France: Compliance In France And The United States: A Combination Of Corporate And Social Responsibility

In the past, French law neither mandated nor provided any material incentives for companies to embrace compliance, corporate and social challenges. But things are dramatically changing in Europe, and more specifically in France, so that there are growing similarities between French and American law in this respect.

This fall, the French Parliament inserted a provision into the French Civil Code whereby each company's corporate interest takes account of not only the shareholders' interest but also the company's social and environmental responsibility.1 Based on an EU Directive,2 French law since 2017 has obliged the country's largest companies to disclose nonfinancial information (regarding social, environmental, human rights and anticorruption issues) in their annual reports.3 Last but not least, the enactment of two important recent laws has triggered a radical change in the French compliance landscape.

First, the Sapin II Law,4 similar to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), obliges companies to implement an "anticorruption program."5 This law brings the French legal framework in line with international standards and expectations in the area, drawing upon the U.S. and UK anticorruption and sanctions regimes.6 If anticorruption laws in other EU member states do not specifically oblige companies to adopt a compliance program, however, these member states recognize that such programs can be used as an instrument to mitigate or inhibit liability.7

Second, the Duty of Vigilance Law8 provides that the parent and other companies have an obligation to adopt and publish a "vigilance plan" in order to prevent infringements of human rights, fundamental freedoms, and harm to health or the environment. It is the first law that imposes specific due diligence obligations on businesses regarding human rights. The law comes against a background of disasters like the Rana Plaza collapse, the Bhopal gas tragedy and the sinking of the Erika. To date, certain existing European9 and national-level10 initiatives only require companies to report on their efforts to preserve human rights risks. Switzerland, however, is expected to adopt legislation that is similar to French law this winter.11

1. Scope of application

The Duty of Vigilance Law applies to companies whose parent is incorporated under French law12 and that employ, for a period of two consecutive financial years, at least 5,000 employees, including employees of French subsidiaries, or at least 10,000 employees (taking into account those of both French and foreign subsidiaries).13 It is more limited in scope than the Sapin II Law, which applies to entities with at least 500 employees in France, with a yearly turnover of over €100 million.14

Nevertheless, subsidiaries or controlled companies that exceed the thresholds set out by the Duty of Vigilance Law are deemed to satisfy the vigilance duties when the vigilance plan of the company that controls them has been established for the whole group.15 In the same vein, the French Sapin II Law provides that subsidiaries or controlled companies that exceed the thresholds prescribed by the law are deemed to comply with their anticorruption obligations, provided that the company which controls them implements these measures and procedures at the group level.16

2. Vigilance and anticorruption duties and obligations

Companies falling within the scope of both laws shall implement effective vigilance and anticorruption compliance plans built on a common model and methodology.

It might be difficult to determine the most suitable individuals inside a company to develop a vigilance plan. A company may already employ individuals in charge of the areas covered by the law (human rights, health and safety, and the environment) and may already have processes in place.17 Many companies have created interdepartmental working groups, comprising legal, compliance, risks, audit or internal controls personnel,18 to develop a vigilance plan.19 Implementing an anticorruption compliance program generally falls within the mission of the entities' legal/compliance departments. Their major challenge might be to ensure a common understanding of the plan's objectives and allocation of resources while implementing the five measures that must be included in the vigilance plan:

  • A risk mapping
  • Procedures to assess, in accordance with the risk mapping, the status of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom the company maintains "established commercial relationships"
  • Appropriate actions to mitigate risks or prevent serious violations
  • A whistleblowing mechanism
  • A monitoring system to verify the plan's efficiency20

As such, the vigilance plan resembles in many aspects the eight anticorruption measures in the Sapin II Law to be implemented21 under the potential control of the French Anticorruption Agency:

  • A code of conduct
  • An internal whistleblowing mechanism
  • A risk mapping designed to identify, analyze and rank the company's risk exposure to bribery
  • Procedures for assessing the clients', providers' and intermediaries' status with respect to the risk mapping
  • Internal or external accounting control procedures designed to ensure that the company's books, records and accounts are not used to conceal bribery
  • A training program for "the most at corruption risk" employees
  • A disciplinary regime in case of violation of the code of conduct
  • Internal controls and procedures designed to assess the efficiency of compliance.22

These measures echo what the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have laid out in their Guidelines on the FCPA,23 which enumerates similar points to be taken into consideration when evaluating compliance programs:

  • Commitment to compliance at the highest level
  • Written and widely disseminated compliance programs
  • Independence and funding
  • Risk assessment
  • Training and continuing advice
  • Enforcement of policies and disciplinary measures for noncompliance
  • Paying attention to third-party relationships
  • Confidential reporting and internal investigation
  • Periodic testing and review
  • Pre-acquisition due diligence and post-acquisition integration24

Hence, there are clear similarities between compliance programs on both sides of the Atlantic. In France, where there are in principle two sets of compliance requirements, the Anticorruption Agency has argued that anticorruption measures may also be used to support a vigilance plan.25 In addition, even though the Agency dictates that the anticorruption whistleblowing mechanism should be distinct from the one for disclosing other risks specified in the Duty of Vigilance Law (regarding social, environmental and human rights risks),26 companies can set up only one whistleblowing system to deal with these different risks.

Risk assessment and mapping

A company designing Sapin II and vigilance plans should start with a risk assessment.27 A risk assessment requires a documented analysis of the entity's exposure to risks — corruption, human rights, fundamental freedoms, and harm to health or the environment — as close to the ground as possible.28 It may therefore be necessary to understand the local context, carry out sites visits, communicate with the actors on the ground and identify particularly vulnerable groups of employees.29 Once identified, the risks have to be prioritized, mapped and properly managed.

Analysis of the first published vigilance plans suggests that not all companies may have correctly identified their risks,30 notably because they did so in a very general manner without addressing their business lines. The culture of compliance is rather new in France, and it will take time for companies to adapt to its demands. However, it clearly remains an area for improvement.

Third-party due diligence processes

Processes should be defined for assessing the status of customers, first-tier suppliers and intermediaries,31 or subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom "established commercial relationships" are maintained.32

Companies should collect information and documents33 so as to identify and assess the risk exposure of third parties based on objective and quantifiable criteria (geographic location, business sector, product services, etc.). Moreover, this process should be conducted before starting a relationship with the third party and should be repeated regularly in the course of the relationship, with a predefined frequency based on the level of risk. The process of renewing contracts can also be used to ensure that third parties have complied with their commitments throughout the previous contract term.34 Digital tools are, in this respect, obvious allies in the process of risk management.

Awareness-raising measures

Under the Sapin II Law, certain compliance measures become legal obligations, such as adopting a code of conduct,35 training those most exposed to corruption risks and setting up a disciplinary regime so as to sanction violations of the code.36

The Duty of Vigilance Law is less detailed, although covered risks may be addressed within the Sapin II code of conduct.37 Moreover, companies may design supplier codes of conduct38 and train relevant employees regarding procurement issues.

Detecting wrongdoing and following up on the effectiveness of the plans

Both laws require establishing an internal whistleblowing mechanism39 to be communicated proactively and tailored to the individuals likely to use it. Moreover, protective measures should be established (regarding confidentiality, anonymization, protection and security of the whistleblower40).

With regard to internal or external accounting controls required by the Sapin II Law to ensure that the company's books, records and accounts are not used to conceal bribery,41 the French Anticorruption Agency advises entities to adopt the "three lines of defense" model.42 The first-level control involves operational personnel responsible for preparing and approving journal entries, and ensuring that they are properly documented and supported with evidence. The purpose of the second-level control, notably involving risk, legal and compliance functions, is to ensure that the first-level control is correctly functioning. The third-level control is a process of ongoing assessment supported by internal and external audits. Additionally, under both laws, companies should monitor and asses the effectiveness of their plans.43

3. Incurred sanctions

If companies do not fulfill their obligation to adopt and implement a vigilance plan, it is yet unclear what the consequences would be. Only common civil liability would apply based on the French general tort law.44 As such, interested parties might be able to allege that companies are civilly liable and seek damages,45 and/or require the judicial authorities to order a company to develop and implement a vigilance plan.46

In this respect, the Duty of Vigilance Law seems to share some similarities with the U.S. Alien Tort Statute (ATS),47 which states that "the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States."48 The U.S. Supreme Court recently significantly narrowed the application of the ATS by holding that it may not be used to impose liability on foreign corporations.49 It is worth noting that the French constitutional court has similarly limited the impact of the Duty of Vigilance Law so that its scope shall not exceed the usual limits of tort law and thus expose companies to excessive liability risk. To date, no action for noncompliance with the Duty of Vigilance Law seems to have been brought in France. However, some NGOs in March 2018 issued a formal notice on the basis of this law claiming that a number of companies were responsible for the deforestation caused by wrongful soya cultivation in Latin America.50

By contrast, the Sapin II Law specifically provides that if a covered entity fails to implement an effective anticorruption compliance program, it may incur administrative fines (independent of any potential criminal prosecution) imposed by the French Anticorruption Agency (up to €1 million for legal persons, and up to €200,000 for individuals).51 Moreover, warnings or orders to adapt the anticorruption measures could be imposed.52 The French Anticorruption Agency and judges could order their decision to be published, disseminated or displayed,53 thereby causing reputational damages.

As a way of conclusion

The evolution of the French and EU legislative framework illustrates a paradigm shift in the fields of corporate social responsibility and the fight against corruption, with both being reshaped by a transition from soft to hard laws. Given the compliance challenges at stake (including for a company faced with multijurisdictional investigations), companies should be encouraged to rapidly address their important ethics responsibilities by implementing a coordinated, rationalized and cost-effective corporate compliance approach based on international standards shared by the EU and the United States.

Footnotes

1. Government bill relating to growth and transformation of companies, dated 9 October 2018, Article 61, to be adopted in January 2019.

2. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, 22 October 2014, amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of nonfinancial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.

3. Article L.225-102-1 of the French Commercial Code, modified by the Order No. 2017-1180, 19 July 2017: Information on how companies take into account the social and environmental consequences of their activities, and, for some of them, on the impact of their activities with regard to human rights and the fight against corruption must be disclosed in their annual report; should companies fail to disclose that information, an injunction procedure might be triggered under the same article.

4. Law No. 2016-1691, 9 December 2016, on transparency, fighting corruption and modernizing economic life.

5. An anticorruption program sanction has also been created and is provided for in the French Criminal Code.

6. See notably the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the 2010 UK Bribery Act, and related guidelines.

7. E.g., under Article 31 bis, para 2, of the Spanish Criminal Code, an effective implementation of a compliance program is expressly deemed to exempt a company from its liability and Section 31 quáter considers it as a mitigating circumstance. Under Section 7(2) of the UK Bribery Act, implementation of a compliance program is a defense for a company to prove that it had "adequate procedures" in place to prevent bribery. Article 6.1.(b) of the Italian Decree No. 231 of 8 June 2008 also provides that companies may avoid the risk of incurring liability provided that they have implemented an effective compliance program.

8. Law No. 2017-399, 27 March 2017, on the duty of vigilance for parent and other companies, modifying the French Commercial Code.

9. Directive 2014/95/EU, 22 October 2014, amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of nonfinancial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.

10. For instance, see the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015; California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 (SB 657).

11. SCCJ, "Another step towards the adoption of a mandatory HRDD bill in Switzerland," 16 July 2018, ECCJ: http://corporatejustice.org/news/7046-another-step-towards-the-adoption-of-a-mandatory-hrdd-bill-in-switzerland.

12. French Const. Court, 23 March 2017, No. 2017-750 DC, para 3.

13. Art. L. 225-102-4, I, para 1, of the French Commercial Code.

14. Art. 17, I, of the Sapin II Law.

15. Art. L. 225-102-4, I, para 3, of the French Commercial Code.

16. Art. 17, I, 2°, of the Sapin II Law.

17. S. Brabant, C. Michon and E. Savourey, "The Vigilance Plan. Cornerstone of the Law on the Corporate Duty of Vigilance" (2017) 50 Revue Internationale de la Compliance et de l'Ethique des Affaires, 1, 8.

18. E.g., it seems that the company Orange has relied upon its CSR department, which had been associated with the compliance department created within the context of the Sapin II Law:

https://www.orange.com/fr/content/download/46451/1361766/version/4/file/Plan%20de%20Vigilance%20%20Orange%202017.pdf.

19. C. Michon, S. Berne and S. Boucherand, "Application of the law on the corporate duty of vigilance. Analysis of the first published plans," 25 April 2018, 1, 8.

20. Art. L. 225-102-4, I, para 4, of the French Commercial Code.

21. AN, report No. 4242 of 23 November 2016, 14.

22. Art. 17, II, of the Sapin II Law.

23. Criminal division of the U.S. DOJ and the enforcement division of the U.S. SEC, A resource guide to the U.S. FCPA, 2012.

24. Ibid. 57 – 63.

25. French Anticorruption Agency, Guidelines to help private and public sector entities prevent and detect corruption, influence peddling, extortion by public officials, unlawful taking of interest, misappropriation of public funds and favouritism, 2017.

26. Ibid. 11.

27. Art. 17, II, 3°, of the Sapin II Law; Art. L. 225-102-4, I, 1°, of the French Commercial Code.

28. Guidelines of the French Anticorruption Agency (n 25) 15.

29. A. Petitjean and P. Hoerner, "Devoir de vigilance: quel bilan des premiers plans ? Comment se positionnent les parties prenantes?" (2018) Centre Etudes & Prospective du Groupe Alpha 1, 3.

30. Ibid. 2.

31. Art. 17, II, 4°, of the Sapin II Law.

32. Art. L. 225-102-4, I, 2°, of the French Commercial Code.

33. Guidelines of the French Anticorruption Agency (n 25) 19.

34. Ibid. 24.

35. Art. 17, II, 1°, of the Sapin II Law.

36. Art. 17, II, 6° and 7°, of the Sapin II Law.

37. E.g., Total Code of Conduct:

https://www.total.com/sites/default/files/atoms/files/total_code_de_conduite_vf.pdf.

38. E.g., Total Fundamental Principles of Purchasing:

https://www.total.com/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fundamental_principles_purchasing.pdf.

39. Art. 17, II, 2°, of the Sapin II Law; Art. L. 225-102-4, I, 4°, of the French Commercial Code.

40. U.N., Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework, 2011, principle 31; see also Guidelines of French Anticorruption Agency (n 25) 19 and CNIL, Deliberation No. 2017-191 of 22 June 2017 modifying deliberation No. 2005-308 of 8 December 2005 on the single authorization of data processing in the context of whistleblowing schemes.

41. Art. 17, II, 5°, of the Sapin II Law.

42. Guidelines of French Anticorruption Agency (n 25) 27.

43. Art. 17, II, 8°, of the Sapin II Law (and "French anti-corruption guidelines now available to companies in English," 15 February 2018, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek); Art. L. 225-102-4, I, 5°, of the French Commercial Code.

44. Decision No. 2017-750 DC (n 12) para 27.

45. Art. 225-102-5, para 1, of the French Commercial Code.

46. Art. L. 225-102-4, II, para 1, of the French Commercial Code.

47. 28 U.S.C. § 1350.

48. 28 U.S.C. § 1350.

49. Jesner v. Arab Bank, 584 U.S. (2018).

50. Official notice, 26 March 2018 from Mighty, France Nature Environnement and Sherpa.

51. Art. 17, V, para 2, of the Sapin II Law.

52. Art. 17, V, para 1, of the Sapin II Law.

53. Art. 17, V, para 4, of the Sapin II Law; Art. L. 225-102-5, para 3, of the French Commercial Code.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions