Keywords: Autonomous Vehicles, Car-Generated Data, eCall, Ownership
Today's cars include up to 100 electronic control units as well as numerous sensor networks and assistance systems. While these devices can improve the comfort and safety of the driver and passengers, they also can collect and store a great deal of information about the current driving pattern, geolocation, traffic or even weather conditions. Some data collected this way can, either by itself or in connection with other data, also be considered personal data.
The importance and number of data-gathering instruments in vehicles will most likely increase once autonomous vehicles hit the road. So-called "connected cars" are even equipped with wireless connectivity that allows real-time transmission of information—even between the vehicles themselves.
Most of the current discussion on connected cars is based around the health and safety benefits that such connectivity could offer. For example, with regard to the European eCall Regulation (2015/758/EU), the European Commission states that "an eCall-equipped car will save hundreds of lives in the EU every year." This Regulation requires that from March 2018 all new passenger cars and light vans will have to be equipped with devices that automatically alert rescue services to car crash sites.
However, a fundamental question has yet to be answered: whether a piece of data can legally be owned and who would actually own such data. Current EU as well as German data protection laws do not contain provisions adequately addressing this question. Thus, it is unclear whether and to what extent someone can exert legal rights over a single piece or set of data elements. It is in particular unclear whether the drivers, the owners or the manufacturers of vehicles can be said to own the data generated by them. There are some arguments to be made for either standpoint.
It should come as no surprise that many parties, including insurance companies, are interested in car-generated data. In response to a parliamentary question regarding the ownership of car-generated data, the German government drew a distinction between data for vehicle functions on the one hand and data for service functions (e.g. infotainment) on the other hand. Only with regard to the former would the car owner, in principle, have the genuine power to dispose of such data ("tatsächliche Verfügungsgewalt"). Without further regulation, the question of ownership over, and the power to dispose of, such (personal) data could become a controversial and confusing one.
Originally published February 10, 2016
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.