China: When Images Encounter Trademarks - A Discussion About Merchandising Right

Last Updated: 23 December 2015
Article by Fiona Cui

In recent years, disputes over famous images have been gradually increasing. Some people register celebrities or cartoon characters as trademarks, and copyright owners safeguard their legal right by virtue of the merchandising right. Thus, the merchandising right has gradually come into public's view and caused widespread concern. However, in existing legal provisions, the merchandising right has not been recognized yet and still falls within the doctrinal scope currently in China. Based on existing legal provisions, and in combination with relevant cases, this article attempts to conduct brief analysis of merchandising right.

Merchandising right originated in the U.S. from the right of privacy under the traditional right of personality. The term "right of publicity" was clearly coined by Judge Frank in the case of "Haelan" in 1953. Later, the U.S. Supreme Court also recognized the right of publicity in its cases. Hence, the right of publicity was separated from the right of privacy and became a new kind of intellectual property right.

The famous cartoon characters created by Walt Disney Company boosted the merchandising of images. Driven by the huge commercial interests of merchandising of images, some manufacturers made use of images without the permission of rights owners or even registered images as trademarks, resulting in lots of disputes. So far, the merchandising right has become a new intellectual property right dispute.

In China, when merchandising right is talked about, it is worth mentioning the image dispute case of "San Mao", which can be deemed as a classic case causing hot discussion about merchandising right. In that case, the plaintiff is the inheritor of the cartoonist who created the cartoon character "San Mao"; and the defendant is a corporate, who registered the character of "San Mao" as a trademark and widely used the same without the permission of the copyright owner. The plaintiff believed that the defendant's conduct infringed upon his copyright and therefore sued to a court. After hearing the case, the court held that: 1) The plaintiff, as the inheritor, enjoys the right of using the work and getting guerdon within the term of copyright protection; and 2) The defendant's conduct constituted an infringement of the property rights in a work. Thus, the court finally ruled that the defendant should stop using the cartoon character on their products and corporate image and bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

So what is merchandising right? Through the above discussion, we can learn that it is a right when we put famous images (including the images of real persons, fictional characters and human body images) as well as names of famous works into commercial use. If anyone merchandizes works' names or images that are already in use by their owners and enjoy substantial influences and such kind of conduct is enough to cause consumers' confusion and misidentification of the sources of goods, the goods/services are considered to be created by or associated with the copyright owner. Therefore, the owner is eligible to safeguard his legal rights in the name of merchandising right.

What if someone registers famous images as trademarks? If so, how should the rights owners safeguard their rights and eliminate the trademark registration?

Article 32 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the "Trademark Law") provides that, "the trademark application shall neither infringe upon another party's prior existing rights, nor be an improper means to register a trademark that is already in use by another party and enjoys substantial influence."As there is no specific provision about merchandising right in the law, can the copyright owner claim his prior rights according to the merchandising right?

According to Article 5 of the General Principles of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (herein after referred to as the "General Principles"), the lawful civil rights and interests of citizens and legal persons shall be protected by law; no organization or individual may infringe upon them. According to the General Principles and provisions of other laws, the merchandising right clearly belongs to those legitimate rights and interests which should be protected, though there is no special provision on merchandising right in China's Trademark Law. As a result, the prior rights stated in Article 32 of the Trademark Law should be interpreted broadly as including both statutory rights and other civil rights and interests that are protected by law.

Meanwhile, Article 17 of the Provisions on Several Issues concerning the Trial of Administrative Cases Involving the Granting and Determination of Trademark Rights (Draft for Comments) issued by the Supreme People's Court in 2014 stipulates that: Where a party claims that the trademark in dispute infringes upon the copyright of its role image and thus violates the provisions in Article 32 of the Trademark Law, the people's court shall examine whether such role image constitutes a work in the sense of copyright law. Where the name of the work or the name of a role in the work does not constitute a work but is of high awareness, and the use of such name as trademark on related categories of goods can easily mislead relevant public into believing that it has been approved by the work's original right-owner or has other specific relations therewith, the people's court shall support the party to accordingly claim its prior rights and interests as provided by Article 32 of the Trademark Law. It is thus clear that the merchandising right is expected to be officially confirmed in the judicial level.

Therefore, there will be no obstacles, in both legal theories and laws, for the copyright owner's opposing or applying for annulment of the trademark in dispute by claiming his prior merchandising right, in accordance with the first half provision of Article 32 of the Trademark Law.

In author's opinion, the application of merchandising right shall meet the following elements:

1. the publication date of prior images or works is earlier than the registration date of the trademark in dispute;
2. the prior images or works enjoy certain popularity in the relevant public in China before the application date of trademark registration;
3. the trademark in dispute has certain relations with designated goods or works (but the relevance should not be too exorbitant);
4. the registration and use of the trademark in dispute will easily lead to confusion of relevant public, thereby causing potential damage to the interests of the copyright owner.

In practice, the right owners' claim of their prior rights on trademarks in dispute according to the merchandising right has been supported by the court successively. Let us further learn it through the following two cases.

Case I: The Beetles case

Mr Lian and Mr Chen applied to the China Trademark Office for the registration of the opposed trademark " " (No.4375006) on November 22, 2004, which was specified to be used on the commodities of category 18 such as "wallet". However, Apple claimed that "THE BEATLES" is the name of the famous British band, with its music and audiovisual products very popular and prestigious in many countries and regions including China. The band members authorized Apple to develop and register a series of "BEATLES" trademarks. However, the opposed trademark contains the name of "BEATLES", and the registration and use of the trademark infringe upon Apple's prior rights to "BEATLES", which will easily mislead the public and result in adverse effects.

After trial, the court believed that: The judicial protection of intellectual property rights should be focused on the property and market resource attribute of the intellectual property rights. The commercial value and business opportunities brought by the popularity of the band name come from the wisdom input in the band music creation and advertising for a long period of time, and deserve respect. Anyone's use of the famous band name as a trademark without authorization not only damages the right owner's business opportunities and commercial value but also violates the principle of good faith, and shall thus be prohibited by law. Therefore, if the merchandising right attached to the name of the famous band is not protected just because it does not belong to the category of current statutory rights, it apparently conflicts with the original legislative intention. In this case, as the use of the opposed trademark will easily lead to the relevant public's confusion or misidentification, it is ruled that the opposition review decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (hereinafter referred to as the "TRAB" is revoked, and the TRAB should render a new decision then.

Case II: Case of Bond 007

Mr Xie applied for the registration of the opposed trademark " " (No.3121466), which was specified to be used on the commodities of category 10 such as "condom". However, Jordan company claimed that "007" and "JAMES BOND" are respectively the code name and real name of the leading role of its movie series, which are of originality and high popularity. Therefore, Jordan company enjoys the copyright, trademark right and merchandising right thereof. The opposed trademark has infringed upon its prior right, and shall not be approved for registration.

After trial, the court believed that: It can be confirmed based on evidence submitted by Jordan company that "007" and "JAMES BOND", as the role names of its move series, have enjoyed high popularity and been well-known by the relevant public prior to the registration of the opposed trademark; and the commercial value and business opportunities brought by the role names are something gained through Jordan company's investment of mass labor and capital. For this reason, the prior renowned role names in movies shall be protected as prior rights. In the end, it is ruled that the TRAB's opposition review decision is revoked, and the TRAB should render a new decision then.

It can be seen from the above discussion and cases that famous images are something created through tremendous investment of labor and capital and something containing huge commercial value and economic benefits, and should thus be protected. Others' registering them as trademarks for use will easily lead to consumer's confusion or misidentification. It should be regarded as the improper use of others' popularity, and shall be prohibited as it violates the principle of good faith and damages the fair competition order.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Unitalen Attorneys at Law
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Unitalen Attorneys at Law
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions