China: New Rules of Evidence Established for Intellectual Property Cases in China

Last Updated: 15 May 2002
Article by Lindsay Esler

Historically, China has never had a comprehensive set of rules governing the admissibility of evidence in civil cases. The only relevant statutory provisions were to be found in the Civil Procedures Laws. In anticipation that separate and specific legislation would be introduced, the Civil Procedures Law did not attempt to provide a full set of guidelines on the admissibility of evidence or the burden of proof. Effectively, China has been operating in a partial legal vacuum for many years and while the People’s Courts have generally tended to take a pragmatic and logical approach to the issue, some legal commentators have complained that such an approach has tended to promote inconsistency, and consequently uncertainty. This lack of certainty has discouraged foreign owners of intellectual property rights from taking enforcement action through the People’s Courts.

It is useful at this point to provide some background on the way in which intellectual property rights are enforced in China. Since modern intellectual property laws were introduced to China approximately 20 years ago, China has established a parallel enforcement system under which intellectual property rights can be enforced either by petitioning one of several administrative authorities to take administrative enforcement action (which generally takes the form of a raid) or by filing a lawsuit in the People’s Court.

Lawsuits have numerous advantages, such as the possibility of obtaining significantly higher monetary penalties and even criminal sanctions (for privately instituted criminal cases) as well as providing possibilities for taking action in complex or borderline cases which the administrative authorities routinely refuse to handle. However, administrative actions have until very recently comprised some 95% of all of the intellectual property enforcement actions taken in China, with legal actions through the People’s Court comprising only 5% of the total. Only with the 2001 amendments to China’s Patent Law was a sufficient level of certainty established to encourage foreign patentees to initiate legal actions. This is understandable, because the administrative enforcement route had largely proved unsatisfactory for patents, although it had been spectacularly successful in the field of trade mark infringement, where determinations of infringement are much easier for the administrative officials to make.

The move towards litigating intellectual property cases before the People’s Court undoubtedly created fresh impetus for the introduction of specific legislative provisions concerning evidence. In addition, in a speech in July 2001 Mr. Xiao Yang, the Chief Justice of the Supreme People’s Court emphasized that China must focus on the improvement of the evidence system. Mr. Xiao Yang’s comments were made in anticipation of the production of a draft of a specific Evidence Law which has since been circulated for comment. It is not yet known when this new substantive law will come into force.

On 21 December 2001, in a further move towards the development of a satisfactory framework to establish clear rules of evidence, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the "Supreme People’s Court - Several Provisions regarding Evidence in Civil Cases" (the Provisions). The Provisions became effective on 1 April 2002 but they will only apply in the case of legal actions commenced after that date. They constitute a significant step forward in the establishment of a modern and above all, predictable, Court system in China.

The Provisions comprise 6 sections which cover :-

  1. Evidence produced by the parties;
  2. Evidence collected by the People’s Court itself;
  3. Time limitations on production and exchange of evidence;
  4. Evidence examination;
  5. Certification and admission of evidence;
  6. General and miscellaneous provisions, including the relative weight of judicial decisions.

The terms "evidence examination" and "certification and admission of evidence" merit explanation. Under Chinese court procedures, evidence examination includes several formal steps, including presentation of the evidence and cross-examination of the party producing the evidence. During this process the plaintiff’s attorneys are obliged to make formal submissions on the format and the acceptability of the evidence and also as to the veracity and substance of the evidence concerning the facts at issue. Certification and admission of evidence on the other hand is a procedure led by the Judge during which the court determines the probative value of the evidence which has been presented and consequently determines whether the fact situation alleged by the plaintiff is substantiated.

Section 1 of the Provisions sets out the rules regarding the burden of proof. Article 4 of Section 1 is of most interest from an intellectual property perspective. Specifically, Article 4 (a) provides that where the subject matter of the lawsuit concerns a patented method of production, the burden of proof shall be on the party (whether an entity or a natural person), who produces the allegedly infringing products to prove that the product is made with the different method. This is a slightly unusual requirement, although it is eminently logical for the burden of proof on this particular issue to fall on the defendant, as the only party with actual knowledge of the means of production of the infringing product. The premise is that if the defendant cannot satisfy the court that he is not only aware of, but is also applying, an alternative production method, it may be assumed that the patented method of production is being employed. Practically speaking, if a defendant cannot describe in some detail a non-infringing method of production, it may reasonably be assumed by the Court that the actual production is taking place using the patented method.

The Provisions do not establish any guidelines for determining the balance between the likely value and the potential danger of admitting the evidence. Therefore, they do not provide legal practitioners with adequate tools to attack questionable evidence unless such evidence falls within one of the specified categories. Article 69 of the Provisions does, however, state that the following evidence by itself cannot be used to establish a particular point of fact:-

  1. Testimony provided by a person who is not an adult which is inconsistent with the person’s age and ability;
  2. Testimony provided by a person who is related to one of the parties or one of the parties’ attorneys;
  3. Questionable audio and visual material;
  4. Copies in duplicate which cannot be verified as to origin;
  5. Testimony provided by a person who refuses to attend court and fails to provide a sound reason for doing so.

Section 2 of the Provisions relates to the collection of evidence by the People’s Court. The Provisions permit judges to take the initiative in collecting evidence if the parties cannot collect the evidence themselves and (a) the facts which are to be proved relate to private interests of a third party, state interests or the interest of the public at large; or (b) the purpose of the collection of evidence is solely to make decisions on pure procedural issues.

Either party may request the Court to collect evidence if they are not able to obtain the evidence for reasons which are accepted as being objective. If a party wishes to request the Court to collect evidence on its behalf, it must make a specific request in writing at least 7 days before the expiration of the specified period for presenting evidence. An appeal is available if the request for the Court to gather evidence is rejected. Similarly, any request for preservation of evidence is required to be filed at least 7 days before expiration of the deadline for presenting evidence.

Section 3 of the Provisions specifies timeframes for presentation and exchange of evidence. Under the Provisions, the Court may fix deadlines for presenting evidence. A period of at least 30 days must be allowed, subject to any other arrangement which may be fixed by mutual consent of the parties. Any evidence which is filed after the expiration of the time limit will normally not be considered. If genuine reasons exist which prevent either party from meeting the court-imposed deadline, that party may apply for a further extension.

Section 4 of the Provisions provides for the examination of evidence by means of cross-examination. Any evidence which is not subjected to this process will not be accepted by the Court. It is open for either party to call witnesses and any request for personal appearance of a witness must be filed at least 10 days before the expiration of the period allowed for presentation of evidence. The witness’ costs will be born by the losing party. Once a witness is summoned, they may be questioned by either party, as well as the Judge presiding over the case. Provisions is also made for calling expert witnesses to clarify particularly difficult issues. Again, the expert may be questioned by either of the litigating parties or the Judge presiding over the case.

ection 5 of the Provisions sets out the method of verification of the evidence which has been presented. During this process, the Judge will determine whether a particular item of evidence is acceptable and make a determination as to its probative value. The Judge is required to provide a reason for each determination which is made regarding the acceptability of items of evidence.

Since the new Procedures provide a systematic method of determining the admissibility of evidence, they will undoubtedly bring significant improvements to the predictability and consistency of court proceedings regarding intellectual property matters in China. As such, the new Procedures are to be welcomed and owners of intellectual property rights in China may also look forward to the apparently imminent introduction of the substantive Evidence Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions