancellation may be rightfully made when it appears that there has been a failure to comply with the condition prescribed. Where there is a contract express or implied, that the agency should be continued for a period of time, the principal cannot terminate it by exercising his option of revocation before the expiry of the period "without sufficient cause".

Illustrative (relevant) termination clause in the agreement :

"This agreement shall come into force on 1st April, 2001 and shall subject to the provisions hereinafter contained, continue to be in force for a period of 5 years effective from 1st April, 2001. The agreement can be terminated by either side "on its expiry" by giving six months prior notice in writing to the other party."

Termination clause is not a non-obstante Clause :

The above clause of the agreement inter alia states that this agreement is subject to the other provisions embodied in the agreement, particularly Agents responsibilities, Settlement of Accounts, Sales procedure, Storage & Insurance and lift of all consignment from the packaging station of the principal and may include more as stipulated in the agreement.

The above 'illustrative' termination clause is a general clause and not a non-obstante clause and which has to be read with the other mandatory clauses embodied in the agreement.

Incase agent is acting contrary to the understanding & stops transaction of business on one pretext or the other: - apparently, now the agent is violating the mandatory duties and responsibilities assigned to him through the said contract of agency. In other words, the conduct and acts of the agent fully demonstrate that he is renouncing the business of agency as stipulated in Sec.201 of the Indian Contract Act.

In these peculiar facts and circumstances, a big question that would arise is - - whether the principal can terminate the agency sans notice as stipulated under (relevant) clause of the Agreement. If yes, under what circumstances should the right of revocation of agency be exercised.

The facts and circumstances of the case - as may be applicable, in case acts of the agent fully demonstrate that the agent implies renouncing the relationship and the agent is bent upon to cause loss to the principal by not lifting the consignments from the packaging stations of the principal. In this curve of things, it is not gainsaid that the principal should be given six months prior notice for revocation of agency as stipulated in the contract. If that is being resorted to, the principal will be put into irreparable loss, untold misery from all the fronts and counts i.e. economically, market goodwill, accumulation of stocks, reputation etc. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid extraordinary facts and situation, the principal will be justified in revocation of the agency dispensing the prior notice as stipulated in the contract.

Sec. 205 and 206 of the Contract Act:

However, Sec. 205 and 206 of the Contract Act denotes that where there is an express or implied contract that the agency should be continued for any period of time, the principal must may compensation to the agent, or the agent to the principal, as the case may be in case the termination is without reasonable cause. Sec.206 states that reasonable notice must be given of such revocation or renunciation. (Illustrative) it is reiterated that the principal has written a series of letters to the agent to provide such information as required by law and consequences therein of failing to resume business transactions .... . If one analyses, the series of the said letters of the principal and the conduct demonstrated by the agent thereon, which goes to say that it has been brought to the notice of the agent about the consequences of the non resume business transaction ...., inter alia it can be presumed that the reasonable notice has been given to the agent.

Claim for damages:

Apart from revocation of agency, the principal may also claim damages/losses sustained due to the acts/non-acts of the agent by referring the matter to arbitration as stipulated in the contract of agency. It also is well settled that the party who has breached the contract and has by his conduct exhibited the traits of having abandoned or renounced the obligations under the contract will not be entitled to claim damages from the other side. In this case, the sole selling agent, having exhibited uncooperative attitude and conduct and by virtually sabotaging the business of the principal, notwithstanding his clear obligations both under the agreement and the Contract Act, would have no case to go before any court and seek damages or compensation - on the contrary, the principal would be well justified in claiming damages and expenses/costs against the sole selling agent. In view of the 'doctrine of necessity', the dispensing with prior to six months notice would be justified and reasonable – otherwise, to wait for six months and play into the hands of an untrustworthy agent would only witness the complete obliteration of the principal's business.

Case law on the subject:

Union of India, V/s. The Steel Stock Holders Syndicate, Poona , AIR 1976 SC 879

Held (1) that in the instant case, the plaintiff had not claimed loss of market or remote damages. Moreover, if there was no physical deterioration of the goods at all which were delivered to the consignee at Poona, the case of the plaintiff was clearly taken out of the ambit of Sections 76 and 78 and his suit for damages also could not be defeated on the ground that it was barred by Section 76 or Section 78. In view of the finding of fact arrived by the Courts below, the plaintiff was undoubtedly entitled to damages for the loss occurred to him because of the amount of money deposited in the Bank being locked up for more than six months.

Industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd., Vs. Cannanore Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. and others, AIR 2002 SCOURT 1841

(A) Contract Act (9 of 1872), S.56 - Contract - Non-performance of contractual obligation - Impossibility of performance - Can be an excuse.

Maxims - "Lex non cogit ad impossibilia" also expressed as "impotentia excusat legem" -

Meaning: There can be no doubt that a man may by an absolute contract bind himself to perform which subsequently however becomes impossible, or to pay damages for the non-performance and this interpretation is to be placed upon an unqualified undertaking, where the event which causes the impossibility was or might have been anticipated and guarded against in the contract, or where the impossibility arises from the act or default of the promissor. But where the event is of such a character that it cannot reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when the contract was made, they will not be held bound by general words which, though large enough to include, were not used with reference to the possibility of the particular contingency which afterwards happened. It is on this principle that the act of God is in some cases said to excuse the breach of a contract. Though impossibility of performance is in general no excuse for not performing an obligation which a party has expressly undertaken by contract, yet when the obligation is one implied by law, impossibility of performance is a good excuse. (Paras 28, 29, 30)

Southern Roadways Ltd., Madurai v. S. M. Krishnan AIR 1990 SC 673

Contract Act (9 of 1872), S.201, S.221, S.208 - Revocation of agency - Effect - Agent allowed to remain in possession of premises for purpose of carrying on agency business of Company - Termination of agency by Company - Agent has no right to remain in possession of premises after termination of his agency - He is not entitled to interfere with Company's business.

The company is engaged in the business of transport of goods and parcels to different places. It has appointed commission agents at various stations for the purpose of carrying on its business. Respondent was one such agent. One of the clauses of the agreement by which he was appointed provides that the agent should arrange a suitable avenue and engage employees. Further clause provides for his removal from service at any time without notice. It also provides that upon removal of the agent the company could occupy the godown. The company could also utilise the services of employees engaged by the agent. As per the agreement the Company took on lease a godown. The godown was put in possession of the respondent for the purpose of carrying on his agency business of the company. The agent mismanaged the business and misappropriated the income of the Company. Therefore the company terminated his agency, he was informed that the company would be taking possession of the godown and carrying on the business on its own. By subsequent letter, he was also intimated that the company has taken possession of the godown and another agent was appointed in his place. The agent however, prevented new agent and also the company from carrying on business at the godown premises. The Company, therefore, had to institute a suit for declaration of its right to carry on business in the said premises. Permanent injunction restraining the respondent from interfering was also sought for.

Held, the agent's possession at the suit premises was on behalf of the company and not on his own right. It was, therefore, unnecessary for the company to file a suit for recovery of possession. The agent has no right to remain in possession of the suit premises after termination of his agency. He has also no right to interfere with the company's business. Therefore temporary injunction could be granted.

(Paras 9, 17, 19)

Contract Act (9 of 1872), S.185 - Agency - elements of - Fiduciary element agency, though the key to much of the law governing this relation, is not the essential element in relation. (Para 14)

The rights of the principal on agent committing breach of duty were briefly stated by Lord SUMNER in Christoforides V. Terry : (1924) All ER Rep 815.

Principals have three rights as against agents who fail in their duty

  1. They can recover damages for want of skill and care, and for disregard of the terms of the mandate;
  2. They can obtain an account and payment of secret and illicit profits, which have come to the hands of their agents as agents;
  3. And they can resist an agent's claim for commission and for indemnify against liability incurred as mandatory by showing that the agent has acted as a principal himself and not merely as an agent. Each remedy is distinct and is directed to a specific irregularity.

Bostan Deep Sea Fishing Co. V. Ansell (1888) 59 LT 345.

Another remedy against defaulting agent is that he can be dismissed instantly and summarily. Where the managing director of a company had taken bribes from a third party for favouring him by engaging his ships, the company was held justified in dismissing him without notice.

Notice precedent to revocation (S.206) :

Sohrabji V. Oriental Government Security Assurance Co. AIR 1946 PC9.

Where an agency has been created for a fixed period, a reasonable notice would be necessary to terminate it. The length of notice will depend, among other things, upon the length for which the agency has continued. Thus, the Privy Council has held that "the notice of 3 ½ months given by the respondents was inadequate to determine an agency which had lasted for nearly 50 years, under which a very large business had been built up, and great expense incurred by the agents".

JK Sayani V. Bright Brothers, AIR 1980 Mad 162.

Their Lordships would have accepted without question that two years a reasonable notice. in a Madras case reasonable notice for premature determination was not given. The agent was earning Rs. 4000 per month. The court allowed Rs. 12,000 as compensation in lieu of reasonable notice which should at least have been for three months.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions