Hong Kong: Claims Against Auditors: Summary Justice?

Last Updated: 16 February 2004

In 2003, decisions of the Hong Kong and English Courts of Appeal addressed persistent and difficult issues as regards the existence and scope of any duty of care, causation and loss in claims against auditors, and the extent to which these may be resolved summarily (i.e. without a full trial). In addition, "loss of opportunity" claims are becoming increasingly significant in this area. In the Hong Kong appellate decision in Guang Xin, the Court of Appeal was less willing than the Court of First Instance to resolve such matters summarily. A similar reluctance was demonstrated by the English Court of Appeal in its recent Equitable Life decision.

Hong Kong: Guang Xin Enterprises Ltd v Kwan Wong Tan & Fong
The plaintiff company went into creditors’ voluntary liquidation in 1998, with net liabilities said to be over HK$4 billion. The defendant firm audited the company’s accounts for 1994-1996. The company alleged the auditors were negligent in not uncovering and reporting adversely upon:

  • certain sham transactions allegedly entered into by management to disguise financial problems;
  • management’s gross over-valuation of certain assets. The company claimed, principally, that had it not been for the auditors’ alleged failure to identify this, the company would have been wound-up upon publication of the 1994 accounts, rather than continuing to incur further trading losses up to 1998.

The first instance court struck out both claims:

  • alleged sham transactions claim - it was fatal to the company’s case that some, at least, of its directors appeared to have been aware of the shams;
  • alleged trading losses claim - applying English authorities (principally the well known Galoo decision), the dominant cause of loss was held to be continuation of trading after 1994 and, as a matter of policy, the law should not hold auditors liable for loss thereby incurred. New Zealand authority to contrary effect (the Sew Hoy decision) was rejected.

In March 2003, the Court of Appeal upheld the strike-out decision, but left the door open to a reformulation of the claims:

  • alleged sham transactions claim - the company argued on appeal that, even if the board had been aware of such transactions, public revelation as a result of the auditors' report might have been enough to prompt resolution of the problems. The Court of Appeal indicated that "a pleading along these lines might be viable", provided that proper particulars were given of the steps which it was claimed would have been taken had the auditors' report revealed the alleged sham transactions and of the precise manner in which loss was alleged to have resulted;
  • alleged trading losses claim - the company only appealed in respect of one particular transaction. The Court of Appeal held that the pleading was incomprehensible and upheld the strike-out, but granted time to apply to amend the pleading.

The Court of Appeal was not prepared to accept the auditors’ suggestion that claims by insolvent companies against their auditors should be denied on the policy ground that such claims would in substance be for the benefit of creditors (to whom the auditors owed no duty). Rather, it was suggested that policy considerations of this nature were a matter for the Legislative Council, rather than the Judiciary.

England: Equitable Life v Ernst & Young
The Equitable Life Assurance Society is suing its former auditors, Ernst & Young, in connection with the recent financial difficulties faced by Equitable following the well-known House of Lords’ decision in 2000, concerning the Society’s liability to policy-holders.

Equitable advanced its claim in two ways:

  • lost sale claims - if the directors had appreciated the true financial position they would probably have put Equitable up for sale in 1998, or soon after the House of Lords’ decision in July 2000, so as to achieve an orderly sale;
  • bonus declaration claims - if the directors had been alerted to the true position, they would have cut back the bonus declarations for each year between 1997 and 2000.

In February 2003, the first instance court struck out the claim, although it subsequently allowed some elements to be reinstated following certain amendments which reduced the claim from £2.6 billion to £500 million. On 25 July 2003, the Court of Appeal substantially allowed Equitable’s appeal.

Ernst & Young argued, amongst other things, that it owed no duty to Equitable to protect it from losses suffered by business decisions of the directors, such as decisions whether to sell, or declare bonuses, where advice on those issues was not expressly requested. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument.

As to the two specific claims, the Court of Appeal held that the first instance court had been wrong to reject them summarily:

  • lost sale claims - these were reinstated in principle, subject to being formulated in terms of the loss of a chance of a sale;
  • bonus declaration claims - these were reinstated in their entirety, without the restrictions imposed at first instance.

The Court of Appeal expressed some sympathy for Ernst & Young’s point that the claims represented a significant burden for a litigant to have to bear to trial. However, there were procedural remedies to address this (e.g. requests for clarification of a party’s case). Striking out was not an appropriate solution, in the circumstances.

In the above cases, the appellate courts have shown less of an inclination to summarily dispose of certain claims against auditors than judges at first instance. Whether this trend continues remains to be seen but, no doubt, it will be welcomed in some quarters; most notably, claimants and liquidators of certain companies. It is also interesting to observe a growing tendency of some judges at first instance to scrutinise claims at a summary stage. In part, this tendency is explained by civil procedural rule changes adopted by the English Courts in 1999 and likely, in some shape or form, to be mirrored sometime in Hong Kong (an issue on which we will write more another time). That said, these cases still demonstrate that summary disposal is less suited to claims that (amongst other things) are undoubtedly complex, raise difficult issues of fact and law and require further investigation. The huge burden that this might place on a litigant (not to mention issues of cost) may well be a secondary consideration, compared to the need to ensure that such claims are properly determined.

By John Ogilvie and Graeme Johnston

© Herbert Smith 2003

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions