China: The First Application Of An Earlier Design In Non-Infringement Defense Jiankai LI v. Zengfeng HUANG (Article No. 27 From "China Patent Case Review 2015" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)


Jiankai LI v. Zengfeng HUANG - The First Application of an Earlier Designin Non-infringementDefense(Civil Judgment (2012) Yue Gao Fa Min San Zhong Zi No. 298 by the Guangdong High People's Court on November 26,2012]

Prior design defense is a very important non-infringement defense system in design patent infringement lawsuits, which allows the People's Court to determine whether an infringement is established simply by determine whether the accused design constitutes similar to the prior design without evaluation of validity of the design patent.1 This case shows that although a design patent application was submitted before the filing date of the involved patent and published thereafter the filling date (hereinafter referred to as the "earlier design") does not constitute as prior design. It can be used, however, as the basis for a non-infringement defense by referring to the prior design defense rules, thereby substantially expanding the applicable scope of prior design defense.

Jiankai LIhas a design patent No. ZL200930081693.1, titled "Stand" (as shown in Figure 1), with the filing date of July 3, 2009 and the issued date of May 12, 2010. On September 19, 2011, Jiankai LI filed a lawsuit to the Jiangmen Intermediate People's Court and alleged that Zefeng HUANG manufactured and sold stand product (as shown in Figure 2) infringing his design patent. Zefeng HUANG argued that the accused product belongs to the prior design and provided an earlier design (as shown in Figure 3) as evidence. The evidence is the design patent No. ZL200830187853.6, titled "Folded Round Table" with the filing date of December 5, 2008 and the publication date of January 27, 2010.

The first instance court, after hearing, ruled that the infringement is established and that the prior design defense does not stand.

Zefeng HUANG unsatisfied with the first instance's judgment and appealed to the Guangdong High People's Court, arguing that the accused product belongs to the prior design and does not constitute infringement of the patent concerned.

The second instance court, after hearing, held that the accused product is a stand and the earlier design relates to a folded roundtable. By comparing the accused product with the parts in the earlier design corresponding to the accused product, it can be seen that both are stand consisting of round steel tubes, and are formed by connecting two groups of H-shape brackets, one of which is long and the other is short. In the opening state, it appears as X shape. The shorter H-shape bracket is rotatably connected to a U-shape bracket. The design of the accused stand and the earlier design do not have substantial difference and can be considered as the same design. Hence, the accused product uses the design of the earlier design and does not infringe the patent right of Kaijian LI. Hence, the non-infringement defense should be supported. Therefore, the first instance's judgment is reversed and Kaijina LI's claims Kaijian LI are rejected.


The Chinese Patent Law (2009) stipulates in Article 62 that, in patent infringement dispute, where the accused infringer has evidence to prove the art or design which he implemented belongs to the prior art or prior design, there is no patent infringement. For design patent infringement, this system is called "prior design defense."2 The theory of the prior design defense is that, protection for a patent right should not cover any design falling into the scope of public field, otherwise it will harm the public interest. Since China's patent invalidation proceeding and patent infringement lawsuit are separately managed by the Patent Reexamination Board of the SIPO and the People's Courts, respectively. Therefore, when the patentee initiates infringement lawsuit in the People's Court, the accused infringer usually submits to the Patent Reexamination Board an invalidation request for the involved patent. In this case, if the People's Court suspends the case and waits for the final conclusion of the validity of the patent right, it will greatly prolong the litigation procedure, resulting in delayed and pending lawsuits. Prior design defense system is designed to allow the People's Court to determine whether the accused design belongs to the prior design so as to determine whether non-infringement defense stands. Since this system does not involve the validity of the patent right, it can reduce the length and delays of litigation to a large extent. In recent judicial practice, the prior design defense system duly plays its role.

It is noteworthy that, although according to Article 62 of the Chinese Patent Law (2009), the prior design refers only to designs known to the domestic public or abroad before the filing date of the involved patent, the Supreme People's Court has issued a judicial policy document clearly stating that, where the accused infringer alleges to implement a design recited in a conflicting application (referred to as the "earlier design" hereinafter) and thus does not constitute patent infringement.3 Such allegation can be judged with reference to the examination standard of the prior design defense. However, the conflicting application in the judicial policy document is not the same as the conflicting application defined in Guidelines for Patent Examination.4 The judicial policy document only requires the conflicting application to be associated with the involved patent in terms of time, that is, the conflicting application filed before the filing date of the involved patent and published after the filing date; while the Guidelines for Patent Examination requires that the conflicting application is not only associated with the involved patent in terms of time, but also associated with the involved patent in terms of the content, i.e., the design in the conflicting application and the design in the involved patent should be the same design.5 In addition, the conflicting application defense mentioned in the judicial policy requires comparing the accused design with the design in the conflicting application, while the Guidelines for Patent Examination requires comparing the design in the conflicting application with the involved patent. Hence, it is more appropriate and accurate to refer to the conflicting application in the judicial policy as "earlier application." The judicial policy essentially expands the prior design defense rules to cases where the accused infringer implements the design in an earlier application. The present case is the very first case in which an earlier application is used as non-infringement defense in a manner similar to the existing design defense and has milestone meaning.

The following points should be noted in applying prior design defense with an earlier application:

  • First, the accused design should belong to identical or similar design to the earlier application, which is the basis for determination of identicalness or similarity.
  • Second, the accused design should be compared with the design in the earlier application alone, and cannot be compared with the combination of a plurality of designs or the combination of a prior design and a common design.
  • Third, if the accused design is a part of the design of the earlier application, it only needs to compare the part in the earlier application corresponding to the accused design.
  • Fourth, under the Chinese Patent Law, the criteria of determining whether a conflict application can be found is to determine whether two designs are the same or substantially the same. But in the trial practice, the criteria of determining whether the earlier application defense stands is to determine whether the accused design and the design in the earlier application are the same design or have no substantial difference,6 that is, to be identical or similar.

However, whether an earlier application can be used as basis for non-infringement defense remains controversial. From the point of the law, the Chinese Patent Law clearly stipulates the prior design defense rules, the scope of the prior design, and the use of an earlier application as defense lacks a legal basis. From the purpose of the introduction of this defense system, the defense system mainly aims at solving the problem of prolonged infringement dispute resulted from separate jurisdictions over patent rights and patent infringement disputes, while not empowering the People's Court to adjudicate the validity of patents. Thus, the grounds for defenses should be strictly limited. For example, grounds such as lack of support from the description, insufficient disclosure, and lack of inventiveness cannot be used as arguments for non-infringing defense. From the point of judgment standards, the earlier application defense and prior design defense are identical, and no new standards will be introduced. Thus, the introduction of the earlier application defense has been accepted by the Courts, more and more cases are expected to adopt earlier application defense in the future.


[1] In China, patent is divided into invention, utility model and design. Accordingly, prior art defense is applicable in invention patent and utility model patent infringement lawsuits, prior design defense is applicable in design patent infringement lawsuits.

[2] For ease of discussion, the following discussions only refers to "prior design defense", but are equally applicable to "prior art defense".

[3] "Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues concerning Maximizing the Role of Intellectual Property Right Trials in Boosting the Great Development and Great Prosperity of Socialist Culture and Promoting the Independent and Coordinated Development of Economy", issued on December 16, 2011.

[4] Determining whether the comparative design constitutes a conflicting application for the patent concerned shall be made in accordance with all the contents of the published comparative design. When comparing the comparative design with the design of the product claimed by the patent concerned, whether the comparative design includes a design identical or substantially identical with the patent concerned shall be decided.

[5] A design for which the patent right is granted is not an prior design, and no application is filed by any unit or individual for any identical design with the patent administration department under the State Council before the date of application for patent right and no identical design is recorded in the patent documentations announced after the date of application.

[6] "Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent" stipulates in Rule 14 that if the accused design and the prior design are the same design or of no substantial difference, the People's Court shall determine that the design implemented by the accused infringer belongs to an prior design patent stipulated by Article 62 of the Chinese Patent Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
Wan Hui Da - Peksung IP Group
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
Wan Hui Da - Peksung IP Group
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions