Hong Kong: Personal Data Privacy – Protection Under Hong Kong Law And Transfers Out Of Hong Kong

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD") established in Paris in 1961 was a convention of European member countries of the European Economic Community.

A significant and early action by OECD was to establish a set of principles for protection of personal data.

It is most important in all consideration of personal data privacy issues to realize and acknowledge that privacy of personal data is not privacy per se. That is a huge subject and often not the matter of legislation.

But, taking OECD personal data protection principles as a model for domestic legislation, the legislature of widely varying countries around the world have enacted personal data privacy legislation.

One of these was Hong Kong which enacted its Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance ("PDPO") in 1996.

The PDPO was, and remains, principally concerned to control the collection and use of personal data.

"Personal Data" is defined in the PDPO as anything which enables a living individual to be identified. The most common item of such personal information is the Hong Kong identity card number of an individual.

The PDPO in its operational reality concerns three possible parties who are:

  1. the Data User – the collector of the personal data of an individual for the use by that collector;
  2. the Data Subject – the object (the individual concerned) whose personal data is collected by the Data User;
  3. "Data Processor" – the party engaged by the Data User to process for any reason the Personal Data of the Data Subject under instruction from the Data User.

The PDPO was structured around eight Data Protection Principles ("DPPs") which were, and are:

Data Principle 1 – Collection must be for a novel purpose necessary for that purpose but not excessively so. At the time of collection the Data Subject must be informed whether he has no option but to supply it and, where it is obligatory for him to supply it, what are the consequences for him if he fails to supply it.

The established convention in Hong Kong to incorporate Data Principle 1 is through the Personal Information Collection Statement ("PIC") to which all Data Users are subject.

The practice is to establish a form of consent by Data Subjects to exemptions for the Data User from onerous requirements of the PDPO by including express reference whether in hard copy or on a Data User's website requiring a signed or "tick the box" confirmation by the Data Subject. Under the authority of the Electronic Transactions Ordinance unless there is a specific rule of law that requires actual writing to evidence a commitment, the electronic transmission of consent is sufficient.

Data Principle 2 – All practicable steps must be taken to ensure the maintained accuracy and the known limited duration of retention of personal data.

Data Principle 3 – Use of Personal Data. The Data Subject must voluntarily give express consent to the use and must also give express further consent for the use of the collected personal data for any new use.

Data Principle 4 – The Data User is obliged to take all practicable steps to ensure that the collected personal data is protected against unauthorized or accidental access, processing, erasure or other use, and if a Data Processor is engaged by the Data User the contract between the appointing Data User and the appointed Data Processor must be carefully drawn to provide for liability of the Data Processor to the Data Subject for failure by the Data Processor.

Data Principle 5 – Information on the use by the Data Users of the collected data must be generally available.

Data Principle 6 – A Data Subject is entitled to access both the fact of holding, the content of and length of holding time for the personal data collected and to receive clear reasons for any refusal by the Data User to comply.

From the date of its enactment in Hong Kong in 1996, and under the able direction of a succession of Personal Data Privacy Commissioners ("PCs") the PDPO has developed a substantial body of legal/regulatory mandates all of which comprehensively indicate and support the full application of the PDPO. The developing bodies of substantial publication about the obligations under the PDPO have generated an increasingly important influence on the community in Hong Kong as a growing user – and abuser – of personal data in the Territory.

Of course, the PDPO was enacted before the internet became a reality in the lives of all individuals throughout the entire World.

The 1996 enactment included a Section 33 which did then, and continues today to contain prohibition on the transfer of personal data out of Hong Kong unless certain exemption requirements apply or are complied with.

However, in – and well before – 1996, substantial and growing use was made by Data Users of the personal data of Data Subjects for purposes such as pay roll, leave/holiday recording, medical history and other related employment statistical functions whether directly by the Data Users or through the engagement of Data Processors. Much personal data was transmitted overseas from Hong Kong largely due to the high Hong Kong cost both of labour and of rentals of premises to house the labour which would otherwise be necessary for the processing of the personal data in Hong Kong. Because the bulk of the recording functions were too expensive to carry out in Hong Kong and given that a very substantial bulk of personal data had been remitted out of Hong Kong to service providers in a number of places overseas but particularly China, India and the Philippines there was a distinct danger of dramatic economic destruction of this established state of affairs with possibly unfairly damaging catastrophic results if Section 33 would have been implemented. In the years leading up to 1996 and as an important role played by China in the "Open Door" policy initiated by Dung Xiao Ping in 1992 massive transmission from Hong Kong of personal data to service providers in Guangdong Province bordering Hong Kong was the established way to structure economic recording for many different reasons and purposes and, of course, China being a communist party controlled state there was – and still is – no privacy or personal data privacy regulation on the ground in any way equivalent to the OECD principles and the PDPO.

This was because Section 33(1) has a curt and peremptory wording that Data Users shall not transfer personal data to a place outside Hong Kong unless one or more of six possible exemptions is available. Briefly, they are:-

  1. if a place outside Hong Kong has been specified by the PC in a list prepared by the PC for the purposes of ensuring that the domestic law of that place secures personal data protection.

    We understand that the PC has in fact prepared such a list covering approximately 51 countries but this list has not been published yet. However, given that the necessary research to establish data protection equivalence in the laws of these other countries is an extensive, expensive and time consuming exercise it is good that the PC has prepared this list which will of course be very useful for Data Users to adopt in the context of future cross-border transmission of personal data; or
  2. that the Data User – having made specific due diligence enquiry – reasonably believes that in that foreign place there is an equivalent law to the PDPO; or
  3. the Data Subject has consented in writing to the transfer; or
  4. the Data User can establish reasonable grounds for belief that in all the circumstances the transfer is to avoid adverse action against the Data Subject and it is not practicable to obtain his consent and that if consent could have been obtained the Data Subject would give it; or
  5. the data is exempt from Data Protection Principle 3 by virtue of an exemption under Part 8 of the PDPO dealing with matters of public policy importance which should prevail over the PDPO controls such as preservation of evidence of criminal liability or the avoidance of civil damage; or
  6. the Data User can clearly show taking reasonable precautions and exercise of all due diligence to ensure that the foreign place will not collect, hold, process or use the personal data in any manner which if that foreign place were Hong Kong would be a contravention of the PDPO.

As stated above, in the years up to 1996 and in the absence of any controlling legislation such as the PDPO, the transmission of personal data outside Hong Kong to any one or several of a number of countries was huge and although the well-intentioned thrust of the legislature was to control all such transmission for the benefit of the Hong Kong Data Subject, it would have been impossible to bring Section 33 into effect.

For that reason therefore, Section 33 was deliberately not brought into effect and has not been brought into effect yet.

In 2013 the PDPO was amended both to provide for responsibility of the Data User to contract specifically with any outsourced Data Processor but also to increase penalties by substantial amounts for breach under the PDPO.

Accordingly, and given the predominant traffic of personal data on the internet the ease of transmission of personal data out of Hong Kong has now become an arguably dangerous flouting of the control which the PDPO seeks to impose on Data Users in accordance with the six data collection principles set out in the PDPO.

Over what is now a five year tenure the present PC incumbent has been extremely diligent in applying the Data Protection Principles to all manner of Data User activity in Hong Kong with the result that the envelope of liability for abuse of the PDPO of the six Data Protection Principles has spread wider and deeper than ever imagined although without sanction of, or amendment to, the PDPO as enacted in 1996.

One of the principal current thrusts of the PC is to draw attention to Section 33 as a dormant giant which it is the responsibility of the community to wake up to and through bringing it into effect and thereby rounding off the full force and control of the PDPO over use and abuse of personal data.

We do not have direct inside knowledge, but the indications are that the present PC has quite possibly achieved a liaison with the administration of the Hong Kong Government effectively clearing the way for the introduction of Section 33 into effect.

It is therefore possible to perceive a link in that one major personal data development instigated by the PC was the introduction and publication in December 2014 of the most recent of the "Guidance Notes" which the PC is empowered to issue.

This December 2014 Guidance Note is expressly headed "Guidance on Personal Data Protection in Cross-Border Data Transfer."

The Guidance Note sets out what is described as a practical guide to Data Users to prepare for the implementation of Section 33 of the PDPO.

The thrust is to confirm and illustrate understanding of the compliance obligations of Data Users with cross-border data transfer under the full impact of Section 33.

The Guidance Note sets out the available exemptions under the Section 33(2) fully setting out the effective bite of the PDPO upon cross-border data transfer, the available exemptions from the application of the PDPO to any particular cross-border data transfer, and the detailed assistance provided to Data Users in their conditions of data collection even to the extent of suggesting that they include model clauses set by the PC in their contracts with Data Processors with the intention of enabling those adopting the model clauses to continue the collection of personal data for cross-border transfer.

The December 2014 Guidance Note should be regarded as a wake-up call to the community in all aspects of its operations to what really should be seen as the impending bringing of Section 33 into effect. Given the substantial penalty increases brought in in 2013, it is important for all Data Users to be mindful of transgression against the rights of Data Subjects who are all becoming increasing aware of those rights in this day and age.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions