India: Letters Of Request; Hague Convention On The Service Abroad Of Judicial And Extrajudicial Documents And Taking Of Evidence AbroadIn Civil Or Commercial Matters — An Indian Perspective

Last Updated: 27 November 2012

p>Article by Ginny Jetley Rautray*

A. Letter of Request – meaning of.

Letters of Request / Rogatory is a formal communication in writing sent by the Court in which action is pending to a foreign court or Judge requesting the testimony of a witness residing within the jurisdiction of that foreign court may be formally taken thereon under its direction and transmitted to the issuing court making such request for use in a pending legal contest or action. This request entirely depends upon the comity of courts towards each other and usages of the court of another nation1.

India became a party to the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, and also the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters in 2007.

B. The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters 1965.

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters 1965 ["Service Convention"] entered into force in India in 2007. India has made a reservation to the Convention objecting to service of process by mail, or directly on defendants through judicial officers in India (i.e. advocate or private process server) without the involvement of the designated Central Authority. Further, the documents for service must be written in English.

Under the Service Convention, a Central Authority is designated and all requests for service can be sent to it. The request for service of documents should be in English language or accompanied by an English translation. The service of judicial documents through diplomatic or consular channels is limited to the nationals of the State in which the documents originate.

The request should be modeled along the lines of the model annexed to the Hague Service Convention. The authority or judicial officer competent under the law of the state of origin must send the document to the Central Authority of the relevant state. The Central Authority would then either execute the service itself or arrange for it to be executed by other means provided in Article 5 of the Service Convention.

The Central Authority for service is the Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs situated at 4th Floor, A-Wing, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi, 110001, India2.

C. The Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters [the Hague Convention].

(a) Objective of the Hague Convention:

The Hague Convention was concluded to facilitate the transmission and execution of Letters of Request and to further the accommodation of the different methods used for this purpose in order to improve mutual judicial cooperation in civil or commercial matters.

Signatories to the Hague Convention have agreed to discovery of documents and testimony. Under Hague Convention discovery of documents can be sought by means of a Letter of Request, issued by the court where the action is pending and transmitted to the "Central Authority" of the jurisdiction where the discovery is located. The Central Authority responsible for transmitting the request to the appropriate judicial body for a response (Articles 1 and 2). A Letter of Request can also be issued for seeking deposition testimony to be taken before a diplomatic or consular officer (Article 3).

The contracting States to the Hague Convention are required to establish a Central Authority responsible for accepting and processing Letters of Request from other contracting States.

(b) Central Authority designated under the Hague Convention:

India, pursuant to Article 2 of the Hague Convention, has designated a Central Authority to receive Letters of Request from a judicial authority of another Contracting State and to transmit them to the authority competent to execute them. The Central Authority designated by India for this purpose is:

  • The Ministry of Law and Justice and the High Courts in all states and union territories in India (under Articles 2, 16 and 17).
  • The district court in whose territory the evidence is to be taken (under Article 18).
  • The Central Authority and the relevant court (under Article 8).

The Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs is situated at 4th floor, A-Wing, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi, India.

(c) Reservation / declaration made by India to the Hague Convention:

India has spelt out its reservations ("declaration") under the Hague Convention in the following terms:

  • All requests under the Convention shall be in the English language, or accompanied with an English translation.
  • Subject to prior authorization of the Central Authority and the concerned court, members of the judicial personnel of the requesting Contracting Party may be present at the execution of a letter of request.
  • Evidence by diplomatic officers or consular agents of Indian nationals or nationals of a third State under Article 16 of the Convention can be taken with the prior permission of the Central Authority.
  • In accordance with Article 18, a diplomatic or consular officer or a commissioner authorized under Article 15, 16 and 17 may apply for appropriate assistance to obtain the evidence by compulsion to the District Court within whose territory the evidence is to be taken.

The Republic of India will not execute Letters of Request issued in pursuance of Article 23 of the Convention for the purpose of obtaining pre-trial discovery of documents, which requires a person to produce any documents other than particular documents specified in the Letter of Request, which are likely to be in his possession, custody or power.

(d) Letter of Request:

The Letter of request to take depositions should be modeled on the Hague Model Letter of Request and submitted to the Indian Central Authority designated for the Hague Convention3. Article 3 of the Hague Convention provides that a Letter of Request shall specify:

(a) the authority requesting its execution and the authority requested to execute it, if known to the requesting authority;

(b) the names and addresses of the parties to the proceedings and their representatives, if any;

(c) the nature of the proceedings for which the evidence is required, giving all necessary information in regard thereto;

(d) the evidence to be obtained or other judicial act to be performed.

Where appropriate, the Letter shall specify, inter alia:

(e) the names and addresses of the persons to be examined;

(f) the questions to be put to the persons to be examined or a statement of the subject matter about which they are to be examined;

(g) the documents or other property; real or personal, to be inspected;

(h) any requirement that the evidence is to be given on oath or affirmation, and any special form to be used;

(i) any special method or procedure to be followed under Article 9.

A letter may also mention any information necessary for the application of Article 11. No legalization or other like formality may be required.

A Letter of Request coming from a judicial authority of a Contracting State will be received in another Contracting State by a designated Central Authority who shall then transmit the Letter to the authority competent to execute them. The Letter shall be sent to the Central Authority of the State of execution without being transmitted through any other authority of that State (Article 2).

Whom to address? The Letter of Request must be addressed to the appropriate High Court in India within whose jurisdiction the witness resides. There are at present 21 High Courts for 28 States in India. The Request must clearly mention the address of the witness.

A Letter of Request cannot be used to obtain evidence which is not intended for use in judicial proceedings, commenced or contemplated. A Letter of Request may be issued to obtain evidence or to perform some other judicial act, in civil or commercial matters, by a judicial authority of a Contracting State in accordance with the provisions of the law of that State to the competent authority of another Contracting State (Article 1). The expression "other judicial act" does not cover the service of judicial documents or the issuance of any process by which judgments or orders are executed or enforced, or orders for provisional or protective measures.

(e) The procedure for taking evidence in India:

Upon issuance of a Letter of Request by a foreign court which is normally addressed to the High Court in the appellate jurisdiction in which the witness is situated, the concerned High Court would appoint a commissioner and issue a direction to him as it may deem fit and appropriate. The fee of the commissioner is normally borne by the party seeking to take evidence. The Commissioner would fix a date for recording of the evidence. The evidence is recorded in the manner desired by the foreign court. After the recording of the evidence the Commissioner would have to file the evidence with the High Court. The High Court would either forward it to the central government which would transmit it to the foreign court issuing the request or may allow the entire record of the Commissioner's report be transmitted by the applicant directly to the foreign court.

(f) Pre-trial discovery of documents:

Article 23 of the Hague Convention specifically provides that a contracting State could make a declaration "that it will not execute Letters of Request issued for the purpose of obtaining pre-trial discovery of documents as known in Common Law countries."

Contracting States which have executed a declaration under Article 23 are:

Argentina, Australia, Bulgaria, China, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, South Africa, Seychelles, Singapore, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Venezuela

(g) Expression "Evidence" includes production of documents:

The expression "Evidence" is confined to one or other mode of evidence and it extends to both oral testimony as well as production of documents through the named witnesses. The Delhi High Court in the Upaid Systems Ltd.4 case held that there was nothing in Order 26 Rule 19 of the CPC to limit the language to only "oral evidence" and eschew documentary evidence which may come within the expression "evidence"; nor was there any warrant to interpret the provision in the light of subsequently ratified convention, with declaration, by India. Indian law even permits through Order 11 Rules 12 to 14 CPC, courts to direct disclosure/discovery of documents which may later be determined to be inadmissible or irrelevant5.

(h) Approach of Indian courts:

The power to legislate in respect of treaties lies with the Parliament under Entries 10 and 14 of List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Even though the Indian Parliament has not enacted a special law to give effect to the Hague Convention, it would not take away the courts power to act on a Letter of Request in terms of the provisions of Order 26, Rules 19 to 22 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)6. Further, Article 27 of the Hague Convention provides that the Convention would not affect any existing law a contracting state may have on the subject.

An international treaty entered into by India cannot become law of the land and it cannot be implemented unless Indian Parliament passes a law7. The Indian Supreme Court in Kesoram Industries case8 relied on the decision in Corocraft Ltd. v. Pan American Airways Inc.9, wherein Lord Denning observed that it is the duty of the courts to construe the legislation so as to be in conformity with international law and not in conflict with it. It is one thing to say that legislation may be interpreted in conformity with international principles but is entirely a different thing to give effect to a treaty provision in the absence of municipal laws.

The Indian government has in its response to a questionnaire on the Hague Convention adopted the stand that the implementation of the convention into municipal laws of India is through section 78 and Order 26, Rule 19 to 22 of the CPC.

Section 78 of the CPC deals with commissions issued by foreign Courts and reads as under:

"Section 78: Commissions issued by foreign courts. Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be prescribed, the provisions as to the execution and return of commissions for the examination of witnesses shall apply to commissions issued by or at the instance of-

(a) Courts situate in any part of India to which the provisions of this Code do not extend; or

(b) Courts established or continued by the authority of the Central Government outside India; or

(c) Courts of any State or country outside India".

Section 78 of the CPC must be read with Order 26 Rules 19 to 22. The object of Section 78(c) of CPC is to facilitate collection of evidence pursuant to a request received from a foreign court.

Order 26 Rule 16 provides for the powers of the commissioner including power to call for documents. Rule 16 refers to express powers of a commissioner to (a) examine the parties themselves and any witness whom they or any of them may produce, and any other person whom he thinks proper to call upon to give evidence in the matter referred to him; and (b) call for and examine documents and other things relevant to the subject of inquiry. Rules 16 states:

"16. Powers of Commissioners.- Any Commissioner appointed under this Order may, unless otherwise directed by the order of appointment,-

(a) examine the parties themselves and any witness whom they or any of them may produce, and any other person whom the Commissioner thinks proper to call upon to give evidence in the matter referred to him;

(b) call for and examine documents and other things relevant to the subject of inquiry;

(c) at any reasonable time enter upon or into any land or building mentioned in the order."

Order 26, Rules 19 to 22 of the CPC specifically deals with Letters of Request issued by a foreign court for taking evidence of witnesses residing in India. Rule 19 specifically deals with cases in which a High Court may issue commission to examine witness.

"19. Cases in which High Court may issue Commission to examine witness-(1) If a High Court is satisfied-

(a) that a foreign court situated in a foreign country wishes to obtain the evidence of a witness in any proceedings before it,

(b) that the proceeding is of a civil nature, and

(c) that the witness is residing within the limits of the High Court's appellate jurisdiction, it may, subject to the provisions of Rule 20, issue a commission for the examination of such witness.

(2) Evidence may be given of the matters specified in clauses (a), (b) and (e) of sub- rule (1)-

(a) by a certificate signed by the consular officer of the foreign country of the highest rank in India and transmitted to the High Court through the Central Government, or

(b) by a letter of request issued by the foreign court and transmitted to the High Court through the Central Government, or

(c) by a letter of request issued by the foreign court and produced before the High Court by a party to the proceedings."

Power to appoint a commissioner is established under Order 26, Rule 19 of CPC notwithstanding that the treaty is not incorporated into the municipal laws. A reading of Order 26, Rule 19 would reveal that the courts in India, upon receiving a request from a foreign court for assistance have to satisfy itself three conditions:

(a) the proceeding is in the foreign court;

(b) it is a "civil" (as opposed to a criminal proceeding) proceeding and;

(c) the witness whose deposition is sought lives within its jurisdiction.

Rules 20, 21 and 22 of Order 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure read as follows:

"Rule 20: Application for issue of commission- The High Court may issue a commission under Rule 19:

(a) upon application by a party to the proceedings before the foreign court, or

(b) upon an application by a law officer of the State Government acting under instructions from the State Government"

Rule 21: To whom commission may be issued. A commission under Rule 19 may be issued to any court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the witness resides, of where the witness resides within the local limits of (the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Court) to any person whom the court thinks fit to execute the commission.

Rule 22: Issue, execution and return of Commissions and transmission of evidence of foreign court.

The provisions of Rules 6, 15, sub-rule (1) of Rules 16-A, 17, 18 and 18-B of this Order in so far as they are applicable shall apply to the issue, execution and return of such commissions, and when any such commission has been duly executed it shall be returned, together with the evidence taken under it, to the High Court, which shall forward it to the Central Government, along with the letter of request for transmission to the foreign court."

The court within whose jurisdiction the witness resides will be the appropriate court to execute the letter of request. Simply because a witness has not been specified in the letter of request issued by a foreign court would not make the request unenforceable especially in the light of the language of Order 26 Rule 19 read along with Rules 17, 20, 21 and 22.

(i) Conclusion:

Order 26 Rule 19 and 20 do not confer any power upon Indian courts to go into a proprietary of the letter of request or the questions of relevance or admissibility of the evidence. The questions of relevancy and admissibility are to be considered by the court issuing the letter of request. The very fact that the letter of request had been issued implies that it has been issued after taking into account the question of relevance and admissibility as well by the foreign court. Indian court would not sit in appeal over the orders of foreign court on this aspect of the matter10.


* Partner, Rautray & Co., New Delhi, India. (Email:

1 Union of India v. W.N. Chadha, AIR 1993 Supreme Court 1082.

2 See:

3 See:

4 Upaid Systems Ltd. v. Satyam Computer Services, (2009) 164 DLT 45.

5 M.L. Sethi v. R.P. Kapoor, AIR 1972 SC 2379.

6 Upaid Systems Ltd. v. Satyam Computer Services, (2009) 164 DLT 45.

7 Article 253 of the Constitution of India. See: State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries, (2004) 10 SCC 201.

8 State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries, (2004) 10 SCC 201.

9 [1969] 1 All ER 82.

10 Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Amr Technology Inc., Power of Attorney Col. J. K.Sharma v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., Andhra Pradesh High Court (Decided on: 8 December 2008). Also see: Wooster Products Inc v. Magna Tek Inc, (1988) 2 ARB LR 184 (Delhi) wherein the court observed: "The question of relevance has to be decided not in accordance with Indian Law but law of the Foreign Court where civil proceedings are pending and it would be beyond jurisdiction of this court to adjudicate upon the question of relevance of the said documents".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions