China: Derivative action based on the New York Convention not recognised in Hong Kong

Last Updated: 27 June 2012
Article by Denis Brock

On the 14th June 2012, the judgment of Xiamen Xinjingdia v Eton Group & Ors was handed down in the Hong Kong High Court. It held that an order enforcing a foreign arbitral award under the New York Convention cannot be used as a derivative action to claim damages not considered in the original award through importing the law of the enforcing court. It sends a stark message of the difficulties which parties will face when they do not consider how an award in their favour can be enforced, even if they are successful.

The Background

The case arose out of contract between the plaintiff and the first and second defendants, the Eton Group, for the sale of land and apartments in the PRC. The owner of the land was the fourth defendant, whose entire shareholding was held by the first and second defendants. It was anticipated that the sale contract would be completed in three steps. First, the first and second defendants would give up their possession of the land in return for the plaintiff paying RMB120 million. Secondly, the plaintiff would construct apartments on the land. Thirdly, once the apartments were completed, the first and second defendants would transfer their shareholding in the fourth defendant to the plaintiff. Unfortunately for the plaintiff, the first and second defendants reneged on the contract and instead entered into a contract with the fifth defendant, who in turn built the apartments on the PRC land.

The CIETAC Arbitrations

The contract in question contained an arbitration clause. Accordingly, the plaintiff filed for arbitration in CIETAC against the first and second defendants alone. The plaintiff essentially claimed specific performance of the land sale and construction contract in return for the payment of RMB120 million, a sum which remained unpaid. The plaintiff won the first reference, obtaining an award allowing specific performance of the land sale and construction contract.

However, the arbitral panel had failed to have its attention drawn to the fact that the first and second defendants had undergone a restructuring by relinquishing their interest in the fourth defendant to the third defendant, a subsidiary of the fifth defendant. The restructuring was the subject of a second CIETAC arbitration. This time it was the first and second defendants filing for the arbitration. They claimed that the first award should be set aside because the sale was no longer possible because of the restructuring. The second arbitral award again held in favour of the plaintiff.

Enforcement in the Hong Kong courts

The plaintiff brought two sets of proceedings in Hong Kong; (a) New York Convention enforcement proceedings and (b) Enforcement Extension proceedings.

The New York Convention enforcement proceedings

These proceedings were simple. They sought to allow enforcement of the first arbitral award requiring the completion of the PRC land sale and construction contract. The High Court allowed the enforcement proceedings under sections 2GC and s40B of the previous Arbitration Ordinance (Cap.341), which still exists in substantially the same form under the new Ordinance. The High Court unsurprisingly allowed the enforcement of the award against the first and second defendants. The Court of Appeal considered an application for leave to appeal against this judgment. Leave to appeal was refused. It was held that the "impossibility" created by the defendants "was self-inflicted" and "the Eton Group went ahead with the restructuring notwithstanding that the arbitration had commenced. It took a calculated risk and must bear the consequences." The first and second defendants were therefore subject to a Hong Kong order which required that they compel the fourth defendant to transfer its interest in the PRC land and apartments to the plaintiff.

However, as considered above, the fourth defendant no longer had any interest in the land in question. The plaintiff therefore seemed to have a recognised award which could not be enforced in practice. This was because the fifth defendant could not be compelled to transfer its interest in the PRC land to the plaintiff because this was a further party who was not subject to the first CIETAC arbitral award.

The Enforcement Extension proceedings

Nonetheless, the plaintiff brought the second set of proceedings essentially to extend the first CIETAC arbitral award, which allowed specific performance of the land sale and construction contract against the first and second defendants to nine additional defendants. The third to fifth defendants were related corporate entities of the first and second defendants and the sixth to ninth defendants were individuals related to the first and second defendants. These proceedings consisted of so-called derivative and original actions.

The derivative action

The derivative action sought to claim that the judgment allowing the enforcement of the New York Convention enforcement proceedings could be used to claim damages against the first and second defendants in lieu of specific performance of contract. Even more controversially, the re-characterised specific performance claim could be invoked against the third to eleventh defendants, as well as the first and second defendants, under the Court's statutory, common law and equitable jurisdiction to grant enforcement remedies to a party deprived from obtaining specific performance. This was despite the fact that none of these parties were bound by the original land sale and construction contract which stated that disputes should be referred to arbitration.

The attempt to recast the arbitral award allowing specific performance as a claim for compensation so as to extend that award against all eleven defendants was swiftly dismissed. The Honourable Mr Justice Stone refusing to allow "palm tree justice" through the recasting of the CIETAC arbitral award in a Hong Kong Court. This was on the uncontroversial and firmly established basis that the nature of the New York Convention procedure is simply a mechanistic process of registering and enforcing a foreign award against the parties to the arbitration agreement. It does not allow the subverting of the original award, or any other intrusion upon the thought-process of the arbitrators. Nor could it be used to apply the substantive law of a foreign enforcing court. This presented an absolute bar to using a derivative action to claim damages against the eleven defendants based on an arbitral award allowing specific performance of a contract against two defendants.

The original action

Several free standing claims were made against all the defendants essentially alleging that the restructuring of the companies in Hong Kong was a conspiracy to evade enforcement of the CIETAC arbitral award. In addition to the conspiracy claim, there were also claims based on economic torts and the creation of constructive trusts arsing due to the fraudulent conduct of the defendants. These claims were all dismissed. Mr Justice Stone concluding that a Hong Kong Court did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims. Further, even if the Court did have jurisdiction, Hong Kong Law did not apply because the land sale and construction contract chose PRC Law, and there were no equivalent causes of actions relied on by the plaintiff. Moreover, even if Hong Kong Law applied, the factual background to the restructuring in fact suggested there was no basis for the conspiracy claim. In summary, the plaintiff's claims failed on every single ground even alternative submissions which were considered in this through judgement.


The judgment sends out an important message to parties that it will not be possible to extend an arbitral award by using the substantive law of another jurisdiction to extend its terms to create alternative causes of actions, and to expand the scope of the award to make claims against non-parties. In this respect, the judgment is reassuring for its sounds application of legal principles which are firmly established within the context of the enforcement of arbitral award under the New York Convention. The basic principle that only parties which are subject to an arbitration agreement are bound by its terms will apply in enforcement proceedings in Hong Kong. It reminds all that the Hong Kong courts can be relied upon to apply determined legal principles although this may sometimes not achieve the rule-bending palm tree justice sometimes adopted by common law courts.

Yet, there does not appear to be solution to this case. In this respect, it should be noted that the defendants filed for a further arbitration in CIETAC in which they sought clarification as to how the defendants could comply with a term of the land sale and construction contract, which stated that the parties should use an 'alternative approach in order to meet the purpose of the agreement'. This further application was, however, dismissed. Nonetheless, the Honourable Mr Justice Stone commented that it was still open for the plaintiff to go back to CIETAC to request clarification on how the contract could be performed. This seems to be the final remedy open to the plaintiff; although it may come almost five years after the original land sale and construction contract was signed in October 2007.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.