Guernsey: Opposing Positions

Last Updated: 12 October 2016
Article by Laila Arstall

It is nearly a year since tax authorities around the world sent their first sets of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) reports to the US Internal Revenue Service.

These were compiled by financial institutions under the terms of applicable inter-governmental agreements (IGAs) in their respective jurisdictions. Now those same financial institutions are starting to prepare for the common reporting standard (CRS) which, for the 55 early adopter jurisdictions, was introduced with effect from 1 January 2016.

Building upon the Model 1 IGA template issued by the US to enable jurisdictions to comply with FATCA, the CRS is a separate regime for automatic exchange of information developed by the OECD.

The CRS has a wider global reach than FATCA given that, as of 9 May 2016, 101 jurisdictions had committed to implement CRS exchanges by 2018 at the latest.

Under the CRS, jurisdiction A will send jurisdiction B information in respect of accounts maintained by financial institutions in jurisdiction A for individuals and entities that are resident in jurisdiction B.

In many cases the exchange is reciprocal but, in some instances, transfers of data take place one-way only, as in the case of the arrangements between, for example, Guernsey and the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and the Cayman Islands, where Guernsey will receive information on financial accounts maintained by financial institutions in the BVI and in the Cayman Islands for Guernsey residents, but not the other way around.

The information to be gathered under CRS is broad in scope across three dimensions:

  •  the financial information to be reported relates to reportable accounts and includes not only all types of investment income but also account balances and the proceeds of sale of financial assets;
  •  the financial institutions that are required to report under the CRS include banks, custodians, brokers, certain collective investment vehicles, trust and corporate service providers; and
  •  reportable accounts include accounts maintained for individuals and entities (which includes partnerships, trusts and foundations) and there is a requirement to look through passive entities to report on the individuals who are seen as ultimately behind these structures.

The CRS sets out due diligence rules to be followed by a financial institution in terms of identifying reportable accounts. This involves reviewing client due diligence gathered for anti-money laundering (AML) and know your client purposes (KYC) on pre-existing account holders and requesting new account holders to complete self-certificates.

Once identified as a reportable account, the data to be reported is gathered from financial statements and other information maintained by the institution on the account and in respect of the relevant account holder, or its controlling person(s). The required data is used to complete a CRS schema which is then filed with the local tax office through an online portal.

Given that, in the main, the steps to review, identify and report on accounts follow the same approach, whether under US FATCA, UK FATCA or CRS.

Financial institutions that have already gone through the process of filing reports under FATCA in 2015 will be well placed to leverage that experience as they take steps to comply with reporting under CRS.

Classification trap

But there are traps for the unwary. One such concern arises in the context of the classification of entity account holders. In particular, an entity that is 'managed by' another financial institution could itself be classified as an investment entity under the definition of that term in both the IGA and the CRS.

However, there are subtle differences in the terminology used in each definition and consequently how these terms are interpreted in practice. These differences are now being reflected in guidance published by different jurisdictions, and as a result, the differing approaches are coming to the attention of financial institutions and their advisers as they gear up to collate the appropriate financial data for the reporting period of 2016 in readiness for filing under CRS as early as 2017.

In both the IGA and the CRS, the definition of investment entity has two limbs; one limb under which entities are classified as investment entities in their own right and the other limb for entities which qualify as such under the 'managed by' test.

In order to determine whether an entity that is managed by a financial institution is an investment entity, the IGA offers the choice of two alternative tests: the test that appears in the US FATCA Regulations or a simpler test that is set out in the IGA itself.

The US FATCA Regulations test requires the managed entity's gross income to be primarily attributable to the investing, reinvesting or trading in financial assets in order to be classified as an investment entity. An entity's gross income is said to be 'primarily attributable' to the relevant activity if it is equal to or exceeds 50% of its total gross income from all sources. By contrast, the IGA test makes no reference to financial assets or the need to review the gross income of the entity concerned in order to qualify as an investment entity.

For those financial institutions that applied the US Regulations' test to classify managed entities in order to comply with FATCA, they would be able to continue to rely on that same criteria for the purposes of CRS. Those that applied the simpler test of the IGA, rather than opting for the US FATCA Regulations test, now find that they have to revisit that classification and, in addition, review the entity's gross income to see if it is primarily attributable to the investing, reinvesting or trading in financial assets.

Apart from the additional resources required to revisit a classification, what are the consequences of this difference in approach for those financial institutions and their managed entities which are affected? Where an entity has been classified as an investment entity under the 'managed by' limb of the IGA test for FATCA purposes, the result is that the entity itself is responsible for the reporting of financial information in respect of its own investors. Often the fulfilment of that duty is delegated to the third party service provider which manages the entity. This is permitted under the IGA and CRS.

However, under the 'managed by' limb of the definition of investment entity in the CRS, that same entity could potentially fail to meet the gross income test and as a consequence be classified instead as a passive non-financial entity (passive NFE). In this case, the obligation to collate and report information on financial accounts maintained for the entity passes to the financial institutions at which those financial accounts (if any) are maintained, which could be in a number of jurisdictions.

The reporting of data, therefore, becomes fragmented and is collated by entirely separate institutions. Furthermore, reports would only be triggered if the controlling person behind that entity is identified as being resident in a participating jurisdiction. While there is no intention to avoid reporting the correct information, the scope and nature of the information to be collated and then reported can differ depending upon the classification of the entity itself. This has led to confusion at the coal face.

OECD approach

On the face of it, the CRS is portrayed as a global standard which is compatible with FATCA. Indeed, the OECD states in its Implementation Handbook that 'an explicit objective when designing the standard was to build on FATCA, and more specifically the FATCA IGA, as by maximising consistency with the FATCA IGA governments and financial institutions could leverage on the investment they are already making for FATCA. This was to ensure that a new international standard could be created, which would deliver the most effective tool to tackle cross-border tax evasion, while minimising costs for governments and financial institutions'.

So, this seems to suggest that an approach which allows the IGA definitions to be used interchangeably with the CRS definitions should be acceptable. If this is correct, then the classification of an entity as an investment entity under the 'managed by' test of the IGA would be acceptable for the CRS, and its treatment as an investment entity as far as the reporting of data would be consistent. But is this correct?

The handbook continues by stating: 'While a large proportion of the standard precisely mirrors the FATCA IGA, there are also areas of difference. These differences are due to the removal of US specificities (such as the use of citizenship as an indicia or tax residence and the references to US domestic law found in the FATCA IGA); or where certain approaches are less suited to the multilateral context of the standard, as opposed to the bilateral context of the FATCA IGA.' Here it seems the OECD is warning that where there are differences, this is deliberate and for specific jurisdictional reasons.

The definition of investment entity is referred to in part III of the handbook, which states that 'while the wording of the definition of investment entity may differ between Model 1 IGA and the investment entity in section VIII, A, 6 of the standard, the standard was designed to achieve an equivalent outcome to that achieved through the Model 1 IGA. Jurisdictions should therefore be able to rely on the approach in the standard for purposes of both the standard and the Model 1 IGA'. This suggests that in cases of divergence between the definitions used in the IGA and in the CRS, it is the CRS that should be applied (and not the other way around).

Defined terms

How is it then possible to reconcile consistency with divergence in the case of defined terms?

Perhaps the key lies in the fact that the OECD has confirmed that the CRS 'often incorporates definitions and processes contained in the current US FATCA Regulations'. Accordingly, it is of the view that jurisdictions can adopt a single approach to these areas, both in relation to implementing the CRS and the IGA, provided that, where a choice is given in the IGA to use the definitions of the US FATCA Regulations, its financial institutions have chosen to do so.

Where does this debate leave us? Until the position is clarified, financial institutions which manage entities will continue to call for reassurance so that they can continue their preparations for CRS in the certainty that they are on the right track. But who will provide this clarification? As the OECD's global forum on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes assesses whether participating jurisdictions are implementing the CRS correctly, the finance industry stands on a ledge between two streams.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
24 Oct 2018, Conference, St Peter Port, Guernsey

The Fund Finance Association is a non-profit industry association in the fund finance market that aims to educate members, legislators, regulators and other constituencies about the fund finance market.

13 Nov 2018, Conference, St Peter Port, Guernsey

SuperInvestor is part of the SuperReturn Series - the world's leading private equity events.

6 Dec 2018, Conference, St Peter Port, Guernsey

The definitive funds event of the year will include insights and predictions from over ten industry experts from both the Channel Islands and Europe

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Carey Olsen
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Carey Olsen
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions