Germany: Good Patent Practice For A Venture Capital Financed High-Tech Start-Up

Last Updated: 28 November 2006
Article by Malte Köllner

By Dr. Malte Köllner, Patent Attorney, Triangle Venture Capital Group

What should a venture capital financed high-tech start-up do on the patent field to become a strong company. Is it worth spending money on patents? (You might guess that the answer is yes, the author is a patent attorney, but wait!) Is it of strategic importance or is it more a marketing tool on the investment market? Do patents have any influence on turnover and profit?

One way of answering this question would be by trial and error: gather experience. However: how many years and millions do you need to find out with sufficient significance? Will the company still be alive until you finally found out? You could ask your patent attorney. He may not have a very convincing argument but he will be in favour of patents. Or you can ask experienced managers. Probably, they won't be of much help either, telling different stories.

Help might come from empirical research in business administration. And here are the answers:

A number of studies have shown a significant influence of patents on the success of a company. With success of a company we mean vague things like turnover or profit.

Is it enough to just file patents, to just file anything? You will guess the answer to this rhetorical question: Of course not.

Quality matters

High quality patent applications significantly increase the turnover of a company two to three years later. The effect increases with the quality of the patents [Ernst, H. (1999): Führen Patentanmeldungen zu einem nachfolgenden Anstieg des Unternehmenserfolges? Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 51. Vol.(12), page 1146-1168].

One reason for this increase could be the fact, that good inventions covered by high quality patent applications are more often commercialized than others [Shane, S. (2001): Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation, Management Science 47(2), page 205-220].

No wonder, therefore, that patents with a broad scope of protection increase the value of a company [Lerner, J. (1994): The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics Vol. 25(No. 2), page 319-333].

And, grouping the individual patents to a "portfolio", you find that a valuable, high quality patent portfolio increases the stock price and market capitalization of a publicly traded company [Deng, Z./Lev, B./Narin, F. (1999): Science & Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance. Financial Analysts Journal 55(5), page 20-32].

Strategy and management matter

The implementation of a patent strategy in the R&D department together with corresponding patent management processes almost doubles the profit margin of a company, in particular if it is combined with a systematic use of patent information [Omland, N.: "Patentmanagement und Unternehmenserfolg – eine empirische Analyse", Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte (2005) 402].

One reason for this could be the fact that a well managed patent portfolio has a higher quality and thus increases the turnover of a company (see above). At the same time, systematic use of patent information can safe R&D expenditures by avoiding spending money for reinventing things already invented elsewhere [Omland, N.: "Patentmanagement und Unternehmenserfolg – eine empirische Analyse", Mitteilungen der Deutschen Patentanwälte (2005) 402] [Ernst, H. (2003): Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information 25, page 233-242]. This looks quite plausible.

Meanwhile, we have become familiar with a number of principles and can almost guess what comes: companies with an actively pursued and systematic patent strategy have a higher growth rate of the turnover [Ernst, H. (1996): Patentinformationen für die strategische Planung von Forschung und Entwicklung, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. Wiesbaden]. Having read until these lines, we cannot say that this is really a surprise for us.

So, have these ideas become a common place for us within minutes? Are these results all of a sudden evident? They may be for those who have read these lines or the cited literature (or other relevant literature). Unfortunately, however, few have taken the time to read this or even had the chance of reading it, since most of these papers appeared in journals not read by patent professionals. Consequently, these ideas are anything but commonplace in industry. Although they should, shouldn't they?

What does not matter?

Quantity does not matter. It only costs money for loads of patents. And low quality patent applications have, if at all, a negative influence on the company, because they consume money without producing anything helpful for the success of the company.


Build a high quality patent portfolio. Don't file just anything. Look for quality. And install patent management. Be systematic. Put brain into your patent work. Develop a strategy and actively pursue it. But what is this: "patent management" or "patent strategy"?

What could patent management involve? Management is the art of achieving a goal, some say. So when reflecting on the best way of achieving a goal, it seems to be a good idea to first spend some time thinking about the goal to be achieved. In other words: where do you want to go with your patents? What is your patent strategy and your strategic aims? What is a suitable patent strategy for a venture capital financed young high-tech startup company?

What does "patent strategy" at all mean? Is it just a buzz word, management talk? Some people call their way of choosing countries for applications abroad their "patent strategy". Others consider the ideal way of patent prosecution to be their "patent strategy". Again others do not differentiate much between patent portfolio management and "patent strategy".

Let me stick to a vague but simple differentiation: for me, strategy has something to do with the goals to be achieved and the big picture of the way to do so. Management, on the other hand, rather concerns every day routines of doing business, in particular finding processes for supporting the strategic goals.

In this perspective, patent strategy generally could aim at the following:

  • Licencing out your patents. If you are lucky, your ideas will form the basis of a standard. Or you can claim damages (the so-called "stick licensing").
  • Cross licencing your patents with the patents of your competitors.
  • Building a monopoly position based on your patents around your products, protecting them.

Different of these strategies are best practice in different industry sectors. Mixtures also occur.

Do any of these strategies make sense for a young high-tech start-up company? Experience shows that patent strategies of young high-tech start-up companies in the big picture do not differ from those patent strategies pursued by industry leaders. Rather, a suitable patent strategy for a young high-tech start-up company looks like an imitation of the best practice for the respective industry sector, complemented by some additional measures to be taken, which I would like to illustrate a little in the next paragraphs.

Patent strategy for young high-tech start-ups

  • First of all, imitate what is best practice in your industry sector. For example, in the pharmaceutical area of biotechnology that would mean to try to monopolize a drug. In telecommunications this might mean to try to create intellectual property which may serve as the basis of a new standard.
  • Secondly, patents are better than trade secrets. Do not forget that we are talking about young companies that are venture capital financed. Such companies often go from financing round to financing round. Financing rounds and the anxious months before they are closed (and sometimes not) may cause a fluctuation of the personnel. Also, the personnel might fluctuate with the ups and downs of business success. Even more so, the personnel might be subject to considerable changes in case of a sale of the company. Surely, fluctuating personnel takes trade secrets along and reveals trade secrets as what they are: a perpetual risk.
  • Thirdly, rather make a few patents too many than one too few. As we have seen, it is important for a high-tech company to build a strong patent portfolio. This should contain - in the ideal case - only valuable, high-quality patents. The problem is, that you cannot always judge which patent has a high value and which one not. This is even more the case since this judgment can change over the years with changing business environment conditions. Therefore, in case of doubt: file a patent and uphold your old patents. Only abandon patents if you are more or less 100% sure that they are doomed to fail. (You may be forced to lower this threshold when you are short of money.)
  • Make patents regularly, say one per month or quarter, at least one every six months, since it is one of the most prominent aims to be achieved by a young high-tech start-up to build a strong patent portfolio. You should not rely on the strength of only one patent. You might be wrong in your judgment about this patent. More than once, the most valuable patent of a patent portfolio was not the one which everybody would have thought it to be.
  • Go for a quick grant of the patent applications. Accelerate the prosecution where possible. It might be wise to avoid the PCT route and go directly into different countries or regions. When choosing the PCT route for application, it generally takes four to five years and more until patents are granted. However, a patent application has a much lower value than a granted patent in case of a financing round. On the other hand, the preliminary report on patentability issued at the end of the international phase of a PCT application is achieved fairly quickly (after about two years) and is almost as good as a grant of the patent, if this report is positive. Clearly this implies that once you chose the PCT route, you have to take extra care to achieve a positive preliminary report on patentability.

In following these simple measures, a young high-tech start-up company can achieve a number of advantages:

  • The company will be in possession of a respectable patent portfolio. This can always be used as marketing tool for the next financing round. Granted patents somehow prove the uniqueness of the technology. Also, a well-established patent portfolio has a crucial influence on the valuation of the company, in particular for a tradesale, i.e. when the start-up is taken over by an industry leader. The younger a company is, the more its potential will be judged based on the patent portfolio - and not on the vanishing turnover.
  • A suitable patent portfolio can help a young company become visible even with low turnover. Competitors may not be awakened by the negligible sales a young company may have achieved. But they may be awakened by the threat that resides in a patent portfolio.
  • Valuable patents might also allow you to trigger a merger or acquisition using your patents, e.g. by filing a patent infringement suit and settling it by being acquired.

Maybe we know now where we want to go in patent matters.

Patent management

This obviously brings us to the question how we can achieve these strategic goals. In other words: what patent management should strive to pursue? Let me enumerate the essential steps of a good patent management for a young venture capital based high-tech start-up.

  • Step one is the definition of a patent strategy and of goals to be achieved. Needless to say that this strategy must be deduced from the general business objectives. R&D, sales and IP must be interlocked. Also, the strategy you once drafted might not quite work the way you expected it to do. So keep it dynamic, update and fine tune your patent strategy regularly.
  • Step two is very simple: have regular meetings discussing IP matters. The participants should come from the R&D department, from sales, from management and - of course - from the IP department. For a small start-up, the CEO and the patent attorney alone might populate such an IP meeting. Others might join when the company grows. The aim is as simple as thinking regularly about patents; this simple step seriously helps to improve the IP position of the company. Very simple and yet all too often not observed.
  • What should be discussed during these IP meetings? There is one paramount point: Collect all ideas and inventions of your engineers that you can get hold of. You can only build a patent portfolio if you are aware of inventions. Now: what to do with these ideas? File them as patent applications? Wait. Don't hurry. Here come some of the key success factors for a good patent management.
  • Do not file everything. Remember that only quality matters, not quantity. (And remember that money is short in young companies, even with venture capital on board.) It is your duty to select the potentially best inventions for patent application.
  • Do not file event driven. A typical event driven filing is governed by the following script: An idea has been born within the R&D department of the company. The CEO will meet a customer next months and has the intention - among others - to present this idea to foster the sales process. In order not to destroy any IP, it is agreed to contact the patent attorney and make him file a patent application rapidly to protect this idea.
  • However: concentrate. Step back. What do you want to achieve? A patent portfolio full of high quality, valuable patents. You are to pursue a strategy. Therefore, file in a strategic and systematic way. Does this invention support your strategy? Will it create a valuable patent? Is it really worth spending the money on it? Surely, you cannot judge for sure which invention will be of value later on. Nevertheless, try to analyse. Think twice. When in doubt: file. But stick to your strategy. I don't have to remember that we are not living in the best of all worlds. Money is a scarce resource. You probably have a limited IP budget. You are forced to optimise the allocation of these scarce resources. Where should you put the money on in order to best serve your company? You should invest on one hand in high-quality patents. On the other hand, investing according to your patent strategy is probably the wisest decision in terms of money allocation.
  • Conduct searches. Make use of patent information. Remember that the systematic use of patent information is beneficial to your company. Analyse the patent landscape. Analyse the patent portfolio of your competitors. This will allow you to find landmines before they find you. Find ways to circumvent your competitors' patents. Be well informed and don't be taken by surprise.
  • Monitor all patent publications in a certain field. Definitely monitor all patent publications of your mayor competitors. But also monitor the entire field of interest. Take care to narrow your field of view to a level that can be supported by those responsible for reading the material. These can be the engineers, if they received some basic IP training. The CEO may not have enough time for this. But those who read the results of the monitoring process should be part of the IP meeting team.
  • Do not analyse too much what you find by monitoring patent publications. There doesn't seem to be a need to categorize all patent publications found. In any case, you will have to make a novelty search before filing an application. And again, what would be the criteria for categorizing the patent publications? The criteria relevant later on in a conflict might be entirely different from what you consider today. Patent monitoring is like reading a specialized newspaper tailored for your needs as well as a means for discovering imminent danger.
  • Before filing an application conduct a novelty search or try to be familiar with the prior art by some other way, e.g. by knowing every patent document in your field. You risk wasting a lot of money in filing an application - and probably expensive foreign filings twelve months later - in case some patent office can confront you with highly relevant prior art killing your application. True, it is not easy to conduct prior art searches and the searches performed by the patent offices often have a higher quality than your own searches. The risk to be surprised by prior art found, e.g., by the European Patent Office cannot entirely be eliminated. However, a simple calculation shows that it is worth spending on the order of one, two or three thousand euros or dollars on a prior art search before filing an application. This money may prevent you from spending much more on a useless application in case you find highly relevant prior art. But there is another very important effect of a prior art search: if you are familiar with the relevant prior art for a patent application, you have a much better impression what the core of the new ideas is. What are the all important distinguishing features over the prior art? With this knowledge at hand the drafting of the application will result in a patent application of higher quality, stressing the important point with the necessary degree of detail. Such an improved quality of the application will have a beneficial influence on one hand on reduced prosecution costs. In the ideal case - which happens in real world every now and again - there will be no material office action at all during prosecution - in the entire world. The examination of the application will quickly result in grant of the patent in all countries with much reduced costs for the prosecution. On the other hand, a higher quality of the patent has a beneficial effect on your business. So the money spent for a prior art search before filing an application is money well invested.
  • Before starting a product development make a freedom-to-operate analysis. This should be fairly evident to everybody. If you omit this, you might end up having spent quite a bit of money for product development without being able to sell your product and that way get any return on your investment, because unfortunately your mayor competitor is holding a patent on just what you developed and - well, well, well - you somehow didn't know. The money will simply be lost.
  • After filing an application go for quick grant. Try to get an office action as early as possible in order to get an idea about the chances of success of this application. Also, you should try to get an idea about the form of the claims that might eventually be granted. What scope of protection might this patent end up with? Broad or narrow? This will allow you - among other factors - to get an idea about the qualitative value of this patent (application). Remember that patents with a broad scope of protection increase the value of a company (see above), while narrow patents don't.
  • It has proven very helpful to take into account the above mentioned two factors:
    • chances of success of the patent application and
    • qualitative value of the patent application

in taking decisions during the prosecution process, in particular as far as the choice of countries for foreign filing is concerned. That way you can fulfil one of your duties: carefully and intelligently select the countries for foreign filing.

  • If licensing out your patents is part of your patent strategy, uncover licensing potential on a regular basis. This can be achieved, e.g., by monitoring all patent applications during the examination of which your patents are cited as prior art. Also, it is beneficial to discover what patents are dependent on your patents. (There exist automated tools for this on the internet, see
  • Prosecute any infringement consequently. This might cost money and bring in money. At the same time, it teaches your industry sector that you not only bark but also bite, if necessary. This will definitely increase the influence of the existence of your patent portfolio on decisions taken by your competitors. They are much more likely to respect your patents and your products will face less competition. This, of course, increases your turnover.

I think these simple rules have a beneficial effect also on other high-tech companies, beyond venture capital financed companies and beyond start-ups.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions