Germany: 244. European Law: Dual Resident Corporations – Ûberseering BV

Last Updated: 13 May 2002

Dr. Oliver Heinsen, KPMG Frankfurt

For editorial cut-off date, disclaimer, and notice of copyright see end of this article.

1. ECJ to rule on German seat-of-management rule

Prior articles have described the seat-of-management rule (Sitztheorie) under German choice of law doctrine and the impact of this rule on dual resident corporations (DRCs). The 1999 Centros decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) was widely interpreted as signifying that the separate corporate identity and legal capacity of an EU corporation must be determined under the law of the jurisdiction where the corporation was organised (place-of-incorporation rule – see KPMG German News no. 3-4/1999 p. 27 = article no. 190; see also issues nos. 4/1995 p. 2, 3/1997 p. 19, 4/1997 p. 2, and 4/1998 p. 13 = articles nos. 40, 81, 94, and 158).

A case is now pending before the ECJ in which the court is expected to hold that the seat-of-management rule is incompatible with the freedom of establishment clause of the EC Treaty (articles 43 and 48 EC). The new case, Überseering BV v. NCC Nordic Construction Company Baumanagement GmbH (ECJ docket no. C-208/00), was referred to the ECJ by the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in a ruling dated 30 March 2000 (VII ZR 370/98 – IStR 2000, 382).

An opinion issued in the matter on 4 December 2001 by one of the ECJ's eight Advocates General argues that the seat-of-management rule violates the EU freedom of establishment clause.

2. Background

Under the prevailing German choice of law rule, an association is subject to the company law of the jurisdiction in which its "seat of management" (more literally, "seat of administration" – Verwaltungssitz) is located. The seat of management generally coincides with the entity's principal place of management (Ort der Geschäftsleitung), though exceptions are conceivable. If an association's seat of management is in Germany, this means that, from a German perspective, the association can only acquire (or retain) corporate status if it has been incorporated in accordance with German law. Incorporation under the laws of another jurisdiction is irrelevant. Without corporate status, the entity lacks separate legal identity and legal capacity, including the capacity to sue. The owners and officers of a corporation with a foreign registered office, but a domestic seat of management, can be held personally liable by German courts (see e.g. KPMG German News no. 4/1995 sec. 2.3 = article no. 40).

A major exception to the above principles is created by a 1954 treaty between Germany and the United States by which the parties, among other things, mutually recognise all corporations duly formed under the laws of the other treaty state. A similar agreement exists between Germany and Spain. A draft EU treaty deals with mutual recognition of EU corporations, but has not yet entered into force. Germany has ratified the treaty.

For tax purposes, foreign corporations with German permanent establishments or a German place of management are generally subject to corporation tax even though lacking separate legal identity under the seat-of-management rule. Germany's Federal Tax Court first reached this result in 1992 by likening foreign corporations without separate legal identity to certain domestic entities that are subject to corporation tax under § 1 (1) no. 5 KStG, even though not possessed of separate legal identity.

3. Facts of Überseering

The case grew out of a 1992 construction contract entered into by Überseering BV, a Dutch limited liability company, as purchaser, and NCC GmbH, a German limited liability company, as contractor. The contract involved work on German real property. The BV sued the GmbH for damages by reason of alleged defects in the work performed.

Just prior to the filing of suit in 1995, the BV was purchased by two German-resident individuals, who then managed the BV from Germany. The lawyers of the GmbH alleged, and the lower courts agreed, that this caused the BV's seat of management to shift from the Netherlands to Germany, meaning that henceforth the BV's separate legal existence and legal capacity depended on German corporate law. The BV's shareholders did not attempt to form a GmbH in Germany as the successor to the BV (re-incorporation), nor did they attempt direct conversion of the BV into a GmbH under §§ 362 - 393 of the Business Reorganisation Act. (Whether such reorganisations are possible is controversial.) The German courts therefore held that the BV had ceased to exist as a separate legal entity with capacity to sue when the seat of management was transferred. They dismissed the BV's complaint against the German contractor without reaching the merits of the case.

The BV appealed the case up to the Federal Court of Justice, Germany's highest court of general jurisdiction, which suspended proceedings and certified two questions to the European Court of Justice for preliminary decision:

  • In the case of companies duly organised under the laws of another EU member state, do Articles 43 and 48 EC (freedom of establishment) preclude application of the corporate law of the country in which such companies have their seat of management where this means that the companies are no longer able to enforce their contractual rights in court?
  • If so, does the freedom of establishment principle mandate use of the place-of-incorporation rule as a choice of law principle?

The Federal Court of Justice stated that it would uphold the lower court decisions dismissing the suit unless the ECJ answered the first question in the affirmative. The German high court explained that the seat-of-management rule prevented avoidance of German company law provisions that were intended to protect creditors, minority shareholders, controlled subsidiaries, and employees. The court expressed concerns about a corporate law "race to the bottom" amongst the member states of the European Union if the protective provisions of domestic law could be circumvented by organising a company in a foreign jurisdiction.

4. Opinion of the Advocate General

After lengthy remarks discussing the applicable provisions of the EC Treaty, particularly Article 293 EC, and the ECJ's Daily Mail and Centros decisions, the Advocate General concludes that the German choice of law rule restrains the freedom of establishment and can only be justified by overriding public interests. While the Advocate General affirms the legitimacy of the goals cited by the German Federal Court of Justice in support of the seat-of-management rule, he argues that the means employed to reach the goals are ill suited to the ostensible ends and unduly burdensome (Opinion sec. 50 ff.). Specifically, the loss of the ability to sue and thus to enforce rights in court was considered "a tremendous obstacle to freedom of establishment" (Opinion sec. 56). The Advocate General bases his Opinion on the assumption that the contractual rights in question are forfeited under the German choice of law rule. Argument from representatives of the German government to the effect that the rights were not lost, but merely could no longer be exercised by the BV as such were disregarded as vague (Opinion sec. 55).

The Advocate General's investigation of the policy behind the seat-of-management rule is cursory. Certain points are brushed aside on the grounds that they "do not deserve to be considered" because they were not adequately explained by the German government or the referring court (Opinion sec. 54). Another surprising aspect of the Opinion is the assumption that the policy goals behind the seat-of-management rule (such as enforcement of the employee co-determination regime for companies with more than 2,000 employees or provisions protecting minority shareholders) have no weight to the extent not implicated by the specific case before the court (Opinion sec. 53, 54).

The Advocate General declined to address to the second question posed by the Federal Court of Justice on the grounds that it concerned a matter of national legislation within the discretion of the governments of the EU member states (Opinion sec. 64 ff.).

5. Implications

The civil law and tax implications of the abandonment of the German seat-of-management rule were discussed in the 1999 article on Centros (KPMG German News no. 3-4/1999 p. 27 = article no. 190).

A number of the tax points discussed in the prior article are now moot as a result of the changes made to German corporation tax law by the 2000 Tax Reduction Act. For instance, the dividend-received exemption and capital gains exemption under § 8b (1) and (2) KStG are now available to all entities subject to corporation tax, not just to corporate entities as defined in § 1 (1) nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6 KStG. Hence, it no longer matters whether a foreign corporation is subject to corporation tax under § 1 (1) no. 5 KStG (consequence of seat-of-management rule) or under § 1 (1) no. 1 KStG (consequence of place-of-incorporation rule).

The Business Tax Development Act (discussed in KPMG German News no. 1/2002 p. 31 = article no. 248) likewise puts an end to the double nexus (place of management and legal seat » registered office) required in order to be a lead entity in a tax consolidated group (new § 14 (1) no. 2 KStG). However, the law continues to require a double nexus in order to be a member company in a tax consolidated group (§ 14 (1) sent. 1 KStG). Since the seat-of-management rule is the only justification for requiring a double nexus, a clear rejection of this rule by the ECJ in Überseering would cast doubt on the validity of this requirement. See article no. 190 for more detail.

On the other hand, if the ECJ upholds the seat-of-management rule, its civil law consequences may prevent a foreign corporation with its seat of management, but not its legal seat, in Germany from taking advantage of the liberalisation of the German tax laws.

Clear rejection of the seat-of-management rule would furthermore facilitate reliance on dual resident corporations as planning instruments in international reorganisations, as is also explained in more detail in article no. 190.

6. Concluding remarks

Unlike Centros, Überseering clearly frames the issue of the validity of Germany's seat-of-management rule as a choice of law principle. In light of Centros and the strongly worded Opinion from the court's Advocate General, the ECJ is expected to reject the seat-of-management rule and thus – implicitly or explicitly – endorse the place-of-incorporation rule as the norm within the EU.

Editorial cut-off date: 20 March 2002

Disclaimer and notice of copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. KPMG Germany in particular insists that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note that the article is current only through its editorial cut-off date shown immediately above (not to be confused with the later date as of which the article was placed online – the date appearing at the article's outset). Related developments subsequent to the editorial cut-off are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While KPMG Germany's articles are carefully reviewed, it can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Any claims nevertheless raised against KPMG Germany on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Germany (KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG). No use of or quotation from the article is permitted without full attribution to KPMG Germany and the article's stated author(s), if any. Distribution to third persons is prohibited without the express written consent of KPMG Germany in advance.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions