Guernsey: Domicile Advantage: IAIS’ Capital Adequacy Principle

Last Updated: 9 November 2012
Article by Martin Le Pelley

Most Read Contributor in Guernsey, September 2016

Domiciles can achieve competitive advantage by applying ICP 17 and reducing capital requirements for lowest risk captives, says Martin Le Pelley, Chairman of the Guernsey International Insurance Association.

With so much attention being placed on the impact of Solvency II on EU captive domiciles and those jurisdictions seeking equivalence with Solvency II, some may have overlooked the fact that the International Association of Insurance Supervisors updated its Insurance Core Principles in October 2011.

It is the adherence to the IAIS core principles which the IMF use to assess the preparedness of jurisdictions in compliance with international regulations and maintenance of financial stability. As such, not only are the ICPs more important for comparability of jurisdictions than Solvency II, but furthermore, they will be difficult for jurisdictions to "opt out" of without risking being perceived as behind the curve in terms of risk-based regulatory best practice.

Solvency II, as a regulatory regime, is almost certainly fully compliant with the IAIS Core Principles, as the EU regulatory regime was developed with the changing ICPs in mind, and the architects of Solvency II will also have been key players in the development of the ICPs.

This means that captives which are located within the EU and which are capable of meeting the requirements of the new regulations in a cost-efficient way will have nothing to worry about in relation to compliance with insurance regulatory best practice. Of course, many may struggle to comply, and the fine tuning of Solvency II is taking much longer than anticipated due to the ongoing Eurozone credit crisis. However, if we put aside the significant economic pitfalls which continue to blight Europe, it could be argued that the EU is well progressed in meeting the ICPs.

In the rest of the world, the regulatory community is waking up to the need to amend their regulations to continue to comply with the ICPs. In particular the revised ICP 17 on Capital Adequacy is a significant step forward from the previous prudential regulatory principles. This risk-based solvency principle does allow more flexibility than is built into Solvency II – for instance there is no prescriptive confidence level requirement for capital adequacy, unlike Solvency II which requires a 99.5% VaR confidence.

However, there is a requirement to set a confidence level, and to assess licensees against the stated confidence level. This means, therefore that the supervisor must have the capability to develop risk-based solvency requirements based around a stated solvency, and licensees must have the capability to assess themselves against the requirements.

Captive domiciles, in particular, are aware that 99.5% VaR is likely to be overly prudent in relation to the simple risk profile of a captive, where the parent company's risk appetite is the driver (but is unlikely to have been defined with clarity), however the determination of a different confidence level is, itself, a challenge, as the supervisor will need to justify their choice of confidence level, and explain why they are, potentially, out of line with other insurance domiciles.

The "prescribed capital requirement (PCR)" is the capital level which is determined by applying the confidence level to the various risks associated with the insurer, such that the PCR should represent a "solvency control level above which the supervisor does not intervene on capital adequacy grounds" per ICP 17.4. In Solvency II the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) is this regulatory regime's PCR.

The choice of confidence level is not the only challenge faced by captive supervisors, as the ICP also requires supervisors to put in place a "range of different intervention actions" depending on the point at which the insurer's capital falls below the PCR but remains above the minimum capital requirement (MCR). If a supervisor sets the PCR too high, then it risks requiring insurers to hold too much capital and may need to intervene regularly when capital levels fall short. On the other hand, if the PCR is set too low, then the jurisdiction may be seen as "light touch" or "high risk" in relation to the capital requirements for insurers, especially when the supervisor should not intervene if the insurer is capitalised in excess of its PCR.

Furthermore, what does "range of different intervention actions" actually mean? Do supervisors need to stipulate when they will take action, and what action that will be? If they are not prescriptive then there is a risk that captive boards will be paranoid about breaching the PCR, even if they regard the capital requirement as excessive, such that their concerns about compliance may outweigh their concerns about effective use of capital. On the other hand, if the supervisor is too explicit in terms of intervention actions, this may inadvertently lead to captive boards routinely breaching their PCR on the basis that the regulatory intervention is more tolerable than holding more capital. If the PCR is routinely breached, then its effectiveness as a capital adequacy measure becomes significantly weakened.

In Guernsey, which is the largest European captive domicile (and outside of the EU) the supervisor is actively considering ways to engineer compliance with the new ICP 17 in such a way as to continue to make Guernsey attractive as a captive domicile (and more attractive than the EU) whilst ensuring that the island is fully compliant with the material requirements of ICP 17.

Conversely, Bermuda, which is seeking Solvency II equivalence for its commercial insurers, is looking to exempt its captives from the requirements of equivalence. Does this indicate that Bermuda may be looking to avoid compliance with ICP 17? There does not appear to have been any attempt to bring the captive regulations in Bermuda up to the requirements of ICP 17 yet?

The USA is a significant captive domicile in its own right, with a number of States enacting captive legislation, and Vermont continuing to occupy the position of one of the largest captive domiciles in the world. However, will any of these States change their capital requirements to enable compliance with ICP 17? If not, does this mean that the USA will be regarded as non-compliant with international regulatory best practice by the IMF?

The IAIS has not yet published any guidance as to how to apply ICP 17 to captive supervision. Under the previous core principles, the IAIS published a Captive Guidance Paper to help supervisors in their application of the requirements of the core principles. This paper has not yet been updated for the new core principles, such that, when it is, it may be the case that the Bermuda approach (and the EU supervisory approach for insurers writing less than €5m gross premiums) which is to disregard ICP17 may be appropriate.

However, jurisdictions which seek to avoid implementing the requirements of ICP 17 may be missing an opportunity. The IAIS is much more aware of the differences in the variety of insurance vehicles around the world than the European Commission is. They understand that for regulations to be effective they must be appropriate for the types of risk inherent in the large variety of insurance vehicles. It is for this reason that the Core Principles allow flexibility to ensure supervisors can adhere to the intention of the Core Principle by adopting regulations which are tailored specifically to the market under supervision. For captive insurance, this means ensuring that the regulatory regime is risk-based, firstly, and secondly is proportionate to the risks being run by the insurers, which in the case of captive insurers are limited and easily defined.

As a consequence, there is competitive advantage to be had by supervisors who can apply ICP 17 in such a way as to reduce capital requirements for the lowest risk captives, and increase capital requirements for those captives involved in more complex risk, including third party liability risks. The key will be for the supervisor to properly understand the risks in the market, and develop regulations which not only respond adequately to those risks, whilst minimising unnecessary regulatory capital requirements, but also comply with ICP 17 to enable the international community to better appreciate that not all insurers are the same, and that a proper risk-based capital adequacy regime is actually in the interests of all insurers, including captives.

The problem for EU captive domiciles is that the European Commission failed in its drafting of Solvency II to appreciate the breadth of different types of insurers, and draft sufficiently flexible risk-based regulations to cater for them all.

I am still hopeful that, one day, this will happen, but in the meantime, there are opportunities for those domiciles that do have this appreciation and can act on it.

Originally published in Captive Review, September 2012

For more information about Guernsey's finance industry please visit

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.