Germany: Merger Control For Start-Ups – Much Ado About Nothing?

Last Updated: 14 July 2017
Article by Kathrin Westermann and Peter Stauber

In its 2016 Annual Economic Report, the German Federal Government announced that as part of the upcoming 9th amendment to the German Act Against Restraints of Competition (ARC), “merger control will be expanded to cover cases where, despite low turnover of the company acquired, the transaction value involved in a takeover (e.g. the purchase price) is particularly high.” As shown by the further explanations, with these plans the Federal Government is aiming in particular at big companies acquiring stakes in innovative start-ups. These transactions currently often “fly below the radar” of the German Federal Cartel Office (“FCO”) since the target company’s turnover is in most cases not high enough to meet the thresholds of German merger control. Under currently applicable law, transactions have to be filed with the FCO only if – in addition to an aggregate worldwide turnover of all participating undertakings of more than €500 million – one of the undertakings generates a turnover of more than €25 million in Germany, and a second one a turnover of more than €5 million.

The Government’s motivation and first reactions on the market

According to the Federal Government, the business ideas of start-ups can be “of major economic importance to a well-established buyer and lead to a dominant position in the market which is undesirable in the overall economy.” In particular “multilateral platforms“ such as search engines and social network service providers seem to have been identified as source of potential competition concerns. In this regard, the Federal Government intends to examine how their specific features – network effects, interdependencies between platforms, the collection of a large amounts of user data – can be taken into account in a competitive assessment even outside of merger control.

There have been marked reactions in the German start-up scene to the Federal Government’s announcement within a very short period of time. Some are afraid that the plans would not only mean an additional obstacle for financially strong investors seeking to acquire or invest in start-ups, but that they would basically prevent such venture capital transactions.

The cause of concern is not the transaction value as such…

This concern seems to be a little exaggerated. In fact, the transaction value to be introduced by the planned Act is not known yet. Such a criterion for merger control procedures is indeed rare. However, it is precisely in the United States – virtually the heartland of Internet start-ups – that a “size of transaction” test has been applied as a threshold for merger control for decades. Transactions from a value of currently US$312.6 million require filing in the United States even if the parties to the transaction (and in particular the target company) generate only a minor turnover in the United States. If the transaction value is higher than US$78.2 million but below US$312.6 million, a filing is generally required only if one party has turnover or assets in excess of US$15.6 million, and the other turnover or assets in excess of US$156.3 million, in the United States.

It is not yet known what amount is intended to be determined for the transaction value if the plans actually result in a draft bill. The German Monopolies Commission, an independent advisory committee to the Federal Government, in its special report “Competition policy: The challenge of digital markets”, proposed a value of €500 million. A significantly lower amount should be neither in the interest of the Federal Government nor in the interest of the FCO. That is because the authority’s limited resources would then be tied up to a flood of merger filings with most of the transactions being of no significant competitive relevance. This would thwart the purpose of such new threshold.

It appears that the use of the transaction value as a threshold has had no impact on venture capital transactions, in particular founders’ exits, in the United States. At most, the transaction landscape may be affected if a very low transaction value is set above which merger control would be triggered.

…but the interpretation of the term itself…

The additional work resulting from the introduction of a threshold based on the transaction value, however, will not predominantly depend on the nominal amount of the transaction value. In practice, it will be more important how the transaction value is to be calculated.

Transactions with a fixed purchase price, including if applicable the assumption of liabilities of a certain amount, should be unproblematic. However, difficult questions of interpretation can arise for example if sellers are offered the option to receive purchaser’s shares in consideration and holding periods are agreed in that context. Would the transaction value in such a case have to be determined based on the value of the options at the date of signing of the contract, or based on their value (or presumed value) at the date of granting, i.e. at the closing of the transaction? Or does the transaction value depend on the value of the options on expiry of the holding period? How should arrangements be dealt with under which at least part of the purchase price is to be determined only at a later point in time? Will it be necessary to perform an enterprise valuation for every transaction and, if so, is such valuation to be governed by the Principles for the Performance of Business Valuations (IDW S 1), the standard of the German Institute of Public Auditors? What valuation standard is to apply if the purchase contract is not governed by German law?

If the lawmakers intend to leave these questions of interpretation up to the FCO, it would be desirable for corresponding guidelines to be developed in close consultation with those affected the most – start-ups, venture capital and private equity investors and M&A experts – to provide market participants with practical and, most importantly, easy-to-handle guidelines.

It will also be important to design the new threshold in such a manner that the transaction value is related to Germany. According to the Monopolies Commission, it would suffice if at least one of the undertakings participating in the transaction generates a turnover of more than €25 million in Germany. This threshold, however, could also be met by the investor alone. As a result, even the acquisition of start-ups which are not (yet) active in Germany could be subject to German merger control. Arguably, a filing requirement could be denied in this case based on a lack of domestic effects (Sec. 130(2) ARC). However, this leaves room for interpretation which is not conducive to the predictability of transactions. For a sufficient connection to competition in Germany, it therefore seems preferable to determine as sole (or at least one) criterion that the target company has at least some, not completely insignificant assets or turnover in Germany.

…and most of all the competitive assessment by the FCO

The requirement of a merger control procedure in the acquisition of start-ups will be an obstacle above all if the transaction raises competition concerns. It is therefore decisive whether, as part of the 9th amendment to the ARC, the FCO’s material assessment criteria are to be tightened as well.

Up to now, a transaction can only be prohibited if the FCO shows that the transaction would result in a significant impediment to effective competition, in particular by establishing or strengthening a dominant market position. The lawmakers should not change this standard in future.

Start-ups often provide services which were previously not available or not available in that form. It is therefore often unclear whether such services are to be qualified as belonging to an already well-defined product or services market or to a new one, and in the latter case, how such new market should be delineated precisely. The business ideas of start-ups are also often comparatively easy to reproduce, so that many competing providers are quickly formed which offer the same or very similar service or product. It is not least in the platform sector that the half-life of market dominance can be short. Who still remembers former “Internet giants” such as AOL, MySpace or StudiVZ?

As before, the FCO will have to take into account these dynamics of the “new markets” when deciding on the competitive effects which a transaction may have. Being overly careful in taking such decisions would also in future do more harm than a “false positive” decision, i.e. clearance of a transaction that later turns out to be critical in terms of its effects on competition. The examples of hotel booking portals, Expedia, and HRS show that competition authorities do not need merger control to be able to investigate (presumably) anticompetitive conduct of Internet platforms. On the other hand, an assessment of transactions in the start-up sector which is too critical could lead to major economic disadvantages in the medium or long-term.


The planned introduction of an additional merger control threshold based on the transaction value should per se not prevent venture capital transactions. The amount and definition of the relevant transaction value should, however, be determined reasonably. In order to ensure a sufficient connection to competition in Germany, a minimum should be fixed for the target’s turnover or assets in Germany as a criterion to be applied in addition to the transaction value.

The degree of additional burden resulting from the planned new regulations will therefore not so much depend on whether, but much more on how, a merger control assessment is carried out. Both the lawmakers and the FCO are called upon to exercise caution. The currently applicable law already provides for a sufficient set of tools to tackle actual or presumed restraints of competition and abuses of market power. If the Federal Government intends not only to introduce an additional threshold, but also to tighten material assessment criteria in merger control, that would not only be needless but also less than conducive to a lively venture capital scene and, therefore, economically counterproductive.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions