India: Star Fund Manager of Alliance Debarred

Last Updated: 20 May 2004
Article by Sandeep Parekh

The regulator's case against the star fund manager may not be as strong as SEBI, India’s securities regulator would have us believe.

Article previously published in the BNA International publication World Investment Regulation Review Vol 2, Number 9. 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) passed an interim order on August 9, 2003, debarring Samir Arora, the chief investment officer of Alliance Asset Management Company in India, from participating in the securities markets.

Another order, passed on September 24, 2003, confirmed the first one, resulting in the continuance of Arora's bar from the securities industry until further orders.

The order is based on several erroneous applications of the law, and is not logically consistent. At best, it does nothing for the markets in terms of setting the regulatory tone and, at worst, penalises Arora's superstardom rather than a wrongdoing.

The first order was riddled with inconsistencies and failed to fully state the facts. The second one fills in some of the gaps in the logic and facts of the first order but still falls short of proving its case emphatically. This piece critically analyses the salient parts of the order.

Facts: Sale of AMC

Alliance Capital Management, United States (Alliance, United States) owns an asset management company (AMC) in India which manages mutual fund schemes.

Alliance, United States, sought to sell its Indian AMC by an offer to select bidders.

Samir Arora, the fund manager of the AMC, told the management that he would continue working with the AMC only if it were bought by one Henderson Global Investors. Arora had a contract with Henderson for a substantial equity stake in the proposed entity.

AUM erosion Vs NAV erosion

According to the regulator this proposal created panic in the markets and the assets under management (AUM) of the AMC fell, enabling the Henderson/Arora group to acquire the company at a discount to the original market value.

The first hole in the argument of the regulator is equating the AUM with the net asset value (NAV) of the fund. The order seems to suggest that unitholders of the mutual fund are somehow hurt by large-scale redemptions.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. People liquidated their units of various schemes because of the value they put in the brand equity of its fund managers.

Thus instead of staying invested in Alliance, they chose to liquidate their investment at the then current NAV. It is likely that they put the money in some other equity scheme.

This view was, in fact, empirically supported for several days after the episode when, despite the negative news and the fact that the fund saw above normal redemptions, NAVs of Alliance Capital schemes did not show any significant erosion.

In the absence of an erosion of the NAVs of the mutual fund units not related to market movements, a fall in the AUM cannot be termed as hurting interest of the unitholders.

This reasoning seeps into other aspects of the ruling, too.

For instance the order states: "It was the paramount responsibility of Shri Samir Arora to enhance the AUM of the mutual fund for the benefit of unitholders. However, in contrast, in his role as a bidder, his interest would have been to acquire the fund at the cheapest possible price. From the subsequent events it is observed that by his actions/inactions, Shri Samir C Arora has let the AUM fall, knowing that the valuation of the AMC depends on the AUM, so as to achieve his selfish objective of acquiring the fund along with Henderson at a lesser price and, in the process, he has compromised his position of fiduciary responsibility with unitholders and the sponsor".

It is certainly not the job of the fund manager to increase the size of the AUM. His job is to increase the value of the assets that are given to him to manage.

It is also not possible for unitholders to get any advantage out of a larger AUM (if at all the converse is usually true). Thus the argument that the AUM of the MF affects the AMC's value is correct but the converse does not hold - that a larger value of the AUM would result in any benefit to the unitholders.

In the order, the NAV movement is compared with two high performing mutual funds during the same period.

However, the correct comparison would be with the index and also with, say, a set of 20 or 30 mutual funds with a similar composition. To call the returns abnormal the same should fall outside at least 95 per cent of such funds.

A cursory look at the benchmark shows negative returns for the index in the December 2002 to January 2003 period. Absent a more scientific analysis, the conclusion of Sebi cannot be sustained.

Conflict of interest

The order goes on to quantify the gain that Arora would make with the deal and calls him 'selfish' and acting in self-interest. Now, with due respect to the regulator, it is not per se illegal to be selfish.

Is Arora expected to say "no, thank you, but to preserve the market integrity I will not change my job".

Well that is the crux of the weakness of the order. Not only is the order violative of basic rights of a person's choice of employment, it also goes against the grain of the Indian Contract Act which prohibits fetters on a person's choice of profession.

It is no secret that the value of a fund management company is often a function of the value of its managers and analysts. And Arora, like any other employee, is trying to make the best deal he can for himself.

Unfortunately for him, the reason of his popularity is also a reason for people associating success with his funds (however unreasonable or wrong that might be of the investors).

It is improper for the regulator to limit the rights of a fund manger from changing his job. Not every conflict of interest is prohibited by law.

The order finds that one of the bidders quoted $42-50 million while the Henderson/Arora group made a bid for $30-33 million. Here the order mixes up the mutual fund with the AMC. It was the AMC which was up for sale. Whether it gets a fair price or not is for the seller to determine.

The AMC is a subsidiary of the American company and its sale has no impact on the unitholders of the mutual fund.

Whether the price was adequate or not is purely a contractual issue between Alliance, United States, and the bidders. Being privately held, the sale of the AMC has no public interest element or any impact on the mutual fund.

Insider trading

The order also makes some observations of 'insider trading' by Arora. There are damaging findings of Arora making a positive public statement about Digital GlobalSoft and then, within a week, of his liquidating the entire shareholding in the company on behalf of all the funds under him.

Unfortunately, there is no factual enquiry reflected by the order, no phone records, no meetings with insiders and no basis for stating that he entered into prohibited trades after getting inside information.

Based on circumstantial evidence alone, the regulator has brought charges of insider trading. Whether this form of circumstantial evidence will suffice to stick charges remains to be seen.

Disclosure violations

Lastly, the order holds Arora responsible for not making takeover code and insider regulation disclosures (similar to the Schedule 13F disclosures in the United States).

These are, of course, quantifiable wrongs and the fact that purchases and sales were made without the correct disclosures for crossing acquisition limits would ipso facto create a wrongdoing without any further proof though there is no resultant takeover code and insider trading violation (only a disclosure violation).

Here again there is an infirmity in the order. The order is directed against Arora who is only an investment officer. Such a violation is appropriately directed against the company and the mutual fund trustees who have committed the wrong.

The apportionment of the blame would probably fall on the head of the compliance department of the company or such other officers who are entrusted with the job and only incidentally on the investment managers.

While the previous order placed no blame on the company and the mutual fund's board of trustees, the recent order recognises the role and responsibilities of the company and trustees in the violations.

A part of the blame, of course, falls on Arora because it seems that he was the only person who knew the collective holding of various mutual funds (including other funds) and the violations arose only on an aggregate basis.

Of course, it is the job of the compliance officer to find out all collective holdings in a company by the AMC and its group companies.

The failure highlights the need of respectable Indian mutual funds and financial institutions to have internal controls in place.

Other funds and financial institutions should take this as a cue not only to improve internal audit but also to introduce something necessary, though alien, to the Indian financial industry: a periodic annual legal audit by an outside law firm.


It is likely that the order would not stand up to the scrutiny of the often critical Securities Appellate Tribunal which is the appellate body.

And absent a very tangible proof of insider trading, not much of the blame will survive against Arora. What case there might be against the company is a different issue altogether.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.