Germany: Commercial Landlord And Tenant Law

Last Updated: 19 September 2014
Article by Leonie Munz

I. Landlord rights of the property buyer prior to transfer of ownership

By Leonie Munz

Purchase agreement regarding a property with a rented flat

In its ruling of March 19, 2014 (VII ZR 203/13) the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has arrived at the conclusion that the landlord is entitled to authorize the purchaser already prior to the transfer of ownership to assert the rights of the landlord in his own name. It is not necessary to disclose the authorization regarding the effectiveness of the legal transaction made on the basis of the authorization.

Contractual rights of the property purchaser prior to the transfer of ownership

The ruling is based on the following facts: The landlord (seller) and the purchaser concluded a notarial purchase agreement for a property to which the rented flat formed part. The purchase agreement entitled the purchaser to issue towards the tenants, immediately and until the complete transfer of ownership in the land register, all statements under landlord and tenant law and to conduct respective legal proceedings in his/her own name. Prior to the transfer of ownership in the land register the purchaser addressed the request of a rent increase to the tenant, which the tenant accepted without requiring any authorization. Subsequently the tenant demanded his rent back because the purchaser (and later acquirer) had only pretended to be in the position of a landlord. The action remained unsuccessful.

Difference between authorization (Ermächtigung) (§ 185 German Civil Code (BGB)) and power of attorney (Vollmacht) (§ 166 Sec. 2 German Civil Code (BGB))

Since the clause in the notarial purchase agreement had granted the purchaser the right for taking action in his/her own name, the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has assumed an authorization (Ermächtigung) (§ 185 German Civil Code (BGB)) and not a power of attorney (Vollmacht). The holder of rights can principally authorize a third party to assert dependent rights to alter a legal relationship in his/her own name. The purchasers automatic move into the position of the landlord and the transfer of ownership pursuant to § 566 German Civil Code (BGB) did not exclude the prior authorization of the acquirer to assert claims in his/her own name.

No duty to disclose

It was not necessary for the effectiveness of statements made by the authorized person to disclose the authorization. If claims were made against the tenant from a person other than the original landlord, he was entitled to first of all be provided with the evidence of authorization if he doubted that a power of attorney or an authorization existed or a transfer of rights pursuant to § 566 German Civil Code (BGB) had taken place. Thus the tenant was sufficiently protected.

Practical considerations

The ruling of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has been delivered for a rental contract of a flat. It identically applies to cases of commercial tenancies which exist more often: If a third party that is not the original landlord exercises rights to alter a legal relationship (for example, termination), without providing evidence of authorization the tenant is entitled to immediately reject the statement. If the tenant rejects the statement immediately, the third party is entitled to repeat the statement together with the respective evidence (an original document of the authorization is necessary – a possibly certified copy – does not suffice!); however only this second statement "counts" for instance with reference to the compliance of specific deadlines to be met.

II. Content of fulfilment obligations of the landlord – No entitlemenet of the tenant to the modernisation of a heating system – working in accordance with the contract –

By Dr. Moritz Ulrich

In its ruling of December 18, 2013 – XII ZR 80/12 the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has made it clear that in case of a commercial tenancy ("at least in that present case") there is no entitlement of the tenant to the modernisation of an existing - uneconomical but flawless - heating system which corresponds to the contractual agreements.

Comprehensively refurbished commercial real estate with an unmodified distance heating system – contractually agreed and actually reaching heating output

The plaintiff requested from the defendant outstanding rent. The parties had signed a rental agreement for commercial premises regarding an older building, which had been comprehensively refurbished by the plaintiff prior to being taken over. The existing district heating system, which could only be regulated centrally, as well as the existing ventilation system remained unchanged. The parties made the building specification of the landlord content of the rental agreement. As far as the heating system was concerned, it had been regulated that the supply air should be centrally heated during the heating period up to an outside temperature of approx. 18 degrees Celsius and should be made available in the rental area. Furthermore the landlord was supposed to provide a separate connection for the supply of the communal areas and of the offices in order to reach a room temperature in those rooms of up to 21 degrees Celsius. The systems complied with those requirements. The defendant reduced the rent by arguing that the heating and ventilation system was oversized with respect to the low public traffic on the premises and could not be adjusted according to demand: they could not be operated economically.

No entitlement to modernisation without agreement

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has stated: The rental object was not defective within the meaning of § 536 German Civil Code (BGB). Allthough the rental contract did not refer to an express agreement concerning the technical equipment of the rental object it contained, however, the kind of information which could be taken into account for interpreting the target condition to be identified.

Decisiveness of technical standard at construction time: no entitlement to claims from § 535 Sec. 1 Sent. 2 German Civil Code (BGB) or § 536 Sec. 3 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB)

The inefficiency of operating the heating and ventilation system did not result in a defect of the rental object. It corresponded to the decisive technical standard at the time the building had been built and it operated free from defects. If the non-economical operation of the heating system existing upon completion of contract resulted in a defect, as represented in parts of the literature, the landlord would be required to technically change the system to (§ 535 Sec. 1 Sent. 2 German Civil Code (BGB)). However, the law did not provide such a duty of modernisation. The efficiency principle anchored in the residential landlord and tenant law in § 556 Sec.3 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB) did not lead to any other result either.

Practical considerations

Decisive for assessing the technical standard of a rental object are the norms applicable at the time when the building was built. However, even in case of older buildings the technical standards applicable upon completion of the rental agreement can be decisive for assessing the defectiveness if – other than in the present case – the landlord carried out structural alterations on the rental object which were comparable to a new building or to a substantial modification of the building (Federal Supreme Court (BGH), ruling of June 5, 2013 – VIII ZR 287/12).

From the perspective of the landlord particular attention should be paid to the information provided thus interpreting the target condition which forms part of the rental agreement in order to be able to successfully counter demands for reduction occurring at a later stage.

III. Written Form Requirement – valid unilateral adjustment of advance payments of operating costs by the General Terms and Conditions

By Dr. Rainer Burbulla

On February 5, 2014 (XII ZR 65/13) the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled that the contracting parties can - with respect to the rent for commercial premises – effectively agree in General Terms and Conditions the landlord's right, by means of a unilateral statement to adjust the amount of the operating costs advance payment subsequent to the operating cost statement. Exercising this right of adjustment is not subject to the written form requirement as set forth in § 550 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB).

Unilateral adjustment, as per contract, of the advance payments of operating costs by the General Terms and Conditions

The parties had agreed to an amount of 1 2,061.90 as monthly net advance payment for the incidental rental costs incurring. As far as the amount of the advance payments of service charges was concerned § 5 Clause 1 of the rental agreement specified: "Potential credits or subsequent claims resulting from an advance payment of incidental costs have to be mutually balanced with immediate effect. In these cases as well as in case of an increase or a reduction of the incidental costs the landlord is entitled to newly determine the advance payment to be made on a monthly basis." Since the incidental costs statement of 2005 resulted in a subsequent claim of a net amount of approximately 1 5,200.00 the landlord informed the tenant in writing that an adjustment of the advance payments of incidental costs became necessary and that the advance payments of incidental costs had to be increased to a monthly amount of € 3,391.47 as of August 2007. Subsequently the tenant paid that amount. In March 2009 the tenant terminated the rental agreement by invoking a violation of the written form, amongst other things, because the increase of advance payments of operating costs did not observe the written form of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB).

No violation of the written form clause

No interference with the protective purpose of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB)

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has negated the possibility of termination. The increase of the advance payments of operating costs did not lead to a violation of the written form requirement. The regulation provided for in § 5 of the rental agreement granted the lessor the right to newly determine the amount of the advance payments in the event of subsequent claims. This agreement corresponded in its meaning with § 560 Sec. 4 German Civil Code (BGB), a paragraph only applicable to residential tenancies. Whereas the landlord is entitled to adjust advance payments by a unilaterial statement in text form (§ 126 b German Civil Code) without requiring the approval of the other party. In line with this, § 5 of the rental agreement provided that the landlord's right to demand an adjustment of the advance payment by way of a unilateral statement. The contracting parties actually acted accordingly: The landlord informed the tenant about the higher amount of the advance payment to be paid as of August 2007 and the tenant followed that request without requiring further statements. There were no opposing legal grounds if the contracting parties agreed in case of the rent for commercial premises in the General Terms and Conditions that the landlord was entitled to adjust the amount of the advance payments of operating costs by a unilateral statement subsequent to the operating costs statement. That was not opposed by the protective purpose of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB). That paragraph intended to provide clarity for future property acquirers regarding the conditions of a long-term rental agreement. However there were also situations in which a comprehensive "provision of information" was not possible. This applied, for example, to renewals of rental agreements due to exercising the option right. In that case the acquirer would be sufficiently warned due to the renewal option agreed in the rental contract. Regarding the potential exercise of the option right he would have to gather information from the seller (lessor) or the tenant. The same applied to § 5 of the rental agreement. In that paragraph the need for protection of a property acquirer was taken into account the clause clearly indicated the possibility of a change in the amount of advance payments specified in the contract document.

Practical considerations

The provision of § 560 Sec. 4 German Civil Code does not apply to commercial landlord and tenant law. In order to enable landlords to adjust advance payments of incidental costs, the landlord should expressly provide an adjustment clause in the rental agreement. Such a clause is, according to the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) also possible in a standard form.

D. COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW

I. Landlord rights of the property buyer prior to transfer of ownership

By Leonie Munz

Purchase agreement regarding a property with a rented flat

In its ruling of March 19, 2014 (VII ZR 203/13) the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has arrived at the conclusion that the landlord is entitled to authorize the purchaser already prior to the transfer of ownership to assert the rights of the landlord in his own name. It is not necessary to disclose the authorization regarding the effectiveness of the legal transaction made on the basis of the authorization.

Contractual rights of the property purchaser prior to the transfer of ownership

The ruling is based on the following facts: The landlord (seller) and the purchaser concluded a notarial purchase agreement for a property to which the rented flat formed part. The purchase agreement entitled the purchaser to issue towards the tenants, immediately and until the complete transfer of ownership in the land register, all statements under landlord and tenant law and to conduct respective legal proceedings in his/her own name. Prior to the transfer of ownership in the land register the purchaser addressed the request of a rent increase to the tenant, which the tenant accepted without requiring any authorization. Subsequently the tenant demanded his rent back because the purchaser (and later acquirer) had only pretended to be in the position of a landlord. The action remained unsuccessful.

Difference between authorization (Ermächtigung) (§ 185 German Civil Code (BGB)) and power of attorney (Vollmacht) (§ 166 Sec. 2 German Civil Code (BGB))

Since the clause in the notarial purchase agreement had granted the purchaser the right for taking action in his/her own name, the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has assumed an authorization (Ermächtigung) (§ 185 German Civil Code (BGB)) and not a power of attorney (Vollmacht). The holder of rights can principally authorize a third party to assert dependent rights to alter a legal relationship in his/her own name. The purchasers automatic move into the position of the landlord and the transfer of ownership pursuant to § 566 German Civil Code (BGB) did not exclude the prior authorization of the acquirer to assert claims in his/her own name.

No duty to disclose

It was not necessary for the effectiveness of statements made by the authorized person to disclose the authorization. If claims were made against the tenant from a person other than the original landlord, he was entitled to first of all be provided with the evidence of authorization if he doubted that a power of attorney or an authorization existed or a transfer of rights pursuant to § 566 German Civil Code (BGB) had taken place. Thus the tenant was sufficiently protected.

Practical considerations

The ruling of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has been delivered for a rental contract of a flat. It identically applies to cases of commercial tenancies which exist more often: If a third party that is not the original landlord exercises rights to alter a legal relationship (for example, termination), without providing evidence of authorization the tenant is entitled to immediately reject the statement. If the tenant rejects the statement immediately, the third party is entitled to repeat the statement together with the respective evidence (an original document of the authorization is necessary – a possibly certified copy – does not suffice!); however only this second statement "counts" for instance with reference to the compliance of specific deadlines to be met.

II. Content of fulfilment obligations of the landlord – No entitlemenet of the tenant to the modernisation of a heating system – working in accordance with the contract –

By Dr. Moritz Ulrich

In its ruling of December 18, 2013 – XII ZR 80/12 the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has made it clear that in case of a commercial tenancy ("at least in that present case") there is no entitlement of the tenant to the modernisation of an existing - uneconomical but flawless - heating system which corresponds to the contractual agreements.

Comprehensively refurbished commercial real estate with an unmodified distance heating system – contractually agreed and actually reaching heating output

The plaintiff requested from the defendant outstanding rent. The parties had signed a rental agreement for commercial premises regarding an older building, which had been comprehensively refurbished by the plaintiff prior to being taken over. The existing district heating system, which could only be regulated centrally, as well as the existing ventilation system remained unchanged. The parties made the building specification of the landlord content of the rental agreement. As far as the heating system was concerned, it had been regulated that the supply air should be centrally heated during the heating period up to an outside temperature of approx. 18 degrees Celsius and should be made available in the rental area. Furthermore the landlord was supposed to provide a separate connection for the supply of the communal areas and of the offices in order to reach a room temperature in those rooms of up to 21 degrees Celsius. The systems complied with those requirements. The defendant reduced the rent by arguing that the heating and ventilation system was oversized with respect to the low public traffic on the premises and could not be adjusted according to demand: they could not be operated economically.

No entitlement to modernisation without agreement

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has stated: The rental object was not defective within the meaning of § 536 German Civil Code (BGB). Allthough the rental contract did not refer to an express agreement concerning the technical equipment of the rental object it contained, however, the kind of information which could be taken into account for interpreting the target condition to be identified.

Decisiveness of technical standard at construction time: no entitlement to claims from § 535 Sec. 1 Sent. 2 German Civil Code (BGB) or § 536 Sec. 3 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB)

The inefficiency of operating the heating and ventilation system did not result in a defect of the rental object. It corresponded to the decisive technical standard at the time the building had been built and it operated free from defects. If the non-economical operation of the heating system existing upon completion of contract resulted in a defect, as represented in parts of the literature, the landlord would be required to technically change the system to (§ 535 Sec. 1 Sent. 2 German Civil Code (BGB)). However, the law did not provide such a duty of modernisation. The efficiency principle anchored in the residential landlord and tenant law in § 556 Sec.3 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB) did not lead to any other result either.

Practical considerations

Decisive for assessing the technical standard of a rental object are the norms applicable at the time when the building was built. However, even in case of older buildings the technical standards applicable upon completion of the rental agreement can be decisive for assessing the defectiveness if – other than in the present case – the landlord carried out structural alterations on the rental object which were comparable to a new building or to a substantial modification of the building (Federal Supreme Court (BGH), ruling of June 5, 2013 – VIII ZR 287/12).

From the perspective of the landlord particular attention should be paid to the information provided thus interpreting the target condition which forms part of the rental agreement in order to be able to successfully counter demands for reduction occurring at a later stage.

III. Written Form Requirement – valid unilateral adjustment of advance payments of operating costs by the General Terms and Conditions

By Dr. Rainer Burbulla

On February 5, 2014 (XII ZR 65/13) the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled that the contracting parties can - with respect to the rent for commercial premises – effectively agree in General Terms and Conditions the landlord's right, by means of a unilateral statement to adjust the amount of the operating costs advance payment subsequent to the operating cost statement. Exercising this right of adjustment is not subject to the written form requirement as set forth in § 550 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB).

Unilateral adjustment, as per contract, of the advance payments of operating costs by the General Terms and Conditions

The parties had agreed to an amount of 1 2,061.90 as monthly net advance payment for the incidental rental costs incurring. As far as the amount of the advance payments of service charges was concerned § 5 Clause 1 of the rental agreement specified: "Potential credits or subsequent claims resulting from an advance payment of incidental costs have to be mutually balanced with immediate effect. In these cases as well as in case of an increase or a reduction of the incidental costs the landlord is entitled to newly determine the advance payment to be made on a monthly basis." Since the incidental costs statement of 2005 resulted in a subsequent claim of a net amount of approximately 1 5,200.00 the landlord informed the tenant in writing that an adjustment of the advance payments of incidental costs became necessary and that the advance payments of incidental costs had to be increased to a monthly amount of € 3,391.47 as of August 2007. Subsequently the tenant paid that amount. In March 2009 the tenant terminated the rental agreement by invoking a violation of the written form, amongst other things, because the increase of advance payments of operating costs did not observe the written form of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB).

No violation of the written form clause

No interference with the protective purpose of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB)

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has negated the possibility of termination. The increase of the advance payments of operating costs did not lead to a violation of the written form requirement. The regulation provided for in § 5 of the rental agreement granted the lessor the right to newly determine the amount of the advance payments in the event of subsequent claims. This agreement corresponded in its meaning with § 560 Sec. 4 German Civil Code (BGB), a paragraph only applicable to residential tenancies. Whereas the landlord is entitled to adjust advance payments by a unilaterial statement in text form (§ 126 b German Civil Code) without requiring the approval of the other party. In line with this, § 5 of the rental agreement provided that the landlord's right to demand an adjustment of the advance payment by way of a unilateral statement. The contracting parties actually acted accordingly: The landlord informed the tenant about the higher amount of the advance payment to be paid as of August 2007 and the tenant followed that request without requiring further statements. There were no opposing legal grounds if the contracting parties agreed in case of the rent for commercial premises in the General Terms and Conditions that the landlord was entitled to adjust the amount of the advance payments of operating costs by a unilateral statement subsequent to the operating costs statement. That was not opposed by the protective purpose of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB). That paragraph intended to provide clarity for future property acquirers regarding the conditions of a long-term rental agreement. However there were also situations in which a comprehensive "provision of information" was not possible. This applied, for example, to renewals of rental agreements due to exercising the option right. In that case the acquirer would be sufficiently warned due to the renewal option agreed in the rental contract. Regarding the potential exercise of the option right he would have to gather information from the seller (lessor) or the tenant. The same applied to § 5 of the rental agreement. In that paragraph the need for protection of a property acquirer was taken into account the clause clearly indicated the possibility of a change in the amount of advance payments specified in the contract document.

Practical considerations

The provision of § 560 Sec. 4 German Civil Code does not apply to commercial landlord and tenant law. In order to enable landlords to adjust advance payments of incidental costs, the landlord should expressly provide an adjustment clause in the rental agreement. Such a clause is, according to the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) also possible in a standard form.

IV. Written Form – valid unilateral notification of a rent increase due to a change of the consumer price index

By Dr. Rainer Burbulla

In the aforementioned ruling (X II ZR 65/13) the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has additionally decided that a rent increase based on the index clause regarding rental agreements did not have to observe the written form of § 550 German Civil Code (BGB). That was also not changed by the addendum to the index clause according to which a written notification of the tenant in case of an increase were provided if a purely declaratory character was attributed to it according to the decisive interpretation made by the judges of fact.

Index clause with automatic adjustment

In the rental agreement for commercial premises existing between the parties the amount of the net rent was fixed until December 31, 2008. From January 2009 the agreed index clause in § 7 No. 1 applied. Accordingly, "the agreed rent is subject to change on each January 1 to the same extent as the consumer price index for Germany as a whole had changed either upward or downward and as identified by the German Federal Statistics Office. The adjustment of the respectively changed rent occurred automatically on January 1 of each year by a written notification provided by the landlord. The date of notification did not have any influence on the coming into force of the rent increase." The landlord asserted a rent increase due to an index change and requested the tenant to additionally pay the increased rent. The tenant terminated the rental agreement amongst other things because the rent increase made did not observe the written form of § 550 German Civil Code.

Declaratory effect of the adjustment notification – no need for a supplement

In the opinion of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) the termination was ineffective. The indexation clause agreed in the rental agreement was effective. According to that clause the adjustment of the rent occurred automatically at the beginning of each year as of 2009. The respective contractual agreement was already part of the original rental agreement and, therefore, complied with the written form requirement of § 550 Sent. 1 German Civil Code (BGB). If the clause provided a written notification of the landlord, that notification would be of a purely declaratory nature and would not result in the fact that the contracting parties had to contractually conclude an index-related rent increase, for example, in an addendum to the rental agreement.

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has expressly confirmed the validity of existing and commonly accepted contractual practice according to which rent increases due to a change of the index principally take place "outside" the rental agreement by way of a separate letter regarding the rent increase.

To read this Newsletter in full, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.