France: Global Trading - French Tax Aspects - Part II

Last Updated: 29 June 1995
Choice of a relevant method of allocation

The potential lack of tax neutrality concerning global trading activities stems from the difficulties usually encountered in financial matters as regards the allocation of a fair remuneration to each actor for the services rendered, the risks borne, the value added (this difficulty derives from the particularly intangible nature of the transactions being carried out).

Here again the diversity of the various potential approaches is pretty well illustrated in the comparison between Anglo-Saxon approaches on the one hand and French approach on the other hand.

a) The various approaches followed by countries

The structure and organisation of the group as well as the functions and financial risks (market and counterpart risk) between the different entities necessarily influence, from a tax point of view, the analysis that should be undertaken concerning the validity of the profit and remuneration allocation methods.

This can be explained by the fact that, in most of the countries involved, domestic tax laws as well as treaties provide that the transactions must be performed in accordance with the arm's length principle, i.e. under conditions prevailing on the market.

These so-called fully competitive conditions depend on the functions performed, the added value created, the risk assumed and the degree, autonomy and responsibility granted in the decision-making process which is inherent to any financial operation, at the headquarters' level as well as at the level of each entity involved in the global trading activities.

The complexity of the problem is reinforced by the characteristics of the internal laws relating to transfer prices.

For example, a remuneration method developed in accordance with fully competitive criteria could be contested by local tax authorities on the grounds that internal criteria used to set transfer prices would not have been respected.

b) The Anglo-Saxon approach

We should bear in mind the fundamental differences which exist between the US approach on the one hand and the European approach on the other hand (and to a smaller extent in Japan) as well as the very penalising consequences likely to emerge from the evolution of the American legislation concerning this matter.

Thus, the United States or the United-Kingdom seem to adopt or advocate a global method of profit allocation between the various entities or establishment of a single group: the overall profit due to transactions is allocated between the different entities or establishments in accordance with flat keys linked to various parameters, (number of operations, number of employees, ratios relating to traders remuneration, nature of the risk assumed, identification of the capital engaged...)

Obviously, because of this method, which is by nature difficult to objectives, the situation of the entities is quite difficult, in the event of US Internal Revenue Service investigations.

This explains the issue by the IRS of Advance Pricing Agreements to taxpayers who request it. These agreements aim at setting appropriate transfer prices as well as establishing a profit allocation method arising from global trading activities. For instance, it is well known that Barclays Bank and Sumitomo Bank obtained such agreements years ago (Tax Notes International, May 11, 1992, pp. 959 and 960; Tax Notes International, May 16,1992; Tax Notes International, May 23, 1994, nos. 1362 to 1364).

However, we understand that some companies feel reluctant to approach the IRS, to the extent that this process requires the unveiling of information (particularly concerning the world-wide structure of the group).

However the IRS has very recently revealed the logical line followed when negotiating and granting Advance Pricing Agreements as regards global trading, which should reassure the companies concerned. This is indeed the purpose of Notice 94-40 published April 25, 1994 whose main components are subject to the following developments.

The notice deals in particular with the following subjects:

- the concept of "Advance Pricing Agreement" (APA)
- the context in which the IRS has taken positions
- the specific procedure relating to global trading activities
- the criteria used to grant APA as regards global trading activities
- the practical implementation of the method chosen
- the eventual transposition of the present method to the future negotiations with residents or non-residents.

Concept of "Advanced Pricing Agreement"

First, it should be noted that in an Advance Pricing Agreement process, the Internal Revenue Service and the American taxpayer together choose a methodology which enables them to set transfer prices. Then this latter is applied to each allocation of revenues, costs, deductions or credits between (or within) two or more organisations, businesses, companies, enterprises held or controlled directly or indirectly by the same groups.

In financial matters, the Internal Revenue Service has already concluded APA's with several taxpayers operating on derivatives in accordance with an entirely centralised management system.

Accordingly, as mentioned in Notice 94-40, companies interested in APA's should have a fully centralised management system, at the risk management level as well as at the personnel management level. The transactions performed on all world-wide markets must be recorded on a global book. Every day, at the closure of the quotations, this book must be transferred from one establishment to another in accordance with the procedures and rules set by the headquarters.

However, the Internal Revenue Service warns the reader that the above-mentioned instruction does not aim at setting general rules concerning the federal taxation of by-products.

In fact, Notice 94-40 only aims at describing a method and factors which must be considered in order to allocate the revenues stemming from the above-described transactions when these latter are executed both in the United States and in other countries and when these transactions are characterised by the transfer of a book including the positions of all the establishments of the company acting on those markets. However, the IRS does not prevent taxpayers whose activities are not centralised from trying to resort to the APA procedure.

The context

The Internal Revenue Service points out that historically financial markets were bound to their national borders within which transactions were regularly carried out.

However, world-wide financial markets have become more and more integrated because of the technological developments, the financial innovations, and the progressive suppression of foreign exchange controls.

Consequently, numerous financial intermediaries henceforth act without interruption on the financial markets via world-wide traders : from which ensues the concept of "global trading".

Four general functions are common to global trading operations: trading, sale, management and technical assistance.

A trader conveys the prices, carries out the sale and purchase of instruments, and sets the method of covering or arbitrating the performed transactions.

A salesman advises the clients on the manner in which to manage the prices, the rate and exchange risks associated with its assets and liabilities, in order to sell them by-products.

A manager monitors the establishment level of risk and sets the limits which are not to be exceeded.

Finally, the assistance function which supports the three functions above, includes a wide range of activities : development of technologies and information systems, analysis of the counterpart risk, accounting and administrative assistance, etc.

Several international financial groups have integrated these functions for different business reasons.

Nevertheless, according to the Internal Revenue Service, we may distinguish two major kinds of operational structures: the organisations which are fully centralised and the ones which are not.

The global trading activities undertaken by fully integrated companies are characterised by the centralisation of the risk and personnel management.

In that case, the risks are globally managed.

Consequently, a global book is kept and sent every day at the closure of the quotations from one establishment to another.

A specialised department monitors the counterpart risk relating to the transactions performed by the traders in order to assist the risk evaluation and management.
Thanks to this information, the head office sets rules of conduct and determines customer credits which must be respected by all traders of the group.

Each book is concerned with a product or a group of products and is under the liability of a chief trader or a manager. The trader or the manager sets and enacts the rules which must be respected by each establishment.

This manager is liable for the economic performance of the book. In this respect, he supervises local traders to the extent that he is often near them.

In a fully integrated organisation, each establishment carries out the same functions with respect to the limits, procedures and rules of conduct sets by the head office.
For example, a seller may be located in one country, the purchaser may be located in another one. Furthermore this transaction can be covered by a third country. In such a case, each establishment contributes to the overall profitability of the world-wide activity.

According to notice 94-40, the APA procedure proved its efficiency in allocating the incomes issued from integrated global trading activities to the extent that the Internal Revenue Service has allowed this method of allocation among the different jurisdictions involved.

For each transaction, the taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service have concluded an APA to allocate the revenues (in case of a treaty the US and foreign authorities conclude also an agreement).

According to the same notice, the IRS, the foreign partners and the taxpayers have considered that this method of allocation was suited to the integrated global trading activities, with respect to the volume and the nature of the transactions concerned by the APA process.
Indeed this method allows the taxpayers to correctly appreciate the contribution of each establishment to the overall profitability of the book.

When global trading activities are carried out by companies and subsidiaries located in different jurisdictions, the APA were concluded according to section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code and to the tax treaties concerned.

However for companies located in a given jurisdiction which act through branch offices located in the other jurisdictions involved, the APA were concluded according to the sole tax treaties between the United States and the countries where the taxpayer is located.

Procedure followed

Generally speaking, those APA's which have been granted to taxpayers acting on financial markets in accordance with a globally integrated operating method, have covered transactions performed on financial term instruments as well as cover transactions tending to reduce the rate or the exchange risks.
Regarding global trading, the APA have been granted to American companies which performed their transactions through branch offices or subsidiaries located in the countries which have signed a non double taxation agreement.

At the same time, the Internal Service allowed foreign companies which partially undertake global trading activities through a branch office located in the United States to benefit from this procedure.

Although the Internal Revenue Service has not yet entered into such a negotiation, a foreign company acting in the United States through a subsidiary could a priori benefit from this procedure. It would be no procedural obstacle.

Thanks to its flexible nature, the APA's process is not necessarily applied to all global trading book. Therefore, the taxpayer can choose those activities to which the process will be applied. It is understood that each APA is specifically adapted to the particular situation of the taxpayer.

Criteria used in an APA's process specific to global trading activities

Regarding global trading activities, notice 94-40 includes a general description of APA's delivered by the Internal Revenue Service to taxpayers who operate in accordance with an integrated operating system.
In each of these APA, the Internal Revenue Service, the taxpayer and the tax authority of the country concerned have agreed that the world-wide profit issued from each book covered by the procedure would be allocated among the various locations where the global trading activity is undertaken, in accordance with a profit split method.

Indeed, this method aims at measuring the economic activity of each establishment and its contribution to the profit of the group, calculated on a world-wide basis.

From this perspective, three factors have been identified. They are :
- the relative value of the establishment (the "value" factor);
- the risk relating to a specific establishment (the "risk" factor);
- the volume of the activity of each establishment (the "activity" factor).

These factors are weighted to reflect the contribution of each establishment to the group's overall profitability.
In addition, the APA's process evaluates these factors in different manners: indeed, the procedure is adjusted to the circumstances by choosing criteria which reflect as much as possible the taxpayer situation.

For each factor, some parameters are taken into consideration such as the taxpayer's management structure, its information system, the functions fulfilled, the risks assumed and the capital invested by each establishment.

The "value" factor enables the measurement the contribution of each establishment to the group's world-wide profit. It is understood that the by-product "trading" generates significant profits and losses for the establishment.
As regards taxpayers concerned by the APA's process, it has been noticed that their resources came essentially from the traders to the extent these latter have a client list and know the market very well.

Indeed, the traders are responsible for negotiating the prices, performing the transactions and setting the coverage strategies to be applied. In return, they receive a compensation which is usually made up of a fixed salary and a bonus depending on the contribution of each establishment to the world-wide profit.

The amount of these compensations is therefore a good indicator of the contribution of each establishment to the world-wide profit and is considered by the US authorities as well as by the foreign authorities as the best instrument to measure this contribution.

The "risk" factor measures the potential risk to which the company's capital is exposed as a result of the activity of each of its establishments.

This factor provides an interesting indication of each establishment's contribution to the world-wide gross profit. Since this factor is based on the proper characteristics of each taxpayer, it can be evaluated in different ways: weighed maturity of the volume of swaps transactions (calculated by multiplying the notional amount of each rate exchange contract or foreign currency exchange contract by its maturity) or amount of the opened positions at the end of the establishment's fiscal year.

Sometimes, the weight of this factor is less important than the other factors (especially the "activity" factor).

The "activity" factor also enables the measurement of the contribution of each establishment to the world-wide company gross profits. This factor is measured in reference to the remuneration of the personnel required for support functions (for example personnel responsible for the back office). It can also be measured in reference to the present net value of the transactions undertaken by the establishment (this value corresponds to the sum of the present value of the future cash flow).

Implementation of the allocation method

According to notice 94-40, the first step is to assess the amount of the profits and the losses, to which the method is therefore applied.

Traditionally, this amount (world-wide profit or loss) includes world-wide profits and losses resulting from the trading transactions performed on the domestic and foreign by-products markets and from the attached cover transactions, to the extent the taxpayer and the tax authority have decided to include them in the APA.

The expenses directly related to the market transactions must be deducted from this amount (for example, the expenses involved by the computer system, the payment due to a specific personnel, the commissions and fees paid to the brokers).

Other expenses such as rent, office supplies and telecommunications are inherent in the functioning of each establishment , and are therefore allocated to them, subject to the application of specific US tax rules.

The second step consists of calculating the ratio resulting from each factor.

For example, in order to calculate the ratio relating to the "value" factor, the amount of remuneration paid to US traders is divided by the total of remuneration paid to all traders (US and non US combined).

This percentage can bear, if necessary, a weighted coefficient.

Once the three ratios are calculated, the percentage of revenues or losses attributable to the US is calculated by dividing the sum of the three factors by the weighted sum of each factor.

Finally, in order to calculate the share of the world-wide profit attributable to the US, the world-wide profit or loss is multiplied by the percentage described above.

Transposition to future APA

In sum, we should keep in mind that notice 94-40 is not intended to give a standard method or standard factors.

Other methods can be used to the extent that they enable a better measurement of the contribution of each establishment to the overall profit.

For some fully integrated companies, the method and factors described in Notice 94-40 do not permit precise measurements of the contribution of each trading location to the overall profits of the global trading activities.

In addition, with respect to the management or information system specificities, other methods or factors could be applied.

In these two cases, the IRS admits the implementation of other methods or factors to the extent that they permit a more precise measurement.

Furthermore, various methodologies may be suited to non fully integrated global trading activities which are not characterised by the transfer of the global trading book positions in accordance with the closure of the market.

c) French approach

Other countries, such as France, seem to adopt another approach which generally consists of identifying each function of the financial market activity at an international level, or in the global trading process and proposing an appropriate compensation of these methods.

From this perspective, in order to set an appropriate method of compensation, the world-wide financial market or global trading must be analysed in detail, in France as well as in each location involved, in accordance with predetermined criteria.

Three standard schemes are usually distinguished : global book (as described in Notice 94-40 by the IRS), centralised organisation per product, decentralised independent system.

The implicit and explicit criteria include in the various internal laws concerning the transfer prices must then be identified.

Finally, with respect to compensation, certain choices must be made such as:

- choice between an overall remuneration for each location, considering its contribution to the overall activity (same approach as the Anglo-Saxon approach)

- and an individual remuneration of each function, based on an operational approach (conception, management, trading, economic function, counterpart risk, capital cost, logistical and computer support).

And, in an operational approach, the choice must be made between a profit allocation and the payment of commission or cost plus.

In this respect, an entity whose responsibility in the profit-making process is prevalent would rather receive a profits or losses allocation, for example global trading activities or management of position.

On the other hand, a secondary activity in the profits or losses process should be compensated by means of commission or cost-plus.

Finally, in case in which the assuming of the counterpart risk would be disconnected from the management, a specific compensation could be considered.

In conclusion, there is a serious risk that the tax authorities will contest the compensation modes chosen. If this risk can not be entirely suppressed, it can nevertheless be substantially reduced thanks a suitable analysis of the operating modes of the activity performed. In this manner, the compensation modes chosen should be appropriate and accepted by the various tax authorities concerned.

Because of these uncertainties, an analytic and specific method must be applied taking into account all the establishment departments involved.

The understanding of the flows, the identification of the risks and the consideration of the processes and objectives could be useful in drafting a kind of white paper which afterwards enables a suitable analysis of the tax situation.

Thanks to this first approach, it is then possible to determine the more appropriate allocation of the income and expenses among the various entities involved.
Of course, handling the problem solely from the tax perspective is illusory; operational aspects also deserve specific attention.

Various connection rules

The sole allocation method does not permit the attaining of complete tax neutrality.
In this respect, a harmonization of the rules relating to the calculation and connection of the profits among the various countries is necessary.

Indeed, the fourth obstacle to tax neutrality could stem from the lack of harmonization between the various internal laws relating to the use of financial instruments : either taking into or not account the deferred losses and/or gains, the evaluation methods of these deferred gains or losses, the specific rules concerning coverage transactions or symmetrical positions, the diversity of regulations according to the kind of product under consideration.

Therefore, even if the first technical difficulties are resolved - for the record, on one hand, consideration from a tax perspective of the internal flows, and on the other hand, implementation of an appropriate allocation method - a solution should be found concerning the formation of the allocated revenues as well as the connection rules of the planned commissions.

If the methods of result assessment are different among the various countries or if the connection rules relating to the planned commissions or incurred costs become divergent afterwards, the risk that the tax neutrality can only be reached at the conclusion of the activities performed must be seriously considered.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. For additional information contact Claire Acard on 33/(1)/55 61 10 10. The members of Archibald Andersen Association d'Avocats (S.G. Archibald and Arthur Andersen International) are registered with the Hauts-de-Seine Bar and the Lyon Bar.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.