Until now, Article 1736 IV bis of the French Tax Code
(FTC) has imposed very high penalties for trustees who fail to
comply with filing requirements imposed by French tax legislation
applicable to trusts. Following the decision of the Constitutional
Court dated 22 July 2016, French tax authorities have made changes
to the penalties applicable for failure to comply with some
disclosure obligations, in particular the ones applicable to
trustees ("circulaire" of 14 September
As it stands, trustees who have failed to comply with the filing
requirements for trusts can receive a penalty under Article 1736 IV
bis of the FTC. This includes a fine of either €20,000 or
12.5% of the total value of the assets held in trust, whichever is
These fines apply in respect of declarations that should have
been lodged on or after 8 December 2013. For declarations due
before this date, the fine is 5% of the total value of the trust
This penalty applies to all the assets held in trust and arises
each time a failure occurs.
As part of the French tax authorities changes, trustees who have
failed to comply with the filing requirements for trusts will now
receive a fine of either €20,000 or a percentage of the total
value of the assets held in trust, whichever is higher.
The percentage varies depending on the origin of the funds
settled in trust:
If the funds were
"received" through a transfer on death, the rate is
If the funds were placed in trust by
the settlor while he was not a French tax resident, the rate is
If the funds were placed in trust by
the settlor while he was a French tax resident, the rate is
In addition to these penalties, settlors or deemed settlors also
face penalties if they have failed to comply with their personal
wealth tax filing obligations. In the case of voluntary disclosure,
the penalty is 25% or 35% of the tax due.
The penalties applicable for failure to disclose foreign bank
accounts have also been reduced from 5% to 1.5% or 3% depending on
the origin of the funds as mentioned above.
However, the question remains as to whether these new rates will
Considering that the Constitutional Court already considered
that a penalty of 5% was too high outside the context of tax fraud,
we do not see why a penalty of 3.75% or 7.5% would be
The Constitutional Court has sanctioned the application of flat
rate percentage penalties when no fraud can be identified. The
government is therefore expected to propose in the next tax bill
new provisions in respect of penalties to replace the application
of automatic flat rate percentages.
To be continued...
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In the inaugural episode of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aburto and Sarah Willis introduce listeners to the podcast and discuss their experiences with diversity and inclusion in the legal industry. They also outline some of the obstacles the profession faces with respect to adopting new strategies and overhauling old practices.
For episode two of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aberto and Sarah Willis interview Mark Greenburgh, a partner in Gowling WLG's London office. They discuss the exciting new diversity and inclusion opportunities that have arisen since the combination of Gowlings and Wragge Lawrence Graham, as well at Gowling WLG UK's LGBT OpenHouse initiative.
Mark Greenburgh is a partner in Gowling WLG's London office, with his practice focused on employment litigation. He helps clients find solutions to workplace relationship issues and interpret the special legislation or collective agreements applicable to public sector employees.
Mark is also a Higher Rights Advocate, a Freeman of the City of London, Liveryman of the Worshipful Company of Solicitors, a member of the City of London Employment Law Committee and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts.
In episode three of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aburto and Sarah Willis interview Lorna Gavin, Gowling WLG U.K.’s head of diversity, inclusion and corporate responsibility. In their discussion, they explore the challenges and opportunities of implementing diversity and inclusion strategies across a global firm, while also detailing Gowling WLG U.K.’s various diversity networks.
In the wake of the 2016 Presidential election and the unexpected November Surprise election of Donald J. Trump, who has indicated an intention to repeal the 'death tax,' the estate planning community is trying to digest exactly what a repeal of the estate tax would look like, ..
This article deals with the tax considerations arising out of tax treaties when dealing with passive income, in particular the manner in which Contracting States share jurisdiction to tax when negotiating tax treaties.
Jonathan Sheehan gives an Irish perspective in the October 2016 edition of The American Lawyer on the European Commission's decision that Ireland granted undue tax benefits of up to EUR13 billion, plus interest, to Apple.
In a recent decision, the SFSC ruled that a Swiss regulated and tax-exempt pension fund is entitled to reclaim Swiss federal withholding tax deducted from dividends of publicly traded shares of Swiss companies.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).