KPMG Germany Webpage Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.
For income tax purposes, a look-through approach applies to partnerships under German law. Income tax (individual or corporate) is thus paid by the partners, not by the partnership. For trade tax purposes, however, partnerships engaged in commercial activities are a taxpaying entity.
In a recent case (DB 1995, 123 - 22/11/1994) the Federal Tax Court had to decide when trade tax liability begins for a commercial general partnership (OHG) both of the partners of which were corporations. The Trade Tax Act does not state expressly when trade tax liability starts and ends. The courts have consistently held that trade tax liability begins only after a business has commenced trading and entered the marketplace. Preparatory activities such as constructing a factory or building a ship are not part of trading activity and do not create trade tax liability. This instead begins when goods are manufactured or the ship is put into service. Marketing activities and initiating client contacts also constitute trading activities.
The Federal Tax Court held that the same approach applies even when all of the partners are corporations. The decision is interesting because corporations are themselves liable to trade tax from the start of their legal existence by virtue of their corporate form alone irrespective of when trading activity is commenced. The decision is logical when one recalls that, for trade tax purposes, the partnership is the taxable entity, not the partners.
The practical consequences of the decision are probably negative for the taxpayer since expense is likely to exceed revenue in the pre-trading phase. Such expense will not be carried forward for trade tax purposes and hence be lost.
Disclaimer and Copyright
This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Under Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories ("EMIR")...
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).