India: DTAA Vindicated: Sign Of Times To Come?


The interpretation and implementation of the provisions of a Double Tax Avoidance Agreement ("DTAA") has been controversial since the Vodafone-Hutch deal in 2007. In that case, the Income Tax Department ("IT Department") introduced retrospective amendments in order to tax transactions with an Indian nexus, which, foreign companies viewed as a retroactive measure in the path to greater liberalization and a deterrent to investing in India. However, the recent decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court ("the Court") where they disallowed a claim of INR 7 billion (USD 130 million)1 by the IT Department against Sanofi Pasteur Holding SA ("Sanofi"), the apprehensions of foreign investors post-Vodafone will, hopefully, stand alleviated to a certain extent.

The present newsletter discusses the facts leading up to the case, the rationale for the decision of the Court and the implication for other foreign companies contemplating acquisitions overseas, having an India component. Please note that at the time of preparing this Newsletter, the judgment of the Court was not available for review and reliance has been placed on the contents of the order of the Authority for Advance Ruling as well as media reports on this case.

1. Factual Matrix

In 2006, two French companies, Merieux Alliance and Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault ("the Sellers") formed a joint venture in France named ShanH, which, shortly after its incorporation, acquired 90% stake in Hyderabad based Shantha Biotechnics Limited ("Shantha"). Thereafter, in August 2009, Sanofi acquired ShanH from the sellers in France for approximately USD 736 million, and indirectly, acquired 90% stake in Shantha. In essence, this was a transfer of shares between two non-residents. In August 2008 itself, the IT Department carried out a survey under section 133A2 of the Income Tax Act ("IT Act"). From the information culled out during the survey, the IT Department formed an opinion that by the transfer of shares from the Seller in France, Sanofi acquired ownership of Shantha in India. Accordingly, it notified Sanofi that it had an obligation to deduct and deposit tax before making the payment for acquisition of ShanH since the underlying assets, i.e., shares of an Indian company, were being transferred and, therefore, the deal was subject to Indian tax laws.

In response, Sanofi stated that the transaction has been consummated in France and no tax liability arose in India due to the transfer of shares between two non-resident companies. The IT Department issued a show-cause notice to Sanofi demanding why Sanofi should not be proceeded against as an assessee-in-default under section 201(1) of the Act and also asked the Sellers to provide relevant documentation to ascertain the tax obligation in India. On receiving the show-cause notice, the Sellers filed an application for advance ruling from the Authority for Advance Ruling ("AAR")3 on the question of whether the transaction is taxable in India, specifically on the following issues:

i. In terms of the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ("DTAA") between India and France, read with section 90 of the IT Act, whether capital gains arising from the sale of shares to Sanofi is liable to tax in France or in India?

ii. Without prejudice to the above, whether controlling interest (assuming while denying that it is a separate asset) is liable to be taxed in France under Article 14(6) of the DTAA?

After hearing the Sellers and the IT Department, the AAR decided in favor of the IT Department holding that ShanH's only assets were the shares it held in Shantha. Therefore, the sale of its shares essentially led to change in control and ownership in an Indian company. The AAR observed that the purpose for formation of ShanH appeared to be only to hold shares in Shantha, leading it to believe that ShanH was a façade created for avoiding capital gains tax in India. Subsequently, Sanofi approached the Court challenging the decision of the AAR.

2. Contentions of the parties

2.1 Sanofi's arguments

Sanofi contended that pursuant to the Indo-French DTAA, the transaction is not taxable in India. As per Article 14(5) of this DTAA gains on transfer of shares in a company, representing more than 10% of shares in that company, is to be taxed in the contracting state to which the company belongs.4 Sanofi relied on the provisions of section 90 of the IT Act and argued that the provisions of the IT Act itself provide for application of the DTAA, and, therefore, the claim of the IT Department is bad in law. Opposing the contentions put forth by the IT Department during the AAR proceedings touting ShanH as being a tool for avoiding tax in India, Sanofi mentioned that ShanH was incorporated to streamline investments of the Sellers into India and participate in the managerial and technical aspects of Shantha.

Furthermore, it was formed in 2006 when the sale of 2009 was not contemplated. Sanofi tried to establish that ShanH was essentially an independent functioning company in France. A part of its argument was that it is legally permissible for two companies to form a joint venture for the purpose of making fresh acquisitions and that this was not an attempt to avoid or evade tax in India. It further mentioned that this was not a case of treaty shopping as the tax payable in France on capital gains is disadvantageous since in France, shares had to be held for two years prior to sale to qualify as long term capital gains whereas this period is only one year in India. Sanofi argued that it was seeking its lawful benefit under the DTAA and not attempting to evade or avoid tax.

2.2 IT Department's contentions

The IT Department's primary contention was that ShanH was a façade created for avoiding capital gains tax in India. The fundamental contention was that the only asset of value that ShanH has is its shareholding of Shantha, inferring that creation of an investment company was done mainly as a façade to avoid tax. The IT Department argued that where the underlying asset for any transfer taking place abroad is in India, such a transaction is liable to tax in India. According to the IT Department, ShanH was merely a paper company with no employees or office space and was created only to act as a vehicle to avoid taxation in India. If shares of an Indian company are transferred freely between two non-residents leading to change in control and ownership of an Indian company and without attracting any tax in India, this, would defeat the purpose of section 195. Under section 195 of the IT Act, any person whether in India or abroad (including a company), makes a payment to a foreign company, for a transaction taxable in India, is under an obligation to deduct withholding tax payable in India before making the payment and, thereafter, deposit the tax so deducted with the IT Department. The IT Department felt that since this transaction clearly related only to the assets in India, it is taxable in India and, accordingly, Sanofi should be held in violation of section 195.

Responding to Sanofi's arguments on the application of the DTAA, the IT Department contended that the gains from transfer of more than 10% of a company may arise in France; however, the situs of the underlying assets is in India and must not be ignored. Since the assets transferred are located in India, the capital gains arise and are taxable in India. The IT Department tried to take support from the amendment to the IT Act under the Finance Act, 2012, making all transactions since 1964 involving transfer of underlying assets in India taxable and reiterated that the underlying assets is in India and, as a result, the transaction must be taxed in India.

3. The Court's ruling and rationale

After hearing both parties at length, the two judge bench of the Court decided in favor of Sanofi and quashed the ruling of the AAR. Based on the facts, the Court determined that ShanH is in fact an independent entity which actively participates in the management of Shantha and was not created as a façade to evade tax. The Court also accepted that ShanH was incorporated in 2006, the sale took place in 2009 and held that there was no intention to avoid tax in India. For arriving at this conclusion, the Court examined whether there was intent to avoid tax by the companies and the genuineness of the claims re the participation in Shantha was legitimate. This decision establishes that courts need to assess the intention of the parties and whether the underlying intention of parties it to transfer an asset in India or whether the international transaction contemplated simply touches an aspect in India.

On the question of capital gains, the Court held that as ShanH is an independent foreign entity, transfer of its shares outside India does not attract any tax in India. It set aside the contention of the IT Department vis-à-vis applicability of the IT Act which brought within its purview all transactions since 1964. Section 90(2) clearly prescribes that the provisions of the IT Act will apply to an assessee who falls under a double tax avoidance agreement only to the extent to which they are beneficial to the assessee. In this case, section 90(2) read with Article 14(5) of the DTAA clearly prescribes that tax on capital gains is taxable in France, and the Court accordingly overruled the order of the AAR and quashed the order of the IT Department against Sanofi demanding INR 7 billion.


The decision of the Court provides relief to Sanofi and similarly positioned foreign companies anticipating overseas transactions with an Indian component. This judgment clearly establishes the superior status of the DTAA against the provisions of the IT Act, and to a certain extent, also provides additional parameters based on which an overseas transaction will be scrutinized. These include ascertaining the intent of the parties as well as whether the foreign entity owning Indian assets is a mere paper company or an independent and functioning unit.. While it is open for the IT Department to file an appeal before the Supreme Court, considering the decision of the Court is well reasoned, it will be interesting to see if the IT Department appeals and, if yes, then the grounds on which it prefers the appeal.


1 1 USD = 55 INR approximately

2 Section 133A of the IT Act provides the tax department with the power to enter and carry out a survey at the premises of a person of company within its jurisdiction and to seek any information which may be relevant for any proceeding under the IT Act, including seeking and inspecting the books of accounts and or any documents present

3 In India, a company has the option to approach the AAR in order to get a tax issue determined before partaking in a transaction or carrying out an activity on which, the tax implication is not certain

4 Article 14(5): Gains from the alienation of shares other than those mentioned in paragraph 4 representing a participation of at least 10 per cent in a company which is a resident of a Contracting State may be taxed in that Contracting State

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.