India: Proposed Amendments In The Competition Act: A Positive Step Forward?

Last Updated: 25 February 2013
Article by Dhruv Suri


The Competition Commission of India ("CCI") is an active regulatory body and, in a short span, has made its presence felt across a wide spectrum of industry. The substantive provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 ("Act") pertaining to "anti-competitive agreements"1 and "abuse of dominant position"2 were implemented in 2009, while merger control became effective from June 01, 2011. In the recent years, the CCI has analyzed and ruled on various provisions of the Act in several orders, and, in the process, highlighted the lacunae where the Act could possibly be amended.

On December 10, 2012, the Indian government introduced the Competition (Amendment) Bill ("Bill") in the parliament. This Bill aims to modify certain provisions of the Act, as well as insert some new provisions, to meet the evolving needs of industry. The Bill still has to be debated and passed by two houses of the parliament before it becomes law. The present newsletter analyses some of the key proposed amendments and the potential impact they will have on competition law in India if the Bill is passed in its present form. The references to sections here are in the context of the Act.

1.0 Proposed Amendments

For ease, the proposed amendments are divided into two broad heads, namely substantive and procedural, both of which are described below.

1.1 Substantive Amendments

(i) Vertical arrangements to include "provision of services"

Present law: Section 3(4) refers to agreements between enterprises or persons at different stages of the production chain in different markets, in respect of production, distribution, storage, sale or price of, or trade in goods or provision of services. It states that if such vertical agreements cause or are likely to cause any appreciable adverse effect on competition, they shall be deemed void. While this provision makes reference to provision of services, the illustrations mentioned therein, such as tie-in arrangements, exclusive supply agreements, exclusive distributorship agreements, refusal to deal and resale price maintenance, only make reference to "sale of goods" and not to "provision of services."

Proposed law: The Bill now aims to include reference to "provision of services" in the explanation provided for all the illustrations under vertical agreement. While this amendment does not substantively impact the interpretation of section 3(4) per se since the main clause includes reference to "provision of services," it does ensure that there is no dichotomy between the text of the main clause and explanation provided for its illustrations. For instance, the present definition of "tie-in arrangements" includes "any agreement requiring a purchaser of goods, as a condition of such purchase, to purchase some other goods." The amendment proposes the definition to be modified as "any agreement requiring a purchaser of goods or recipient of services, as a condition of such purchase or provision of such services, to purchase some other goods or availing of some other services."

(ii) Introduction of "collective dominance"

Present law: Section 4(1) states that "No enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position." The CCI had to interpret the scope of "group" in the case of Consumer Online Foundation vs. Tata Sky Ltd. & Others3 wherein the Informant had alleged that all direct-to-home operators were "individually dominant" in their "relevant market." The CCI did not accept this contention and stated that "the word "group" referred to in section 4 of the Act does not refer to group of different and completely independent corporate entities or enterprises. It refers to different enterprises belonging to the same group in terms of control of management or equity." The CCI further held that "the concept of dominance does centre on the fact of considerable market power that can be exercised only by a single enterprise or a small set of market players. Every single player in any relevant market cannot be said to possess such dominance..." The principle of this finding was also reiterated by the CCI in the case of Royal Energy Ltd. vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Others. 4

Proposed law: The Bill now proposes to replace section 4(1) with "No enterprise or group, jointly or singly shall abuse its dominant position." The intention behind this amendment is to include enterprises or groups, related or unrelated, whether within the same management or not, to fall within the ambit of section 4. This implies that independent and unrelated parties could be held "dominant" under section 4 explanation (a).5 The amendment proposed by the Bill is a positive step forward since it will regulate instances where, for instance, a particular industry may collectively abuse its position but a single enterprise within that industry may not qualify as a dominant player under section 4.

In a significant judgment, CCI had imposed a penalty of about US$ 114 million on DLF Limited in Belaire Owner's Association vs. DLF Limited and Others.6 One ground was that DLF abused its dominant position in the relevant market by imposing unfair and discriminatory conditions in its builder contracts. Other real estate enterprises, which also, perhaps, indulged in similar practices, were not reprimanded since they did not singly stand out as "dominant" in the relevant market. With the proposed amendment, if all (or at least more than one) real estate companies indulge in practices similar to that of DLF, they could collectively be held in contravention of the Act.

Further, unlike cartels, there is no requirement for the parties to have intent to be collectively dominant. To explain this further in the aforementioned judgment, it may not be necessary for the real estate enterprises to have a common intent to collectively dominate in the relevant market. Conduct without intent would be sufficient for them to fall within the ambit of section 4 on account of collective dominance. This can have serious ramifications on small and mid-size companies, who, under the present Act, may not be deemed dominant.

(iii) Definition of "Turnover"

Present law: Section 2(y) states that "Turnover" includes value of sale of goods or services. However, this definition does not specifically clarify whether any applicable taxes on such goods or services would form a part of "turnover" while calculating it under sections 5,7 278 and 43A.9 Under section 5, "turnover" is used to ascertain the financial thresholds which trigger the requirement for seeking an approval of the CCI before a proposed combination. Under sections 27 and 43A, "turnover" is used to ascertain the amount on which penalty may be levied. Therefore, it is critical that the definition of "turnover" is unambiguous to ensure a correct estimation of values.

Proposed law: The Bill now proposes to modify section 2(y) to state that "Turnover" will include value of sale of goods or services excluding the taxes, if any, levied on sale of such goods or provisions of services. Interestingly, Form II, which is filed with the CCI to seek an approval of proposed "combinations," specifically states that "the turnover shall be computed in accordance with section 2(y) of the Act, excluding indirect taxes, if any." With the proposed amendment, the Act will statutorily clarify that taxes ought to be excluded, not only for the purpose of seeking a combination approval (for which Form II is filed), but also when "turnover" has to be ascertained for imposing penalties under section 27 and 43A. Nevertheless, computation of "turnover" for determining the thresholds under section 5, as well as penalties, continues to be a grey area. Explanation (c) of section 5 explains the basis of determination of "asset value" which must pertain to the financial year immediately preceding the financial year in which the date of the proposed combination falls. No such explanation is provided with respect to computation of "turnover." Ambiguity on this point can potentially have harsh repercussions while calculating penalties.

(iv) Definition of "Group"

Present law: The definition of "group" under section 5 explanation (b)(i) states that a "group" means two or more enterprises which, directly or indirectly, are in a position to exercise 26% or moreof the voting rights in other enterprises. This definition assumes significance in cases pertaining to alleged contraventions under section 4 which stipulates that "no enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position," as well as under sections 5 and 6 for ascertaining whether a proposed "combination" ought to seek a CCI approval or not. On March 02, 2011, the Indian government released a notification10 ("Notification") which increased the 26% threshold to 50%. The Notification specifically stated that "groups exercising less than 50% voting rights in other enterprises" were exempt from any approvals under section 5. This implied that even 50-50 joint ventures fell within the definition of "group."

Proposed law: The Bill aims to bring the Act in sync with the Notification and revises the definition of "group" to include "two or more enterprises which, directly or indirectly, are in a position to exercise 50% or more of the voting rights in the other enterprise." 50-50 joint ventures continue to fall within its scope. This amendment does not change the present interpretation of "group," but merely brings the Act in conformity with the Notification.

1.2 Procedural Amendments

(i) Dawn raids to be simplified

Present law: Under section 41(3), the Director General ("DG") is empowered to conduct search and seizure in accordance with provisions of sections 240 and 240A of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Companies Act"). Pursuant to these provisions, the DG has to procure an order from a Magistrate for undertaking a search and seizure. This procedure is consistent with how raids are conducted in any other civil/criminal proceeding in India. As on date, there has been no case before the CCI where any search and seizure order has been obtained by the DG, so, the "effectiveness" of the existing regulation is untested.

Proposed law: The Bill now proposes that instead of the Magistrate, the DG can seek an order from the Chairperson of the CCI, under section 41(3) to conduct any search and seizure. While this amendment can be criticized on the ground that dawn raids would become "unchecked" and managed "internally" within the CCI, it will also ensure that as competition issues get more complex and high-value, search and seizure raids would become an extremely productive tool for the DG to conduct its investigation and ensure a stricter competition regime.

(ii) Orders of the CCI during the stage of inquiry

Present law: In some cases filed before the CCI, a peculiar concern has been highlighted in the CCI's orders. Once a complaint is filed and a prime facie case is established, the CCI directs the DG to conduct its investigation.11 If the DG submits a report that there is a contravention of the Act, the CCI has to invite objections/suggestions from the parties. After hearing the objections/suggestions, the CCI can only pass an order under sections 26(8)12 or under section 27,13 neither of which permit it to go against the finding of the DG where the DG has held a contravention. This situation was first examined by the CCI in the case of Pankaj Gas Cylinders Ltd. vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited,14 and the correct interpretation of the Act was adopted in its dissenting order. The dissenting order rightfully stated that "Under section 27 of the Act, an order can only be passed when a contravention is established. Therefore, dropping of a case after DG has found a contravention is not authorized under the Act." Since then, numerous cases have been heard by the CCI where, despite the DG's confirmation of a contravention, the CCI passed an order closing the case. 15

Proposed law: In order to give the CCI statutory provisions under which it can close a case even if the DG finds a contravention of the Act, the Bill proposes to expand the scope of section 26(8). In addition to passing an order directing a further inquiry, the amendment will also allow the CCI to "make appropriate orders thereon after hearing the concerned parties." This means that if the amendment is effected, the CCI will legitimately be able to pass any order, irrespective of the finding of the DG during its investigation.

(iii) Opportunity to be heard before imposition of penalty

Present law: Under section 27(b) of the Act, the CCI can impose a penalty for contravention of section 3 or 4. Such penalty can be up to 10% of the average turnover for the last 3 financial years, or, in cases of a cartel, up to 3 times the profit or 10% of the turnover, whichever is higher, for each year the alleged cartel is in force. In the last 3 years, there have been multiple cases where CCI has imposed penalties for contravention. However, in each of these instances, once the contravention was proved, the CCI imposed penalties without offering any hearing to the parties on the "quantum" of penalty to be imposed. While this practice has been prevailing due to the lack of any corresponding provision in the Act mandating a hearing, it is inconsistent with the judicial process followed in courts and with due process principles. Typically, an opportunity is provided to the contravening party to present its arguments for the imposition of the least applicable penalty. In Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa,16 the Supreme Court of India ("SC") held that " order imposing penalty for failure to carry out a statutory obligation is the result of a quasi-criminal proceeding, and penalty will not ordinarily be imposed unless the party obliged either acted deliberately in defiance of law or was guilty of conduct contumacious or dishonest, or acted in conscious disregard of its obligation. Penalty will not also be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so. Whether penalty should be imposed for failure to perform a statutory obligation is a matter of discretion of the authority to be exercised judicially and on a consideration of all the relevant circumstances." Various other judgments have corroborated and upheld the principle of judiciously exercising the right to levy penalties.17

Proposed law: The Bill now proposes to amend the language of section 27(b) as well as 27(g)18 to include a proviso requiring the CCI to grant a hearing to the party(s) before it passes any order under any of the aforementioned sections. This development will be consistent with judicial practice and offer a fair chance to parties to defend any imposition of the penalty once the CCI holds them in contravention of the Act.


The present newsletter includes only certain key amendments proposed by the Bill. These amendments will make the Act more in sync with other mature jurisdictions, like the European Union, where, for instance, provisions relating to collective dominance, conducting dawn raids without approaching courts and imposition of penalty after giving parties a chance to be heard, have been in force successfully.

The Bill is still at an extremely nascent stage and will probably take another 6-8 months before it is debated by both houses of the Indian parliament and becomes law. Till then, the future of some orders of the CCI remains questionable. For instance, under what provision has the CCI closed cases when the DG's report concludes a contravention of the Act? Similarly, how have penalties been imposed without giving a personal hearing to parties in view of the SC's decision in Hindustan Steel Limited vs. State of Orissa? It will be interesting to see how the SC will interpret the lacunas in the Act once appeals lie before it from the orders of Competition Appellate Tribunal.19 At this juncture, the Bill is a positive step in the evolution of Indian competition law.


1 Section 3 of the Act.

2 Section 4 of the Act.

3 Case No. 2 of 2009 dated March 24, 2011.

4 MRTP Case No. 1/28 (C-97/2009/DGIR) dated May 09, 2012. This case was filed before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and then, post its dissolution, transferred to the CCI.

5 According to section 4 explanation (a), "dominant position" means a position of strength which enables an enterprise to operate independent of competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market, or affect its competitors/consumers in its favour.

6 Case No. 19 of 2010 dated August 12, 2011. DLF filed an appeal against the order of the CCI with the Competition Appellate Tribunal. The Competition Appellate Tribunal stayed the payment of penalty and directed the CCI to amend the terms of DLF's builder contract to ensure that it is in conformity with the Act. On January 03, 2013, the CCI passed a supplementary order modifying the relevant clauses of the contract.

7 Section 5 deals with "combinations" and specifies the various financial thresholds based on (i) asset value and (ii) turnover, which once crossed, require the parties to seek an approval from the CCI for the proposed combination.

8 Under section 27, penalties are levied for any contravention of section 3 or 4 of the Act.

9 Under section 43A, penalties are levied in cases where information is not furnished to the CCI under section 6 of the Act for seeking a combination approval.

10 S.O. 481(E) dated March 04, 2011 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

11 Such orders are passed under section 26(1) of the Act.

12 In the event the DG recommends a contravention of the Act, the CCI can only pass an order under section 26(8) for further inquiring into the contravention in accordance with the Act. This section does not empower the CCI to close a case in such situations.

13 Under section 27, orders are passed by the CCI after inquiry into agreements of abuse of dominant position is completed by the DG. These orders only pertain to directing parties to discontinue the alleged practice, impose a penalty or modify the terms of any impugned agreement.

14 Case No. 10 of 2010 dated June 22, 2011.

15 See the CCI's orders in (i) All India Tyre Dealer's Federation vs. Tyre Manufacturers, MRTP Case: RTPE No. 20 of 2008 dated October 30, 2012; (ii) Film and Television Producers Guild of India vs. Multiplex Association of India, Mumbai and Others, Case No. 37 of 2011 dated January 03, 2013.

16 1969(2)SCC627.

17 Kesar Enterprises Limited vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, 2011(13)SCC733, wherein the SC emphasized on the principles of natural justice to be followed before imposition and recovery of penalty.

18 Section 27(g) of the Act empowers the CCI to pass any order or issue such directions as it may deem fit. This is a broad section giving residuary powers to the CCI.

19 Under section 53T of the Act, appeals from the Competition Appellate Tribunal vest with the SC within 60 days from the date of the order.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Dhruv Suri
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.