India: Veto Rights Relating To Quorum And Voting On Resolutions - Whether Enforceable Under The Indian Companies Act, 1956?

Last Updated: 25 July 2003
Article by Padmanabhan Iyer


It is quite common to observe in most of the Joint Venture Agreements ('JVA') that certain special rights or (veto rights as these are commonly known) retained by the JV parties qua Board meetings and General meetings. These rights are invariably incorporated in the Articles of Association (the 'Articles') of the Joint Venture Company. Generally these rights provides for the presence and / or affirmative vote of the JV parties to pass a resolution or to take a decision. The basic fabric of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') is democracy. In Board meeting or General meeting the principles of corporate democracy is stressed by providing for simple majority votes in most of the cases and three fourth majority for certain cases which require special resolution. Though there is no special resolution in the case of Board meeting, there is no prohibition either to provide for the same in the articles.

The professional opinion on these special rights is equally divided. The contention of the pro-group is that the Act provides for the framing of its own Articles for a company and since these rights are associated with the management of the company there is no bar to have such provisions in the Articles. On the contrary, the anti-group contends that these special rights are not in consistent with the provisions of sections 9,28,86,87 and 287 of the Act. This article examines the validity and enforceability of such veto rights.

Veto Rights

In Latin"Veto" means "I forbid". The term, according to New Webster's Dictionary, means "power or right of forbidding; to withhold assent to; to reject". Thus, veto rights mean the right to forbid or withhold assent or to reject. In other words, it is a special right given to a person to reject a proposal. As anybody can agree to or reject any proposal, one may ask, what is special in veto. The importance or specialty of veto is that when exercised it rejects the proposal inspite of the proposal having majority assent.

Reverse Veto Rights in the Articles of Association

Generally in the case of joint Ventures the JV parties provide certain special rights such as mandatory presence to form a valid quorum, mandatory affirmative vote to pass a resolution etc to each of them or any one of them, in the articles of association of the Joint Venture company. These rights are provided for to protect the interests of the parties. Though commonly these special rights are termed as veto rights, in stricter sense they are not veto rights for these rights are purported to block the formation of quorum or passing of resolutions by not exercising the rights. Thus, in real sense, these rights are Reverse Veto Rights ('RVR').

What is quorum

The term "Quorum" means, according to New Webster's Dictionary "the number of members that must be present at a meeting to make its transaction valid". Thus quorum is the least number of members who are required to be present at a meeting of a body of persons so as to make it a valid meeting. If the quorum is not present no meeting can be held.

Statutory Quorum.

Section 287 of the Act stipulates that the quorum for a meeting of the Board of directors of a company shall be one-third of its total strength or two directors whichever is higher. What this section prescribes is a statutory minimum quorum for conducting a valid Board meeting. While calculating the one-third of the strength, any fraction therein has to be rounded of to one. Thus, for example one-third of 5 directors shall be 2; and one-third of 7 shall be 3 and so on.

Articles can provide for higher quorum

The quorum as stipulated by the Act is the minimum quorum required under the Act. There is no prohibition for a company to fix a higher quorum than the statutory quorum1. For example, say the articles may provide for one -half of the strength of the Board or 5 directors or all the directors as quorum. However, the quorum requirement, in any event, should not be lesser than the statutory minimum. Thus, in any case, at least two directors are required to form a valid quorum.

RVR in formation of Quorum

This is normally known as "mandatory presence". When this right is provided for in the Articles of a company, a quorum is said to have been present only when a particular person puts his presence. The quorum fails, in spite of having the minimum number of the quorum, if such a mandatory presence is not made.

Generally the clause providing for such mandatory presence right is worded in the following manner.

" The quorum for the meeting of the Board of directors shall be 3, out of which at least one nominee director of Group A and one nominee director of Group B shall be present at all the Board meetings of the company"

"The quorum necessary for any general meeting of the members of the company shall be 2 members, whether present in person or by proxy, provided however, presence of Group A shall be necessary for constituting a valid quorum".

Let us assume that there are 5 directors and the quorum fixed is 3 directors. Group "A" has three nominees and Group "B" has two nominees. If at a meeting all the nominees of A are present but nominees of B absent themselves (reasons could be anything), whether there is a valid quorum or not? Likewise, let us assume there are 5 members 3 representing Group A and 2 representing Group B. If at a general meeting when the two members representing Group B present and Group A absents themselves, whether there is a valid quorum?

The power of the articles to fix a higher quorum than that of the statutory quorum extends only to the number of persons to form a quorum and it does not extend to a particular person belonging to a particular group. The reason is that, quorum denotes a "minimum number" out of the total numbers and not a particular person. If at all any particular person's presence is required, as a sine qua non for constituting a quorum, the language of section 287 would have been totally different. The intention of the Act is to prescribe the minimum number of persons to form a quorum so that a meeting can be held and as long as the number of persons required to form a quorum is present.

According to Section 9 of the Act any provision in the articles contrary to the provisions contained in the Act, to such extent of repugnancy, is void. Even The provisions of Table A, if run against the provisions of the Act, shall be void. The Madras High Court2 held that if the provisions in the articles patterned on the regulations of Table A or even the very regulations of Table A are found to be repugnant to any express provision of the Act, the court will not hesitate to declare the articles or the regulations of Table A void. The court further observed that any article in the Articles of any company is couched in a wide language in this behalf it will be the duty of the court to read the said clause or article consistent with the statutory provisions. If such harmonious reading is not possible, the clause in table A or the relevant article contained in the Articles of a company will have to yield to the provisions contained in the statute.

Where the articles of the company provided for circulation of resolution without being required to circulate the draft resolution to the directors for passing a circular resolution was struck down as being repugnant to section 2893.

The freedom provided, under section 28 of the Act, to modify Table A and to have its own regulations, ipso facto, does not authorise any company to provide for regulations which give a "special right" to any particular group or person holding same kind of share capital. Rights are associated with shares and equal rights are ensured for every class of shareholders within their class. In this context it is pertinent to mention that the Supreme Court4 has held that one section of the Act could not have intended to prevent what another section on the same Act made legal.

In view of the above discussion the non- presence of the veto member will not invalidate the quorum of the meeting. The ideal way to ensure the compulsory presence of any particular person would be to fix the number of quorum at such a figure that without the presence of a particular person quorum could never be constituted. In the above example, the quorum could have been fixed at 4 directors so that the presence of the nominee of Group B is ensured without falling foul with the statutory provision. In the same manner instead of fixing the quorum for general meeting at 2, it could have been fixed at 3 which will ensure the mandatory presence of Group A.

RVR in voting.

This is normally known as "affirmative vote". When this right is provided for in the articles of association of a company, a resolution is said to have been passed only when a particular person casts his affirmative vote. The resolution fails, inspite of having majority of votes, if such an affirmative vote is not casted.

Generally the clause providing for such affirmative voting right is worded in the following manner.

"The decision pertaining to the following matters shall require an affirmative vote in favour of such decision by at least one member belonging to Group B"

Suppose Group A has 76% and group B has 24%. Group B rejects an ordinary resolution and a special resolution though the resolutions were supported by Group B. Whether the resolutions are said to have been passed or not?

The first question which arises is whether such affirmative voting rights can be provided under the Act? Section 87 of the Act confers with equal voting right on all shareholders belonging to the same class. Thus, in terms of the provisions of section 87 special voting rights cannot be provided to members of the same class.

However, section 86 of the Act, provides for the issue of equity shares with differential rights as to voting, dividend or otherwise. For this there ought to be two different classes of equity shares, one is the normal equity share with normal rights and the other is the special equity share with special voting rights. In view of this, special voting rights can be given to a particular class of shares and not to a particular group or a person belonging to the same class. Though different class of equity shares with different voting rights can be issued, the special right can be given by providing for graded votes, say Class A shares will have one vote and Class B shares will have two vote per share.

Nowhere the Act says that only with the affirmative vote of a particular person or group a resolution can be passed. Conversely, the Act nowhere stipulates that a resolution shall fail when a person, having affirmative vote, fails to cast the vote. Thus, in order to defeat a resolution the votes cast against it should be more than the votes cast for it in the event of ordinary resolution. Similarly in the case of special resolution the votes cast for the resolution should be three times the votes cast against it. In other words, in a meeting a resolution can be defeated only by casting votes against it and not by absenting or refraining from casting vote.

In view of this the affirmative voting right of Group B, will not stand in the way of passing resolutions by Group A, provided the requirements of the Act are satisfied. The only manner in which Group A can defeat a special resolution is by holding at least 26%; and an ordinary resolution can be defeated by only holding 50% shares.


Company law is based on the principles of shareholders democracy and as such the majority will always hold sway. Veto rights are measures intended to protect the interests of the minority group. Certain basic rights, which are the bedrock of corporate democracy, such as attending the meeting, voting thereat etc are not amenable to modification in contrary to the substantive legal provisions of the Act. Even if the Articles contain such clauses, the enforcement of the same through a court of law will not be possible. Hence, the better manner to protect the interests of the minority group or a JV partner is to ensure the same within the four walls of legally permitted methods.


1 Amrit Kaur Puri vs Kapurthala Flour Oil & General Mills Co Pvt Ltd, (1984) 56 Comp.Cases 194 (P&H)

2 Southern Roadways Ltd v CIT (1981) 51 Comp.Cases 513 (Mad) (FB).

3 Mazda Theaters Pvt Ltd vs New Bank of India Ltd, ILR (1975) 1 DEL 1.

4 Oriental Metal Pressing Works (P) Ltd vs Bhaskar Kashinath Thakur, (1961) 31 Comp.Cases 143 (SC)

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.


To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions