Hong Kong: Drafting an Effective Arbitration Clause in the Light of the Issues Posed by E-Commerce

Last Updated: 25 October 2001
Article by Julie Soars

The consent of the parties to submit to arbitration by a binding arbitration agreement is the cornerstone of international arbitration. With the upsurge in global electronic ("e-commerce") transactions1 entered into as a result of email communications or via the Internet by way of a trading platform (using a mechanism provided on a web site), contracts are increasingly entered into which are "paper-less" or not recorded in writing in the historical sense of that phrase. Where arbitration is the chosen method of dispute resolution in these contracts, then the arbitration agreement entered into is generally in electronic form.2

The threshold question, which arises, is whether such e-commerce arbitration agreements are enforceable - there may be doubts if the applicable principles of law established by legislation and case law are inadequate or outdated.3

Of great importance is whether e-commerce arbitration agreements satisfy the requirements of the major international treaty governing the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958 (the "New York Convention"). In particular, whether:

  1. e-commerce arbitration agreements will be recognised as being valid in form (for example whether they satisfy any "writing" or "signed by the parties" requirement which applies under the applicable law4); and
  2. any award made pursuant to such an arbitration agreement will be able to be enforced or may be susceptible to challenge.

As a result of these issues, parties who enter into e-commerce arbitration agreements expect to initiate arbitral proceedings but are oftentimes frustrated, Courts have to resort to strained and expansive interpretations of legislation and enforcement problems may be created when awards are rendered. Problems may arise when the law governing the arbitration provides a broader definition of the writing requirement for arbitration agreements than the law of the place of enforcement. Any uncertainty created due to differences in, and a lack of uniformity of, interpretation of the writing requirement for arbitration agreements is detrimental to international business.

Is An E-Commerce Arbitration Agreement Enforceable?

The arbitration laws of most countries contain the requirement that arbitration agreements must be in "writing" (variously defined); such laws frequently require that the arbitration agreement be signed by the parties or contained in communications exchanged between them. The actual content of these requirements varies from country to country.

An e-commerce arbitration agreement will generally be enforceable under the applicable law if there is existing legislation and case law which recognises the validity of e-commerce contracts or additional legislation validating electronic transactions has been enacted.

The question of whether valid arbitration agreements should be able to be concluded electronically should, from a theoretical and policy perspective, pose no more problems than have been created by the increased use of telex and subsequently of telecopy or facsimile.5 The reason for this is that, in reality, e-commerce is merely a new form of communication.

The United Nations Commission on International Trade ("UNCITRAL") has led the way in developing various model laws in respect of electronic transactions and the Model Law on Electronic Commerce was completed in 1996.6 The Model Law on Electronic Commerce aimed to establish equal treatment under the law for online and offline contracts (a "media neutral environment"), by providing norms and rules to validate contracts formed through electronic means, defining the characteristics of valid electronic writing and signature, and providing guidance on the legal recognition of data messages.7 The Model Law on Electronic Commerce has been used by many countries as a basis for legislation to recognise and confirm the validity of electronic transactions and contracts.8 The Model Law on Electronic Commerce has already been adopted in Europe by Ireland, France, Slovenia and the states of Jersey. In addition, both Canada and the USA have been influenced by the Model Law on Electronic Commerce by adopting respectively, the Uniform Electronic Commerce Act (adopted in 1999 by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada) and the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (adopted in 1999 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law).9

The European Union has adopted a Directive on Electronic Commerce of 8 June 2000, which must be implemented by member states by 16 January 2002 10 It does not contain any specific provisions relating to the written requirement of arbitration agreements as required by almost all of the Arbitrations Acts in Europe. In addition, this Directive does not preclude the Member States ability to maintain or establish general or specific legal requirements concerning secure electronic signature.

On 24 November 2000 the ASEAN countries11 signed an e-ASEAN Framework Agreement 12 which includes a commitment to adopt electronic commerce regulatory and legislative frameworks that create trust and confidence for consumers by, inter alia, expeditiously establishing national laws and policies relating to electronic commerce transactions based on international norms and facilitating mutual recognition of digital signature frameworks.

Singapore 13 and Hong Kong SAR 14 have led the way by enacting legislation based on the Model Law on Electronic Commerce. This law provides conclusively that binding agreements can be made by the exchange of emails or other electronic means (unless there is an express agreement to the contrary) and that the "writing" requirement in any statute includes any means by which information may be recorded and providing for the recognition of digital signatures. A survey of other ASEAN countries reveals that similar legislation is in the process of being enacted.15

In Asian countries not part of ASEAN, reforms are also being implemented. In the PRC, the need for appropriate legislation has been recognised by the Ministry of Information Industry but none is yet in place.16 In Japan, the cabinet has approved a bill to revise laws to allow the electronic issuance of documents related to electronic transactions among private parties.17 Moreover, the Japanese Law Concerning Electronic Signatures and Certification Services 2000 came into force on 1 April 2001. In Taiwan the government has recognised the need for appropriate legislation, however, as yet none is in force.18 On 5 February 1999, the Korean Government enacted the Digital Signature Act, which deals solely with setting up a legal framework for the operation of licensing authorities. It does not make any statement regarding the legal validity of an electronic document; therefore a major barrier to e-commerce remains.

Does An Arbitral Award Made Pursuant To An E-Commerce Arbitration Agreement Satisfy The Requirements Of The New York Convention?

The signatories to the 1958 New York Convention could not have anticipated the developments in e-commerce that have taken place. Article II(3) of the New York Convention requires the Courts of a signatory state to direct disputes that have been filed before the Courts to arbitration when a binding arbitral clause exists between the parties. Article II(1) requires a signatory to recognise an "agreement in writing" to refer disputes to arbitration and article II(2) provides that an "agreement in writing" shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties or contained in an exchange of letters or telegrams. Likewise, article 7(2) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 19 follows the New York Convention in requiring written form. It widens and clarifies the definition of written form in article II(2) of that Convention by adding "telex or other means of telecommunication which provide a record of the agreement".

UNCITRAL has recognised the potential problem created by the form requirements in articles II(2) and 7(2) of the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration if such provisions are narrowly interpreted.20 The UNCITRAL Arbitration Working Group has noted that article II(2) had been interpreted broadly by national Courts to include other means of communication, particularly telex (and presumably extending to facsimile). If the same teleological interpretation is adopted, there is no reason why it should not extend to cover electronic commerce.21

To ensure, however, a uniform interpretation of the form requirement, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Working Group has proposed that a declarative interpretative instrument be prepared which aims to apply the Model Law on Electronic Commerce as a rule of interpretation to article II(2) of the New York Convention22 It is proposed that the interpretative declaration be to the effect that article II(2) should be broadly interpreted; it will note that technologies in international commerce have advanced since the New York Convention was drafted in 1958, and that subsequent international legal instruments have recognised other interpretations of writing requirements, particularly in the area of electronic commerce.

The non-binding nature of the proposed declarative interpretative instrument has raised concerns that it will not effectively resolve the problem because state Courts may choose to ignore it (unless it is adopted by legislation).23 There is also an issue as to whom it should be addressed; no view has yet been reached as to whether it should be directed to a particular body, such as legislatures or Courts.24

The UNCITRAL Arbitration Working Group has also recommend that article 7(2) of the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration be modified and that the modifications be circulated with an accompanying guide to enactment.25

Recommendations For Overcoming Potential Problems

It would be prudent before entering into an e-commerce arbitration agreement to consider the applicable law and the law of any place where the award is to be enforced to identify whether an enforcement risk exists. If there is a risk, then a possible way of overcoming it is for the parties to enter into a submission agreement (in a more traditional written form) after the dispute arises, confirming their agreement to submit the dispute to arbitration. Alternatively, if no agreement between the parties can be reached, then the enforceability issue could be determined as a preliminary issue in the arbitration (to try to avoid enforcement difficulties at a later stage).


The issues raised by e-commerce are not novel; similar issues were raised when telexes and faxes first came to be used in international commerce. E-commerce does, however, require the supplementation or adaptation of existing legal principles and laws. Given the pro-e-commerce attitude evinced by ASEAN members and otherAsian countries it seems likely that any interpretation issues in respect of the New York Convention are likely to be resolved by agreement. Provided that an overly technical approach is not taken by national Courts and other bodies when deciding these issues and policy considerations are considered, there is unlikely to be any real issue about the enforceability of e-commerce arbitration agreements or awards made pursuant thereto. Measures are being taken by bodies such as UNCITRAL to overcome any uncertainties, but developments are occurring rapidly and the pace of response is slow. There remains a residual risk that an arbitration based on an e-commerce arbitration agreement may be frustrated or an award not enforced on technical grounds. These risks can be overcome if parties are advised and made aware of any limitations in the applicable law at the time that the e-commerce arbitration agreement is entered into. Further, any enforceability issue can potentially be overcome by a post-dispute submission agreement between the parties or by determining the point as a preliminary issue.


  1. The reference to "e-commerce transactions" in this briefing is to transactions carried out by means of electronic data interchange and other means of communication which involve alternatives to paper based methods of communication and storage of information.
  2. Referred to in this briefing as e-commerce arbitration agreements.
  3. This briefing focuses on the issues particularly raised by the nature of e-commerce arbitration agreements and will not address any other requirements for enforceability under the applicable law (such as whether the agreement is sufficiently certain).
  4. Governing law of the contract and/or the law governing the arbitration agreement (if not the same).
  5. See the comments of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group on Arbitration, Thirty-second Session (2000) (A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.108/Add.1), para.35.
  6. General Assembly Resolution 51/162 UNICITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996) (A/RES/51/162).
  7. ibid., at para 6.
  8. Including all member states of the European Union, who are obliged to adopt the EU Directive on Electronic Commerce by January 2002.
  9. This Act has been enacted as law in a number of States in the USA.
  10. Some countries such as the UK have already implemented the directive – see the Electronic Communications Act 2000.
  11. State of Brunei Darussalam, Kingdom of Cambodia, Republic of Indonesia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Union of Myanmar, Republic of the Philippines, Republic of Singapore, Kingdom of Thailand and Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
  12. Signed at the Fourth ASEAN Informal Summit 22-25 November 2000, Singapore.
  13. The Singapore Electronic Transactions Act came into effect on 10 July 1998.
  14. The Hong Kong Electronic Transactions Ordinance Cap.553 which came into effect (in stages) on 7 January, 18 February and 7 April 2000.
  15. For example, in Thailand, a draft e-commerce law has passed its second and third readings (15 October 2000) and was signed by the Deputy PM on 5 November 2000. It is not yet in force.
  16. "E-commerce needs legal support" by Xue Hong in China Daily 1/
  17. "Cabinet approves e-commerce bill" in The Japan Times 21/10/2000.
  18. Press release of the Executive Yuan (cabinet) dated 24 December 1999.
  19. Which has been widely used by many countries as a basis for their arbitration, whether by wholesale or piecemeal adoption (including Hong Kong (although article 7(2) is excluded from application by section 2AC of the Arbitration Ordinance Cap. 341) and Singapore) as a model for their legislation relating to arbitration.
  20. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group on Arbitration, Thirty-third Session (2000) (A/CN.9/485), para 21.
  21. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group on Arbitration, Thirty-second Session (2000) A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.108/Add.1), paras. 35-36.
  22. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group on Arbitration, Thirty-third Session (2000) (A/CN.9/485), paras 62-64.
  23. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group on Arbitration, Thirty-third Session (2000) (A/CN.9/485), paras, 60-61.
  24. ibid., para 62.
  25. ibid, paras 23-59, 70.


"© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us."

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.