On 3 October 2011 the SFC announced that it had reprimanded
Citigroup Global Markets Asia Limited
("Citigroup") and fined it HK$6
The rationale for the reprimand and the fine was Citigroup's
failure to immediately report the misconduct of a former licenced
representative employed by Citigroup who was involved in what
appears to be a ponzi scheme similar to that of Bernard Madoff.
Citigroup's failure to report was compounded by the fact
that although it initially reported to the SFC that the
representative had been dismissed for gross misconduct, and
informed the SFC that an internal investigation was in progress, in
fact in so doing, Citigroup misled the SFC because at that time it
had already obtained a preliminary report which revealed important
information in relation to the representative's apparent
Citigroup delayed the provision of this report to the SFC until
a follow up investigation by its external auditor was complete. By
the time the report was provided to the SFC, the representative had
left Hong Kong and he has not returned.
The delay therefore in reporting to the SFC meant that the SFC
and other law enforcement agencies had no opportunity to interview
the representative or secure his whereabouts pending the completion
of an investigation.
SFC's director of enforcement, Mark Steward said:
"Citi Asia not only failed to detect a Ponzi Scheme
operating under its nose, despite having the opportunity to do so,
but then failed to report the Scheme to the SFC in a timely way,
thus making the investigation of this case more difficult given Mr.
X's decision to leave Hong Kong after he had been dismissed by
"Intermediaries know they have a duty to report
misconduct to the SFC immediately upon discovery, not when they
have plumbed the bottom of it. Delay in reporting simply helps the
wrongdoer. This public reprimand should make it clear that the SFC
condemns such delay in the strongest terms."
This was an expensive lesson for Citigroup, and one which should
be readily avoidable.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Confidentiality of corporate documents and information is one of
the key attractions of incorporating a company in the BVI. A
company search of the BVI Registrar of Corporate Affairs will only
disclose certain information and documents.
When pursuing a debt, it is common to add a claim for interest on the monies due.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).