Germany: Recent Case Law Of The European Court Of Justice And The European Court Of First Instance In Trade-Mark Matters

Last Updated: 23 July 2009
Article by Alexander R. Klett and Valeria Mushchinina

Three-dimensional trademarks

On May 2, 2009, the European Court of First Instance had to decide on the registrability of three-dimensional trademarks in two cases.

In the first case (T-449/07), the plaintiff had applied for a three-dimensional CTM in the form of an arrangement of five separate sausages, the ends of which are linked. The application was, among others, for meat, poultry and game products and other food products. In principle, a product design as such can be protected by trademark law. In that regard, the criteria for assessing the distinctive character of three-dimensional marks consisting of the shape of a product are no different from those applicable to other trademark categories. However, average consumers will often not view mere product shapes as indicators of origin, and it is therefore often more difficult to establish distinctiveness in relation to such a three dimensional mark than in relation to a word or figurative mark.

The court stated that sausages are widespread, everyday consumer goods in the European Union. Although the shape applied for differs from the classic shape of sausages, the average consumer will not perceive the shape applied for as an indication of the commercial origin of those goods. Though the shape applied for is similar to the shape of a pretzel, it is nevertheless the case that the average consumer will view the shape applied for merely as a collection of five sausages linked to one another.

Also, the use of a novel form of presenting sausages as a particular marketing concept is a factor that cannot have any bearing on the assessment of the registrability of the mark. Therefore, according to the court, the shape applied for is devoid of distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trademark Regulation.

The court also denied the registrability of a trademark for perfumes in the shape of a cylindrical, elongated and transparent perfume spray bottle (T-104/08). The court stated that the more the shape applied for comes close to the shape in which the product most likely appears, the more likely it is that this shape lacks distinctive character. A "variation" of the common shape of a product type does not suffice for distinctiveness, according to the court. Although the court admitted that it is easier to prove the distinctive character of a perfume packaging in comparison with other three-dimensional trademarks, the same criteria for the assessment of distinctiveness are still to be applied. The court decided that the shape applied for, which is quite plain, is, taken as a whole, quite common and is often used especially for perfume tester bottles. The same, according to the court, applies to the combination of the parts of the shape.

Scope of protection of well-known trademarks according to the Community Trademark Regulation

On March 12, 2009, the European Court of Justice decided a case concerning the scope of protection of well-known trademarks according to Article 8(5) of the Community Trademark Regulation (C-320/07 P). The NASDAQ Stock Market Inc., the owner of the earlier trademark "NASDAQ," registered inter alia for financial services, opposed the application of a figurative trademark "Nasdaq" for sport equipment by Antartica Srl. pursuant to Article 8(5) of the Community Trademark Regulation (broader protection for well-known trademarks). The Court of First Instance as court of lower instance held that Antartica's use of the figurative mark "nasdaq" without due cause would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character and repute of the earlier mark. The trademark NASDAQ presents a certain image of modernity, which establishes the existence of a future risk that this reputation could be transferred to the goods of Antartica.

Antartica Srl. claimed that the consumers of the goods covered by the trademark applied for are not aware of the earlier mark and, therefore, that any unfair advantage can be ruled out in the current case. For purposes of Article 8(5) of the Community Trademark Regulation the "reputation" of the earlier mark, according to Antartica, had to extend to the general public and not only to the public constituted by the consumers of the goods designated by that trademark.

The European Court of Justice agreed with the court of lower instance and stated that considering the omnipresence of the stock market NASDAQ in the press—not only in the specialist press but also in the general press—and the interest of a large part of the general public in the development of the financial markets, the reputation of the earlier mark reaches further than only to professional circles of the financial sphere.

However, only a few weeks later, on April 30, 2009, the European Court of Justice decided in another case regarding Article 8(5) of the Community Trademark Regulation (C-136/08 P) that no likelihood of confusion exists between the earlier figurative trademark "Camel," which was registered for tobacco goods and cigarettes, and the figurative trademark "Camelo," registered for coffee.

Though the court recognized the fact that the earlier trademark is well-known and that the trademarks are similar, it could not determine that the further requirements of Article 8(5) of the Community Trademark Regulation were fulfilled. The court could not find that the trademark applied for would take unfair advantage of the distinctiveness or would damage the reputation of the earlier trademark.

Consequences of a breach of a trademark license agreement

In the judgment of the European Court of Justice dated April 23, 2009 (C-59/08), the following facts were at issue: Christian Dior couture SA concluded a trademark license agreement with Société industrielle lingerie (SIL) in respect of the manufacture and distribution of luxury corsetry goods bearing the Christian Dior trademark, which is owned by Dior.

According to the agreement, in order to maintain the repute and prestige of the trademark, SIL was obliged not to sell the goods outside the selective distribution network. In breach of its contractual obligations, SIL sold goods bearing the Christian Dior trademark to Copad, a company operating a discount store business. Therefore, Dior brought an action against SIL and Copad for trademark infringement. Within this action, the French Cour de cassation decided to refer three questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

The court answered the question of whether a provision in the license agreement prohibiting sales to discount stores on grounds of the trademark's prestige falls under Article 8(2) of the Directive 89/104/EEC (Trademarks Directive) in the affirmative, provided it has been established that contravention, by reason of the situation in the main proceedings, damages the allure and prestigious image that bestows on the respective products an aura of luxury.

Article 8(2) of the Trademarks Directive contains the following wording:

"The proprietor of a trademark may invoke the rights conferred by that trademark against a licensee who contravenes any provision in his licensing contract with regard to its duration, the form covered by the registration in which the trademark may be used, the scope of the goods or services for which the license is granted, the territory in which the trademark may be affixed, or the quality of the goods manufactured or of the services provided by the licensee."

The court pointed out that it is precisely where the licensee contravenes provisions in the license agreement concerning, in particular, the quality of the goods manufactured, that Article 8(2) of the Directive enables the proprietor of the trademark to invoke the rights that the directive grants him. The quality of luxury goods is also based on the allure and prestigious image that bestows on them an aura of luxury. Therefore, an impairment to that aura of luxury is likely to affect the actual quality of those goods. It is not impossible that the sale by the licensee of luxury goods to discount stores that are not part of the selective distribution network set up under the license agreement may constitute such impairment. The court stated that it is for the national court to examine whether contravention by the licensee had damaged the aura of luxury of the goods. In this respect, the nature of the luxury goods bearing the trademark, as well as the volumes sold, had to be taken into account, along with the question of whether the licensee sells the goods to discount stores that are not part of the selective distribution network regularly or only occasionally, and what the nature of the goods normally marketed by those discount stores—and the marketing methods normally used in that sector of activity - are.

The second question concerned the circumstances under which the trademark owner cannot claim his right to prohibit the use of a trademark because his rights are exhausted. According to Article 7(1) of the Directive, exhaustion occurs in relation to goods that have been put on the market in the Community under the trademark by the proprietor or with his consent. The European Court of Justice decided that in cases in which a licensee puts goods bearing a trademark on the market in disregard of a provision in a license agreement, he does so without the consent of the proprietor of the trademark if it is established that the provision in question is included in those exhaustively listed in Article 8(2) of the Directive.

With its third question, the Cour de cassation asked whether the proprietor of a trademark can nevertheless oppose further commercialization of the goods if the fact that a licensee puts luxury goods on the market in contravention of a clause in a license agreement is deemed to result in exhaustion of rights. According to Article 7(1) of the Directive, the proprietor can oppose further commercialization of the goods in specific cases, especially where the condition of the goods is changed or impaired after they have been put on the market. The question was whether the proprietor of a trademark could rely on a clause in a license agreement that the licensee had violated, in order to support this argument.

The court answered as follows: Where a licensee sells goods to a discount store in contravention of a provision in the license agreement, a balance must be struck. On the one hand, the legitimate interest of the proprietor of the trademark covered by the license agreement in being protected against a discount store that does not form part of the selective distribution network using that trademark for commercial purposes in a manner that could damage the reputation of that trademark needs to be considered. On the other hand, the discount store's legitimate interest in being able to resell the goods in question by using methods that are customary in its sector of trade has to be taken into account. Therefore, should the national court find that sale by the licensee to a third party is unlikely to undermine the quality of the luxury goods bearing the trademark, so that it must be considered that they were put on the market with the consent of the proprietor of the trademark, it will be for that court to assess, whether further commercialization of the luxury goods damages the reputation of that trademark. In this respect, it is necessary to take into consideration, in particular, the parties to whom the goods are resold, and the specific circumstances in which the luxury goods are put on the market.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions