France: The Risks Of Co-Employment Liability In France

Last Updated: 22 August 2016
Article by Katell Deniel-Allioux

Against a background of financial crisis and corporate restructurings, French workers have taken to the ramparts. Employees dismissed "for economic reasons" have, in increasing numbers, been filing complaints under the Labor Code, collective bargaining agreements and case law of the French Supreme Court aimed at extending liability for wrongful terminations to shareholders and especially investment funds, particularly in the context of collective economic dismissals. Employees have been using two theories—co-employment and group—to go beyond the operating company and tap into the financial resources of their former employer's deep-pocketed backers.

Evolution of the French Supreme Court's position on the notion of co-employment

Co-employment has been defined as a relationship between two or more employers in which each has actual or potential legal rights and duties with respect to the same employee. Unlike a single employer-employee relationship, in which the employer bears certain responsibilities to employees, including with respect to termination of employment, in a co-employment situation, these responsibilities may be shared.

The terms of leveraged buyout (LBO) transactions usually specify that, along with the managers' takeover of the company, the investment fund or, technically speaking, its management company, may, in certain cases, direct the company's strategy (often to an extent greater than could a simple shareholder), as well as actively participate, de facto or de jure, in the company's management (through positions held by its representatives in the holding company's management bodies).

It is in this context that there has been an increase in actions by dismissed employees seeking judicial recognition of the "co-employer" status of a parent company, an ultimate controlling company or even a management company. Plaintiffs have been encouraged by court rulings finding that the question of whether a defendant is a co-employer is a factual one that looks to the nature of the relationship, not simply to a corporate organizational chart. "Confusion of interests, activity, management and operating methods" can be sufficient, the court has held. (Cass. soc. June 9, 2004, No. 01-43802; June 26, 2008 No. 07-41294). Through this type of action, employees are trying to obtain additional damages—and even reinstatement in the company recognized as co-employer.

After several decisions on the merits accepting such claims, and thus recognizing the existence of co-employment outside of a formal -subordinate relationship, the French Supreme Court, in its Molex decision (Cass. Soc. July 2, 2014, No. 12-15.208), sent the pendulum swinging in the other direction, stating that:

"outside any situation of subordination, a company belonging to a group can only be considered as a co-employer, with respect to the personnel employed by another company, provided there is between them, beyond the necessary coordination of economic actions between companies belonging to the same group and in a state of economic domination that this affiliation can create, a confusion of interests, activities and management, demonstrating itself by interference in the latter's economic and social management."  

It is interesting to note that since this fundamental ruling in which the French Supreme Court clearly attempted to put a stop to actions on the grounds of co-employment, lower court judges have resisted (see, e.g., Paris CA March 20, 2015, No. 09-09794) by continuing to recognize situations of co-employment.

Meanwhile, the French Supreme Court, for its part, is staying the course and, until now, has quashed every decision recognizing co-employment referred to it.

Accordingly, the following can be noted:

  • The fact that a subsidiary is treated in practice as a simple establishment without administrative or accounting structure and without real financial and management autonomy does not establish a confusion of interests, activities and management between the two companies;
  • The domination of one company over another does not mean that there is interference in the dominated company's economic and social management; thus, co-employment was not established when the dominating company "suddenly [withdrew] its clientele from the production company without any economic alternative being presented and a fortiori implemented";
  • Having the same president for both companies in issue and the intervention of the parent company's general manager in the subsidiary do not constitute circumstances sufficient to establish the confusion of interests and management;
  • The granting of credit by a supplier demonstrates a community of interests and activity, not economic domination;
  • The fact that a subsidiary does not have autonomy in administering orders, sales, invoicing, personnel and payroll due to its integration in a global system managed by the parent company does not constitute interference by the parent company in the subsidiary's economic and social management.

Redeployment obligation in groups

Prior to any economic dismissal, an employer that is part of a "group" is required to search within that group for positions available to redeploy the employee whose dismissal is being contemplated. Failure to comply with this obligation will result in the dismissal being considered as having no real and serious cause, and the employee can then claim damages (minimum six months' salary, provided the employee has at least two years' seniority and the company employs at least 11 employees).

It is therefore particularly tempting for an employee dismissed for economic reasons by a group controlled by an investment fund (which is itself managed by a management company) to want to extend the notion of group to all the other companies in the fund's portfolio (and even to all the companies in the portfolios of other funds managed by the same management company) in order to invoke a claim of breach of the redeployment obligation.

In the absence of a legal definition of the notion of group in the French Labor Code, reference should be made to (i) the definition given by the French Supreme Court (decisions of April 5, 1995, Nos. 93-43866 and 93-42690) on the redeployment obligation, in which it said that the redeployment possibilities must be "searched for in the group among the companies whose activities, organization or place where business is carried on permit them to permute all or part of the personnel" and (ii) the various definitions given by the French Commercial Code (Articles L 233-1 and L 233-16), which notably refer to the capital links existing between the companies within a group but, also notably, to the notion of dominant influence (which is not necessarily subordinated to capital ownership). For example, although the management company is not a shareholder in the companies of the portfolio of the investment fund which it manages (only the fund is a shareholder thereof), it very often exercises a significant influence in these companies, particularly when the funds' investment is a majority investment.

It was on the basis of the notion of control as defined by the French Commercial Code (notably control by the exercise of voting rights and by dominant influence) that employees claimed recognition of a group that included their company (Sublistatic) and the management company of the shareholding fund.

In dismissing their claim, the Douai Court of Appeal (November 27, 2009, No. 08/03825) found that the management company did not hold any Sublistatic shares and was only the manager of the open-end investment fund.

This decision has been found objectionable by certain legal scholars insofar as it does not take into account the particularism of the shareholding structure of funds and, notably, the fact that an open-end investment fund, which quite often holds the majority of the capital and does not have legal personality, is represented vis-à-vis third parties by the management company that acts in its name and on its behalf and exercises its voting rights in the companies belonging to its portfolio.

However, even if a group within the meaning of the French Commercial Code is recognized as existing between an LBO company, a management company and an open-end investment fund, does this group constitute a "group" within the meaning of the redeployment obligation set forth in the French Labor Code?

The Versailles and Douai Courts of Appeal answered "no" to this question. The grounds of the Versailles Court of Appeal's decision in the SGD case (Versailles Court of Appeal, February 3, 2010, Nos. 09-09068 and 09-09154, SA SGD v/SAS Cognetas) are interesting in that the court concluded that the elements provided by the claimant did not allow it to "find a directional convergence, a continuity of interest between [the management companies and the target company] giving rise, in view of the place where business is carried on, to a possibility of permutation of all or part of the personnel."

The Grenoble Court of Appeal (Grenoble CA September 12, 2011, No. 10/00926) more recently took into account the specificity of open-end investment funds and the specific mission of a portfolio management company, recalling that "the companies managing open-end investment funds and companies in which these funds have been invested do not constitute a group in the sense where a group includes companies whose activity, organization or place where business is carried on permit the permutation of all or part of the personnel."

Therefore, the courts have confirmed that—as between a management company and the companies in which the funds it manages have shareholdings—there is no "group," as appreciated by the labor law, for purposes of imposing redeployment obligations.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
19 Oct 2018, Conference, Warsaw, Poland

The 42nd PIKE Conference and Exhibition will be held on 19-22 October at the International Conference and Entertainment Centre in Krakow. The event is organized by the Polish Chamber of Electronic Communication (PIKE).

25 Oct 2018, Other, Munich, Germany

Please register via RSVP button by October 15, 2018. If you have any questions, please contact Marcel Schmidt.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Frankfurt, Germany

With the blockchain market maturing, we see an advancing diversification of token types and offerings.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions