India: Legal Risk of Entering Into OTC Derivatives Including Currency and Interest Rate Swaps in India

Last Updated: 29 November 2002
Article by Sandeep Parekh

Mr Sandeep Parekh is an Advocate, LL.M. (Securities and Financial Regulations), admitted to the New York bar. Visiting Faculty, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.

One of the largest risks in signing an over the counter ("OTC") derivatives contract is the uncertainty of the contract being declared void by a court. OTC derivatives contract exclude futures and options that are traded on stock exchanges or other exchanges. The exchange-based derivatives will soon be in the market and there are specific laws which will permit their trading. The Exchanges themselves have framed extensive regulations to regulate such trades and such derivatives contracts are outside the scope of this paper. OTC derivatives contracts are those derivatives contracts which are entered into between two (or more) parties, in other words they are traded by negotiated deals between the parties who are known as counterparties.. The rights of such parties would flow from the contract entered into between them. There are standardised international contracts which suggest standard documentation for entering into such documentation. Though there are hundreds of types of OTC derivatives we shall for the sake of clarity restrict ourselves to foreign currency swaps or interest rate swaps. Such swaps are permitted by the RBI but may fall foul of the Indian Contract Act 1872.

A swap is defined by the Encyclopaedia of Banking and Finance by Charles J. Woelfel (10th Ed.) as

"A financial transaction in which two counter-parties agree to exchange streams of payment over time according to a pre-determined rule. A Swap is normally used to transform the market exposure associated with a loan or bond borrowing from one interest rate base (fixed term or floating rate) or currency of [one] denomination to another."

Swaps are of two primary type (i) Interest swaps and (ii) Currency Swaps.

The RBI under its Exchange Control Manual ("ECM") expressly permits a foreign currency swap or an interest rate swap (presumably based on a foreign currency) if an authorised dealer in Foreign Exchange and another counterparty enter into it.

3C.8 (i) Authorised dealers may arrange foreign currency-rupee swaps between corporates who run exposures arising out of their long-term foreign currency commitments. Entities in the system who do not have any forex exposure but are willing to assume a forex liability in lieu of their long term rupee liability may also become counter parties in the arrangement. (Emphasis supplied)

(ii) Authorised dealers may enter into foreign currency-rupee swaps between entities to assist the exchange of such obligations between them and absorb the residual currency/interest mismatches within their open position/gap discipline.

NOTE: A Swap is a financial transaction in which two counterparts agree to exchange streams of payments or cash flows over a period of time with a view to achieving overall cost reduction for bother parties. Hence it is not the intention that authorised dealers should allow the swap route to become a surrogate for forward contracts for those who do not qualify for forward cover under paragraphs 3C.1, 3C.2 and 3C.6.

Thus under the ECM, it would be permissible to enter into a foreign currency swap with an authorised dealer without a foreign currency exposure.

The Indian Contract Act ("the Act") sings a different tune for entering into swaps. It may be mentioned that the Contract Act being a statutory Act overrides the Exchange Control Manual which are guidelines imposed by the RBI (which have the effect of law but are of inferior power and would be have to cede to a contrary statute in force). In case the guidelines clash with the Act, the Act would prevail. The guidelines cannot permit what the Act prohibits. S.30 of the Act of 1892, reads thus in so far as relevant:-

30. "Agreements by way of wager are void; and no suit shall be brought for recovering anything alleged to be won on any wager, or entrusted to any person to abide the result of any game or other uncertain event on which any wager is made".

In Pollock and Mulla's Contract Act, (11th Ed., 1994, pages 478-469), "wager" is described thus: -

"What is wager? "A wager has been defined as a contract by A to pay money to B on the happening of a given event, in consideration of B paying to him money on the event not happening. But Sir William Anson's definition, "a promise to give money or moneys worth upon the determination or ascertainment of an uncertain event," is nearer and more accurate. To constitute a wager "the parties must contemplate the determination of the uncertain event as the sole condition of their contract. One may thus distinguish a genuine wager from a conditional promise or a guarantee". Anson, Law of Contract, 17th Ed., 221, 222)".

In Alamia v. Positive Government Security Life Assurance Co., (23 Bom 191 at pp 209-210) a case of life insurance, Fulton J. said:

"What is the meaning of the phrase "agreements by way of wager" in S. 30 of the Contract Act? ... Can it be that the words mean something different in India from what the corresponding words "agreements by way of wagering" mean in England? I do not see how such an argument can be maintained, or how the fact that the 14 Geo III c.48 is not in force in India affects the question. In Hampden V. Walsh Cockburn C. J. defined a wager as a contract by A to pay money to B on the happening of a given event in consideration of B paying money to him on the event not happening, and said that since the passing of 8 and 9 Vict. c. 109 there is no longer as regards action any distinction between one class of wager and another, all wagers being made null and void at law by the statute. In Thacker V. Hardy,, Cotton L.J. said that the essence of gaming and wagering was that one party was to win and other was to lose upon a future event, which at the time of the contract was of an uncertain nature; but he also pointed out that there were some transactions in which the parties might lose and gain according to the happening of a future event which did not fall within the phrase. Such transactions, of course, are common enough, including the majority of forward purchases and sales."

Wagering contracts may assume a variety of forms, and a type with which the Courts have constantly dealt is that which provides for the payment of differences in stock transactions, with or without colourable provisions for the completion of purchases. Such provisions, if inserted, will not prevent the court from examining the real nature of the agreement as a whole. (RE: Gieve, 1988. 1Q.B 794, C.A.) "The distinction is doubtless rather subtle, and probably lies more in the intention of the parties than in the form of the contract". (Trimble V. Hill, 1879, 5 A.C. 342 and Kathama Natchiilar V. Dorasinga, 1875, 2 I.a. 169, 186).

Speculative transactions must be distinguished from agreements by way of wager. "There is no law against speculation as there is against gambling. (J.H.Todd V. Lakshmidas, 1892, 16 Bom 441, 445-446).

In an article "Are Swaps Gambling Contracts? " by Gillian Hogarth (Baker and Mckenzie, London, June 1993), it is stated that there has always been a residual doubt as to whether a contract for differences, such as an interest rate or currency swap could constitute "Gaming or Wagering" contracts. The author resolves this doubt with the following statement:-

"the case of Morgan Grenfell & Company Limited V. Welwyn Hatfield District Council and Islington London Brough Council (as a third party) 30th April, 1993, in the Commercial Court before Mr.Justice Hobhouse, addresses this question. Mr.Justice Hobhouse handed down his decision on 30th April, 1993. He held that, whilst swap agreements had potentially speculative characteristics, for a contract to constitute a gaming or wagering contract by virtue of Sections 18 of the Gaming Act, 1845 and Section 1 of the Gaming Act, 1892, it must have been the intention of both, and not merely one, of the parties at the time of entering into the contract that the purpose of the transaction was to wager. If the transaction is entered into by parties or institution involved in the capital market and appears to be commercial or financial transaction with a potential for wagering, evidence must be adduced to rebut the inference that the transaction is commercial or financial one to which the law will give full recognition and effect."

For a contract to be void under Section 30 of the Act, there must be an absence of an underlying to the transaction. To quote Anson (p.280, 21st Ed), a recognised authority on Contracts Law: The parties must however contemplate the determination of the uncertain event as the sole condition of their contract and not as a mere incident in the larger transaction of a contract for the sale of goods on certain terms. To distil the law into a single sentence a wager requires a) speculation on both sides that would be determined by a future uncertain event b) absence of underlying c) settlement of differences by a set-off payment.

The ECM expressly by its terms permits entering into a currency swap so long as it is between a bank and a corporate and so long as there is an underlying transaction. By introducing an element of an 'underlying' to the swap, the RBI intended to bring the specified swaps out of the proscription of a wager as contained in Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act. By implication RBI admits that even foreign currency swaps are governed by the Indian Contract Act. If the contract is not a foreign currency swap it would not have the (express-but-limited) safe harbour of the RBI, but would be governed purely by the Indian Contract Act. The RBI permission to let entities enter into a currency swap without an actual currency exposure would similarly be regulated by the case law on wagering contract; which requires that the speculative intent of one party alone would be insufficient to strike down the contract as a wager. However a case where both parties intend merely to speculate, and since every swap contract is settled by differences and since the value of the swap would depend on a future uncertain event such contracts could potentially be declared void by a court of law.

Thus a limited class of people would potentially be faced with their swap contracts being declared void. It is thus extremely important for at least one party to demonstrate in the contract itself that the reason it is entering into the contract is more than mere speculation. It should narrate with all relevant facts how the swap is either a hedge or if it is speculative how it would be set off by say the party’s export obligations. To illustrate, Company X has substantial export orders and it enters into a swap agreement whereby it will be liable to pay Company Y if the rupee moves down in respect to the dollar. If the rupee moves down, company X would lose on the swap but would make more money on account of increased revenues on the export front thus creating a matched books effect, or a hedged position in net.

If either or both parties do not so do, it would be upon the court to infer the intent of both the parties. At the end of the day the party which is the net creditor on the basis of the swap undergoes a risk of a legal default, which it could have easily avoided by mentioning the lack of speculative intent in the swap contract itself. If the loss is very substantial, the debtor party may find it economically feasible to challenge the legality of the contract even if it knew that it did not have any speculative intent when it entered into the contract.Conducting or engaging in the business of swaps is a lawful and legitimate part of the activities of financial institutions. The object of such transactions is not to wager but to insure the possible loss occasioned by fluctuations in interest rates or variation in the rupee value. A certain amount of speculation is involved in these transactions but all speculation is not wager. Speculation too is not implicated by the prohibition on wagering, only speculation which is capable of being set off and which has no underlying, in other words a mere bet on a future event would be prohibited. A swap by definition involves a set-off of payments, however a set-off which will create a hedge would not be speculative and therefore legitimate. This is reinforced by the fact that RBI (by the ECM) permits certain swaps which obviously are not illegal under the Contracts Act. If forex swaps are legal under the Contract Act, there appears no reason why interest swaps or other OTC derivatives would be hit by the wager prohibition, of course subject to the limitations already discussed above.

The author is an Advocate based in New Delhi.

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not represent our legal advice as to any particular set of facts.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions