India: IPAB Admonished The Trademark Registry

Last Updated: 11 September 2013
Article by Vaibhavi Pandey

Most Read Contributor in India, September 2016

The arguments related to the pendency and backlog of proceedings in the Trademark Registry or the cases where its negligence and indifference have been pointed out by the courts and tribunals are no more new or unique to us. Once again, in its decision dated 5th June, 2013 in the matter of NWL FRANCE SERVICES SAS vs. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) has chided the Trademark Registry for their indifferent and irresponsible attitude towards the applicants. In the order dated 5th June, 2013 Hon'ble Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan in clear and distinct words termed this case as "a classic case of official indifference." This case throws light on the lack of transparency and failure to respond to the communication letters of the parties on the part of the Trademark Registry.

The factual circumstances in which the present case arose were: The applicant applied for the registration of his trademark "WATERMAN" in class 16 on 14th May, 1992 as a mark to be associated with the trademark no. 147630. The application was published in the journal of the Trademark Registry on 8th January, 2001 with the disclaimer stating that the registration will give no right to the exclusive use of the letter 'W' except as substantially shown in the representation. The second respondent in the above case filed a notice of opposition in March, 2001 under the provisions of Section 21 of the Trademarks Act, 1999. As per the provisions of Section 21 of the Act, the Registrar is required to serve a copy of opposition to the applicant and the applicant is required to file a reply to that opposition within a period of two months failing which his application shall be considered as abandoned. However, no such notice was served to the applicant by the Registrar and three years later, in the year 2004, the applicant came to know about the said opposition through the online status of the application available on Registry's website. Through a letter dated 15th June, 2004, the applicant stated that three years have elapsed and they have still not received any copy of opposition. The Registry never responded to the letter of the applicant, in addition to that the status of the application as observed by the applicant in the year 2008 was appearing as abandoned. On 23rd July, 2008 the applicant again addressed a letter to the Registrar stating that the abandonment was wrong and immediate steps should be taken to consider the matter. The applicant also filed an application under The Right to Information Act, 2005 and wrote several other letters to the Trademark Registry but no communication or reply was ever made by the Registry to the applicant.

Later, on 29th June, 2011 the opponents wrote to the Registrar that they and the applicant have arrived at an agreement and the opponents now want to withdraw the opposition. This letter was also received by the Registry on 8th June, 2012, almost after one year in May, 2012 the applicant found from the online status of the application that the Order of Abandonment was passed by the Senior Examiner on 3rd December, 2009.

The IPAB expressed its shock and surprise to the irresponsible behavior of the Registry. The documents filed by the applicant clearly showed that he has not left any possible way to find out what happened to their application but they could not find even a single response from the Registry in the period of these 10 years. The Board highly criticized such an irresponsible attitude by an authoritarian body with quasi-judicial powers. One of the most important and mandatory duty of the Registrar is to reply to the letters precisely and as soon as possible. Another very shocking fact is that the status of the application was shown as abandoned when checked in July, 2008 and the order of abandonment was passed in 2009. What kind of anticipation is that? Was the order presumed by the Registry almost a year earlier to which it was actually passed? Keeping in view all the above ambiguities, the learned Chairman asked for a reply from the Trademark Registry seeking answers on the following issues-

  • How even before the order was passed the online status treated the mark as abandoned? One of the most dubious acts of the Registry that have emerged in this case is the question as to how can an order be presumed by the Registry a year before it was actually passed. What kind of anticipation is this? An order dated 2009 and its consequences imposed in 2008 itself? Such actions on the part of government offices not only make us ponder about the case in issue but also alarm us as to how many other such cases can possibly be lying with the registry. How many other status updates have merely been "ANTICIPATED" by them? The answers lie with the Registry itself.
  • Why none of the letters written by the opponents received any reply? This is a practice which almost everyone dealing with the government offices are familiar with. The letters sent to them are usually addressed after a very long period or they are lost somewhere in the bulk of letters pending over there. But this is not the question of one or two letter, almost a series of letters have been sent to the registry by the applicant in the period of 8 long years i.e. from 2004 to 2012 which according to the applicant have not received any response from the registry.
  • Why even after the opponent has indicated their opposition was withdrawn no communication was sent regarding order of abandonment? An opposed application is considered as abandoned if there is no reply to the opposition from the applicant. However, in the present case the applicant entered into an agreement with the opponents and they subsequently withdrew their application. It was the duty of the registry to communicate the present withdrawal to the applicant and reconsider their abandonment, but no such communication was ever made regarding this to the applicant.
  • Why was the order of the abandonment passed by an examiner and not "The Registrar"? As we all know there is a departmental hierarchy within which every office needs to work upon. Any order as to abandonment, rectification, opposition etc is passed by the Registrar himself. An examiner is only entitled to examine and publish the examination report of the application and not to pass the order of abandonment of an application.
  • If there is documentary proof that the notice of Opposition was communicated to the appellant or the counsel, the same shall be furnished. The registry has been given an opportunity to present any evidence or proof in case any letter or correspondence as to the Opposition was made by it to the applicant.


Discrepancies, ambiguities, such words are not new or unusual to us when we talk about government offices. As appropriately described by the IPAB, this is a "classic case of official indifference". Such cases not only create annoyance and anguish in the minds of the general public but also adversely affect their faith in the administration. Apart from this, such irresponsible behaviors from the administrative authorities may result in severe financial losses and mental agony to the applicants. In the present case, the reply of the trademark registry is much awaited as it is going to answer several questions running in the minds of the general people.

Transparency and accountability at the administrative level are the key ingredients of a democracy like India, where the government is supposed to be "of the people, for the people and by the people". The purpose of the Trademarks Act itself provides " provide for registration and better protection of trademarks for goods and services and for the prevention of the use of fraudulent marks..." But with such cases arising every other day we can say that merely setting up goals is not sufficient but the actual spirit of the legislations enacted should also be incorporated and visible in the actions of the offices as well. Then only we can reach the expectations of our legislations and strengthen the faith of the general public in the administration.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.