China: 3 Takeaways From Michael Jordan's Chinese Supreme Court Trademark Victory For Companies Doing Business In China

Michael Jordan, arguably the greatest and most well-known professional basketball player of all time, spent much of his time on the court defying the laws of gravity, but his defying of the odds in his trademark battles in China may be even more surprising. Despite his fame and global notoriety, Jordan has been unsuccessfully battling the Chinese court system for years (and had lost all fights until recently) for the right to use his name, JORDAN, in Chinese characters in China. In fact, a Chinese sports company has been using the name JORDAN, in Chinese characters, for years and has successfully built up a multi-million dollar footwear empire in China.

Jordan and his team launched legal battles in 2012 and their resiliency finally paid off. Just last week, the Chinese Supreme Court handed down its decision, overturning Jordan's defeats at the lower courts, and handing Jordan a (partial) victory. And while the victory may not have been as dramatic as sinking the Utah Jazz with a jumper over Bryon Russell, Jordan's seemingly improbable victory in this case carries with it a number of valuable take-aways that any company should consider when expanding into China.

So... What Exactly Happened?

In short, for the past 15 years, Jordan, the six-time NBA champion, five-time NBA MVP, and fourteen-time All-Star, has not owned the rights to the name Jordan (in Chinese characters) in China. Why not? Because Qiaodan Sports (a Chinese sportswear company headquartered in southeastern China) was first to obtain a registered trademark for the name Jordan in Chinese characters as early as 2001. Qiao-Dan may look and sound alien to non-Chinese speakers, but it is relevant to this legal saga, because it is the Chinese transliteration for the English word: "Jordan." If you say "Qiao-Dan" to a Chinese native speaker, he or she recognizes that as referring to JORDAN in English. And Qiaodan Sports' registration in 2001 of Qiaodan was just the beginning. Over the next decade Qiaodan Sports would register 80 trademarks relating to all aspects of the "Air Jordan" brand, including logos, which Jordan and Nike created and built during the late 1980s and 1990s.

Here are the relevant timelines:

  • 1990s: Nike expanded the Air Jordan brand to China; only the English name JORDAN was registered. It did not register the Chinese characters or phonetics for JORDAN.
  • 2001 – 2003: Qiaodan Sports obtained trademark registrations for (JORDAN in Chinese characters) and.
  • 2002 – 2007: Qiaodan filed 8 more trademarks—some selective ones are outlined below. Nike either failed to oppose these marks or decided not to pursue appeals with the Chinese courts.
  • Pictures of Qiaodan Sports' Stores 2012 – 2013: At this point, Qiaodan Sports owned close to 80 registrations, all of which related to the real Jordan. Although most of these registrations were clearly copies, Qiaodan Sports had been consistently using these marks for over 10 years. In fact, during the decade, Qiaodan Sports was successful in building a sports apparel empire in China—owning more than 5,700 stores across China in 2015; its annual sales in the same year reached RMB 3 trillion, roughly $500 million U.S. dollars. Qiaodan Sports' trademark registrations had also slipped by the five-year invalidation period, during which it would have been a lot easier (and cheaper) for Jordan to challenge the trademark registrations.
  • 2012 – 2015: The real Jordan from the United States started actions to cancel Qiaodan Sports' trademarks in China; he lost. Jordan went on to initiate 78 appeals and lawsuits with China's Trademark Appeal Board, Beijing First Intermediate Courts, and Beijing High People's Court. Jordan lost all of them.
  • 2016: The Chinese Supreme People's Court (similar to the Supreme Court in the US) accepted Jordan's appeal. On December 8, the Court supported 3 out of 10 appeals filed by Jordan, and denied 7 out of 10. The Supreme Court ruled that Jordan enjoys personal name rights over the Chinese characters for QIAO-DAN (the 3 wins); however, the Supreme Court denied Jordan's rights in the corresponding Chinese phonetics for JORDAN (the 7 losses).

Picture of Qiaodan sports store

Why Did Nike and Jordan Lose (prior to 2016)?

To the average person with no knowledge of the Chinese IP system, this case may seem outrageous. How could a Chinese company essentially hijack the persona of the most famous basketball player on the planet and get away with it for over a decade? The answer lies, in part, with the trademark system in China. Unlike in the U.S., the Chinese trademark system is a first-to-file system. This means rights are based almost exclusively on registrations, except in some cases in which a senior party (i.e., the first to "use" the mark) can convince the courts that their marks should be recognized as "famous" (a very high threshold to establish in China). It does not matter if the senior party has been using the mark for a while; if a third party—including a disgruntled employee or a Chinese distributor—is successful in registering the mark in China first, then this third party has the right to use the mark and the senior party does not (or the senior party would have a very difficult time fighting expensive battles to get the rights back). And that is when the trouble often begins for the senior party. This third party can then (and most likely will) allege that the senior party is now an infringer (yes, an infringer of its own brand). The third party can even ask the local officials and policemen in China to shut down the senior party's production lines and seize the allegedly infringing products.

This begs a second question—how in the world was Jordan not recognized as "famous" in China by the Chinese courts? The answer—that a brand may be commercially well-known in China, does not mean it will be legally recognized by the courts as a well-known trademark in China. In fact, the question of whether a trademark has achieved "well-known" or "famous" status in China has been a sensitive topic for years, because it has been tremendously difficult for western brands to achieve such status. Making matters worse is the fact that unknown Chinese brands often receive such a coveted status in China. In addition, notoriety of a trademark around the world carries little to no weight before Chinese courts. Only fame inside China, among the relevant Chinese public, matters. And as discussed above, even that standard is nearly impossible for western companies to meet. For these reasons, it is a much safer (and cheaper) approach for international companies to file early and rely on prior trademark rights, rather than hoping to rely on a trademark achieving "well-known" or "famous" status.

Most western companies now understand the Chinese trademark system and are typically shrewd enough to register their English brands when entering the Chinese market. However, what's often forgotten, or deemed less important, are their Chinese brands. And that can lead to disaster. The Chinese market will create a name for the western brand over time, even though the name has not been authorized by the company. If a third party then obtains a trademark registration on this name, then, as discussed above, the western brand will be at risk of being perceived as an infringer of its own Chinese brand—in fact, New Balance learned this lesson the hard way.

Creating a Chinese name, however, is not as simple as putting the English name in Google Translation and picking out the characters. A Chinese brand can be created in any of the following ways: (1) Translation (such as "Apple"); (2) Transliteration (such as "Google"); (3) Concept (BMW's Chinese name literally means "treasure horse"); (4) Nickname (created by media/consumers: famous example, "Viagra" is known as "Great Brother" in Chinese); (5) Others (e.g., based on trademark record filed with the Chinese government; usually not great brand names).

In the Jordan vs. Qiaodan case, the Chinese name was created based on transliteration. While this Qiao-Dan name enjoys high popularity in China and is (almost exclusively) associated with the real Jordan, Nike/Jordan did not have senior trademark registrations over "QIAODAN" (the phonetics in English) and the "Qiao-Dan" Chinese characters. Because in China the first registration wins, Jordan lost simply because Qiaodan Sports registered his name first at the Chinese Trademark Office. Quite simply, while Jordan was one of the fastest on the basketball court, Qiaodan Sports was faster before the Chinese trademark office. Qiaodan Sports beat Nike and Jordan to it.

The Supreme Court Win on December 8, 2016

China's Supreme Court accepted Jordan's appeal, held a public hearing in April 2016, and publicly announced its decision on December 8, 2016. And as discussed above, Jordan scored a partial victory, seemingly against the odds based on the last decade of loss after loss, This is the final word from China's top court: Michael Jordan enjoys rights over JORDAN in Chinese characters; however, Michael Jordan does not enjoy senior rights over the phonetics for JORDAN.

It might be seen as a bizarre decision because JORDAN in Chinese characters is the same thing as its phonetics: Qiao Dan. Nevertheless, it is still a great win for Jordan and his team for the following reasons:

  • Characters are the more popular form of use than phonetics; among the two, Jordan won the more important one.
  • Qiaodan Sports' bad faith was recognized by the Chinese Supreme Court (it also owns trademark registration for the silhouette logo, famous jersey number "23," and the names of Jordan's two sons- both in English and Chinese characters!). This bad faith recognition should be helpful for Jordan to push for good decisions in his future challenges against Qiaodan Sports' trademark registrations among the lower courts.
  • Publicity—This is certainly a great (and must needed) boost of confidence for western brand owners; we have seen great brands lose significant trademark disputes in China in recent years including Apple's iPhone and New Balance.

However, this is by no means a slam-dunk win for Jordan. Qiaodan Sports still owns the majority of the registrations (including the jumpman silhouette) and it would still be difficult to cancel these registrations, in part, because the registrations are more than five years old. More importantly, Qiaodan Sports, a known infringer, has successfully built a footwear empire in China by trading on the goodwill associated (partially or entirely) with Jordan's brand power. Nevertheless, after a decade of unsuccessful legal battles, gaining the support of China's top court on some important trademarks could lead to more positive decisions for Jordan and his team relating to other trademark disputes in China. At the very least, through this win, Jordan and Nike have formally announced to Chinese consumers that the company "Jordan Sports" has no connection to either the real Jordan or Nike. The message will be heard loud and clear.

Three Takeaways from the Case

Infringers/trademark squatters like Qiaodan Sports are inevitable; but the lawsuit(s) are avoidable. Here are three important lessons to bear in mind before entering in the Chinese market or expanding a business already operating in China:

  1. First registration wins. The Chinese trademark system very rarely recognizes common law rights (i.e., prior use without registration). If you're using a mark in China but have not registered it, you should register immediately. As discussed above, the system is entirely different from that of the United States, and prior use is not a reasonable protection against infringement.
  2. Register your Chinese name(s). If you do not have a Chinese name, you should create one or monitor the market to see if one has begun to gain notoriety in the marketplace. Pay attention to multiple names, not just one; it is not uncommon for a western brand to have multiple Chinese names/brands in Asia. For example, a company could have three different names in Mainland China, and two additional and entirely separate names in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Register popular names for defensive purposes, but at the same time, educate the market and direct consumers to your company's primary (chosen) Chinese name.
  3. Remember the Five Year Rule. Even though the likelihood of success in trademark oppositions is still low in China, brand owners should still pursue oppositions where appropriate and / or even invalidation actions within the first five years of the registration of the infringing mark. China's Trademark Law has undergone three major revisions in 1993, 2001 and 2013; the new law is, relatively speaking, more helpful for brand owners to cancel infringing registrations.

Originally printed in SportTechie on December 15, 2016. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
23 Sep 2018, Seminar, Chicago, United States

Finnegan is a sponsor of the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, supporting the Women in IP Networking Brunch.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
HFG Law & Intellectual Property
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
HFG Law & Intellectual Property
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions