India: Bail, A Matter Of Right: Not To Be Denied On The Ground Of Nationality

The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land. The Fundamental Rights are available to all the "Citizens" of the country but a few of them are also available to "persons". While Article 14, which guarantees equality before law or the equal protection of laws within the territory of India, is applicable to "person" which would also include the "citizen" of the country and "non-citizen". This reflects that the Indian Legal system does not bring the nationality of an individual into consideration while granting him/ her the benefit of the provisions of bail. There is no discrimination or differentiation in granting bail to a foreign national in India.

The Personal liberty is of utmost importance in our constitutional system recognized under Article 21. Deprivation of personal liberty must be founded on the most serious considerations relevant to welfare objectives of the society as specified in the Constitution. The Apex Court of the Country has laid down in its judgments that

"Personal liberty, deprived when bail is refused, is too precious a value of our constitutional system recognized under Article 21 that the crucial power to negate it is a great trust exercisable, not casually but judicially, with lively concern for the cost to the individual and community. To glamorize impressionistic orders as discretionary may, on occasions, make a litigative gamble decisive of a fundamental right. After all, personal liberty of an accused or convict is fundamental, suffering lawful eclipse only in terms of procedure established by 'law'.

Thus personal liberty is not curbed except in accordance to the procedure established by law in order to strike a balance between the right to individual liberty and the interest of society.

"Bail" has been defined as:

"The process by which a person is released from custody"

-Webster's Third New International Dictionary

In the Indian legal system, the procedure of bail is provided in the Criminal Procedure Code. Bail has not been defined in the code although the offences are classified as bailable and non-bailable. In the former class, the grant of bail is a matter of course. It may be given either by the police-officer in charge of a police station having the accused in his custody or by the court. The release may be ordered on the accused executing a bond and even without sureties . In the latter class, the accused may be released on bail but no bail can be granted where the accused appears on reasonable grounds to be guilty of an offence punishable either with death or with imprisonment for life. But the rule does not apply to a person under 16 years of age, a woman, a sick or infirm person. As soon as reasonable grounds for the guilt cease to appear, the accused is entitled to be released on bail or on his own recognizance; he can also be released, for similar reasons between the close of the case and delivery of judgment. When a person is released on bail the order with reasons therefore, should be in writing.

The Indian courts have umpteen number of times held that merely because the accused is a foreign national he cannot be deprived of the benefits of bail. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had observed that "Law does not permit any differentiation between Indian Nationals and Foreign citizens in the matter of granting bail. What is permissible is that, considering the facts and circumstances of each case, the court can impose different conditions which are necessary to ensure that the accused will be available for facing the trial. It cannot be said that an accused will not be granted bail because he is a foreign national."

In the case of Mohammed Kunju , the accused was a foreign national. When he was granted bail, he jumped it and slipped out of India. As a result, legal action against his sureties for levy of the penalty under their forfeited bail bonds was initiated. That action was challenged by the sureties before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India Court. While dealing with the legality or otherwise of the said legal proceeding against sureties, an observation was made by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while granting bail to the accused foreign national, the Court could have imposed the condition to surrender his passport as a measure to prevent him to escape out of India. Thus the Indian Courts while granting bail to a foreign national firmly believes in imposing certain conditions like surrender of passport, bail bonds, attendance before consulate or the investigating officer, etc in order to prevent misuse of the provision as there may be chances of the accused absconding after getting bail.

The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Lambert Kroger vs Enforcement Directorate while allowing the bail application of the foreign national made an observation that "Admittedly the petitioner 's passport is with the respondent and ordinarily the petitioner cannot leave the country without the passport. Though the possibility of fleeing from trial may be more in the case of foreign national. It cannot be said that an accused cannot be granted bail merely because he is a foreign national. There is no law which authorizes or permits discrimination between a foreign national and an Indian national in the matter of granting bail what is permissible is that, considering the facts and circumstances of each case, the Court can impose different conditions to ensure that the accused will be available for facing trial."

In Sartori Livio's case the counsel for the state raised an argument stating that the petitioner is an Italian national and if he is released on bail, there is every likelihood that he may flee from justice. The Hon'ble High Court by relying on the judgment in Nasimjon Komlov vs. Customs in CRLM (M) No. 2038/2000 observed that the argument must be rejected.

The Court said that "it would be a shame if courts are going to keep persons incarcerated merely because they are of foreign origin even though prima facie no case is made out against them. This would be a negation of valued principles of rule of law and vocative of the constitutional mandate and principles of human rights."

The Court further held that just because a foreign national is involved, it does not mean that he is to be denied the benefit of bail. In this case the Court released the petitioner on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of RS.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court. The Court also directed the petitioner to deposit his passport in the custody of the I.O. and not to leave the National Capital Region without the prior permission of the concerned court.

In Haroub Slaum Sleyoum , the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi reiterated the law on bail to a foreign citizen.

The Court observed that "While considering an application for grant of bail, various factors are to be taken into consideration, such as, the nature and seriousness of the offence, the stage of investigation, a reasonable possibility of the presence of the accused not being secured at the trial, a reasonable apprehension of evidence being tampered with or such other circumstances which may be brought to the notice of the Court which might hamper proper investigation into the matter" The Court after considering the facts of the case held that "I find force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that merely because the petitioner is a foreign national this by itself cannot be a ground for declining the bail. No special circumstances have been shown to this Court to show that the petitioner is likely to interfere with course of justice nor any material to show that there are strong reasons that the petitioner is likely to leave the country. Accordingly, I have considered it a fit case to grant bail and release the petitioner."

In a latest case, the Court of Session's Judge for Greater Bombay allowed the bail application of a Chinese national whose bail application was earlier rejected by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court Andheri Mumbai on the ground that the applicant being a foreign national shall not be granted bail as it would be difficult to secure her presence. The Learned Session's judge allowed the application by imposing certain conditions like furnishing of bail bond, not to leave India more specifically Mumbai without In a latest case, the Court of Session's Judge for Greater Bombay allowed the bail application of a Chinese national whose bail application was earlier rejected by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court Andheri Mumbai on the ground that the applicant being a foreign national shall not be granted bail as it would be difficult to secure her presence. The Learned Session's judge allowed the application by imposing certain conditions like furnishing of bail bond, not to leave India more specifically Mumbai without prior written permission from the Court, reporting before the Chinese Consulate once in a week and also to the IO.


The above discussion clearly throws light on the fact that the normal rule is "BAIL NOT JAIL". The Indian Legal system does not create any discrimination or differentiation between Indian Nationals and foreign nationals when it comes to granting bail. The Indian Courts have in catena of judgments rejected the "foreign national" plea and have allowed the bail applications of the foreign nationals by imposing certain conditions in order to secure their presence during the course of trial. The fundamental right to "equality before law" provided by the Constitution of India is not denied to the foreign nationals merely on the ground of they being non citizens of this country. For Indian legal system the "right to personal liberty" of foreign nationals is equally important as that of the Indian nationals and the same is curbed when the security of the society is put at stake.


1. The Chairman, Railway Board & Ors. Vs. Mrs. Chandrima Das & Ors. (2000)2SCC465

2. Babu Singh and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh MANU/ SC/0059/1978 : 1978CriLJ651

3. Section 436 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

4. Commentary on the Code of criminal procedure by Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, 19th Enlarged edition 2010.

5. Anil Mahajan vs. Cojmmissioner of customs & Anr, 2000 CriLJ 2094.

6. Mohammed Kunju and Another v State of Karnataka, AIR 2000 SC 6

7. Lambert Kroger vs Enforcement Directorate on 28 February, 2000 85 (2000) DLT 62

8. Sartori Livio vs. The State, 118 (2005) DLT 81

9. Haroub Slaum Sleyoum vs. Shri Abdul Qadir

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions