China: Protection Of Well-Known Trademarks

In recent years, more and more trademark owners are confronted with the need to seek protection through well-known trademark status to safeguard their trademark rights in China. The phenomenon not only results from the benefits of broader protection granted to a recognized well-known trademark, but also from the deficiency of remedies provided for trademark protection under the present legal system.

The current Chinese Trademark Law and the related Implementation Regulations are based on the 2001 amendment (the second amendment of the Trademark Law). In this amendment, the legal term of well-known trademark was clearly adopted by the trademark law for the first time, with general protection and recognition principles. Although it is an important progress in the trademark legislation, the amended trademark law at the same time deleted another article, which provided that a trademark registration that was acquired by any other unfair means shall be cancelled. This article, without any specific condition regarding the type of unfair means, had been widely and effectively used by trademark owners to protect their trademark rights in China, especially in respect of dissimilar goods and services. However, with the deletion of this article, in order to obtain protection for a mark on dissimilar goods/services, trademark owners have no other choice but to get their marks recognized as well known. At the same time, the trademark authorities have been adopting extremely strict requirements regarding evidence for well-known status. The burden of proof for trademark owners is substantially increased, while the corresponding examination procedures become complex as well.

Since the amendment of the trademark law in 2001, about 1000 trademarks have been recognized as well-known trademarks by competent authorities, including the China Trademark Office (CTO), Trademark Review & Adjudication Board (TRAB), Administration for Industry & Commerce (AIC) and courts of different levels. The following laws, regulations and legal interpretations constitute the essential legal system of protection of well-known trademarks in China: Trademark Law and its Implementation Regulations; Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court of Several Issues Regarding Application of Laws in Trial of Civil Disputes Involving Computer Network Domain Names; Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court of Several Issues Regarding Application of Laws in Trial of Trademark Civil Disputes. On 11th November 2008, the Supreme Court published the Draft of the Interpretation of Several Issues Regarding Application of Laws in Recognition and Protection of Well-known Trademarks in Trademark-Related Civil Disputes (the Draft), for suggestions and discussions. The existing legal provisions and the Draft represent an effort to make more consist of opinions of different authorities in relation to several primary issues on the recognition and protection of well-known trademarks in China.

General Principles of Recognition of Well-known Trademarks

Passive Recognition: The principle of passive recognition means that trademark authorities and courts can only recognize well-known trademarks upon a definitive claim for such recognition made by an interested party in a trademark dispute case. Otherwise, they should not take the initiative to recognize a well-known trademark.

Case-by-case effectiveness: The status of a well-known trademark as recognized in one case is effective on this case only and will not have a decisive effect on other cases. However, this principle does not conflict with the fact that the record of a mark being protected as well-known trademark in one case can be a strong reference in other cases.

Recognition when necessary only: In the trial of cases and upon the claim of the interested party, trademark authorities and courts could proceed to recognize the well-known status of a trademark only in case that the party's interests cannot be protected through other legal remedies. In practice, recognition of well-known trademarks is mainly necessary in the cases where the interested party claims for protection (1)against other application/registration on dissimilar goods/service, (2) against other application/registration on similar goods/service as covered by an unregistered well-known trademark, (3) for stopping certain infringement actions, and (4) against a domain name or a trade name that is conflicting with the interested party's well-known trademark. For example, in 2005, DELL, INC., famous in the computer industry, sued DELL ENGLISH SCHOOL, for the use of "DELL" and "Dai Er (DELL in Chinese characters)" for education services, and requested the court to recognize its trademarks as well-known marks. Upon examination, the Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court found that DELL, INC. had already registered its mark "DELL" on education services, and that the exclusive rights derived from this trademark registration could already prevent DELL ENGLISH SCHOOL from using the sign "DELL" for education services. Under such circumstances, the court reasons that it need not recognize whether the trademark "DELL" is well known and thus did not examine the relevant facts and evidence.

Evidence Requirements for Recognition of Well-known Trademarks

According to the current legal provisions, a well-known trademark is defined as a trademark that is widely known to the relevant public and enjoys a high reputation in China. In general, Article 14 of the Chinese Trademark Law stipulates that the following factors (evidence in support) shall be considered to determine whether a trademark is well known: the degree of knowledge of the relevant public; the duration of use; the duration of time, the degree and geographical range of any publicity of the mark; any record of the mark being protected as a well-known mark. The recently published Draft by the Supreme Court also specifies some other specific factors such as sales volume, profits and taxes, market share, geographical range for sales of the products bearing the mark; market survey reports, market value report issued by professional assessment agencies, documentation provided by industry association.

As far as foreign trademark owners are concerned, a usual situation is that it is often much easier to collect evidence in foreign countries than in China. But from the judgments we received from the CTO and the TRAB, examiners still insist that evidence in China would mostly affect their determination on a mark's well-known status in China. For instance, McLaren International Limited raised a dispute against the registration of the trademark "maclaren" based on its renowned but unregistered trademark "McLaren". In its decision, the TRAB states that the evidence as provided by McLaren International Limited is mainly established in foreign countries, which cannot prove that its mark "McLaren" had been used and obtained certain fame in China before the application date of the disputed mark, neither can it prove that the mark is well known in China. Accordingly, McLaren cannot enjoy broader protection as a well-known trademark, and the disputed registration is maintained. However, there is also some good news for foreign trademark owners. In the recently published Draft of the Supreme Court, it seems that more flexible criteria might be used in this regard. In one provision, it is stated that, pursuant to the situation of specific case and when necessary, the judge can consider the well-known status of the mark outside China to some extent. It will be interesting to see how future cases will apply this new opinion.

Point in Time of Effective Evidence in Recognition of Well-known Trademark

Based on the principle of recognition only when necessary, the recognition of a well-known trademark has to be indispensable to protect the trademark owner's rights in an individual dispute case. On the other hand, whether a mark can be recognized as well known essentially depends on the specific situation of each case as well, including the point in time of its well-known status. In principle, the point of time should be on or before the occurrence of the disputed fact, which means the mark should have already become well known by the occurrence of the disputed fact. As far as the registration of trademark is concerned, this point in time is the application date of the disputed trademark; regarding the dispute cases in relation to trademark infringement or unfair competition, it is the occurrence date of disputed infringing actions, or the registration date of the disputed domain name / trade name with the related authorities. Generally, the evidence formed during the three years prior to the point of time is required to establish the mark's well-known status.

In the lawsuit between DELL, INC. and DELL ENGLISH SCHOOL, the judgment states that the other trademark "Dai Er (DELL in Chinese characters)" as cited by DELL, INC. had not become well known before the trade name registration date by DELL ENGLISH SCHOOL on 23 November 2000. Therefore, the use of the trade name by DELL ENGLISH SCHOOL does not infringe the exclusive trademark rights of DELL, INC. and the court need not recognize whether the trademark is well known after 23 November 2000. So in this case, if DELL, INC. wants to challenge the trade name of DELL ENGLISH SCHOOL, the useful time period for evidence to prove DELL, INC.'s well-known status should be 1997-2000.

Extent of Protection of Well-known Trademark

Protection of a well-known trademark is broader, than regular marks, but still has certain limitations. Concerning a non-registered well-known trademark, the granted protection is limited to identical or similar goods/services. In practice, however, we rarely see successful cases of this sort. Also, considering the Intellectual Property Right environment in China, very few trademark owners will take the risk to firstly use a mark without having it registered or at least, applied for registration. When such situation does occur, it is often the case that another entity, almost always a pirate, has registered the trademark earlier. The pirate will most likely try to negotiate with the real owner for sale of the well-known mark. In other words, neither the real owner nor the pirate will allow such loophole that a well-known mark is left "unregistered".

With regard to a well-known trademark that has been registered, according to Article 13 of the Chinese Trademark Law, it will be protected on dissimilar goods/services on condition that the disputed mark would mislead the public and damage the interests of the owner of the well-known mark. In other words, if the registration/use of the disputed mark would not mislead the public, it should not be decided as infringing upon the exclusive rights of the well-known mark. The criteria are applied by the TRAB in the dispute involving the mark "XI LI in Chinese," which is identical to the mark "HEINEKEN in Chinese characters," but registered and designated on "spectacles". The TRAB decides that the disputed mark is used on "spectacles" in Class 9 while the cited mark of HEINEKEN BROUWERIJEN B.V. is used on "beer" in Class 32. The goods of the two marks belong to different industries without any necessary connection. Although the cited mark of HEINEKEN BROUWERIJEN B.V. enjoys high reputation in respect of beer, their designated goods are different enough and there is no sufficient evidence showing that the registration of the disputed mark on "spectacles" will mislead the public or damage the benefits of HEINEKEN BROUWERIJEN B.V. and consumers. Therefore, the disputed mark remains valid.

The above principles have been widely accepted by different trademark authorities theoretically, and have been applied to different kinds of cases involving well-known trademarks. However, the present situation of recognition and protection of well-known trademarks is still controversial, and is criticized particularly by trademark owners.

One of the most important factors is that recognition as a well-known trademark is almost always the only effective approach to protect a trademark on dissimilar goods/services under the present legal system. This fact pushes trademark owners to claim for well-known trademarks in every case where they encounter infringement or registration in bad faith on dissimilar goods/services. Since the second amendment of the trademark law in 2001, trademark authorities have accepted about 40000 cases where a claim for recognition of well-known trademark was made. This has put tremendous burdens on trademark owners, as well as the relevant authorities. One the one hand, due to the strict requirements of well-known trademark protection system, trademark owners have substantial burdens of proof, especially regarding evidence. On the other hand, with more documents complex examination proceedings, the relevant trademark authorities are taking longer and longer in deciding cases. Furthermore, local AICs and courts of different levels may and often do have different interpretations regarding the criteria for recognizing well-known trademarks. Therefore, selecting the right case and the right jurisdiction and gathering the necessary evidence are vital to a trademark owner's effort in seeking the well-known recognition.

Among the 1000 or so trademarks that have been recognized as well known, less than 100 are foreign marks. Many people think it presents a discrepancy to the quantity of domestic/foreign trademarks that are known to the public in fact, as well as to their actual well-known status. The situation makes trademark owners, especially those of foreign famous brands, face higher risks of unfair competition and dilution of distinctiveness of trademarks. Some trademark owners had been obliged to register their mark in all 45 classes on their own, despite the high registration and maintenance costs. Others, having not registered the mark in time, have to pay sometimes considerable amount of money to get back their own mark, which had been registered by a third party.

The current trademark system with regard to protection through well-known trademark recognition is complex and often quite demanding to trademark owners. While some trademark owners have found effective strategies of working with the system, others are struggling to safeguard their rights. Many people are looking to the proposed third amendment to the Chinese Trademark Law, which is under discussion at present, for more effective provisions in relation to well-known trademarks, as well as other remedies against actions in bad-faith.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions