China: Arbitral procedure and med-arb from English and Chinese eyes

Last Updated: 19 March 2012

By Matthew Townsend and James Rogers

This article was first published in the Global Arbitration Review online news, 12th December 2011

English and Chinese perspectives on international arbitration was the theme of a recent event co-hosted in Beijing by the China Britain Law Institute, or CBLI, and the Bar Council of England and Wales. CBLI co-founder Matthew Townsend and his colleague James Rogers, both of Fulbright & Jaworski's Beijing and Hong Kong offices, report.

Arbitration procedure and culture

Western businesses can be wary of arbitrating in mainland China. Sometimes this trepidation is justified, and sometimes less so. Nevertheless, it is a fact of commercial life that, through the effect of domestic legislation and the bargaining power of Chinese parties to China-related international commercial contracts, international disputes are often settled by arbitration in the PRC.

In these circumstances foreign parties may negotiate extra provisions into their arbitration clauses to mitigate some of the perceived shortcomings of arbitration administered by mainland China arbitral institutions such as CIETAC or the Beijing Arbitration Commission. For example, parties can modify arbitration clauses so that the arbitration be heard in English (the default under the current CIETAC rules is Chinese) and that proceedings include document production (not envisaged in the CIETAC rules) and entail an adversarial procedure with a greater role for cross-examination of witnesses (CIETAC arbitrations tend to be short-form, document-focused and tribunal- rather than party-driven).

However, as panellist James Rowland, a consultant at King & Wood's Beijing office, noted, "certain modifications to make the foreign side comfortable might give the Chinese side a feeling of unfairness."

This could be the case where, for example, the PRC side is required to present its case through translators in English-language proceedings. Elsewhere it was noted that Chinese parties to English-language proceedings may feel disadvantaged by an adversarial procedure rather than an inquisitorial procedure led by the tribunal. They may also be unfamiliar with concepts, like document production, that are not part of the Chinese legal tradition. These preferences were reflected by the Chinese lawyers on the panel who indicated conditional support for what they call the "no-nonsense" and cost-effective procedure traditionally employed by the Chinese arbitration institutions.

CIETAC rule changes

Wang Jie, director of CIETAC's international case department, noted that forthcoming rule changes (anticipated to become effective on 1 March 2012) will contain measures intended to internationalise CIETAC's provisions by enhancing its ability to award interim measures, as well as increasing the flexibility of the parties and CIETAC with respect to specifying the forum and language of proceedings and the appointment of arbitrators.

Significantly the new rules are expected to confirm CIETAC's ability to conduct arbitrations outside mainland China and Hong Kong, given the striking out of wording contained in article 1 of the current rules that "[t]hese Rules are formulated in accordance with the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China" and other forthcoming changes. This raises the possibility that Chinese companies will take CIETAC arbitration offshore from the PRC as they continue to invest abroad.

Arbitration as a means to resolve China-related joint venture disputes

Steven Thompson of XXIV Old Buildings in London and Li Qing, a partner at Jun He in Beijing, each gave presentations on the merits of commercial arbitration in resolving foreign-related joint venture disputes in the PRC. Chief among these were flexibility of procedure and the freedom to appoint suitable arbitrators, as well as the enforcement advantages conferred by the New York Convention. Thompson also considered "the thorny issue of disputes involving third parties and/or non-signatories to arbitration agreements".

There was some discussion of the well-reported Wahaha/Danone arbitration, concerning a trademark dispute following a joint venture between a French and a Chinese entity, which emphasised the importance of choice of jurisdiction and forum in China-related joint venture contracts. Rowland explained that, in his experience, it was not unusual to see a joint venture contract specifying one arbitration forum, while those contracts entered into by the joint venture vehicle pointed to another, and earlier 'framework' agreements between the parties nominated a third. Li Qing noted that, in the Wahaha case, the parties went to arbitration in Beijing under the CIETAC rules, in Hangzhou under the rules of the Hangzhou Arbitration Commission and in Stockholm under the SCC rules, while multiple litigation proceedings were also commenced.

Conciliation in arbitration proceedings

The CIETAC rules, in common with the new Hong Kong arbitration ordinance, allow for the possibility that the arbitrator act as mediator in the course of arbitral proceedings. This kind of "med-arb" provision continues to provoke debate among practitioners.

One case mentioned in both panels was Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Ltd, in which the Hong Kong Court of First Instance refused to enforce an award made by the Xian Arbitration Commission (XAC) in which a mixed med-arb procedure had taken place. The judgment, which has since been reversed on appeal by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal, held that an apparent bias arose from the mediation that made enforcement of the award contrary to public policy in Hong Kong.

In Gao Haiyan, the chairman of the XAC and one of the panel of three arbitrators contacted a third party who had not been involved in the arbitration but who was perceived as having influence over the respondent. This third party was instructed to "work on" the respondent in order to encourage him to accept a settlement proposal suggested by the tribunal in the conciliation proceedings. At no point during this "mediation" were both parties (or even the full tribunal) present.

In reversing the Hong Kong Court of First Instance's judgment, the Court of Appeal indicated that future arbitral awards reached through a med-arb process may well be enforceable in Hong Kong. In reaching this decision the Court of Appeal emphasised the importance of context. The fact that a particular med-arb process might cause an appearance of bias if adopted in Hong Kong did not necessarily mean that the resulting award should be refused enforcement in Hong Kong, particularly when the award was rendered in a jurisdiction (and, in this case, upheld by the courts in that jurisdiction) where the med-arb procedure in question was not uncommon.

Nevertheless, on the med-arb point, Stuart Adair of XXIV Old Buildings sounded a warning note that there was, in general, "an uneasy tension between the formal judicial function of an arbitrator and the informal role of a mediator" that would always potentially jeopardise the successful enforcement of an award where med-arb is undertaken.

However, Wang Jie of CIETAC pointed out that although med-arb was frequently used in CIETAC arbitration proceedings, to date, no CIETAC award had been set aside due to actual or perceived bias.

Arbitration and the China-Africa axis

Phillip Aliker, of Tanfield Chambers in London, discussed the relevance of English law on Sino-African trade. With a geographical correlation across the region between those countries that are former British colonies and those that are high-value recipients of Chinese foreign direct investment this is a clear and persistent relationship. Even following independence, the English Arbitration Act 1996 and its variations to the UNCITRAL Model Law has inspired legislation in Mauritius, Kenya, Ghana and elsewhere.

It would appear, therefore, that, despite the growth of China-related China-seated arbitration, English law still has a significant role to play, both as the governing law of many international contracts and by its influence in shaping the law in many other parts of the world, including Africa.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions