Hong Kong: State and Crown immunity in Hong Kong: practical considerations in selecting and drafting disputes clauses

Last Updated: 22 October 2011
Article by Kim Barton

State and Crown immunity have been hot topics in Hong Kong.  The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal's ("CFA") preliminary decision in the Congo case1 that foreign states have the right to absolute immunity in Hong Kong has been confirmed by an Interpretation issued by the PRC Central Government on 26 August 2011.2 On 8 September 2011, the CFA issued a final judgment confirming that the principle of absolute immunity applies in Hong Kong.

State immunity does not apply, in Hong Kong, to the PRC and its entities.  However, the PRC and its entities enjoy Crown immunity (as did Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of the UK prior to "handover"), as was confirmed by the 2010 decision of the Hong Kong Court of First Instance in Hua Tian Long.3

The Hong Kong Government and its entities are, however, in a different position.  The Crown Proceedings Ordinance ("CPO") continues to permit civil proceedings against the Hong Kong Government and its entities.

Can Hong Kong still be used as a dispute forum in contracts involving state counterparties?

In most cases, yes.

The major impact of the Congo decision is that there is little point bringing proceedings against a foreign government in the Hong Kong courts.  This includes proceedings seeking recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award against a foreign government's assets located in Hong Kong.

Importantly, a Hong Kong arbitration clause involving a foreign state is effective.  There is a residual question over whether the Hong Kong courts will be able to exercise supervisory jurisdiction over an arbitration involving a foreign state or one of its entities: there are strong arguments indicating that participation in a Hong Kong arbitration would amount to a waiver of immunity in relation to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Hong Kong courts but the position is not clear.  That stated the courts residual supervisory powers are very limited under Hong Kong's new legislation.

Practical Steps

You should consider the following when selecting or drafting dispute clauses involving Hong Kong where a government entity is involved:

  • For contracts with the Hong Kong Government or a Hong Kong Government enterprise.  Selection of either the Hong Kong Courts or an arbitration clause is fine.  The Hong Kong Government has, in effect, waived immunity from suit under the CPO. There is no waiver from execution proceedings, however the CPO includes provisions for payment of judgments etc by the Hong Kong Government.  A foreign entity may of course prefer arbitration rather than submission to the Hong Kong courts if the Hong Kong Government or one of its enterprises is the counterparty.
  • For contracts with foreign governments or foreign state-owned enterprises ("SOEs").  Select arbitration and not submission to the Hong Kong courts.  If there are real concerns about the ability of Hong Kong courts exercising supervisory jurisdiction over a Hong Kong arbitration involving a foreign state, then you may prefer to select another New York Convention signatory country which adopts restrictive immunity as the place of arbitration.  This is unlikely to be an issue where the counterparty is a foreign SOE, provided it is independent from its government (see further below).  Do not select a country which is not a signatory to the New York Convention as the place of arbitration because there are likely to be significant problems with enforcement. To view a list of signatory countries, click here.
  • For contracts with PRC Government and its state entities.  Do not adopt a Hong Kong court jurisdiction clause.  The PRC Government and its state entities will be entitled to assert immunity.  You can however select Hong Kong as the place of arbitration where assets are outside of the PRC.  Note there is some question over the ability of the Hong Kong courts to supervise an arbitration involving the PRC Government or one of its entities (discussed above).  If the assets are only in the PRC, then use a New York Convention state venue (but not Hong Kong) and then rely upon the PRC abiding by its treaty obligations.
  • In all cases.  Include a waiver of immunity clause in your disputes clause, including possible waivers from both immunity from suit and immunity from enforcement.  Notwithstanding that these clauses will not be effective in Hong Kong before the Hong Kong courts, they may be effective in other jurisdictions which adopt a less restrictive approach to immunity.  Also, such waiver clauses could be effective in the future in Hong Kong if the PRC decides to adopt a doctrine of restrictive immunity.  In this context it is worth bearing in mind that, in 2005, China signed the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States which endorses restrictive immunity. This treaty is not yet in force.
  • How to assess whether the counterparty is part of a state. It is not always clear if an entity connected with a state is legally part of that state for the purposes of immunity.  In Hong Kong, case law provides some guidance for PRC state entities. The fact that a PRC entity carries on commercial enterprises does not mean it cannot claim immunity.  The "bright line" test is one of control, and the question to be asked is whether the entity in question is able to exercise independent powers of its own.  For example, if a PRC state entity requires authorisation from a ministry prior to entering into a particular contract (as was the case in Hua Tian Long) then the entity is likely to be entitled to immunity.  In contrast, an SOE established by the State-owned Assets Supervision Committee ("SASAC") is unlikely to be entitled to immunity: such entities have independent management, ownership of assets and capacity to independently assume civil liabilities.  For state entities connected with foreign governments it is likely that a similar "structural" approach will apply.  Such an approach is normally adopted in countries which follow the absolute state immunity doctrine, which Hong Kong now clearly does.

Finally, if you are dealing with a state or one of its entities, it is also worth checking to see if there is a bilateral investment treaty ("BIT") offering protection for foreign investments which might be used if things go wrong.  A typical BIT will provide for ICSID arbitration, though some provide for UNCITRAL ad hoc or ICC arbitration.  BITs will not provide remedies for all breaches of contract, but they may offer an avenue to recompense foreigners who have been treated unfairly by a state.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.


1 Democratic Republic of the Congo v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC FACV Nos 5, 6 & 7 of 2010, 8 June 2011.

2 See Interpretation of Paragraph 1, Article 13 and Article 19 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong SAR by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.

3 Intraline Resources SDN BHD v The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "Hua Tian Long" [2010] 3 HKLRD 611.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions