China: Recent Developments in Chinese Patent Law

Last Updated: 6 July 2012
Article by Yan Zhao

In recent years, many patent practitioners have experienced difficulty in amending Chinese patent applications, either voluntarily or in response to action taken by the Chinese Patent Office. One reason for this is that proposed amendments may be rejected by Chinese examiners under Article 33 of the Chinese Patent Law on the basis that such amendments are "beyond the original disclosures" made in the application.

Such rejections can be frustrating, especially since an examiner's reasoning is very often merely a statement that "the amended technical solution is not recited in the original description and claims, nor can it be directly and unambiguously derived from the information contained therein" or that "an ordinary person skilled in the art cannot predict that all of the technical solutions covered by the amended claim will achieve the same technical effect as that of the exemplified one."

This issue has been considered in some recent decisions of the Chinese Supreme People's Court (SPC), which may have a significant impact on this aspect of patent prosecution in China.


Article 33 of the Chinese Patent Law states that "an applicant may amend his patent application documents, provided that the amendment to the invention or utility model patent application documents does not exceed the scope specified in the original written descriptions and claims, or that the amendment to the design patent application documents does not exceed the scope shown in the original drawings or pictures."

Rule 51 of the Implementation Regulations of the Chinese Patent Law further states that an applicant has two opportunities to make voluntary amendments to a Chinese patent application before the application enters into substantial examination. Amendments made during the examination stage are restricted to those required by the examiner's opinions.

The Chinese Patent Examination Guidelines state that the scope of original disclosure in a patent application shall include those that:

  • Are recited in the original specification and claims
  • Can be directly and unambiguously derived from the information contained in the original specification, claims and drawings.

In practice, it appears that the examiners usually require a literal recitation of the amendments in the original disclosure and may impose an Article 33 rejection if this is not the case.

As such, it has become extremely difficult to expand the scope of patents by amending claims after filing. Many examiners hold the view that such amendments automatically justify an Article 33 rejection.


In re Simcere Pharmaceutical Group (Zhixingzi 17/2010)

This case concerned a Chinese patent which originally claimed a ratio of ingredients in the range of 1 : 10-50. This was amended during prosecution to 1 : 10-30 and then again, in response to an invalidation claim, to a specific ratio of 1 : 30. This amendment was refused on the basis that it went beyond the scope of the original claim and the Chinese Patent Reexamination Board (Board) consequently decided that the patent was invalid.

The patentee challenged the Board's decision in the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court, arguing that the amended ratio should be accepted as one technical solution out of those represented by the "1 : 10-30" range, and that therefore no new matter had been added. However, the Court held that the amendment went beyond the original disclosure in that the ratio "1 : 30" belongs to a new, generalised technical solution, and that an ordinary person skilled in the art could not predict all of the technical solutions covered by the ratio that could achieve the same technical effect as that of the disclosed combination. Accordingly, the Court upheld the Board's decision.

The patentee then appealed to the Beijing High People's Court, which held that the amendment did not go beyond the original disclosure, nor did it add any technical features not already included within the patented claims.

The Board then filed a petition with the SPC, arguing that the Court's decision should be made on the basis of the originally published patent application instead of the issued patent.

The SPC refused the Board's request that the case be reviewed, stating that neither of the amendments to the ratio went beyond the original disclosure. The SPC further clarified that whether an amendment goes beyond the original disclosure should not be dependent on whether "all of the technical solutions covered by the amended claim will achieve the object of the present invention".

Yali Zheng et al. vs. Seiko-Epson Ltd. et al. (Zhixingzi 53/2010)

The question before the SPC in this case was whether the amended term "storage device" went beyond the original disclosure of "semiconductor storage device" under Article 33. The Board held that the amendment was beyond the original disclosure, but this decision was overturned by the Beijing High People's Court.

In its decision, the SPC supported the Court's decision and held that:

  • One legislative purpose of Article 33 is to ensure that applicants have an opportunity to improve the quality of their patent applications by making amendments in light of newly identified prior art or evolving technology (though such amendments must not go beyond the original disclosure); and
  • If the derived content is obvious to an ordinarily skilled person in the art, such content shall be regarded as within the scope of the original disclosure.

The SPC also clarified that Rule 51 allows an applicant to broaden the scope of patent protection through voluntary amendments to the claims. This essentially abolishes the examiners' rigid views towards such expansions, which are widely accepted in many other jurisdictions.


It seems that the SPC holds a much more liberal view than the Chinese Patent Office regarding amendments made to patent applications after filing. Should the approach reflected in the SPC's recent decisions be adopted by the Chinese Patent Office, patent practitioners will likely encounter fewer Article 33 rejections in the future, which will certainly be of significant benefit to patent proprietors.

Having said this, however, patent practitioners should bear in mind that it may take time for the Chinese Patent Office to take on board the SPC's opinions and to adjust its guidelines accordingly, especially given that there is often some discrepancy between judicial and administrative views on various patent issues. Nevertheless, the SPC's recent decisions indicate that seeking judicial review may be an appropriate way forward for patent applicants whose proposed amendments are rejected by the Chinese Patent Office under Article 33.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions