Germany: Privatisation of Public Utilities in Germany

Last Updated: 30 November 2001

In this article, Drs. Tim Oliver Brandi and Carsten Corino of Gleiss Lutz describe the privatisation of municipal utilities that is currently taking place in Germany following the energy law reform of 1998 and they examine the opportunities and pitfalls that face potential foreign investors in this area. Gleiss Lutz is the German law firm with whom Herbert Smith have a strategic alliance

I. Public utilities as most important local energy-providers in Germany

In Germany, energy supply on a local level takes place primarily through municipal public utilities ("Stadtwerke"). Altogether there are around 950 public utilities in Germany, of which some 350 are still managed as public law institutions and approx. 600 are already managed as private law companies (limited liability companies or stock corporations). To a large extent, these public utilities still have a de facto monopoly so far as providing energy for the local consumer is concerned. That includes private households as well as commercial buyers.

It is common that different divisions of local services for the public are bundled together by utilities and regional energy providers. These divisions often include, in addition to electricity and gas supply, long-distance heating and water supply, as well as the disposal of waste water and garbage. Alongwith this, public utilities frequently provide other services, such as local public transportation, telecommunication and the operation of municipal swimming pools, parking garages, etc. Normally, only the energy supply divisions within public utilities operated at a profit in the past, while especially the divisions concerned with local public transportation and the operation of municipal swimming pools mostly produced losses. Thus the municipalities often used the profits from energy supply for the cross-subsidisation of the losses in the other divisions. German public utilities taken together achieve sales of some DM72 billion and employ 130,000 workers.

Until a few years ago, the utility companies and the other regional energy supply concerns belonged exclusively to the cities or other municipal regional authorities whose area is supplied by these concerns. However, especially since the reform of energy law in Germany in 1998, many cities have begun to privatise their utilities in whole or in part by granting private investors interests in the public utilities. To an increasing extent, foreign energy providers are entering as investors.

This article sketches the most important features of the privatisation of public utilities from the view of a potential foreign investor. To this end, it will first describe the new general framework for energy law and antitrust law for the operations of the utilities (see II below). Then it will depict the reaction of the utility companies to the modified general framework, in particular the wave of privatisation triggered by the reforms (see III below). After this, the article will briefly describe the typical course of such a bidding process (see IV). In conclusion, for the sake of illustration, the article will address some typical legal issues that arise in connection with the privatisation of utilities (see V).

II. Reform of energy law in Germany

Before the reform of energy law, the goal of German energy law was to avoid competition. The local providers simultaneously operated the networks and delivered the electricity. Antitrust law protected this for instance in the relationship between the public utilities and the regional electricity providers that operate the transmission networks. Prices for customers were high.

On the basis of the 1996 EU-Directive on the internal electricity market, German energy law was fundamentally reformed in 1998. Lawmakers eradicated the exceptions to anti-trust law and granted everyone the right to build direct lines in public streets.

Most notably, however, lawmakers created a right on the part of providers of electricity to transmission over third-party networks for a fee. While all other member states of the EU turned to a state regulator for establishing fees and further conditions for transmission, the federal government of Germany left the specification of terms of third-party access to the energy providers and customers involved (negotiated third party access). The interested groups on the side of both the producers and the consumers reached an initial agreement that exhibited considerable deficiencies. Thereafter, however, a second association-agreement of December 1999 ("Verbändevereinbarung – VV II") and the increasingly competition-friendly interpretation of the law by the antitrust authorities and the courts generally made fair competition possible for electricity customers for the first time. Yet there still exist considerable differences in respect of network-use fees, which differences can only partially be attributed to structural differences in the areas being supplied. Consequently, the discussion is still continuing about the necessity for a detailed ordinance or a regulator for the use of the electricity network and both will probably be demanded by Brussels anyhow.

The national electricity providers and newly founded enterprises offered economical electricity nation-wide - even in the previously protected areas of the public utilities. Customers switched from utilities to their new competitors. As a result of this, the utilities also had to lower their prices. Prices for household customers decreased by up to 30% and for industrial customers by up to 50%. Because the electricity suppliers in the end lowered prices in largely parallel fashion, only some 4% of household customers and a good 10% of commercial customers switched their electricity supplier as a result. At a more or less constant level of electricity consumption, this price drop for electricity led to considerable declines in sales and profits.

The gas industry is lagging behind the electricity industry. In the first place, only now are German lawmakers transforming the guidelines for the domestic natural gas market into national law, i.e., into a special regime for third party access for gas. Secondly, the first association agreement on gas concluded by the interest groups involved does not do much to foster competition. Finally, certain structural differences exist between the gas industry and the electricity industry. Thus there is for example in the gas industry in Germany a heavy dependence on a few foreign gas producers and, in contrast to the electricity industry, no overcapacity. The federal government is calling for a similar expansion of competition for the gas industry to that of the electricity industry. With the implementation of the natural gas guidelines and an improved association agreement, we should expect a development of competition and decrease in prices fundamentally similar to, though not as intense as, those of the electricity industry; if this does not happen, the federal government has announced that it will undertake sweeping measures, including the establishment of a regulatory authority. This competition will lead to further strain on utility companies.

Finally, the recent Commission proposal for a full legal unbundling of integrated energy companies with more than 100,000 customers will require reactions of the utilities.

III. Reaction of the public utilities: privatisation

The altered general framework has led – in addition to greater customer orientation – to a variety of reactions by the public utilities. Utilities are co-operating with one another in order to achieve more economical purchase prices for electricity and eliminate costs by combining their powers. An example here is the nationwide Energy Network Kommunal (enetko). Some utility companies are looking for a close business co-operation with a national energy provider. Thus, for example, the largest German energy provider, Rheinisch Westfälische Elektrizitätswerke (RWE), offers sales-partnerships through which the municipal services sell electricity from RWE in their own name to longstanding customers; the sale takes place, however,for the account of RWE, and the utilities receive only a fixed commission. Occasionally, there are also mergers of utilities.

The most important reaction of the municipalities consists, however, in the privatisation of their public utilities, i.e., the partial or complete sale of the enterprise to private investors. Most of the private investors are large, private energy supply concerns who desire by this means to gain better access to the local, final supply stage. Cities and municipalities expect that through the inclusion of private investors the financial position of utilities will be strengthened by private know how and capital, as well as through the realisation of synergies.

In order to become privatised, public utilities organised as a public institution must first carry out a transformation into a private legal entity. Privatisations of utilities into private legal entities take place, probably without exception, by means of share deals. Sometimes the inclusion of the private investor takes place through a capital increase. More commonly, however, it happens through the municipality’s selling a minority - or even majority - shareholding in the municipal services provider to the private investor. The proceeds gained thereby are often used to pay off the debts of the municipality, or for specific investment plans.

Some 250 of the 600 utilities which have already been reorganised as a private legal entity have a private third party as shareowner. As a rule, though, the shareholding of the private investor still consists in a mere minority shareholding. Examples of recent privatisations are the partial or complete sale of Stadtwerke Kiel to TXU, of the large Hamburgische Elektrizitätswerke to Vattenfall, of Elektrizitätswerk Wesertal to the Finnish electricity concern Fortum and of Stadtwerke Düsseldorf to Energie Baden Württemberg, which is affiliated with Electricité de France. A strategic partner is currently being sought by, for instance, the utilities in Hanau, Braunschweig, Lübeck and Frankfurt on Oder.

If a foreign energy provider wants to get a foot in Germany, the acquisition of a municipal services provider represents in principle a suitable stepping stone. But if the acquisition of a municipal services provider is not to become a stumbling block in the move into the large German energy market, various legal guidelines must be heeded.

IV. General framework and bidding process

Should a municipality wish to privatise its public utility, various legal requirements force the municipality to choose the private investor by means of a structured bidding process. It is not legally permissible for the private investor and the municipality to enter into negotiations without having first carried out such a bidding process for the choice of the investor.

The requirement for carrying out a bidding process is laid down primarily by municipal budgetary law and EU law on state aids. Under these requirements, municipalities are obliged to sell their shares in utilities at "full value", i.e., at the price obtainable on the market. Such a price can be determined only by giving different bidders equal opportunity in a transparent procedure to make an offer for the acquisition of shares in the public utilities to be privatised.

Even more far reaching requirements for the bidding process could result from German and European law on the award of contracts. If a municipality, for example, awards to the utility an extensive commission for supplying water or disposing of waste, and does so shortly after the inclusion of the investor as a new shareholder in the utility company, then the same legal requirements apply as for a public award of a commission to a private company as such. In this case, the strict procedural rules of EU law for the award of public contracts, and the corresponding rules which have been implemented into German national law, must be heeded.

In order to comply with these legal requirements, a largely unified practice for the bidding process for the privatisation of public utilities has developed in the last few years. This practice corresponds to the customary procedure of a structured bidding process for the sale of enterprises in the commercial economic sector: as a rule, the planned inclusion of the private investor is first publicly announced across Europe, in order to invite potential bidders to express interest. In the course of the subsequent privatisation procedure, the bidders first make a non-binding offer on the basis of an information memorandum in which the enterprise to be privatised is presented to the bidders. Afterwards, selected bidders are granted access to further internal information, disclosed in data rooms, about the enterprise. On the basis of the knowledge thereby gained, the bidders can thereupon make a binding offer.The victorious investor is then determined through largely parallel contract negotiations with the remaining bidders.

V. Typical legal issues surrounding the privatisation of public utilities

In connection with the privatisation of utilities, similar questions occur regularly that have to be settled in the privatisation contracts between the private investor and the municipality.

Firstly, the relationship between the private investor and the city, as future joint shareholders, have to be legally established. Here we find most prominently agreements regarding the filling of executive posts of the municipal services provider. Furthermore, arrangements are often made regarding financial contributions by the city and the investor for future investments within the municipal services provider. In addition, mechanisms should be agreed upon for resolving conflicts between shareholders. This can also involve their granting each other put or call options for the sale or acquisition of further shares of the municipal services provider.

Secondly, privatisation contracts usually contain provisions regarding the financial health and future development of the privatised enterprise. Of particular relevance here, from the perspective of the investor, is that the city assures, in the form of guarantees, the existence of essential financial foundations for the investor’s investment decision. Furthermore, it will be important to him to settle on provisions for securing future sales and his entrepreneurial returns. Conversely, the city often endeavours, in the interests of its residents, to contractually set fees that are as stable as possible or even decreasing. In addition, the city will often be tempted to contractually oblige the investor to make additional investments at the business site of the municipal services provider, and to protect the continuing existence of the current plant and employment relationships of the municipal services provider. In light of these conflicting positions, it must be an aim of the contract negotiations between investor and city to find an adequate reconciliation of interests.

Thirdly and finally, the question often arises of how, even after privatisation, the returns of the profitable divisions of the municipal services provider can be used for the cross subsidisation of the divisions running deficits. In the main, the private investor wants a shareholding exclusively in the profitable divisions. The municipality, by contrast, would like as a rule to maintain the cross-subsidisation to the largest extent possible. Here the concern of the municipality is often that it be possible to set off losses from the deficit-running divisions against surpluses of the profitable divisions for tax purposes. Different models are available for resolving this conflict of interest between private investor and municipality. According to one model, the deficit running divisions remain within the municipal services provider, while the private investor has a participating interest in the results of the profitable divisions alone, in the form of a so called "tracking stock". As an alternative to this, it is conceivable that the municipal services provider spins off its deficit running divisions into a new affiliated company. By means of the transformation of the enterprise into a partnership, or through the use of profit transfer agreements, the profits and losses of the two companies can then be set off against each other at the level of the city or an intermediary holding company.

As a result, the questions that have to be settled in the privatisation contracts always depend, however, on the particularities of the operational and legal structure of the municipal services provider in question, as well as on its financial health.

"© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us."

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.