Germany: (Cross-)License Agreements In German Insolvency Proceedings: An Update

On July 25, the Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) of Munich ruled that an irrevocable license does not become unenforceable in German insolvency proceedings. The judgment concerned the rejection of a cross-license by an insolvency administrator. Cross-license agreements play a significant role in industries with a high concentration of patents, such as the semiconductor, biotechnology, software, and internet industries. To minimize the risks of patent violations, market participants grant to each other rights of use in patents, patent applications, and know-how in specific areas. An appeal against the Munich judgment has already been filed with the German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof, or "BGH"). Whether the decision will be upheld remains to be seen. This Commentary provides a brief update on the situation.

Legal and Commercial Background 

In German insolvency proceedings, mutual contracts with respect to which the obligations of the debtor and the counterparty have not been completely performed are governed by §103 of the German Insolvency Code (Insolvenzordnung, or "InsO"). Such contracts are automatically unenforceable unless the insolvency administrator elects the performance of the contracts. If the administrator rejects a contract, i.e., elects not to perform a contract, the counterparty will be limited to a claim for nonperformance. This claim is merely an insolvency claim, so only payment of a—typically low—dividend can be expected. 

License agreements are usually treated similarly to lease agreements over movable assets, so they fall within §103 InsO as well. An insolvency administrator of the licensor will often not be interested in electing performance if realizing the intellectual property right without the license or granting a new license will be favorable to the insolvency estate. The situation becomes more complicated if the license agreement concerns foreign intellectual property rights, e.g., patents registered abroad. The licensee's interest in turn is to uphold the license agreement, in particular if it has made substantial investments based on the license. Other than a lessee, the licensee often has no possibility to substitute the licensed rights by entering into a license agreement with another party. 

Court Rulings—From Software Usage Right to Patent Cross-Licenses 

Software Usage Right (Softwarenutzungsrecht). The first, and still important, decision by the  BGH on the topic dates from 2005. The case concerned a license agreement over a software usage right. The BGH confirmed that license agreements fall within §103 InsO. But the licensee was protected nevertheless, as the court accepted a conditional transfer of the software usage right to the licensee in case of a termination for cause, even if the termination by the licensee occurs in insolvency proceedings. By rejecting the license agreement, the administrator could not prevent the transfer. The software usage right decision might still show how a conditional transfer of rights may possibly protect the licensee. 

Reifen Progressiv. The much discussed Reifen Progressiv case of 2009 did not, at least not directly, deal with an insolvency administrator's right to reject license agreements. It concerned the question whether a nonexclusive sublicense will survive if the exclusive main license is called back. The BGH held that this was the case, strengthening the rights of sublicensees. But the court also mentioned that both exclusive and nonexclusive rights of use have "in rem character," and that the licensor does not have to convey the right of use continuously to the licensee. It was this statement by the court that led legal scholars to believe that at least copyright licenses would now be considered insolvency-proof. 

Take Five and M2Trade. This perception changed with two decisions by the Federal Supreme Court, Take Five and M2Trade (both on the same day in 2012). Both court rulings further strengthened the position of sublicensees. The BGH held that sublicenses continue to exist despite of a termination of the main license agreement. With regard to the administrator's right to reject license agreements, in the Take Five case, the court probably made a statement by not mentioning an "in rem character" of a license again. 

The M2Trade decision, however, includes an important passage with regard to license agreements in insolvency proceedings. The Federal Supreme Court mentions the case that an insolvency administrator of the main licensee rejects the main license, but not the sublicense agreement. With this statement, the BGH confirmed again that license agreements fall within §103 InsO. The court does not distinguish between exclusive and nonexclusive licenses. As a result of the judgment, licensees may consider to use a sublicense as a means of protection against the risk of insolvency. 

Patent Cross-Licenses. In a recent decision dated July 25, the Higher Regional Court of Munich had to deal with the rejection of a patent cross-license by an insolvency administrator. The court decided against the administrator. It held, among other things,1 that a license that is granted irrevocably does not become unenforceable in insolvency proceedings. An appeal against the decision is pending. 

In a similar case of 2012, the Superior Court of Justice (Kammergericht) of Berlin ruled that nonexclusive license agreements are subject to the insolvency administrator's rejection right and are not insolvency-proof. 

Deviating Views and Contractual Workarounds 

A number of German legal scholars take the view that licenses are insolvency-proof under the law that is currently in place. While their reasoning differs, there are valid arguments against each of these views. One should therefore not rely on any of the positions, particularly in light of the Federal Supreme Court judgments mentioned above. 

In light of the risks to license agreements in insolvency proceedings, various contractual workarounds, such as a purchase of rights, contractual trust arrangements, or an easement are suggested. Since none of these have been court-tested yet, they should not be relied on either. 

Legislative Initiatives 

The concerns regarding the insolvency administrator's right to reject license agreements prompted the German legislator to deal with the issue. 

Government Draft Bill of 2007. The first attempt to resolve the matter led to the government draft bill of 2007. It provided that a license agreement over an intellectual property right with the debtor as the licensor remains effective in insolvency proceedings. The draft further gave the insolvency administrator the possibility to demand an adjustment of the remuneration if it was not at arm's length. The draft bill was criticized for a number of reasons and was ultimately not enacted. 

Ministerial Draft Bill of 2012. At the beginning of 2012, the German Ministry of Justice (Bundesjustizministerium) took another attempt to resolve the matter by a change of the Insolvency Code. Other than the draft of 2007, the ministerial draft bill did not affect a right of the insolvency administrator to reject a license agreement. Instead, the licensee could have demanded the conclusion of a new license agreement at appropriate terms. Due to criticism that came in particular from the German industry, the plan was abandoned. 


In light of the M2Trade ruling of the Federal Supreme Court and the failed attempt by the German legislator to change the Insolvency Code, there is currently no certainty that a license agreement cannot be rejected in German insolvency proceedings. This applies to both exclusive and nonexclusive licenses. The contractual workarounds suggested by legal scholars may not be relied on either. One possible way out might be to design the license agreement strictly in accordance with the software usage rights decision of the BGH. Further, groups of companies may try to take advantage of the fact that sublicense agreements are better protected than main license agreements. If the recent judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Munich on cross-licenses is appealed against, the respective decision of the Federal Supreme Court may provide further clarity. 


1. The decision is further based on the case-specific argument that the insolvent company never owned the intellectual property rights in full, but only "reduced" by the rights of use of the plaintiff. The intellectual property rights in question had been transferred by the plaintiff to the insolvent company in the course of a spin-off. The plaintiff had retained rights of use.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions