Hong Kong: A Question Of Construction - Hong Kong Court Rules That Arbitration Clause In Head Contract Was Not Incorporated Into Sub-Contract

Last Updated: 23 September 2019
Article by Damon So and Nigel Sharman

The question of whether an arbitration clause has been successfully incorporated into a contract is one that has come before the courts regularly, with different jurisdictions taking different approaches to what counts as effective incorporation. Difficulties arise in particular in situations where chains of contracts collide, as in the typical construction scenario, and where the reference is to standard forms rather than individually-negotiated contracts.

In Yun Kwan Construction Engineering Ltd v Shui Tai Construction Engineering Co Ltd [2019] HKCFI 1841, the Court was asked by the defendant in an action for alleged outstanding sums under sub-contracts for an order that further proceedings in the action in relation to two of the projects be stayed for arbitration.

The defendant argued that an arbitration clause in the head contracts with the respective employers had been incorporated into the corresponding contracts between the defendant and the plaintiff.

Contractual chain

The first project concerned a residential and commercial development in the Kai Tak district. The main contractor, Konwall Construction & Engineering Co Ltd ("Konwall") had entered into a main contract with the employer for works relating to hoarding, basement excavation and lateral support, foundation and pile caps (the "Employer-Konwall Contract").

In a contract letter dated 3 October 2015 and countersigned by the defendant on 5 October 2015, Konwall then sub-contracted various works to the defendant (the "Konwall-D Contract"). Clause 7 of the letter expressly stated that a number of documents, in particular the General Conditions of Sub-Contract ("GCSC") would form part of the contract. Clause 18.1 of the GCSC provided that disputes in connection with the Sub-Contract would be referred to arbitration.

The defendant in turn sub-sub-contracted part of the works to the plaintiff by way of a contract dated 30 September 2015 ("D-P Contract 1"). Clause 10 of D-P Contract 1 provided that:

"The Principal Contractor entered into a sub-contract with Party A to sub-contract the main works to Party A (Sub-Contract). Party B understands clearly that the works of this sub-contracting agreement were [all/part] of the Main Contract and Sub-Contract, and both parties agreed to the following terms". (English translation)

The contractual chain in the second project, which concerned a residential development in Tuen Mun, followed a similar pattern and was analysed in like terms by the Court. Clause 2 of the relevant sub-sub-contract noted that the terms and conditions of the Standard Form of Domestic Sub-Contract (2008 Addition) published by the Hong Kong Construction Association would apply ("SFDSC").

Clause 18 of the SFDSC said that disputes would "be referred to the arbitration and final decision of a single arbitrator in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Part II of the Arbitration Ordinance...and any such reference shall be deemed to be a submission to domestic arbitration within the meaning of such Ordinance".

Legal principles

Lam J reviewed the relevant legal principles. Article 7(6) of the UNCITRAL Model Law (given effect by sections 19(1) and 19(3) of the Arbitration Ordinance, Cap 609), says that an arbitration clause referred to in a separate document may be incorporated as part of the contract. Section 19(3) provides that:

"A reference in an agreement to a written form of arbitration clause constitutes an arbitration agreement if the reference is such as to make that clause part of the agreement".

Lam J said that under Hong Kong law, there does not need to be an explicit reference to the clause itself; reference to a document containing it may be sufficient provided "the reference is such as to make that clause part of the contract".

The document referred to does not even have to be a contract between the same two parties. As Lam J put it, "It is possible under Art 7(6) to incorporate into a contract between A and B an arbitration clause, by reference to an agreement between B and C or even between X and Y or to an unsigned standard form of contract, which contains the arbitration clause".

This had been settled law in Hong Kong for the past quarter century, unlike the position in other jurisdictions, such as England where courts have often taken the view that, for incorporation of an arbitration clause into a contract between A and B by reference to an agreement between B and C or X and Y, there must be a specific reference to the arbitration clause itself, rather than simply to the contract or document containing the clause.

Untangling the chains

The question as to whether the reference was sufficient as to make the arbitration clause part of the contract, was one of construction. The task of the court was to ascertain, with no preconceived notions, the intentions of the parties when they entered into the contract by reference to the words they used.

As with other questions of contractual construction, this involved examining the wording of the documents against the relevant background to identify what a reasonable man would have understood the parties to mean, citing Building Authority v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (ENM Holdings Ltd) [2018] 21 HKCFAR 194.

The Court said it was clear that the "Sub-Contract" referred to in D-P Contract 1 meant the contract between the defendant and its head contractor, and the "Main Contract" meant the Employer-Konwall Contract. Lam J said the wording of the relevant sentence in the clause meant that it was the works under the D-P contract that were incorporated into the Employer-Konwall Contract and the Konwall-D Contract, not the D-P Contract 1 itself.

The clause made no reference to the "terms and conditions" of the Employer-Konwall Contract or the Konwall-D Contract, and did not in any way state that either of the contracts applied to the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, or that the D-P Contract 1 was "back to back" with or was to be performed "in accordance with" the Konwall-D Contract.

Intention of the parties

Lam J commented that it was not in dispute that until the point of disclosure in these proceedings, the plaintiff had never been given a copy of the Konwall-D Contract, let alone the Employer-Konwall Contract.

It was also hard to see (if the reference was sufficient for incorporation), why only the terms of the Konwall-D Contract were incorporated (as argued by the plaintiff) and not also the terms of the Employer-Konwall Contract, which was also referred to in that sentence.

Similarly, it was difficult to see how it could have been the intention of the plaintiff and the defendant to incorporate both sets of contracts, when the plaintiff had not even disclosed in the proceedings the Employer-Konwall Contract. It was therefore not known whether the two upstream contracts contained dispute resolution clauses that conflicted with each other.

As such, Lam J accepted the defendant's submission that the reference to the Employer-Konwall Contract and the Konwall-D Contract in the clause was "intended to mean that the specifications, standards and requirements relating to the works as specified in those contracts should be followed by the plaintiff in executing the works, being part of the works required under those contracts, and not to incorporate every clause (including the arbitration clause) into the D-P Contract 1".

Lam cited a passage from a leading textbook as applied by Reyes J in Sunbond Engineering Ltd v Konwall Construction & Engineering Co Ltd (unrep. HCCT 15/2003) that:

"As a matter of first principle and in the light of the usual real-life intentions of sub-contracting parties, doubtful or ambiguous references to main contract documents or terms are much more likely to be aimed at the technical descriptions of the sub-contract work to be found in the drawings, specifications or bills of quantities of the main contract rather than at the contractual or legal provisions in the main contract documentation...".

Lam J found the same reasoning applied to the contracts in the second project under consideration.

The Court therefore concluded that the arbitration provisions relied upon by the defendant had not been incorporated into the contracts between the plaintiff and the defendant.

To incorporate or not to incorporate

The incorporation of a term by reference is a frequent occurrence in construction contracts as it is in other types of contracts such as reinsurance contracts, charterparties and bills of lading. 

Particular care is required in cases involving multiple contracts (often forming a chain), as here, as the Courts will be asked to determine the intentions of the parties if the drafting is unclear, particularly where one of the parties is seeking to oust the jurisdiction of the court in favour of arbitration. This is particularly important in cross-border contracts, given the differences in approach taken by the English and Hong Kong courts.

Search for certainty

The English Court of Appeal construction case Aughton Ltd (formerly Aughton Group Ltd) v MF Kent Services Ltd [1991] 57 BLR1, pointed to a difference of approach even within the English judiciary as to whether general words are sufficient for effective incorporation, with Sir John Megaw stating that the arbitration clause should be referred to expressly while Ralph Gibson LJ took the orthodox Hong Kong approach that reference to the contract or standard form document would suffice, an approach that is more in line with the provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law.

The rationale of the courts in England as to why an express reference is needed has not always been clear, with some judges reasoning that there are some instances in which the stricter approach is called for. A bill of lading, for example, might incorporate the terms of a charterparty, but a person who had negotiated the bill in another jurisdiction might have no means of knowing what those terms were, and whether there was an arbitration clause.

As ever, parties seeking to rely on arbitration should use clear words of incorporation to avoid the potential for future disputes in a multi-party scenario.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions