China: Why There Is No Case Law In China

Last Updated: 5 August 2015
Article by Edward J. Epstein

As we begin to drown in the morass of statutes and administrative regulations that have spewed forth from China's law making bureaucracies in the last 30 years, expectations of China's legal system have increased to the extent that multinationals are now asking "how is this regulation interpreted?" or "is there a precedent?" These are perfectly reasonable questions for business people looking for certainty in the law, but sadly the answers are rarely comforting.

The overarching reason for this uncertain state of affairs is political: the interpretation of laws and regulations is generally reserved to the bureaucracies that made them and others who are responsible for enforcing them. The courts thus have little say in the matter. We could end our discussion here, but the legal position is obviously more nuanced and worthy of further investigation.

A Rule of Law without Judicial Interpretation?

A large part of the daily work of the courts in developed liberal democracies is to interpret and apply legislation. Even in common law countries where case law represents a huge body of law in itself, most appellate court work is about statutory interpretation. In contrast, socialist China has clung to the principle that the legal bureaucracy that makes law shall say how to interpret it. This principle applies to laws, regulations and rules made at national and local levels by legislatures, ministries, commissions, local government and their various branches. It does not leave much room for judicial interpretation, which is reserved solely to China's highest court: the Supreme People's Court.

In addition to hearing cases, the Supreme Court makes statutory interpretations in four different situations:

  • Interpretations of key national laws that may run into hundreds of articles, some of which are issued under the influence of scholars and their doctrine and may be expressed as abstractly as the laws themselves
  • Model rules and opinions
  • Specific decisions to amend or repeal previous interpretations.
  • Replies to requests from the provincial-level high courts

All of the above interpretations have normative effect, but only interpretations of national laws are widely disseminated. "Replies to requests" are in effect pre-determinations of a case being heard in a provincial level high court. In practice, intermediate courts make such requests to high courts too, but the replies are not binding.

Unless the Supreme Court has already issued an interpretation on how to apply a particular provision of law, the lower courts are at sea along with the lawyers arguing cases and their clients. Of course, with thousands of laws and regulations to interpret, this is a herculean task.

Cases Have No Precedential Effect

Although the Supreme Court does hear appeals from high courts and review other cases, even its decisions have no precedential effect in China. Unlike the Anglo-American common law, judicial decisions are neither binding nor persuasive in the lower courts in China. This is technically true in all civil law countries, but most have developed principles and procedures to entrench or at least enhance the precedential effect of decided cases. The problem is particularly pronounced in China because of the heavy hand of bureaucracy. References to judicial precedents cited in support of submissions to court are routinely dismissed by opposing counsel because "China has no system of judicial precedent" or otherwise ignored by the court.

However, there has been a trend among the Chinese courts to use higher court decisions as guidelines if not precedents. Cases have been gazetted by the Supreme Court for many years and the trend has become clearer since it issued Stipulations on Guiding Cases in 2010. Guiding Cases are selected by the Supreme Court on the basis of their public impact and usefulness in serving as guidelines for deciding other cases because they are similar or the law is abstract or the case is complex. 

Although Guiding Cases are not strictly binding on the courts, they are required to "refer to" them when deciding similar cases and follow their key points, which must be included in the reasoning given in the lower court's decision, but not as the basis of the judgment. Ironically, since lower courts may refer their own court decisions to the Supreme Court that may decide they qualify as Guiding Cases, it is also possible that higher courts may be required to refer to Guiding Cases from lower courts when adjudicating similar cases. In five years, however, the Supreme Court has published only 52 Guiding Cases, which means that their effect is very limited.

Bureaucracy's Invisible Hand

Without precedent, the courts are strongly influenced by the interpretations of different bureaucracies, and frequently by different parts of the same bureaucracy. The Labor Contract Law is a case in point. Enacted in 2008 to enhance job security, the Labor Contract Law provides that an employee is entitled to a non-fixed term contract (that is, permanent employment) after two fixed-term contracts of any length. In Beijing this has been interpreted to mean that if an employer signs a second fixed-term contract, the employee will become permanent and cannot be terminated if he requests a non-fixed term contract when the second fixed-term contract expires. This bizarre result has not been followed in Shanghai, where the employer is allowed to terminate an employee at the end of the second fixed-term contract.

The reason for the different approaches arises from the compulsory labor contract arbitration process that occurs before such cases get to court. Labor contract arbitration is conducted under the auspices of the labor department and is effectively an administrative not quasi-judicial process.

Even in apparently "civil" or "commercial" cases the hand of bureaucracy may not be far from door of the courts. In contract disputes the quality of goods and services will often be determined not by standards agreed by the parties, but by state standards promulgated and enforced by the quality bureaucracies established for this purpose. Industry standards, let alone the parties' previous course of dealings, will be irrelevant if there is an applicable state standard. A government testing center determines what this is without itself ever having the experience of manufacturing a single product. 

It is inevitable that concepts such as "good workmanship" and "merchantability" are meaningless in a legal environment that has no case law to codify them. For all the beauty and precision in their drafting, it is unimaginable that the English Sales of Goods Act (now almost 120 years old) and the UCC could have been so successful without case law. The success of Chinese codifications will equally depend not on doctrine, but on the certainty and predictability of their application by an independent judiciary which interprets them consistently, publicly and, above all, authoritatively. 

The Hierarchy of China's Ordinary Courts

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Edward J. Epstein
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions