Cyprus: Ship Arrest And Security For Release: Court Decision Offers Valuable Insight




A recent decision1 of the Supreme Court in its first instance admiralty jurisdiction gives valuable insight into the court's approach to applications for the arrest of vessels and for security to be lodged with the court for the release of the vessel.


The plaintiff, a fish-farming business, was the owner of a number of fish cages that were damaged and destroyed by the ship Friendship as it approached the port of Vasiliko, leading to the loss of the fish that had been kept in the cages. The incident took place in the early hours of Saturday morning, December 1 2012. On the following Monday (December 3 2012) - the date on which the vessel was scheduled to depart - the plaintiff filed an action (26/2012) claiming damages of €7.5 million, together with an application for arrest of the vessel.

The court issued an order for the arrest of the vessel, setting the lodging of security of €5 million as a condition for the vessel's release.

The owners of the vessel objected to the plaintiff's application for the arrest and security, based on the established principle that no order for security may be issued for the release of a vessel where the amount ordered as security exceeds the value of the vessel. In support of its objection, the owner submitted a valuation report valuing the vessel at a little over €2 million. With the leave of the court, the plaintiff filed a supplementary affidavit exhibiting a valuation report that estimated the current value of the vessel at €4 million.

The court was required to decide on:

  • notices of opposition and Rule " 60 of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Order 1893;
  • the applicant's obligations when making an ex parte application for the arrest of a vessel and security for release; and
  • calculation of the security for release and the defendant vessel's burden of proof to rebut the plaintiff's evidence as regards the value of the vessel.


Notice of opposition

Rule 60 of the order provides that:

"Any party may apply to the Court for the release of any property arrested and the Court or Judge may, by order, direct the release of such property upon such terms as to the security or as to payment of any costs of appraisement or removal or inspection or otherwise as to the Court or Judge shall seem fit."

Therefore, any request for the release of a vessel must be made with a filing of an independent motion for such release. The court considered this matter in brief and ruled that such non-compliance did not constitute a fundamental defect that nullified the whole proceedings.

The parties acknowledged the above principle on the basis of The Ship 'Gloriana' v Eddy Breidi,2 in which the court considered the same matter and allowed the case to proceed, finding the notice of opposition to be a motion under Rule 60 of the order.

Obligations under ex parte application

It is a well-established principle that an applicant in an ex parte application for the arrest of a ship is obliged to assist the court in reaching an informed and correct decision, particularly as the other party is not represented. The applicant must not only satisfy the court that the conditions set out in the rules have been satisfied, but also provide all details and material facts of the case that the court requires in order for it to reach an informed and just decision.

An affidavit in support of the application for an arrest order must at least provide the minimum background with regard to the existence of a matter to be tried; this usually means that it must include all of the information required to satisfy the necessary pre-conditions for invoking the in rem jurisdiction of the court.

In Caspi Shipping Ltd v the Ship 'Sapphire Seas' (2)3the court rejected the application because the applicant had failed to inform the court of an arbitration clause that was contained in the charterparty under consideration.

In Demetris Panagiotou (Tzimmis) v the Ship 'Tamara I',4 although the applicant failed to satisfy in full the provisions of Rules 51 and 52(b), the court exercised its discretion under Rule 54 and allowed the application, having been satisfied that the omission had no material effect on the subject matter of the application.

In El Fath Co for International Trade SAE v ADT Shipping5 the application for arrest was rejected due to the fact that the affidavit in support of the application had failed to address properly how the preconditions for granting such an order were met.

In the present case the court was satisfied that (given the limited time available) the plaintiff had provided the court with the requisite information that was in its possession at the time it filed the application, and that the preconditions for granting an arrest warrant were satisfied.

Calculation of security for release

One of the factors that the court will take into account when assessing the amount of security to be lodged in order to secure the release of the defendant vessel is the value of the claim. In AK International UK Limited v The Ship 'Naime S' under the flag of the Comoros Islands (2)6 the court stated that "with respect to the security for the release of the Vessel, this is again decided upon taking into consideration the plaintiffs' claim and the satisfaction of a judgment that may be delivered" (at 1475-1476).

As this case indicates, the court will take into consideration both the extent of the damage sustained and the time available for the plaintiff to make an estimate. Where time is limited and there is a risk that the vessel will move outside the jurisdiction, the court may grant an order if it is satisfied that the applicant has provided at least a basic assessment of the damage and the amount claimed.

The court addressed the matter of security in The Ship M/V 'Bay Star' v Mario Cirino Pomicino SPA,7 referring to the case of Singh v F/B 'Alisur Blanco'.8 Judge Pikis (as he then was) stated that:

"The discretion of the court under r. 60 must, no doubt, be exercised judicially by reference to the principle of law underlying the power to direct arrest, on the one hand, and the realities of the case, on the other. The power to arrest a ship and, generally, order security for the claim of theplaintiff, is an especially necessary remedy for the effective exercise of the admiralty jurisdiction in rem, considering that the presence of the defendant in the jurisdiction is normally temporary. However, the terms for the release of a boat must not be oppressive and the amount fixed must be directly referable to the amount likely to be recovered in the event of success."

In assessing the amount of security, the court based its ruling on the principle that the claim cannot exceed the value of the vessel. As such, a claimant is entitled to security that is sufficient to cover the amount of its best arguable case, together with costs and interest, but the amount cannot be more than the value of the vessel.

Ideally, the amount of security or the value of the vessel would be agreed between the parties; where the parties cannot agree on the value of the vessel, the owner of the vessel may file an affidavit in this respect. The applicant may file its affidavit as to the actual value in response and allow the court to decide.

Neither party disputed the basic principles as to the maximum security that the court may grant. However, there was no agreement on the value of the vessel: the owner produced a report estimating its value at a little over €2 million, while the report put forward by the plaintiff valued it at €4 million.

The court considered both of these reports and concluded that that the owner had presented no solid reasons to dispute the valuation put forward in the plaintiff's report. Since the burden of proof was on the defendant vessel to rebut the applicant's valuation, the court accepted the plaintiff's valuation and set the security at €4 million.


Examples of nullity would include proceedings which:

  • ought to have been served, but have never come to " the notice of the defendant;
  • have never started owing to some fundamental defect in issuing the proceedings; or
  • appear to be duly issued, but fail to comply with an essential statutory requirement.

A distinction must be made between these on the one hand, and minor irregularities and procedural defects on the other. This does not relieve the parties of their obligation to abide by the court's rules and practices, but in appropriate circumstances the court will exercise its discretion and allow the case to be heard despite minor irregularities. Rule 237 of the order allows the Supreme Court in its admiralty jurisdiction to follow Order 70 of the former English Rules, permitting the court to exercise such discretion where such non-compliance "shall not render any proceedings void". As was decided in Gloriana, "no application to set aside any proceedings is allowed unless made within reasonable time, nor if the party applying has taken fresh steps after knowledge of the irregularity".

As noted above, an applicant in an ex parte application must satisfy the court that:

  • the application complies with the provisions and requirements of the rules; and
  • the pre-conditions for the issuance of an arrest order have been fulfilled.

This distinction is an important one. Failure to meet all of the procedural requirements of the rules will not automatically result in the application being rejected. The court may exercise its discretion and, where any omissions do not render the exercise of its powers impossible, allow the application to proceed (as in Tamara I). However, if the applicant fails to apprise the court of all facts that it needs in order to exercise its discretion correctly and justly, the application will fail (as in El Fath Co).

The amount fixed as security for the release of a vessel must not be unreasonable and must be justified accordingly. The nature of the claim and the amount likely to be recovered in the event of success are among the factors that the court will take into consideration. The burden of proof of the actual value of the vessel lies with the defendant. If it fails to rebut a claimant's evidence with respect to the actual value of the vessel, it cannot succeed in reducing the security that must be filed for such vessel's release. It is insufficient that a mere opposition or denial of the claimant's allegations be made. As in Gloriana, the defendant must prove that the claimant's evidence does not correspond to the facts.


1. Telia Vasiliko Limited v The Ship 'FRIENDSHIP' under Malta flag now lying at the Port of Vasiliko, Action No 26/2012; decision dated January 18 2013, application for ship arrest dated December 3 2012.

2. (1982) 1 CLR 409.

3. (1997) 1B CLR 833.

4. (1992) 1A CLR 21.

5. (1992) 1B CLR 1255.

6. (2004) 1Γ ΑΑΔ 1456.

7. (1998) 1A CLR 471.

8. (1984) 1 CLR 532.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions