India: Re-Visiting Bhatia International

Last Updated: 27 November 2012
Article by Niyati Nath and Khursheed Vajifdar

A five-member constitutional bench of the Indian Supreme Court (the 'Court') is currently reconsidering the ratio articulated by the Court in Bhatia International v Bulk Trading SA [2002] 4 SCC 105.

The Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the 'Act') has four distinct parts, of which Parts I and II are relevant for this article. Part I applies where the place of arbitration is in India; among other things it confers powers on the Indian courts to grant interim measures (section 9), to appoint and replace arbitrators (section 11) and to set aside arbitral awards (section 34). Part II is concerned with the recognition and enforcement in India of foreign awards that fall within the scope of the 1958 New York Convention and the 1927 Geneva Convention.

In the case of Bhatia, a three-judge bench of the Court considered the matter of a request to an Indian court for interim measures of protection by a party to an arbitration seated in Paris. One of the respondents had sought interim relief from the court under Part I of the Act. The appellant objected that the application could not be allowed on the basis that Part I did not apply to arbitrations seated outside India. The district judge held that the application was maintainable. The matter eventually reached the Court on a second appeal.

The Court held that the provisions of Part I of the Act apply to all arbitrations, including international commercial arbitrations seated outside India, unless the parties have expressly or impliedly excluded its application. The Court's reasons for the finding were as follows:

  • If the Act does not assure parties to an arbitration governed by Part II the right to apply for interim relief pursuant to section 9 (Part I), the parties will find themselves without a remedy, as far as obtaining interim relief in India is concerned.
  • Section 2(2) of the Act provides that Part I will apply where the place of arbitration is in India and section 2(4) of the Act uses the words 'every arbitration'. Section 2(5) refers to 'all arbitrations and to all proceedings relating thereto'. Section 2 is in Part I of the Act. The Court was of the view that the finding that Part I applies to all arbitrations resolves any apparent inconsistency between these provisions.
  • The Act is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law (the 'Model Law'). The provision of the Model Law that is analogous to section 2(2) of the Act states that the law, with the exception of certain provisions, will apply only if the arbitration takes place in the territory of the state. The Court reads the omission of the word 'only' in section 2(2) as further evidence of legislative intent to permit Part I of the Act to apply to arbitrations that take place outside India.
  • Section 44 states that a foreign award is an award issued in a territory that is a signatory to the New York Convention and that has been notified by the Government of India as a reciprocating territory. Awards issued in arbitration proceedings that take place in countries that are not signatories to the New York Convention and/or are not notified as reciprocating territories ('non-Convention awards') are not foreign awards and are not governed by Part II of the Act. Section 2(7) states that an arbitral award made under Part I shall be considered a domestic award. The Court observed that there would be no need to define an award as a domestic award unless the intention was to address awards that would otherwise not be covered by this definition, such as non-Convention awards. The Court was of the view that the legislature intended Part I to apply to all arbitrations. This interpretation facilitates the enforcement of non-Convention awards in India.

The ratio in Bhatia was subsequently extended in other decisions to permit Indian courts to set aside foreign awards1 and to appoint arbitrators in arbitrations seated outside India.2 Bhatia and the string of cases that follow it have been widely criticised for judicial over-reach and for creating significant uncertainty and delay in arbitrations that are seated outside India but involve Indian counter-parties or laws. It has thus become standard practice in India-related commercial transactions and arbitration agreements to expressly exclude the application of Part I to arbitrations seated outside India, with a view to escape the consequences of Bhatia.

The Indian judiciary has also evinced discomfort with the findings in Bhatia and its like-minded successors. It has, in recent decisions sought to restrict the applicability of Part I of the Act to arbitrations seated outside India. Indian courts have also demonstrated a willingness to infer implied exclusions of Part I where parties have chosen a foreign seat and a foreign law to govern the arbitration.3

In December 2011, while considering the case of Bharat Aluminium v Kaiser Aluminium,4 the Court decided that a fivemember constitutional bench of the Court would reconsider the Court's own ruling in Bhatia. The Court invited interested parties to intervene in order to assist the Court as amicus curiae. In response, the London Court of International Arbitration India (LCIA India), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and the Nani Palkhivala Arbitration Centre intervened in the proceedings. Hearings commenced on 10 January 2012 and continued until 29 February 2012. An array of counsel presented their views to the constitutional bench. They made the following submissions, amongst others:

  • The law of the seat or place where the arbitration is held is the appropriate law to govern the arbitration. The theory and practice of international commercial arbitration supports the territorial link between the seat of arbitration and the law governing the arbitration. The Model Law on which the Act is based adopts the territorial principle, as does the Act. The territoriality principle mandates the regulation of the conduct of the arbitration and challenge to the award by the courts of the country in which the arbitration is conducted.
  • An Indian court may grant interim relief only if so authorised by the law. Section 9 of the Act enables the court to grant interim measures of protection before or during arbitral proceedings or at any time after the making of an arbitral award but before the award is enforced pursuant to section 36 of the Act. These powers are wider than the powers available to a civil court under the general Indian law. Part I of the Act (including section 9) does not apply to arbitration seated outside India; consequently, Indian courts cannot grant interim relief in an arbitration seated outside India pursuant to the general law.
  • Non Convention awards cannot be enforced pursuant to the Act as neither Part I nor Part II apply. They may be enforced in India by filing a suit that seeks enforcement of the award under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The award will have to be proven in the suit.
  • The only remedy against a foreign award is to oppose its enforcement pursuant to Part II of the Act. One cannot seek to have the award set aside pursuant to section 34 (Part I).
  • Counsel supporting Bhatia submitted that section 9 is applicable to all arbitrations irrespective of the seat of arbitration. If section 9 is held not to apply to an arbitration seated outside India where a party's assets are located within India, then such arbitration will be rendered infructuous. The nature of the relief granted pursuant to section 9 is interim and conservatory. Such relief does not militate against the principle that courts ought not to interfere in arbitration proceedings. The rules for arbitration promulgated by the LCIA, the SIAC and UNCITRAL are hospitable to the idea of parties seeking interim measures of protection from national courts.

While the constitutional bench appeared to be of the prima facie view that Part I ought not to apply to arbitrations seated outside India, it was troubled at the prospect of leaving a party to an arbitration seated outside India without recourse to the provisions of section 9. The Court asked counsel for their views on:

  • whether parties may instead apply to the Indian courts for an interlocutory order pursuant to order 39 of the CPC; and
  • whether an Indian court may grant interim relief to parties pursuant to sections 8 and 45 of the Act. These provisions permit a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration at the request of one of the parties, where there is an arbitration agreement. Section 8 applies to arbitrations governed by Part I while section 45 applies to arbitrations governed by Part II.

Some counsel expressed the view that a party to an arbitration seated outside India may, in fact, file a suit seeking a Mareva injunction to freeze the assets of the other party. Most were of the view, however, that the remedy of an interlocutory order pursuant to the CPC is not available or ought not to be available for the following reasons:

  • where the arbitration is yet to be initiated, the suit seeking interlocutory orders pursuant to order 39 may amount to a waiver of the party's right to arbitrate in respect of the same cause of action;
  • where the arbitration is pending at the time of filing such suit, the suit will not have a separate cause of action from the pending arbitration and will not be maintainable;
  • the final relief in the suit will in fact be an interim relief. This is not permitted by Indian law;
  • the court's powers to grant interim relief pursuant to section 9 of the Act are far wider than the powers granted pursuant to the CPC and thus, in relation to arbitrations where section 9 does not apply, Indian courts are not authorised by general law to grant the interim relief envisaged by section 9;
  • in the case of Siskina v DistosCompaniaNaviera SA [1979] AC 210, an English court considered whether it had the jurisdiction to order interim measures in respect of substantive proceedings outside its jurisdiction, merely on the basis that certain assets were located within its jurisdiction. The court held that interlocutory relief does not exist in isolation. If a court does not have jurisdiction to decide a dispute in relation to the underlying cause of action, it may not grant interlocutory relief; and
  • the courts of the seat of arbitration have jurisdiction to issue interim measures in an arbitration proceeding. If Indian courts are given concurrent jurisdiction, there is a danger that parallel proceedings will be commenced before both sets of courts that may result in multiple and mutually inconsistent decisions. This will create further uncertainty and delays.

In response to the question of whether interim relief may be granted by Indian courts in arbitrations seated outside India pursuant to section 45 of the Act, most counsel replied in the negative.

At the time of writing, the judgment is awaited. All eyes are on this litigation, with investors, Indian and foreign corporations and the international legal community waiting eagerly for the Court's ruling. The Court has the opportunity to overturn Bhatia, to reduce the scope of judicial interference in arbitrations seated outside India and to improve the climate for enforcement of foreign awards in India.


1 Venture Global Engineering v Satyam Computer Services Ltd [2008] 4 SCC 190.

2 Indtel Technical Services Pvt Ltd v WS Atkins Plc [2008] 10 SCC 308.

3 Videocon Industries Ltd v Union of India [2011] 6 SCC 161; Yograj Infrastructure Ltd v Sang Yong Engineering and Construction Co Ltd [2011] 9 SCC 735.

4 Civil Appeal No 7019 of 2005.

This article first appeared in the September 2012 issue of the Arbitration Newsletter of the Legal Practice Division of the International Bar Association (Vol 17, No 2), and is reproduced by kind permission of the International Bar Association, London, UK. © International Bar Association.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions