China: Chinese Supreme Court Protects State-Owned Assets In Litigation Relating To Non-Performing Loans

China established its non-performing loan assets disposal market in connection with the reform of state-owned banks in 1999. Non-performing loans ("NPLs") were transferred to designated state-owned assets management companies ("AMCs"), which packaged them for sale. Since then, various regulations and rules have been promulgated to regulate the disposal of NPLs, including regulations to permit foreign investors to participate in the restructuring and disposal of NPLs with AMCs.

Recently, the Supreme Court of China issued new guidance to the courts in connection with NPL-related litigation that may have an adverse impact on the sale and purchase of NPLs by investors as well as on the enforcement of their rights under NPLs.

Supreme Court Issues Guidance on NPL Litigation

On April 3, 2009, the Supreme Court of China issued the "Minutes of the Working Seminar by the Supreme People's Court regarding Hearing Cases in Connection with Transfer of Financial Non-performing Creditor's Rights" (the "Minutes"), followed by an explanation of the Minutes, "Several Political and Legal Questions regarding Trial of Financial Non-Performing Creditor's Rights—Explanations to the Minutes of Supreme People's Court regarding Hearing Cases in Connection with Transfer of Financial Non-performing Creditor's Rights" (the "Explanations"). Together, the Minutes and the Explanations introduce new measures that strengthen protection of state-owned assets during NPL disposal. Although the Minutes and Explanations are not official judicial interpretations given by the Supreme Court and thus cannot be cited by the courts in rendering judgment, courts in various municipalities and provinces have interpreted the principles enunciated in the Minutes by reportedly suspending acceptance, trial, and enforcement of NPL-related cases that involve state-owned assets.

According to the Minutes, the Supreme Court, working with various central-level authorities (including the National People's Congress Standing Committee on Legislative Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, China Banking Regulatory Commission, the People's Bank of China, and the State Audit Bureau), tried to come up with a solution to address various perceived shortcomings that have arisen in connection with the disposal of NPLs involving state-owned assets. Those shortcomings included the pricing of NPLs for disposal, collusion among certain bidders and the AMCs in the NPL bidding process, and inadequate notice to the debtors and guarantors that the NPLs have been transferred. The measures proposed by the Supreme Court do not necessarily reflect the consensus view among the various ministries but rather an attempt by the Supreme Court to seize the initiative on the various issues.

Scope of Supreme Court Guidance

It is important to note that the Minutes technically apply only to a limited set of NPLs spun off from state-owned banks prior to 2006. Specifically, the Minutes apply to:

  • Policy-based NPLs acquired from the four state-owned AMCs (i.e., Huarong, Greatwall, Orient, and Cinda) from Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, China Construction Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and China Development Bank from 1999 and 2000.
  • Commercial NPLs acquired from the AMCs from Bank of Communications, Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China from 2004 and 2005.

Nonetheless, until further guidance is given as to the policies, rules, and regulations that govern other NPLs involving state-owned assets, it is likely that local courts will follow the Minutes and Explanations in handling other NPL cases involving state-owned assets.

Courts Not to Accept Certain Categories of NPL Litigation

The Supreme Court has advised that local courts should not accept the following types of NPL related cases:

  • Actions between AMCs and state-owned banks in connection with transfer agreements of policy-based NPLs.
  • Actions against state-owned or state-controlled enterprises if the debtor is either on the list of enterprises to be reorganized or is in the midst of reorganization under the State Council's policy-based closure and bankruptcy proceeding.
  • Actions by debtors or parties with right of first refusal to invalidate any NPL transfer if the debt has already been discharged prior to the issuance of the Minutes.
  • Actions by purchasers of NPLs against state-owned banks for defects in the NPL after AMCs assign NPLs to such purchasers.
  • Actions against forestry industrial enterprises that enjoy the benefit of natural forestry resources and protection plan policy.
  • Actions by debtors or by parties with right of first refusal to invalidate any NPL transfer if such debtors fail to provide bond or if such parties had waived the right of first refusal.

Although this list of cases appears self-evident, and the NPLs involved are generally excluded from the list of NPLs packaged for resale to investors, anecdotal evidence suggests that local courts are refusing to accept a broader category of NPL cases.

Invalidity of NPL Transfer Agreement

The Minutes also establish that the sale and transfer of NPLs to a purchaser may be invalidated for a number of reasons, including:

  • The debtor or guarantor of the NPL is a state organ.
  • The NPL involves national security or sensitive information about national defense or the military industry, as determined by the applicable state organ, or if the transfer of such NPL is prohibited or restricted by law.
  • The AMC maliciously colluded with the purchaser of the NPL.
  • The NPL was transferred without public notice or in violation of the process and procedures established under the Administration of the Asset Disposal Announcement of Financial Asset Management Companies (Revised)1 ("Administration of Asset Disposal Announcement").
  • Substantial inconsistencies exist between the overall NPL portfolio actually transferred and those disclosed in the public notice.
  • The NPL portfolio is not appraised when such appraisal is required, or the AMC, appraisal organization, and/or the debtor maliciously collude to undervalue or omit the value of the NPL.
  • A public bidding or auction of the NPL portfolio is not conducted even if required by laws or regulations, or less than three bidders participate in the public bidding process, or the public bidding is not conducted by a qualified auction intermediary, or such other violation of the requirements set forth in the PRC Auction Law.2
  • Necessary approvals and registrations from the National Development and Reform Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or such other applicable legal authority are not obtained.
  • The NPL of a state-owned or state-controlled enterprise is transferred to a government official, financial supervision institution personnel, judicial or public security officer, AMC personnel, appraisal staff, or an executive or intermediary of the debtor such as its lawyer or accountant and any other connected person who participates in disposition of assets.
  • The purchaser or holder of the NPL is an immediate family member of the AMC personnel participating in disposition of NPLs, the state-owned or state-controlled debtor, or the responsible person at the appraisal organization of the NPL.
  • Any other situations involving national and public interest exist.

If a transfer of NPLs is invalidated by the court, the remedy is rescission and the purchase price returned; however, the transferee can sue for additional monetary damages based on the actual amount of interest accrued and paid by the transferee on the purchase price. According to the Minutes, any invalidation of a transfer of NPLs to any subsequent holder of such NPLs will also invalidate all prior transfers of the same NPL. As a result, any litigation involving NPL transfers will likely have to involve the AMCs and all prior and subsequent transferors and transferees of the NPL, which will increase the complexity and litigation costs, resulting in higher uncertainties to NPL investors.

To add further complexity to any action to invalidate the transfer of NPLs, the Minutes provide that where the invalidated NPL is part of a larger portfolio of NPL assets, the court may nevertheless invalidate the transfer of the entire portfolio if requested by the transferee. The court may also invalidate only the portion of the NPL portfolio whose debts have not been repaid or settled if requested by the transferee; however, in such circumstance, no restitution will be paid for the purchase price of the assets.

Supreme Court Establishes New Right of First Refusal by Local Government to NPLs

The Minutes also establish that local governments, their investment organs, and the related entities holding the state-owned enterprise's capital have the right of first refusal in purchasing NPLs transferred from AMCs. Establishing such right of first refusal to NPLs should properly be a function of, and administered by, the Ministry of Finance, which supervises the AMCs. However, the Supreme Court has used its power to accept cases and to revoke NPL transfers to establish this right of first refusal.

According to the Minutes, AMCs must notify such preemptive right holders of the proposed transfer of the debt obligations of such state-owned or state-controlled enterprise that are located at such debtor's place of registration. If the NPLs are bundled into a larger portfolio of assets composed of debtors primarily domiciled in the same administrative area, AMCs must notify the preemptive right holders within the same locality. If the NPLs are bundled into a diverse assets portfolio, the AMCs must notify the preemptive right holders in the locality where the largest amount of NPLs in value are based.

The preemptive right may be waived by writing or if no response is received pursuant to the notice given. However, no guidance was given as to how such notice is to be given, how much time must be provided, and other processes and procedures.

Miscellaneous Provisions

The Minutes also clarify certain other issues relating to the disposal and enforcement of NPLs. Among the highlights are the following:

Suing State-Owned Banks. Although the state-owned and state-controlled banks are generally exempt from litigation involving NPLs, the Minutes clarify that such state-owned banks may be sued for unjust enrichment in the following situations:

  • If a debtor knows or should have known that its NPLs have been transferred but nonetheless continues to service its debts to the state-owned banks that originated the loan, such debtor must repay its debts to the purchaser of the NPLs and then sue the state-owned banks to recover the amount owed.
  • If a debtor does not know that its NPLs have been transferred and services its debts to the state-owned banks that originated the loan, then the purchaser of the NPL cannot claim against the debtor but may instead sue the state-owned banks to recover the amount owed.

According to market practice, a standard clause in NPL transfer agreements is waiver by the purchaser of NPLs to sue the bank that originated the loans. Such clause is generally not negotiable and accepted by investors since there was legal uncertainty whether such lawsuits are even permitted. However, investors may wish to rethink their acceptance of this clause in light of the Minutes.

Revocation of NPL Transfer Agreement. The Minutes confirm that debtors are entitled to revoke any purported transfer of NPLs if it can be proved that either such NPLs do not exist or have been fully or partially discharged. In such an event, the purchaser of NPLs may claim against the AMCs for damages.

Whether Interest Can Be Claimed. Generally, in litigation between transferors and transferees of NPLs, the court will not uphold claims for interest accrued after the day of NPL transfer, except in circumstances in which the transfer of the NPLs is invalidated.

Choice of Forum. The Minutes confirm that choice of forum clauses negotiated between debtors and the AMCs are valid and will be enforced. This reduces a legal uncertainty that existed and should help to reduce litigation costs and uncertainties in debt recovery against local protectionism.

Change of Parties During Litigation or Enforcement. The Minutes emphasize that courts should replace the transferor with the transferee as the party to the litigation upon application by transferor or transferee. Although this requirement has appeared in previous interpretations by the Supreme Court, courts in practice continue to be inconsistent in its application.

Conclusion

The Chinese Supreme Court, through the issuance of the Minutes and the Explanations, has ventured into the legislative arena by introducing new measures, such as the right of first refusal to purchase NPLs, that are the function of other State organs. The Minutes emphasize protection of state-owned assets over contract law and other legal principles. Although the actual scope of the Minutes is circumscribed and the enumerated types of NPL cases that courts will not accept are limited, the practical effect has been a near cessation of new NPL cases being accepted. Even when such cases are accepted, courts are likely to give judgment based on policy concerns rather than the rule of law.

The Supreme Court acknowledges that the measures introduced in the Minutes are still a matter of debate among various ministries and State organs. Further circulars and rule-making at higher State levels may clarify the direction of the NPL market in China. Until that time, investors should proceed with caution when participating in the NPL market.

Footnotes

1. Promulgated by the Ministry of Finance and China Banking Regulatory Commission on July 11, 2008.

2. Adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on July 5, 1996, revised by the Standing Committee of the National People's on August 28, 2004.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions