India: Star Fund Manager of Alliance Debarred

Last Updated: 20 May 2004
Article by Sandeep Parekh

The regulator's case against the star fund manager may not be as strong as SEBI, India’s securities regulator would have us believe.

Article previously published in the BNA International publication World Investment Regulation Review Vol 2, Number 9. 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) passed an interim order on August 9, 2003, debarring Samir Arora, the chief investment officer of Alliance Asset Management Company in India, from participating in the securities markets.

Another order, passed on September 24, 2003, confirmed the first one, resulting in the continuance of Arora's bar from the securities industry until further orders.

The order is based on several erroneous applications of the law, and is not logically consistent. At best, it does nothing for the markets in terms of setting the regulatory tone and, at worst, penalises Arora's superstardom rather than a wrongdoing.

The first order was riddled with inconsistencies and failed to fully state the facts. The second one fills in some of the gaps in the logic and facts of the first order but still falls short of proving its case emphatically. This piece critically analyses the salient parts of the order.

Facts: Sale of AMC

Alliance Capital Management, United States (Alliance, United States) owns an asset management company (AMC) in India which manages mutual fund schemes.

Alliance, United States, sought to sell its Indian AMC by an offer to select bidders.

Samir Arora, the fund manager of the AMC, told the management that he would continue working with the AMC only if it were bought by one Henderson Global Investors. Arora had a contract with Henderson for a substantial equity stake in the proposed entity.

AUM erosion Vs NAV erosion

According to the regulator this proposal created panic in the markets and the assets under management (AUM) of the AMC fell, enabling the Henderson/Arora group to acquire the company at a discount to the original market value.

The first hole in the argument of the regulator is equating the AUM with the net asset value (NAV) of the fund. The order seems to suggest that unitholders of the mutual fund are somehow hurt by large-scale redemptions.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. People liquidated their units of various schemes because of the value they put in the brand equity of its fund managers.

Thus instead of staying invested in Alliance, they chose to liquidate their investment at the then current NAV. It is likely that they put the money in some other equity scheme.

This view was, in fact, empirically supported for several days after the episode when, despite the negative news and the fact that the fund saw above normal redemptions, NAVs of Alliance Capital schemes did not show any significant erosion.

In the absence of an erosion of the NAVs of the mutual fund units not related to market movements, a fall in the AUM cannot be termed as hurting interest of the unitholders.

This reasoning seeps into other aspects of the ruling, too.

For instance the order states: "It was the paramount responsibility of Shri Samir Arora to enhance the AUM of the mutual fund for the benefit of unitholders. However, in contrast, in his role as a bidder, his interest would have been to acquire the fund at the cheapest possible price. From the subsequent events it is observed that by his actions/inactions, Shri Samir C Arora has let the AUM fall, knowing that the valuation of the AMC depends on the AUM, so as to achieve his selfish objective of acquiring the fund along with Henderson at a lesser price and, in the process, he has compromised his position of fiduciary responsibility with unitholders and the sponsor".

It is certainly not the job of the fund manager to increase the size of the AUM. His job is to increase the value of the assets that are given to him to manage.

It is also not possible for unitholders to get any advantage out of a larger AUM (if at all the converse is usually true). Thus the argument that the AUM of the MF affects the AMC's value is correct but the converse does not hold - that a larger value of the AUM would result in any benefit to the unitholders.

In the order, the NAV movement is compared with two high performing mutual funds during the same period.

However, the correct comparison would be with the index and also with, say, a set of 20 or 30 mutual funds with a similar composition. To call the returns abnormal the same should fall outside at least 95 per cent of such funds.

A cursory look at the benchmark shows negative returns for the index in the December 2002 to January 2003 period. Absent a more scientific analysis, the conclusion of Sebi cannot be sustained.

Conflict of interest

The order goes on to quantify the gain that Arora would make with the deal and calls him 'selfish' and acting in self-interest. Now, with due respect to the regulator, it is not per se illegal to be selfish.

Is Arora expected to say "no, thank you, but to preserve the market integrity I will not change my job".

Well that is the crux of the weakness of the order. Not only is the order violative of basic rights of a person's choice of employment, it also goes against the grain of the Indian Contract Act which prohibits fetters on a person's choice of profession.

It is no secret that the value of a fund management company is often a function of the value of its managers and analysts. And Arora, like any other employee, is trying to make the best deal he can for himself.

Unfortunately for him, the reason of his popularity is also a reason for people associating success with his funds (however unreasonable or wrong that might be of the investors).

It is improper for the regulator to limit the rights of a fund manger from changing his job. Not every conflict of interest is prohibited by law.

The order finds that one of the bidders quoted $42-50 million while the Henderson/Arora group made a bid for $30-33 million. Here the order mixes up the mutual fund with the AMC. It was the AMC which was up for sale. Whether it gets a fair price or not is for the seller to determine.

The AMC is a subsidiary of the American company and its sale has no impact on the unitholders of the mutual fund.

Whether the price was adequate or not is purely a contractual issue between Alliance, United States, and the bidders. Being privately held, the sale of the AMC has no public interest element or any impact on the mutual fund.

Insider trading

The order also makes some observations of 'insider trading' by Arora. There are damaging findings of Arora making a positive public statement about Digital GlobalSoft and then, within a week, of his liquidating the entire shareholding in the company on behalf of all the funds under him.

Unfortunately, there is no factual enquiry reflected by the order, no phone records, no meetings with insiders and no basis for stating that he entered into prohibited trades after getting inside information.

Based on circumstantial evidence alone, the regulator has brought charges of insider trading. Whether this form of circumstantial evidence will suffice to stick charges remains to be seen.

Disclosure violations

Lastly, the order holds Arora responsible for not making takeover code and insider regulation disclosures (similar to the Schedule 13F disclosures in the United States).

These are, of course, quantifiable wrongs and the fact that purchases and sales were made without the correct disclosures for crossing acquisition limits would ipso facto create a wrongdoing without any further proof though there is no resultant takeover code and insider trading violation (only a disclosure violation).

Here again there is an infirmity in the order. The order is directed against Arora who is only an investment officer. Such a violation is appropriately directed against the company and the mutual fund trustees who have committed the wrong.

The apportionment of the blame would probably fall on the head of the compliance department of the company or such other officers who are entrusted with the job and only incidentally on the investment managers.

While the previous order placed no blame on the company and the mutual fund's board of trustees, the recent order recognises the role and responsibilities of the company and trustees in the violations.

A part of the blame, of course, falls on Arora because it seems that he was the only person who knew the collective holding of various mutual funds (including other funds) and the violations arose only on an aggregate basis.

Of course, it is the job of the compliance officer to find out all collective holdings in a company by the AMC and its group companies.

The failure highlights the need of respectable Indian mutual funds and financial institutions to have internal controls in place.

Other funds and financial institutions should take this as a cue not only to improve internal audit but also to introduce something necessary, though alien, to the Indian financial industry: a periodic annual legal audit by an outside law firm.


It is likely that the order would not stand up to the scrutiny of the often critical Securities Appellate Tribunal which is the appellate body.

And absent a very tangible proof of insider trading, not much of the blame will survive against Arora. What case there might be against the company is a different issue altogether.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions