Germany: 223. Transfer Pricing: Tax Court Upholds Document Production Order

Last Updated: 20 July 2001
Article by Alexander Vögele

Co-written by Alexander Loh

KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website

For editorial cut-off date, disclaimer, and notice of copyright see end of this article.

The Münster Tax Court has upheld fines assessed by the tax authorities to compel taxpayer production of cost accounting documents for transfer pricing audit purposes (judgement of 22 August 2000 - 6 K 2712/00 - EFG 2001, 4). The judgement was not appealed and is now final.

1. Facts And Issues

The tax authorities requested the corporation under audit to produce its charts of cost centre accounts (Kostenstellenpläne) for two of the company's 60 departments for use in verifying the appropriateness of transfer prices paid. The charts of cost centre accounts (chart of functional accounts) would reveal the architecture of the company's cost accounting system since all journal expense entries in the financial accounting system were coded to specific cost centres. The tax authorities reserved the right, after examination of the charts of cost centre accounts, to require production of the cost accounting for the departments in question. Foreign affiliates of the corporation under audit carried on businesses of the same nature as the departments for which cost accounting documentation was requested.

Since the taxpayer failed to produce the requested documents, the tax authorities gave notice of intent to assess fines pursuant to §§ 332 AO (in conjunction with §§ 328, 329 AO) in an amount of DM 15,000 for each of the two document requests. When compliance was still not forthcoming by the deadline specified in the notice, the threatened fines were levied.

The taxpayer appealed the assessment on the following grounds:

  • that the tax authorities were not entitled to documents prepared voluntarily, i.e. without legal obligation, and hence not subject to retention under § 147 (1) AO;
  • that requiring the production of documents prepared voluntarily would unconstitutionally disadvantage the company as compared with other taxpayers who limited their documentation to the statutory minimum;
  • that the document request was overbroad, part of a "fishing expedition," and impermissible because the tax authorities lacked the required "well-founded reason" (begründeter Anlaß) to doubt the accuracy of the company's transfer prices;
  • that the documents sought were irrelevant to the stated purpose; and
  • that the company had already provided the tax authorities with all documentation which it was legally required to generate and maintain, that this documentation was an adequate basis for transfer price auditing, hence that the production of additional internal management documents was unnecessary.

2. Statutory Authority For Production Of Documents

The Tax Court determined that the tax authorities were in principle entitled to require production of the chart of cost centre accounts (functional accounts) under § 97 (1) and § 200 (1) AO. At the time of the audit, these statutes read as follows in pertinent part:

§ 97 (1) AO

The tax authorities can require the parties and other persons to produce books, records, business papers, and other documents for inspection and review.

§ 200 (1) AO

The taxpayer shall cooperate in the determination of the matters that may have relevance for tax purposes. It shall in particular provide [requested] information, produce records, books, business papers, and other documents for inspection and review, and provide the explanations needed to understand these records.

3. Document Production Not Limited To Financial Accounts

Citing a 1968 ruling by a combined chamber (Großer Senat) of the Federal Tax Court (Gr. S. 5/67 of 13 February 1968 - BStBl II 1968, 365), the Münster Tax Court held that the tax authorities' right to production of documents was not limited to the books and records that taxpayers are required to keep under the Tax Procedure Act and the Commercial Code (above all, financial accounting records and business correspondence). The right to production of documents instead extended to all documents that existed in fact and possessed evidentiary value with respect to a legally relevant issue.

The court had little trouble affirming the evidentiary value of the cost centre planning for transfer price audit purposes. The court also rejected arguments by the taxpayer that information from outside the financial accounting realm was privileged as management information. A corporation had no privileged private sphere, the court stated.

The tax authorities therefore had authority to request the documents in question. The decision to use such authority in a specific case was discretionary and reviewable only for abuse of discretion.

4. Review For Abuse Of Discretion

The court stated that the tax authorities had discretion to require the production of documents only where such was "necessary, proportionate, feasible, and not unduly burdensome." However, the court affirmed that all these requirements were met.

The court noted that cost centre planning was sought for only 2 out of a total of 60 departments in the firm. For Department A, the documents sought would aid in verifying the carrying values of allocable inventory. For Department B, the documents sought would permit verification whether all costs allocable to services provided to an Irish affiliate company had been invoiced. The court furthermore gave weight to the tax authorities' contention that innumerable individual journal entries would have to be traced and analysed in order to glean comparable information from the financial accounts alone. Finally, the court stressed that the taxpayer was not being required to generate new documents, but merely to hand over records already in its hands.

5. Document Retention Under § 147 AO

The taxpayer contended that its document production obligations under §§ 91 (1), 200 (1) AO could never apply to documents the retention of which was not required by § 147 (1) AO.

§ 147 (1) AO reads as follows:

The following documents must be retained in a systematic manner:

  1. books and records, inventory lists, year-end financial statements, management reports, [and] the opening balance sheet, together with the job instructions and other organisational documents necessary to their comprehension;
  2. commercial and business letters received
  3. reproductions of commercial and business letters sent
  4. bookkeeping vouchers
  5. other documents, to the extent having tax significance.

The court ruled against the taxpayer without specifically commenting on § 147 (1) AO. Logically, the court's reading of the law must be as follows:

  • that document retention under § 147 (1) AO extends to documents having tax significance even if prepared by the taxpayer without legal obligation for internal management purposes, or
  • that the documentation production obligations under §§ 97 (1), 200 (1) AO extend beyond the document retention obligations created by § 147 (1) AO, or
  • both of the above.

6. Perspective

The judgement of the Münster Tax Court stands for the proposition that the tax authorities are entitled to require the production of all tax relevant documents which the taxpayer possesses in fact, whether or not the taxpayer was legally required to create or retain such documents. In considering whether the tax authorities abused their discretion in seeking production of documents, the court appears to have weighed the following factors:

  • whether compliance with the request would cause the taxpayer to incur significant expense or otherwise constitute a significant burden
  • whether the documents sought were likely to have considerable probative value for transfer pricing purposes
  • whether the production request was global or narrowly focussed (here limited to 2 out of 60 company departments)
  • whether the same information could be derived from the financial accounts, and if so, whether the required effort would be significantly greater.

The case does not elucidate the limits of the taxpayer's obligation to provide information to the tax authorities on request, for instance to respond to written interrogatories. Nor does the case raise the issues involved in the interlocutory ruling by the Federal Tax Court (FTC) reported on in article no. 221 (10 May 2001 - I S 3/01). In this ruling, the FTC held that the taxpayer did not breach duties of cooperation by reason of non-production of documents it neither had nor was required to have. The Münster Tax Court found the taxpayer at fault for failing to produce documents which it indisputably did have, regardless of whether it was required to have them. Furthermore, in the FTC case the tax authorities sought to derive expanded authority to assess tax on an estimated basis under § 162 AO from the taxpayer's non-performance of alleged documentation obligations. In the case before the Münster Tax Court, the tax authorities sought to compel performance by assessing fines, not to assess tax on an estimated basis.

7. Concluding Remarks

Given the large number of important document retention and production issues raised by the decision here reported on, it is regrettable that no appeal to the Federal Tax Court was taken. The decision indicates that at least the lower courts are willing to interpret tax procedure law liberally in favour of the tax authorities when it comes to document production in a transfer pricing context.

Editorial cut-off date: 21 June 2001

Disclaimer And Notice Of Copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. KPMG Germany in particular insists that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note that the article is current only through its editorial cut-off date shown immediately above (not to be confused with the later date as of which the article was placed online – the date appearing at the article's outset). Related developments subsequent to the editorial cut-off are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While KPMG Germany's articles are carefully reviewed, it can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Any claims nevertheless raised against KPMG Germany on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Germany (KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG). No use of or quotation from the article is permitted without full attribution to KPMG Germany and the article's stated author(s), if any. Distribution to third persons is prohibited without the express written consent of KPMG Germany in advance.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions