China: Judicial Views On Trademark Confusion In China

Last Updated: 30 April 2016
Article by Xiaoming Liu

In 2013, China revised its Trademark Law for the third time. The new Trademark Law provides in Article 57.2 that "use, without the permission of the trademark registrant, of a trademark that is similar to its registered trademark on identical goods, or use of a trademark that is identical or similar to its registered trademark on similar goods, where the same is likely to cause confusion" shall be infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark.

This is the first time for the concept "confusion" to be explicitly introduced into the law to determine trademark infringement since China enacted its Trademark Law in 1982. It is widely regarded that the introduction of this concept will significantly change the current law enforcement and judicial practices in trademark infringement cases.

In fact, before the concept "confusion" was formally introduced, it was already widely adopted as a main criteria to judge trademark infringement in judicial practices, particularly after the concept was introduced into a judicial interpretation document (Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law to the Trial of Trademark Civil Disputes Cases. Ref. No.: Judicial Interpretation No. 2002-32) in 2002 by the Supreme People's Court (SPC), as the concept "confusion" originates from the basic function of trademark, and the judicial adoption is actually in line with the internal logic of the need for trademark protection.

Here I would like to introduce several different types of "confusion" which have already been adopted in Chinese judicial practices, including source confusion, association confusion, reverse confusion, pre-sale confusion and after-sale confusion.

1. Source Confusion

Source confusion, also known as "direct confusion", refers to the situation where the consumers are confused about the source of goods or services at the time of purchase, due to the use of the infringing trademark misleading the purchase.

A case in point

Trademark infringement dispute between Shaanxi Xifeng Liquor factory and Shaanxu Xifeng Liquor Group Co., Ltd. (the plaintiffs) and Fenyang Beichuan Liquor Factory and Shanxi Xinghuatangrenfu Liquor Co., Ltd. (the defendants) (Ref. No.: Beijing Fengtai People's Court No. (2009) Feng Min Chu Zi 439)

The plaintiffs are the right holders of the trademark 西凤 (XIFENG in Chinese, meaning "west phoenix" literally) in class 33 in respect of the goods "liquor". The trademark had become very famous due to the plaintiffs' wide use and advertisement, enjoying the honor of "famous Chinese liquor" for many times, was recognized as "well-known mark" by Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) in 2005. The defendants used a trademark 两凤 (Liangfeng in Chinese, meaning "two phoenixes" literally) which is confusingly similar to the plaintiffs' trademark, in its produced liquor. The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit based on trademark infringement.

After hearing, the Court opined that 1) the goods are identical; 2) the two marks are similar to each other in respect of writing and pronunciation, and the actual use of the infringing mark is almost the same as the plaintiffs' registered mark; and 3) source confusion might be caused among consumers. Consequently, trademark infringement is confirmed.

2. Association confusion

Association confusion, also known as "indirect confusion" and "sponsorship confusion", refers to the situation where though the infringing trademark will not confuse the consumers about the source of goods, it will cause the consumers to mistakenly believe that the infringer has association with the right holder, including but not limited to joint operation, sponsorship or license.

A case in point

Trademark infringement dispute between Secom Co., Ltd. (the plaintiff) and Shenzhen Shiqiang Telecom Co., Ltd. (the defendant) (Ref. No.: Shenzhen Intermediary People's Court No. (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min San Chu Zi 424)

The plaintiff is the right holder of the trademark "SECOM" in class 9 in respect of the goods "detection sensor, magnetic sensor, etc." The defendant used the trademarks "SECOM" and "SECOM TELECOM" in its brochures, websites, employees' name card, etc., but the defendant did not use "SECOM" or "SECOM TELECOM" on its sold goods "sensors". Instead, it used the trademarks of the real manufacturers on the goods. Even so, the plaintiff opined that confusion might occur and filed lawsuit based on trademark infringement.

After hearing, the court ruled that 1) no confusion will be caused about the source of the goods, as the defendant labeled on the goods the manufacturers' trademarks rather than the plaintiff's trademarks; however, 2) the defendant's use of the plaintiff's trademarks in its brochures, websites, employees' name cards, etc. will cause the relevant public to mistakenly believe that the defendant has association with the plaintiff, such as joint operation, sponsorship or license. In this way, the defendant can profit from the plaintiff's goodwill. Consequently, trademark infringement is confirmed.

3. Reverse confusion

Reverse confusion refers to a situation where a later party adopts a mark identical with or similar to that of an earlier party and causes the consumers to mistakenly believe the goods of the earlier party originate from the later party or it has association with the later party, usually because the later party is much larger and more famous than the earlier party or the later party enhances the popularity of the mark by intensive and large-scale investment and promotion in a very short time.

A case in point

Trademark infringement dispute between Zhejiang Lanye Wines & Spirits Co., Ltd. (the plaintiff) and Shanghai Pepsi Cola Beverage Co., Ltd. (the defendant) (Ref. No.: Zhejiang High People's Court No. (2007) Zhen Min San Zhong Zi 74)

The plaintiff is the right holder of the mark 蓝色风暴 (BLUE STORM in Chinese) in class 32 in respect of the goods "cola, etc." The defendant widely used this mark on its goods of Pepsi cola and in its promotional activities. The plaintiff thought the defendant's large-scale use of the mark posed big obstruction to its continued use of the same mark, and filed a lawsuit based on trademark infringement and claimed reverse confusion.

The case experienced two instances. The court of first instance rejected the plaintiff's complaint for the reason that the defendant had no bad faith intention and that no confusion about the source of goods could be caused among consumers. The plaintiff appealed. After hearing, the second-instance court opined that 1) thanks to the defendant's large-scale promotional activities, the mark has become very distinctive and enjoy good reputation in the market; 2) under such situation, when the plaintiff continues to use its own mark, the consumers will mistakenly believe that the plaintiff's goods originate from or it has association with the defendant; and 3) as such, the relations between the plaintiff and its registered mark will be separated, and the plaintiff's mark will lose its basic function of distinguishing source of goods. Accordingly, the plaintiff will lose interests and its entrepreneurship to invest and further develop the goodwill of its mark. Consequently, trademark infringement is confirmed.

4. Pre-sale confusion

Pre-sale confusion, also known as "initial interest confusion", refers to the situation where confusion occurs among consumers when they firstly notice the infringer's use of a mark identical with or similar to that of another party, but the confusion disappears at the time of real purchase. As such, even if the consumers buy the infringer's goods at last, it is the consumers' real intention, rather than due to confusion about the source of goods.

A case in point

Trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute between Chengdu Xinjin Uncle Tom Shoe Artistry Co., Ltd. (the plaintiff) and Chongqing Fennisi Leather Care Co., Ltd. (the defendant) (Ref. No.: Chongqing First Intermediary People's Court No. (2012) Yu Yi Zhong Fa Min Chu Zi 430)

The plaintiff is the right holder of the mark 汤姆叔叔 (UNCLE TOM in Chinese) in class 37 in respect of the services "shoe repair, leather care, etc." The defendant used the plaintiff's mark as a keyword to promote its own business in the biggest Chinese search engine Baidu. When the netizens searched "shoe repair of Uncle Tom" in Baidu, the first search result is the description "shoe repair of Uncle Tom, chain of Pi-mei-er leather care" which is related to the defendant's webpage. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit based on trademark infringement and unfair competition.

After hearing, the court opined that 1) the promotion information, listed in the defendant's webpage which was directed by the first search result of "shoe repair of Uncle Tom" in Baidu, all belongs to the defendant but irrelevant to the plaintiff; 2) However, the defendant's act of using the plaintiff's mark as key word in search engine intercepted some potential consumers of the plaintiff, misled them to log onto the defendant's website, so as to increase the exposure rate of its own services and get more business opportunity; and 3) as the defendant and the plaintiff are competitors, the defendant's such act to seize more clients, bigger market share will help it attract the consumers' attention and business opportunity which should belong to the plaintiff due to the popularity of its mark. Consequently, trademark infringement is confirmed.

5. After-sale confusion

After-sale confusion refers to the situation where no confusion occurs at the time of purchase by the real buyers, but confusion arises among other people during the process of using the goods after sale. After-sale confusion mainly includes bystander confusion and status confusion.

A case in point

Trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute between the plaintiff (Louis Vuitton Malletier) and the defendants (Guangzhou Baoshiwei Leatherware Co., Ltd. and Li Bin) (Ref. No.: Guangdong Shenzhen Futian People's Court No. (2014) Shen Fu Fa Chu Zhi 1219)

The plaintiff is the right holder of the device mark below in class 18 in respect of the goods "cases, travelling bags, etc." The plaintiff has a very long history of using this mark which has grown strongly distinctive through long and extensive promotion and using in China. The consumers can easily associate this mark with the plaintiff. The defendant used on its suitcases a decoration very similar to the plaintiff's mark, including the color, sequence and combination of the damier. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit based on trademark infringement and unfair competition.


(The mark in question)

After hearing, the court ruled that as the defendant labeled its own mark in the infringing goods and its price is much lower than the plaintiff's real goods, no confusion might occur among the real buyers at the time of purchase. However, during the process of using such goods, other people, including the potential buyers, might be confused about the source of goods. Consequently, after-sale confusion exists and trademark infringement is confirmed.

From the cases above, we can see that though the concept "confusion" was only explicitly defined in the Chinese Trademark Law in 2013, it has long been adopted in Chinese judicial practices. Even the concepts "pre-sale confusion" and "after-sale confusion", which are seldom or very cautiously adopted in many developed countries, have been adopted in some judicial practices though only in very few cases. Therefore, the introduction of the concept "confusion" into the new Trademark Law will not suddenly and abruptly change the current judicial practices regarding the criteria or standard to judge trademark infringement.

However, the introduction of this concept from the previous judicial interpretation document in 2002 to the current Trademark Law in 2013 means a big step forward in trademark legal system. We have reason to believe that the concept of "confusion", including different types of confusions, will be adopted in more judicial practices and will have further development in the near future. The courts' reasoning might be useful in other relevant cases.

(This article was originally published in The Patent Lawyer Magazine March/April 2016)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Xiaoming Liu
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions