Having a system for voluntary disclosure of customs
non-compliance that rewards those who use them by providing reduced
penalties is part of many western customs processes.
Last year the General Administration of Customs (GAC) of the
People's Republic of China established a research team to study
the feasibility of introducing a customs voluntary disclosure
programme, and the current pilot is one trial resulting from this
Since July this year, the GAC has progressively been
implementing a pilot "Enterprise Self-discipline"
programme at selected regional/port customs offices. The
programme is a direct result of the study and is similar to the
voluntary disclosure programmes available in various other
developed countries. It provides for more lenient treatment by
customs for voluntarily reported non-compliance activities.
Currently this programme is available at customs offices in
Tianjin, Wuhan, Nanjing, Suzhou, Xiamen, and Shanghai Pilot
What You Can Do to Benefit from this Opportunity
You can take the following steps in order to benefit:
Conduct your own internal compliance review to identify any
non-compliance trade issues.
Investigate the reasons for the non-compliance and estimate the
value of the potential exposure.
Compile documentation to support your case and submit a
voluntarily report of the non-compliance to customs via a
Customs will verify your self-audit report and may decide to
randomly select items to test the accuracy of your voluntary
Scope of Voluntary Disclosure
The scope of your voluntary disclosure should include:
Any customs non-compliance issues in daily import/export
Any customs non-compliance issues, during the process of a
customs audit, beyond the listed scope of the audit
Some customs offices have listed certain out-of-scope scenarios,
such as in the case where a Customs Price Enquiry Letter has been
Lenient treatment may include:
Lenient, mitigated or no administrative penalties;
Reduced or exempted late-payment surcharge for duty/VAT
Flexible treatment when considering possible downgrading of an
entities customs compliance rating;
Exemption of formal customs audit this/next year.
We suggest you take this opportunity to:
Identify your key customs risk areas, such as tariff
classification, valuation, origin, processing trade, bonded
storage, duty exempted equipment, etc.;
Conduct the self-review, quantify exposures and assess the
level of intent;
Formulate a strategy of immediate mitigation actions, voluntary
disclosure, and further correction plans.
Although some customs offices announced that the current pilot
programme is only valid till end of this year, we believe that this
pilot will lead to changes in legislation that will formalise the
programme. It has also been proposed within customs to add
voluntary disclosure when revising the Regulation on Customs Audit.
We expect that a formal regulation on voluntary disclosure will be
put on the GAC agenda sooner rather than later.
Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization
comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer
Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a
limited liability partnership established in the United States;
Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership
incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong
partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil &
Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer
Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown
logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their
This article provides information and comments on legal
issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a
comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not
intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific
legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters
discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Amendment of Rule 76 of the SEZ Rules, 1976 on January 3, 2017 to allow Law and Accountancy Firms to set up shops in SEZs, though short in content, is arguably big on implications for domestic and foreign Law Firms.
Despite the US government's actions, neither the UNSC nor Australia has altered its sanctions regime in relation to Iran.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).